nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

A Survey of Machine Learning Algorithms and Their Application in Information Security

verfasst von : Mark Stamp

Erschienen in: Guide to Vulnerability Analysis for Computer Networks and Systems

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In this survey, we touch on the breadth of applications of machine learning to problems in information security. A wide variety of machine learning techniques are introduced, and a sample of the applications of each to security-related problems is briefly discussed.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Review into State of the Art of Vulnerability Assessment using Artificial Intelligence

Nächstes Kapitel Vulnerability Assessment of Cyber Security for SCADA Systems

Observations are invariably known as “emissions” in a PHMM.

These VQ codebook vectors are not to be confused with a codebook cipher [82].

Stamp M (2004) A revealing introduction to hidden Markov models. https://www.cs.sjsu.edu/~stamp/RUA/HMM.pdf

Rabiner LR (1989) A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc IEEE 77(2):257–286CrossRef

Cave RL, Neuwirth LP (1980) Hidden Markov models for English. In: Ferguson JD (ed) Hidden Markov models for speech, IDA-CRD, Princeton, pp 16–56

Annachhatre C, Austin TH, Stamp M (2015) Hidden Markov models for malware classification. J Comput Virol Hacking Tech 11(2): 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11416-014-0215-x

Austin TH, Filiol E, Josse S, Stamp M (2013) Exploring hidden Markov models for virus analysis: a semantic approach. In: 46th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, HICSS 2013, Wailea, USA, 7–10 Jan 2013, pp 5039–5048. IEEE Computer Society?. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.217

Kalbhor A, Austin TH, Filiol E, Josse S, Stamp M (2015) Dueling hidden Markov models for virus analysis. J Comput Virol Hacking Tech 11(2): 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11416-014-0232-9

Wong W, Stamp M (2006) Hunting for metamorphic engines. J Comput Virol 2(3): 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11416-006-0028-7

Borello J-M, Mé L (2008) Code obfuscation techniques for metamorphic viruses. J Comput Virol 4(3):211–220CrossRef

Venkatachalam S, Stamp M (2011) Detecting undetectable metamorphic viruses. In: Proceedings of 2011 international conference on security & management. SAM’11, pp 340–345

10.

Cho S-B, Park H-J (2003) Efficient anomaly detection by modeling privilege flows using hidden Markov model. Comput Secur 22(1): 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4048(03)00112-3

11.

Hu J, Yu X, Qiu D, Chen H-H (2009) A simple and efficient hidden Markov model scheme for host-based anomaly intrusion detection. IEEE Netw Mag Glob Internet Working 23(1): 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2009.4804323

12.

Bertacchini M, Fierens P (2009) A survey on masquerader detection approaches. In: Proceedings of V Congreso Iberoamericano de Seguridad Informática, Universidad de la República de Uruguay, pp 46–60

13.

Okamoto T, Ishida Y (2007) Framework of an immunity-based anomaly detection system for user behavior. In: International conference on knowledge-based and intelligent information and engineering systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 821–829

14.

Posadas R, Mex-Perera C, Monroy R, Nolazco-Flores J (2006) Hybrid method for detecting masqueraders using session folding and hidden Markov models. In: Proceedings of the 5th Mexican international conference on artificial intelligence. MICAI’06. Springer, Berlin, pp 622–631

15.

Kazi S, Stamp M (2013) Hidden Markov models for software piracy detection. Inf Secur J Glob Perspect. 22(3):140–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/19393555.2013.787474

16.

Rana H, Stamp M (2014) Hunting for pirated software using metamorphic analysis. Inf Secur J Glob Perspect 23(3): 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/19393555.2014.975557

17.

Simova M, Stamp M, Pollett C (2005) Stealthy ciphertext. In: Arabnia HR, Joshua R (eds) Proceedings of the 2005 international conference on internet computing. ICOMP 2005. CSREA Press, pp 380–388

18.

Srivastava A, Kundu A, Sural S, Majumdar A (2008) Credit card fraud detection using hidden Markov model. IEEE Trans Dependable Secur Comput 5(1): 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDSC.2007.70228

19.

