A Formal Treatment of Backdoored Pseudorandom Generators

We provide a formal treatment of backdoored pseudorandom generators (PRGs). Here a saboteur chooses a PRG instance for which she knows a trapdoor that allows prediction of future (and possibly past) generator outputs. This topic was formally studied by Vazirani and Vazirani, but only in a limited form and not in the context of subverting cryptographic protocols. The latter has become increasingly important due to revelations about NIST’s backdoored Dual EC PRG and new results about its practical exploitability using a trapdoor.

We show that backdoored PRGs are equivalent to public-key encryption schemes with pseudorandom ciphertexts. We use this equivalence to build backdoored PRGs that avoid a well known drawback of the Dual EC PRG, namely biases in outputs that an attacker can exploit without the trapdoor. Our results also yield a number of new constructions and an explanatory framework for why there are no reported observations in the wild of backdoored PRGs using only symmetric primitives.

We also investigate folklore suggestions for countermeasures to backdoored PRGs, which we call

immunizers

. We show that simply hashing PRG outputs is not an effective immunizer against an attacker that knows the hash function in use. Salting the hash, however, does yield a secure immunizer, a fact we prove using a surprisingly subtle proof in the random oracle model. We also give a proof in the standard model under the assumption that the hash function is a universal computational extractor (a recent notion introduced by Bellare, Tung, and Keelveedhi).