2008 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel
A Comparison of Pseudo-paper and Paper Prototyping Methods for Mobile Evaluations
verfasst von : Joanna Lumsden, Ryan MacLean
Erschienen in: On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2008 Workshops
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.
Wählen Sie Textabschnitte aus um mit Künstlicher Intelligenz passenden Patente zu finden. powered by
Markieren Sie Textabschnitte, um KI-gestützt weitere passende Inhalte zu finden. powered by
The research presented in this paper is part of an ongoing investigation into how best to support
meaningful
lab-based usability evaluations of mobile technologies. In particular, we report on a comparative study of (a) a standard paper prototype of a mobile application used to perform an early-phase seated (static) usability evaluation, and (b) a pseudo-paper prototype
created from the paper prototype
used to perform an early-phase,
contextually-relevant
,
mobile
usability evaluation. We draw some initial conclusions regarding whether it is worth the added effort of conducting a usability evaluation of a pseudo-paper prototype in a contextually-relevant setting during early-phase user interface development.