Ariu D, Tronci R, Giacinto G (2011) HMMPayl: an intrusion detection system based on hidden Markov models. Comput Secur30(4): 221–241 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2010.12.004

20.

Okamoto T, Ishida Y (2011) Towards an immunity-based anomaly detection system for network traffic. Int J Knowl Based Intell Eng Syst 15(4): 215–225. https://doi.org/10.3233/KES-2011-0223

21.

Oza A, Ross K, Low RM, Stamp M (2014) HTTP attack detection using \(n\)-gram analysis. Comput. Secur 45: 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2014.06.002

22.

Sperotto A, Sadre R, de Boer P-T, Pras A (2007) Hidden Markov model modeling of SSH brute-force attacks. In: Bartolini C, Gaspary LP (eds) Proceedings of 20th IFIP/IEEE international workshop on distributed systems: operations and management (DSOM 2009). Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5841. Springer, Berlin, pp 164–176

23.

Durbin R, Eddy S, Krogh A, Mitchison G (1998) Biological sequence analysis: probabilistic models of proteins and nucleic acids. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef

24.

Stamp M (2017) Introduction to machine learning with applications in information security. Chapman and hall/CRC, Boca RatonCrossRef

25.

Vemparala S, Troia FD, Visaggio CA, Austin TH, Stamp M (2016) Malware detection using dynamic birthmarks. In: Verma RM, Rusinowitch M (eds) Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on international workshop on security and privacy analytics, IWSPA 2016. ACM, USA, pp 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/2875475.2875476

26.

Attaluri S, McGhee S, Stamp M (2009) Profile hidden Markov models and metamorphic virus detection. J Comput Virol 5(2):151–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11416-008-0105-1

27.

Ravi S, Balakrishnan N, Venkatesh B (2013) Behavior-based malware analysis using profile hidden Markov models. In: Proceedings of 2013 international conference on security and cryptography, SECRYPT

28.

Huang L, Stamp M (2011) Masquerade detection using profile hidden Markov models. Comput Secur 30(8): 732–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2011.08.003

29.

Pathan A-SK (2014) The state of the art in intrusion prevention and detection. Auerbach publications, Boston, USACrossRef

30.

Wright C, Monrose F, Masson GM (2004) HMM profiles for network traffic classification. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM workshop on visualization and data mining for computer security, VizSEC/DMSEC ’04. ACM, USA, pp. 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/1029208.1029211

31.

Wright CV, Monrose F, Masson GM (2005) Towards better protocol identification using profile HMMs, Information security institute, Johns Hopkins university, JHU Technical Report JHU-SPAR051201. https://www.cs.jhu.edu/~cwright/hmm-techreport.pdf

32.

Wright CV, Ballard L, Coull SE, Monrose F, Masson GM (2010) Uncovering spoken phrases in encrypted voice over ip conversations. ACM Trans Inf Syst Secur 13(4): 35–13530. https://doi.org/10.1145/1880022.1880029

33.

Yadwadkar NJ, Bhattacharyya C, Gopinath K, Niranjan T, Susarla S (2010) Discovery of application workloads from network file traces. In: Proceedings of the 8th USENIX conference on file and storage technologies, FAST’10. USENIX Association, Berkeley, USA, pp 183–196. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1855511.1855525

34.

Shlens J (2005) A tutorial on principal component analysis. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~elaw/papers/pca.pdf

35.

Shalizi C Principal component analysis. https://www.stat.cmu.edu/~cshalizi/uADA/12/lectures/ch18.pdf

36.

Stack exchange: making sense of principal component analysis (2015). https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/2691/making-sense-of-principal-component-analysis-eigenvectors-eigenvalues

37.

Deshpande S, Park YH, Stamp M (2014) Eigenvalue analysis for metamorphic detection. J Comput Virol Hacking Tech 10(1): 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11416-013-0193-4

38.

