Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Style as Emergence (from What?) Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2010 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. Let’s Look at Style: Visual and Spatial Representation and Reasoning in Design

verfasst von : Julie Jupp, John Gero

Erschienen in: The Structure of Style

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter explores the perception and modeling of style in design relating to visuo-spatial representation and reasoning. We approach this subject via cognitive and contextual considerations significant to the role of style during designing. A designer’s ability to represent and reason about design artifacts visually and spatially allows meaningful “chunks” of design information to be utilized relative to the designer’s task and context. Central to cognitive and contextual notions of style are two issues, namely the level of semantic interpretation, and the comparative method’s degree of contextual sensitivity. This compound problem requires some explicit and cognitively plausible ordering principle and adaptive measure capable of allowing for dependencies in reasoning about similarities. This chapter first investigates the perception of style in relation to these modeling requirements before demonstrating and testing their implementation. We then discuss style in relation to design tasks and how they can be supported via the classification and retrieval of designs from large databases of visuo-spatial information.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Information Dynamics and Aspects of Musical Perception
Nächstes Kapitel Troiage Aesthetics
Literatur
1.
Stacey M (2006) Psychological challenges for the analysis of style. Artificial intelligence for engineering design, analysis and manufacturing. Special Issue Understand Represent Reason Style 20(3):167–184
2.
Knight TW (1994) Transformations in design, a formal approach to stylistic change and innovation in the visual arts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
3.
Cohn AG (1997) Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning techniques. In: Brewka G, Habel C, Nebel B (eds) Proceedings of KI-97, vol 1303. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–30
4.
Gero JS, Park S-H (1997a) Qualitative representation of shape and space for computer aided architectural design. CAADRIA’97, Hu’s Publisher, Taipei, pp 323–334
5.
Ding L, Gero JS (1998) Emerging representations of Chinese traditional architectural style using genetic engineering. The international conference on artificial intelligence for engineering, HUST Press, Wuhan, pp 493–498
6.
Jupp J, Gero JS (2004) Qualitative representation and reasoning in design: a hierarchy of shape and spatial languages. Visual and spatial reasoning in design III. Key Center of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney, Boston, MA, pp 139–163
7.
8.
Tversky A, Gati I (1982) Similarity, separability, and the triangle inequality. Psychol Rev 89:123–154CrossRef
9.
Love BC, Sloman SA (1995). Mutability and the determinants of conceptual transformability. Proceedings of 17th annual conference of the cognitive science society, Pittsburgh, PA, pp 654–659
10.
Sloman SA (1996) The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychol Bull 119:3–22CrossRef
11.
Krumhansl C (1978) Concerning the applicability of geometric models to similarity data: the interrelationship between similarity and spatial density. Psychol Rev 85(5):445–463CrossRef
12.
Rada R, Mili H, Bicknell E, Blettner M (1989) Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. IEEE Trans Sys Manage Cybern 19(1):17–30CrossRef
13.
Egenhofer M, Shariff AR (1998) Metric details for natural language spatial relations. ACM Trans Info Sys 16(4):295–321CrossRef
14.
Miller G, Charles WG (1991) Contextual correlates of semantic similarity. Lang Cogn Process 6:1–28CrossRef
15.
Medin DL, Goldstone RL, Gentner D (1993) Respects for similarity. Psychol Rev 100: 254–278CrossRef
16.
Thomas MSC, Mareschal D (1997). Connectionism and psychological notions of similarity. Proceedings of 19th annual conference of the cognitive science society, Erlbaum, London, pp 757–762
17.
Jupp J (2006) Diagrammatic reasoning in design: computational and cognitive studies in similarity assessment. PhD Thesis, Key Center of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney
18.
Jupp J, Gero JS (2006) Visual style: qualitative and context dependant categorization. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 20(3):247–266
19.
Goldstone R (1994) Similarity, interactive activation and mapping. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 20(1):3–28CrossRef
20.
Goldstone R (2003) Learning to perceive while perceiving to learn. In: Kimchi R, Behrmann M, Olson C (eds) Perceptual organization in vision: behavioral and neural perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 233–278
21.
Marr D, Nishihara HK (1978) Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proc R Soc B 200:269–294CrossRef
22.
Wertheimer M (1977) Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. Psychologische Forschung 4:301–350CrossRef
23.
Tversky B (1999) What does drawing reveal about thinking? Visual and spatial reasoning in design I. Key Center of Design Computing and Cognition, Sydney, pp 271–282
24.
Jupp J, Gero JS (2005) Cognitive studies in similarity assessment: evaluating a neural network model of visuospatial design similarity. International workshop on human behavior in designing – HBiD05, Aix en Provence, France
25.
Schapiro M (1961) Style. In: Philipson M, Gudel PJ (eds) Aesthetics toda. New American Library, New York, NY, pp 137–171
