Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Sustainability and Human Well-Being Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

17. Third Party Intervention in Conflict Resolution: Dispute Between Bangladesh and India over Control of the Ganges River

verfasst von : Keith W. Hipel, Maiko Sakamoto, Yoshimi Hagihara

Erschienen in: Coping with Regional Vulnerability

Verlag: Springer Japan

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

To demonstrate the strategic influence a third party can have on negotiations, a formal approach to resolving a complex conflict is applied to an important international water resources controversy. Specifically, third party intervention is employed within the framework of the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution (GMCR) to systematically investigate the ongoing dispute between Bangladesh and India over the regulation of the Ganges River by India at the Farakka Barrage located just upstream on the Ganges River in India before it flows into Bangladesh. A general system of systems engineering approach to Third Party Intervention within the GMCR structure is designed to reflect a range of ways in which it can be implemented in practice. Having an insightful and powerful tool like Third Party GMCR permits one to ascertain how a Third Party can guide a serious conflict to a more reasonable resolution which may be mutually beneficial to all concerned parties.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Waterside Environmental Management Incorporating Sustainability and Survivability
Literatur
Bercovitch, J., & Jackson, R. D. W. (2009). Conflict resolution in the twenty-first century: Principles, methods and approaches. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Bernath Walker, S. G., Hipel, K. W., & Inohara, T. (2012). Attitudes and preferences: Approaches to representing decision maker desires. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218(12), 6637–6647. j.amc.2011.11.102.CrossRef
Fang, L., Hipel, K. W., & Kilgour, D. M. (1993). Interactive decision making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Fang, L., Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., & Peng, X. (2003a). A decision support system for interactive decision making, part 1: Model formulation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C, SMC-33(1), 42–55.CrossRef
Fang, L., Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., & Peng, X. (2003b). A decision support system for interactive decision making, part 2: Analysis and output interpretation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C, SMC-33(1), 56–66.CrossRef
Fraser, N. M., & Hipel, K. W. (1979). Solving complex conflicts. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 9(12), 805–816.CrossRef
Fraser, N. M., & Hipel, K. W. (1984). Conflict analysis: Models and resolutions. New York: North-Holland.
Global Water Partnership (GWP), & International Network of Basin Organization (INBO). (2009). A handbook for integrated water resources management in basins, published by GWP and INBO, 2009. Available at www.​gwpforum.​org and www.​inbo-news.​org. Accessed on 31 Mar 2015.
Greig, J. M., & Diehl, P. F. (2012). International mediation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hagihara, Y., & Sakamoto, M. (2004). Conflict management on utilization of the Ganges water resources between Bangladesh and India. Annals of the Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, 47(B), 13.
Hamouda, L., Kilgour, D. M., & Hipel, K. W. (2004). Strength of preference in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 449–462.CrossRef
Hipel, K. W. (Ed.). (2009a). Conflict resolution (Vol. 1). Oxford: Eolss Publishers.
Hipel, K. W. (Ed.). (2009b). Conflict resolution (Vol. 2). Oxford: Eolss Publishers.
Hipel, K. W., Fang, L., & Kilgour, D. M. (1993). Game theoretic models in engineering decision making. Journal of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Infrastructure Planning and Management, 470(IV-20), 1–16.
Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., Fang, L., & Peng, X. (1997). The decision support system GMCR in environmental conflict management. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 83(2 and 3), 117–152.CrossRef
Hipel, K. W., Fang, L., & Kilgour, D. M. (2008a). Decision support systems in water resources and environmental management. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 13(9), 761–770.CrossRef
Hipel, K. W., Obeidi, A., Fang, L., & Kilgour, D. M. (2008b). Adaptive systems thinking in integrated water resources management with insights into conflicts over water exports. INFOR, 46(1), 51–69.
Hipel, K. W., Obeidi, A., Fang, L., & Kilgour, D. M. (2009). Sustainable environmental management from a system of systems perspective. In M. Jamshidi(ed) (Ed.), System of systems engineering: Innovations for the 21st century (pp. 443–481). New York: Wiley. Chapter 18.
Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., & Bashar, M. A. (2011a). Fuzzy preferences in multiple participant decision making. Scientia Iranica, Transactions D: Computer Science & Engineering and Electrical Engineering, 18(3(D1)), 627–638.CrossRef
Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., & Fang, L. (2011b). The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. In J. J. Cochran, L. A. Cox, P. Keskinocak, J. P. Kharoufeh, & J. C. Smith (Eds.), Wiley encyclopedia of operations research and management science (pp. 2099–2111). New York: Wiley. Vol. 3 of 8.
Hipel, K. W., Fang, L., Cullmann, J., & Bristow, M. (Eds.). (2015). Conflict resolution in water resources and environmental management (p. 291). Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.​1007/​978-3-319-14215-9. ISBN 978-3-319-14215-9.
Howard, N. (1971). Paradoxes of rationality: Theory of metagames and political behaviour. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Inohara, T., & Hipel, K. W. (2008a). Coalition analysis in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. Systems Engineering, 11(4), 343–359.CrossRef
Inohara, T., & Hipel, K. W. (2008b). Interrelationships among noncooperative and coalition stability concepts. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 17(1), 1–29.CrossRef
Inohara, T., Hipel, K. W., & Walker, S. (2007). Conflict analysis approaches for investigating attitudes and misperceptions in the war of 1812. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 16(2), 181–201.CrossRef
International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2014). World economic outlook data base. Washington, DC: IMF.
Kilgour, D. M., & Eden, C. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of group decision and negotiation. Dordrecht: Springer.
Kilgour, D. M., Hipel, K. W., & Fang, L. (1987). The graph model for conflicts. Automatica, 23(1), 41–55.CrossRef
Kilgour, D. M., Hipel, K. W., Peng, X., & Fang, L. (2001). Coalition analysis in group decision support. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10, 159–175.CrossRef
Kinsara, R. A., Kilgour, D. M., & Hipel, K. W. (2015a). Inverse approach to the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 45(5), 734–742. doi:10.​1109/​TSMC.​2014.​2376473.
Kinsara, R. A., Petersons, O., Hipel, K. W, & Kilgour, D. M. (2015b). Advanced decision support system for the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. Journal of Decision Systems, special issue on Integrated Decision Support Systems, 24(2), 117–145. doi: 10.​1080/​12460125.​2015.​1046682.
Kondo, N. (ed) (1997). Gendai minami ajia no kokusai kankei (The present international relations in South Asia), Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization, Mihamaku, Chiba, pp. 111–138.
Kuang, H., Bashar, M. A., Hipel, K. W., & Kilgour, D. M. (2015). Grey-based preference in a Graph Model for Conflict Resolution with multiple decision makers. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics: Systems. doi:10.​1109/​TSMC.​2014.​2387096.
Li, K. W., Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., & Fang, L. (2004a). Preference uncertainty in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A, 34(4), 507–520.CrossRef
Li, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., & Hipel, K. W. (2005). Status quo analysis in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56, 699–707.CrossRef
Nash, J. F. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-player games. Proceedings: National Academy of Sciences, 36, 48–49.
Nash, J. F. (1951). Non-cooperative games. Annals of Mathematics, 54, 286–295.CrossRef
Raiffa, H. (1982). The art and science of negotiation. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Raiffa, H., Richardson, J., & Metcalfe, D. (2002). Negotiation analysis: The science and art of collaborative decision making. Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Sage, A. P. (1991). Decision support systems engineering. New York: Wiley.
Sakamoto, M., & Hagihara, Y. (2001). A study of the changing process of the conflict on a large-scale regional development project. Studies in Regional Science, 31(3), 177–190.CrossRef
Sakamoto, M., Hagihara, Y., & Hipel, K. W. (2004). A study on the roles of a third party in the Ganges River water conflict between Bangladesh and India (in Japanese). In Proceedings of the environment research conference, sponsored by the committee on environmental systems of the Japan society of civil engineering, held in Tokyo, 3–4 Nov 2004, Vol. 32, pp. 29–36.
Sakamoto, M., Hagihara, Y., & Hipel, K. W. (2005). Coordination process by a third party in the conflict between Bangladesh and India over regulation of the Ganges River. In Proceedings of the 2005 I.E. international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, held in the Hilton Waikoloa Village, The Big Island of Hawaii, 9–12 Oct 2005, pp. 1119–1125.
von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1953). Theory of games and economic behaviour (3rd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Xu, H., Hipel, K. W., & Kilgour, D. M. (2009a). Matrix representation of solution concepts in multiple decision maker graph models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 39(1), 96–108.CrossRef
Xu, H., Hipel, K. W., & Kilgour, D. M. (2009b). Multiple levels of preference in interactive strategic decisions. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 57, 3300–3313.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Third Party Intervention in Conflict Resolution: Dispute Between Bangladesh and India over Control of the Ganges River
verfasst von
Keith W. Hipel
Maiko Sakamoto
Yoshimi Hagihara
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Verlag
Springer Japan
Buch
Coping with Regional Vulnerability

Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55168-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-4-431-55169-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55169-0_17