Jidigam RK, Austin TH, Stamp M (2015) Singular value decomposition and metamorphic detection. J Comput Virol Hacking Tech 11(4): 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11416-014-0220-0

39.

Annadatha A, Stamp M (2017) Image spam analysis and detection. J Comput Virol Hacking Tech [online first] 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11416-016-0287-x

40.

Norko A (2015) Simple image classification using principal component analysis (PCA). https://ece.gmu.edu/~hayes/courses/MachineLearning/Projects/Presentations/Norko.pdf

41.

Nataraj L, Karthikeyan S, Jacob G, Manjunath BS (2011) Malware images: visualization and automatic classification. In: Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on visualization for cyber security, VizSec ’11. ACM, USA, pp. 4–147. https://doi.org/10.1145/2016904.2016908

42.

Selvin VRS (2017) Malware scores based on image processing. Master’s project, Department of computer science, San Jose state university. http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_projects/546

43.

Wang W, Battiti R (2006) Identifying intrusions in computer networks with principal component analysis. In: The first international conference on availability, reliability and security, ARES 2006. IEEE, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2006.73

44.

Chandola V, Banerjee A, Kumar V (2009) Anomaly detection: a survey. ACM computing surveys (CSUR) 41(3):15CrossRef

45.

Chen T, Hsu YJ, Liu X, Zhang W (2002) Principle component analysis and its variants for biometrics. In: 2002 international conference on image processing, proceedings. IEEE, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2002.1037959

46.

Sprager S, Zazula D (2009) A cumulant-based method for gait identification using accelerometer data with principal component analysis and support vector machine. WSEAS Trans Signal Process 5(11):369–378

47.

Turk M, Pentland A (1991) Eigenfaces for recognition. J Cogn Neurosci 3(1): 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1991.3.1.71

48.

Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J (2000) An introduction to support vector machines and other Kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef

49.

Law M (2011) A simple introduction to support vector machines. http://www.cise.ufl.edu/class/cis4930sp11dtm/notes/intro_svm_new.pdf

50.

OpenCV: introduction to support vector machines. http://docs.opencv.org/doc/tutorials/ml/introduction_to_svm/introduction_to_svm.html

51.

Berwick R (2003) An idiots guide to support vector machines (SVMs). http://www.svms.org/tutorials/Berwick2003.pdf

52.

Firdausi I, lim C, Erwin A, Nugroho AS (2010) Analysis of machine learning techniques used in behavior-based malware detection. In: Proceedings of the 2010 second international conference on advances in computing, control, and telecommunication technologies. ACT ’10. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, USA, pp. 201–203. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACT.2010.33

53.

Ye Y, Li T, Adjeroh D, Iyengar SS (2017) A survey on malware detection using data mining techniques. ACM Comput Surv 50(3):41–14140. https://doi.org/10.1145/3073559

54.

Singh T, Troia FD, Visaggio CA, Austin TH, Stamp M (2016) Support vector machines and malware detection. J Comput Virol Hacking Tech 12(4):203–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11416-015-0252-0

55.

Rieck K, Trinius P, Willems C, Holz T (2011) Automatic analysis of malware behavior using machine learning. J Comput Secur 19(4):639–668CrossRef

56.

Arp D, Spreitzenbarth M, Gascon H, Rieck K (2014) DREBIN: effective and explainable detection of android malware in your pocket

57.

Chavda A (2017) Image spam detection. Master’s project, Department of computer science, San Jose State University. http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_projects/543/

58.

Krasser S, Tang Y, Gould J, Alperovitch D, Judge P (2007) Identifying image spam based on header and file properties using c4.5 decision trees and support vector machine learning. In: Proceedings of information assurance and security workshop, IAW ’07. IEEE, USA. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=4267526

59.

Hu W (2003) Robust support vector machines for anomaly detection. In: Proceedings of 2003 international conference on machine learning and applications, ICMLA03, pp. 23–24

60.

Khan L, Awad M, Thuraisingham B (2007) A new intrusion detection system using support vector machines and hierarchical clustering. VLDB J 16(4):507–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00778-006-0002-5

61.