26.
Gould M, Nunes J, Comas D, Egenhofer M, Freundschuh S, Mark D (1996) Formalizing informal geographic information: cross-cultural human subjects testing. Joint European conference and exhibition on geographical information. Barcelona, March 1996, pp 285–294
27.
Knauff M, Rauh R, Schlieder C (1995) Preferred mental models in qualitative spatial reasoning: a cognitive assessment of Allen’s calculus. Proceedings of 17th annual conference of the cognitive science society, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 200–205
28.
Gross M, Do E (1995) Drawing analogies – supporting creative architectural design with visual references. 3rd international conference on computational models of creative design, Sydney, pp 37–58
29.
Park S-H, Gero JS (2000) Categorisation of shapes using shape features. In: Gero JS (ed) Artificial intelligence in design ’00. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 203–223CrossRef
30.
Davies J, Goel AK (2001) Visual analogy in problem solving. Proceedings of international joint conference on artificial intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, Seattle, WA, pp 377–382
31.
Gero JS, Kazakov V (2001) Entropic similarity and complexity measures for architectural drawings. Visual and spatial reasoning in design II. Key Center of Design Computing and Cognition, Sydney, pp 147–161
32.
Forbus K, Tomai E, Usher J (2003) Qualitative spatial reasoning for visual grouping in sketches. Proceedings of 16th international workshop on qualitative reasoning, Brasilia, pp 79–86
33.
Burns K (2004) Creature double feature: on style and subject in the art of caricature. AAAI fall symposium on style and meaning in language, art, music, and design. The AAAI Press, Washington, DC
34.
35.
Colagrossi A, Sciarrone F, Seccaroni CA (2003) Methodology for automating the classification of works of art using neural networks. Leonardo 36(1):69–69CrossRef
36.
Chang N-S, Fu K-S (1980) Query by pictorial example. IEEE Trans Soft Eng 6(6):519–524CrossRef
37.
Salton G, McGill MJ (1983) Introduction to modern information retrieval. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY
38.
Honkela T, Kaski S, Kohonen T, Lagus K (1998) Self-organizing maps of very large document collections: justification for the WEBSOM method. In: Balderjahn I, Mathar R, Schader M (eds) Classification, data analysis, and data highways. Springer, Berlin, pp 245–252CrossRef
39.
Oja E, Lassksonen J, Koskela M, Brandt S (1999) Self-organizing maps for content-based image database retrieval. In: Oja E, Kaski S (eds) Kohonen maps. Elsevier, New York
40.
Laaksonen J, Koskela M, Laakso S, Oja E (2000) PicSOM – content-based image retrieval with self-organizing maps. Pattern Recognit Lett 21(13–14):1199–1207MATHCrossRef
41.
Jupp J, Gero JS (2006) Towards computational analysis of style in architectural design. J Am Soc Info Sci 57(5):45–61
42.
Brown K, Sims N, Williams JH, McMahon CA (1995) Conceptual geometric reasoning by the manipulation of models based on prototypes. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 9(5): 367–385CrossRef
43.
Gero JS, Park S-H (1997) Computable feature-based qualitative modelling of shape and space, CAADFutures ’97. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 821–830
44.
Martinoli O, Masulli F, Riani M (1988) Algorithmic information of images. In: Cantoni V, Digesu V, Levialdi, S (eds) Image analysis and processing II. Plenum Press, New York, NY, pp 287–293CrossRef
45.
Allen JF (1984) Towards a general theory of action and time. Artif Intell 23:123–154MATHCrossRef
46.
Güsgen HW (1989) Spatial reasoning based on Allen’s temporal logic. Technical Report, TR-89–049. International Computer Science Institute, Berkley, CA
47.
Mukerjee A (1989) Getting beneath the geometry: a systematic approach to modelling spatial relations. Proceedings of workshop on model-based reasoning, IJCAI-89, Detroit, MI, pp 140–141
48.
Hall M (2000) Correlation-based feature selection for discrete and numeric class machine learning. Proceedings of 17th international conference on machine learning, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, pp 359–366
49.
Slonim N, Friedman N, Tishby N (2002) Unsupervised document classification using sequential information maximization. Proceedings of SIGIR’02, 25th ACM international conference on research and development of information retrieval, Tampere, Finland. ACM Press, New York, NY
50.
Downton M, Brennan T (1980) Comparing classifications: an evaluation of several coefficient of partition agreement. Proceedings meeting of the classification society, Boulder, CO
51.
Fowlkes E, Mallows C (1983) A method for comparing two hierarchical clusterings. J Am Stat Assoc 78:553–569MATHCrossRef
52.
Cox IJ, Miller ML, Omohundro SM, Yianilos PN (1999) Target testing and the PicHunter Bayesian multimedia retrieval system. Proceedings of 3rd forum on research technology advances in digital libraries, Washington, DC, pp 66–75
53.
Simon H (1975) Style in design. In: Eastman C (ed) Spatial synthesis in computer-aided building design. Applied Science, London, pp 287–309
Metadaten
Titel
Let’s Look at Style: Visual and Spatial Representation and Reasoning in Design
verfasst von
Julie Jupp
John Gero
Copyright-Jahr
2010
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch
The Structure of Style

Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12336-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-12337-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2010

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12337-5_8

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise