Skip to main content

1983 | Buch

History of Spatial Economic Theory

verfasst von: Claude Ponsard

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Buchreihe : Texts and Monographs in Economics and Mathematical Systems

insite
SUCHEN

Über dieses Buch

The concept of space has always been a fundamental element in various branches of knowledge. The concept often appears in the evolution of knowledge, either as a basis of theory or as a factor in research. It is associated, more or less directly, with all the history of scientific thought. At the level of simple common sense, the importance of the concept of space is only equaled by its lack of precision. It was part of legend before becoming part of history. To indicate the founding of Rome, Romulus started by drawing the boundaries, locating its landmarks in a discontinuous space after having cut the limits of a continuous space. However, neither geographical explorations nor mathematico-logical speculations have ever completely removed the mystery from the concept of space. For all its simple common sense, its mystique remains intact. The privileged position occupied by the concept of space in the history of science and the vagueness of its meaning in the current use of the term, far from constituting a paradox, are mutually explanatory. Every concept of space is necessarily the result of an abstraction, whether the process by which it is reached is through mathematics, psychology, biology, or any other discipline. At the level of common knowledge, the space-time concept is the base upon which are arranged individual experiences. It is thus easy to understand how the concept of space can be understood only through an orderly arrangement of these experiences and their integration into a logical scheme.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Frontmatter
Introduction
Abstract
The concept of space has always been a fundamental element in various branches of knowledge. The concept often appears in the evolution of knowledge, either as a basis of theory or as a factor in research. It is associated, more or less directly, with all the history of scientific thought.
Claude Ponsard
Chapter 1. Before Thunen
Abstract
Any historian who attempted to look back into Ancient Times to find the forerunners of spatial economic analysis would be setting out on a dangerous venture and would be laying himself open to two risks. Firstly that of betraying certain doctrines and arbitrarily uncovering a significance which had remained oblivious to the authors. Secondly, of undermining the concept of economic space to the point of depriving it of its abstract nature. This in turn could lead to people wrongly attributing to spatial economics certain well-founded concrete notions of economic or political geography.
Claude Ponsard
Chapter 2. Johann-Heinrich von Thunen
Abstract
The economic revolution which was beginning to influence development in Northern Germany provided the historical background for Thune’s research on the effects of this revolution on agriculture in Jeverland. The sudden appearance of the market economy and the development of cities were posing new problems at that time.
Claude Ponsard
Chapter 3. From Thunen to Weber
Abstract
After Thunen and his disciples, no new advances in the field of spatial economics were made until the end of the Nineteenth Century. During the second economic and technical revolution of capitalism, a transition was being made from an essentially agricultural economy, with animal-drawn means of transportation, to industrialization with its railroads, urbanization, concentration, etc. This change was felt especially in Germany, the main center of spatial thought.
Claude Ponsard
Chapter 4. Alfred Weber
Abstract
Alfred Weber was surprised to discover that, since Thunen, the problems of location had been neglected or abandoned to the geographers, despite the economic, social, and technical importance of these problems in an era of international and intranational migrations [27] [36]. Weber restricted his interests to industrial location, since Thunen had already constructed a theory of agricultural location. He does not, however, try to explain the location of trade, credit and capital. The distinction, which has gradually been disappearing, between agricultural and industrial location theories was significant in spatial economics up to Losch, and even afterwards.
Claude Ponsard
Chapter 5. From Weber to Palander
Abstract
Shortly after the publication of Weber’s work, Bortkiewicz and Schumpeter began emphasizing the need for a general equilibrium analysis to integrate the partial theories of location (1). Furlan, in his article, recognizes fully the complicated interrelations between the numerous economic factors of location and “the spatial transformation of goods”, but his line of development follows very simplified market models [34].
Claude Ponsard
Chapter 6. Tord Palander
Abstract
The Swedish economist, Palander, made the first major non-German contribution to spatial economics in his 1935 thesis [87].
Claude Ponsard
Chapter 7. From Palander to Losch
Abstract
The impact of Palander’s work in partial spatial equilibrium had not yet been fully felt, when Losch began to elaborate a general spatial equilibrium theory. Only five years separated the publication of Palander’s findings from the first edition of Losch’s monumental work. During these years, the Anglo-Saxons continued the exploration of the spatial structure of markets. At the same time, the evolution of the world situation led to some new and original lines of spatial research.
Claude Ponsard
Chapter 8. August Losch
Abstract
Losch’s work, although later than Palander’s, is still contemporary from two points of view. Historically, Losch’s ideas were made progressively more precise at the same time; and the first publication in 1940 of his main work, “Die raumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft”, constitutes the culmination of these thoughts [112]. Logically, Losch sought in his research the same fundamental objective as Palander, that is, the elaboration of a general equilibrium theory of location in an economic system. But, whereas Palander did not achieve a general theory, Losch made decisive progress toward developing a general model of spatial interdependence.
Claude Ponsard
Chapter 9. From Losch to the Nineteen Fifties
Abstract
In the history of spatial analysis, Losch’s death marks an important date. Its importance is not only derived from the fact that his premature death deprived this field of its most eminent theoretician. The importance of this date stems from the dimensions of Losch’s work. The monumental architecture of his construction gives it a definitive character. While based on a particular system resulting from the intellectual bias of the author, the synthesis is already sufficiently general and comprehensive to integrate the majority of the previous theories. From this point of view, his work appears to be less a consumation of Losch’s thought than the result of a century of analysis. But, even more, to the extent that Losch’s contribution postulates some new developments, his work foreshadows the majority of later studies. He appears, thus, as the landmark in modern spatial research; and the definitive character of his work is confirmed by the fact that it marks a new level of analysis.
Claude Ponsard
Chapter 10. Since the Nineteen Fifties
Abstract
The nineteen fifties mark a turning point in the history of spatial economic theories. Since then spatial analysis has enjoyed rapid development in new conditions.
Claude Ponsard
Conclusion
Abstract
The History of spatial economic theories opens in the 18th century. To this day, in the second half of the twentieth century, it still has not reached its close. For that reason a book such as this has no real conclusion.
Claude Ponsard
Backmatter
Metadaten
Titel
History of Spatial Economic Theory
verfasst von
Claude Ponsard
Copyright-Jahr
1983
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Electronic ISBN
978-3-642-82125-7
Print ISBN
978-3-642-82127-1
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82125-7