Mukkamala S, Janoski G, Sung A (2002) Intrusion detection using neural networks and support vector machines. In: Proceedings of the 2002 international joint conference on neural networks, IJCNN’02, vol. 2. IEEE, USA, pp 1702–1707

62.

Drucker H, Wu D, Vapnik V (1999) Support vector machines for spam categorization. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 10(5)

63.

Sohn T, Seo J, Moon J (2003) A study on the covert channel detection of tcp/ip header using support vector machine. In: Qing S, Gollmann D, Zhou J (eds) Information and communications security (ICICS 2003), vol 2836. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 313–324CrossRef

64.

Lyu S, Farid H (2004) Steganalysis using color wavelet statistics and one-class support vector machines. Proc SPIE 5306:35–45CrossRef

65.

Heisele B, Serre T, Prentice S, Poggio TA (2003) Hierarchical classification and feature reduction for fast face detection with support vector machines. Pattern Recognit 36(9):2007–2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3203(03)00062-1

66.

Biggio B, Nelson B, Laskov P (2012) Poisoning attacks against support vector machines. In: Proceedings of the 29th international conference on machine learning, ICML’12. Omnipress, USA, pp 1467–1474. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3042573.3042761

67.

Jain AK, Dubes RC (1988) Algorithms for Clustering Data. Prentice-Hall, USA

68.

Mirkin B (2011) Choosing the number of clusters. http://www.hse.ru/data/2011/06/23/1215441450/noc.pdf

69.

Mooi E, Sarstedt M (2011) Cluster analysis. In: A concise guide to market research. Springer, Berlin, pp 237–284. Chap 9

70.

Tan P-N, Steinbach M, Kumar V (2005) 8. Cluster analysis: basic concepts and algorithms, pp. 487–568. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2005)

71.

Shabalin AA \({K}\)-means clustering. http://shabal.in/visuals/kmeans/1.html

72.

Lad A. EM algorithm for estimating a Gaussian mixture model. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~alad/em/

73.

Kinable J, Kostakis O (2011) Malware classification based on call graph clustering. J Comput Virol 7(4):233–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11416-011-0151-y

74.

Narra U, Troia FD, Visaggio CA, Austin TH, Stamp M (2016) Clustering versus SVM for malware detection. J Comput Virol Hacking Tech 12(4): 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11416-015-0253-z

75.

Pai S, Troia FD, Visaggio CA, Austin TH, Stamp M (2017) Clustering for malware classification. J Comput Virol Hacking Tech 13(2):95–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11416-016-0265-3

76.

Perdisci R (2012) Vamo: towards a fully automated malware clustering validity analysis. In: Proceedings of the 28th annual computer security applications conference, ACSAC ’12. ACM, New York, USA, pp 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1145/2420950.2420999

77.

Wei C, Sprague A, Warner G (2009) Clustering malware-generated spam emails with a novel fuzzy string matching algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on applied computing, SAC ’09. ACM, New York, USA, pp 889–890. https://doi.org/10.1145/1529282.1529473

78.

Perdisci R, Lee W, Feamster N (2010) Behavioral clustering of http-based malware and signature generation using malicious network traces. In: Proceedings of the 7th USENIX conference on networked systems design and implementation, NSDI’10. USENIX Association, Berkeley, USA, pp. 26–26. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1855711.1855737

79.

Portnoy L, Eskin E, Stolfo S (2001) Intrusion detection with unlabeled data using clustering. In: Proceedings of ACM CSS workshop on data mining applied to security (DMSA-2001), pp 5–8

80.

Gu G, Perdisci R, Zhang J, Lee W (2008) Botminer: clustering analysis of network traffic for protocol- and structure-independent botnet detection. In: Proceedings of the 17th conference on security symposium, SS’08. USENIX Association, Berkeley, USA, pp 139–154. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1496711.1496721

81.

Vaidya J, Clifton C (2003) Privacy-preserving \(k\)-means clustering over vertically partitioned data. In: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD ’03. ACM, New York, USA, pp. 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1145/956750.956776

82.

Stamp M (2011) Information security: principles and practice, 2nd edn. Wiley, USA (2011)

83.

Linde Y, Buzo A, Gray RM (1980) An algorithm for vector quantizer design. IEEE Trans Commun 28:84–95CrossRef

84.

Chen T-S, Chang C-C, Hwang M-S (1998) A virtual image cryptosystem based upon vector quantization. IEEE Trans Image Process 7(10):1485–1488MathSciNetCrossRef

85.

Cox IJ, Kilian J, Leighton FT, Shamoon T (1997) Secure spread spectrum watermarking for multimedia. IEEE Trans Image Proces 6(12):1673–1687CrossRef

86.

Chang C-C, Tai W-L, Lin M-H (2005) A reversible data hiding scheme with modified side match vector quantization. In: 19th international conference on advanced information networking and applications, AINA 2005, vol. 1. IEEE, USA, pp. 947–952

87.

Zheng J, Hu M (2006) An anomaly intrusion detection system based on vector quantization. IEICE Trans Inf Syst 89(1):201–210CrossRef

88.

Ichino M, Kawamoto K, Iwano T, Hatada M, Yoshiura H (2015) Evaluating header information features for malware infection detection. J Inf Process 23(5):603–612

89.

Farag AA, Elhabian SY (2009) A tutorial on data reduction: linear discriminant analysis (LDA). http://www.di.univr.it/documenti/OccorrenzaIns/matdid/matdid437773.pdf

90.

Balakrishnama S, Ganapathiraju A (2007) Linear discriminant analysis — a brief tutorial. http://www.music.mcgill.ca/~ich/classes/mumt611_07/classifiers/lda_theory.pdf

91.

Raschka S (2014) Linear discriminant analysis — Bit by bit. http://sebastianraschka.com/Articles/2014_python_lda.html

92.

Welling M. Fisher linear discriminant analysis. http://www.ics.uci.edu/~welling/classnotes/papers_class/Fisher-LDA.pdf

93.

Farag AA, Elhabian SY (2008) A tutorial on data reduction: linear discriminant analysis (LDA). http://www.di.univr.it/documenti/OccorrenzaIns/matdid/matdid437773.pdf

94.

Kan M, Shan S, Xu D, Chen X (2011) Side-information based linear discriminant analysis for face recognition. BMVC 11:1–12

95.

Liu C, Wechsler H (2002) Gabor feature based classification using the enhanced fisher linear discriminant model for face recognition. IEEE Trans Image Process 11(4):467–476. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2002.999679

96.

Lu J, Plataniotis KN, Venetsanopoulos AN (2005) Regularization studies of linear discriminant analysis in small sample size scenarios with application to face recognition. Pattern Recog Lett 26(2):181–191CrossRef

97.

Boulgouris NV, Chi ZX (2007) Gait recognition using radon transform and linear discriminant analysis. IEEE Trans Image Process 16(3):731–740MathSciNetCrossRef

98.

Zakka K (2016) A complete guide to \(k\)-nearest-neighbors with applications in python and R. https://kevinzakka.github.io/2016/07/13/k-nearest-neighbor/

99.

Liao Y, Vemuri VR (2002) Use of \(k\)-nearest neighbor classifier for intrusion detection. Comput Secur 21(5):439–448CrossRef

100.

Hu J, Gingrich D, Sentosa A (2008) A \(k\)-nearest neighbor approach for user authentication through biometric keystroke dynamics. In: IEEE international conference on communications, ICC’08. IEEE, USA, pp 1556–1560

101.

Elmehdwi Y, Samanthula BK, Jiang W (2014) Secure \(k\)-nearest neighbor query over encrypted data in outsourced environments. In: 30th international conference on data engineering, ICDE 2014. IEEE, USA, pp 664–675

102.

Chen E (2011) How does randomization in a random forest work? https://www.quora.com/How-does-randomization-in-a-random-forest-work

103.

Liaw A, Wiener M (2011) Classification and regression by randomforest. R News 2(3):18–22

104.

Lin Y, Jeon Y (2002) Random forests and adaptive nearest neighbors, Technical Report 1055, Department of statistics, University of Wisconsin. https://www.stat.wisc.edu/sites/default/files/tr1055.pdf

105.

Breiman L, Cutler A (2001) Random forests™. https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~breiman/RandomForests/cc_home.htm

106.

Thaseen S, Kumar CA (2013) An analysis of supervised tree based classifiers for intrusion detection system. In: 2013 International conference on pattern recognition, informatics and mobile engineering, PRIME 2013. IEEE, USA, pp 294–299

107.

Zhang J, Zulkernine M (2006) A hybrid network intrusion detection technique using random forests. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on availability, reliability and security, ARES ’06. IEEE, USA, pp 262–269. https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2006.7

108.

Santos I, Brezo F, Ugarte-Pedrero X, Bringas PG (2013) Opcode sequences as representation of executables for data-mining-based unknown malware detection. Inf Sci 231:64–82MathSciNetCrossRef

109.

Sanz B, Santos I, Laorden C, Ugarte-Pedrero X, Bringas PG, Álvarez G (2013) Puma: permission usage to detect malware in Android. In: International joint conference CISIS12-ICEUTE\({}^\prime \) 12-SOCO\({}^\prime \), vol. 189. Springer, Berlin, pp 289–298

110.

Shabtai A, Fledel Y, Elovici Y (2010) Automated static code analysis for classifying Android applications using machine learning. In: International conference on computational intelligence and security, CIS 2010. IEEE, USA, pp 329–333

111.

Smutz C, Stavrou A (2012) Malicious pdf detection using metadata and structural features. In: Proceedings of the 28th annual computer security applications conference. ACM, USA, pp 239–248

112.

Ma L, Ofoghi B, Watters P, Brown S (2009) Detecting phishing emails using hybrid features. In: Symposia and workshops on ubiquitous, autonomic and trusted computing, UIC-ATC’09. IEEE, USA, pp 493–497

113.

Ghosal V, Tikmani P, Gupta P (2009) Face classification using Gabor wavelets and random forest. In: Canadian conference on computer and robot vision, CRV’09. IEEE, USA, pp 68–73

114.

Nguyen VH, Tran LMS (2010) Predicting vulnerable software components with dependency graphs. In: Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on security measurements and metrics. ACM, USA, p 3

115.

Rojas R (2009) AdaBoost and the super bowl of classifiers: a tutorial introduction to adaptive boosting. http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/inst/ag-ki/adaboost4.pdf

116.

Stamp M (2017) Boost your knowledge of adaboost. https://www.cs.sjsu.edu/~stamp/ML/files/ada.pdf

117.

Hu W, Maybank S (2008) Adaboost-based algorithm for network intrusion detection. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber Part B (Cybernetics) 38(2): 577–583

118.

Miyamoto D, Hazeyama H, Kadobayashi Y (2007) A proposal of the adaboost-based detection of phishing sites. In: Proceedings of the joint workshop on information security

119.

Aswini A, Vinod P (2014) Droid permission miner: Mining prominent permissions for android malware analysis. In: 2014 fifth international conference on the applications of digital information and web technologies (ICADIWT). IEEE, USA, pp. 81–86

120.

Khan MS, Siddiqui S, McLeod RD, Ferens K, Kinsner W (2016) Fractal based adaptive boosting algorithm for cognitive detection of computer malware. In: 5th international conference on cognitive informatics & cognitive computing, ICCI*CC. IEEE, USA, pp 50–59

121.

Yang P, Shan S, Gao W, Li SZ, Zhang D (2004) Face recognition using ada-boosted Gabor features. In: Proceedings of sixth IEEE international conference on automatic face and gesture recognition. IEEE, pp 356–361

Titel: A Survey of Machine Learning Algorithms and Their Application in Information Security
verfasst von: Mark Stamp
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Guide to Vulnerability Analysis for Computer Networks and Systems
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92623-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-92624-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92624-7_2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner