nach oben

Experiments in Fluids

Erschienen in:

01.04.2019 | Research Article

GPU-based, parallel-line, omni-directional integration of measured pressure gradient field to obtain the 3D pressure distribution

verfasst von: Jin Wang, Cao Zhang, Joseph Katz

Erschienen in: Experiments in Fluids | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The introduction of 3D time-resolved velocity measurement techniques enables calculation of the instantaneous pressure distribution by spatially integrating the material acceleration. This paper introduces an efficient method for 3D integration of the acceleration, which does not require prescribed Dirichlet boundary condition on one of the surfaces, minimizes the propagation of errors in acceleration, and can be easily utilized in flows with complex boundaries. This parallel-line, omni-directional integration procedure (Omni3D) calculates the pressure at every point by integration from all directions, while avoiding regions with large acceleration errors. To reduce the computational costs, the calculations are performed by a GPU-based algorithm, which determines the 3D pressure field from tomographic PIV data in 1 min. The accuracy of Omni3D is compared to that of several techniques, including procedures based on solving the Pressure Poisson Equation (PPE) with different Dirichlet boundary conditions. The error analysis is based on Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) data for isotropic turbulence, synthetic 3D PIV images for turbulent channel flow generated from DNS data, and experimental data. It examines the effects of spatial resolution, propagation, and avoidance of embedded local errors, boundary conditions, method for calculating the velocity, as well as viscous and sub-grid stresses on the calculated pressures. For acceleration fields with low errors and properly specified boundary conditions, Omni3D and PPE give similar results. However, Omni3D is more effective in suppressing the effects of acceleration errors. Sample experimental results including instantaneous plot of pressure, pressure statistics, and pressure–velocity correlations based on tomographic PIV data are also provided.

Graphical abstract

Vorheriger Artikel High resolution LDA measurements in transitional oblique shock wave boundary layer interaction

Nächster Artikel Instability modes of millimeter-scale supersonic jets

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Atkinson C, Coudert S, Foucaut JM et al (2011) The accuracy of tomographic particle image velocimetry for measurements of a turbulent boundary layer. Exp Fluids 50:1031–1056CrossRef

Batchelor GK (1951) Pressure fluctuations in isotropic turbulence. Proc Cambridge Phil Soc 47(2):359–374CrossRef

Baur T, Köngeter J (1999) PIV with high temporal resolution for the determination of local pressure reductions from coherent turbulent phenomena. In: 3rd international workshop on particle image velocimetry. Santa Barbara, CA, 16–18 September 1999

Blake W (2017) Mechanics of flow-induced sound and vibration. Academic Press, Cambridge

Bukov AP, Orlov AA, Mosharov VE, Radchenko VN, Pesetsky VA, Sorokin AV, Phonov SD, Alaty L, Colucci V(1992) Application of luminescent quenching for pressure field measurements on the model surface in a wind tunnel. In: Wind tunnels and wind tunnel test techniques; proceedings of the conference, Southampton, United Kingdom, 14–17 September 1992

Bull MK (1996) Wall-pressure fluctuations beneath turbulent boundary layers: some reflections on forty years of research. J Sound Vib 190(3):299–315CrossRef

Charonko JJ, King CV, Smith BL, Vlachos PP (2010) Assessment of pressure field calculations from particle image velocimetry measurements. Meas Sci Technol 21:105401CrossRef

Corcos GM (1963) Resolution of pressure in turbulence. J Acoustic Soc Am 35:192–199CrossRef

de Kat R, van Oudheusden BW (2012) Instantaneous planar pressure determination from PIV in turbulent flow. Exp Fluids 52:1089–1106CrossRef

de Silva M, Baidya R, Khashehchi M, Marusic I (2011) Assessment of tomographic PIV in wall-bounded turbulence using direct numerical simulation data. Exp Fluids 52:425–440CrossRef

Elsinga GE, Scarano F, Wieneke B, van Oudheusden BW (2005) Tomographic particle image velocimetry. In: 6th international symposium on particle image velocimetry. Pasadena, California, USA, 21–23 September 2005

Ghaemi S, Scarano F (2013) Turbulent structure of high-amplitude pressure peaks within the turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 735:381–426CrossRef

Ghaemi S, Ragni D, Scarano F (2012) PIV-based pressure fluctuations in the turbulent boundary layer. Exp Fluids 53(6):1823–1840CrossRef

Golub GH, Loan CFV (1996) Matrix computation. JHU Press, BaltimoreMATH

Graham J, Kanov K, Yang XIA, Lee MK, Malaya N, Lalescu CC, Burns R, Eyink G, Szalay A, Moser RD, Meneveau C (2016) A Web Services-accessible database of turbulent channel flow and its use for testing a new integral wall model for LES. J Turbul 17(2):181–215CrossRef

Huhn F, Schanz D, Gesemann S, Manovski P, Schröder A (2016) Pressure re construction from Lagrangian particle tracking with FFT integration. In: 18th international symposium on the application of laser and imaging techniques to fluid mechanics. Lisbon, Portugal, 4–7 July 2016

Jeon YJ, Tronchin T, Chatellier L, David L (2014) 3D extension of the fluid trajectory evaluation based on an ensemble averaged cross-correlation (FTEE) for acceleration and pressure. In: 17th international symposium on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics. Lisbon, Portugal, 07–10 July 2014

Jeon Y, Earl T, Braud P, Chatellier L, David L (2016) 3D pressure field around an inclined airfoil by tomographic TR-PIV and its comparison with direct pressure measurements. In: 18th international symposium on the application of laser and imaging techniques to fluid mechanics. Lisbon, Portugal, 4–7 July 2016

Jimenez J, Hoyas S (2008) Turbulent fluctuations above the buffer layer of wall-bounded flows. J Fluid Mech 611:215–236CrossRef

Joshi P, Liu X, Katz J (2014) Effect of mean and fluctuating pressure gradients on boundary layer turbulence. J Fluid Mech 748:36–84CrossRef

Kim KC, Adrian RJ (1999) Very large-scale motion in the outer layer. Phys Fluids 11(2):417–422MathSciNetCrossRef

Kobashi Y, Ichijo M (1986) Wall pressure and its relation to turbulent structure of a boundary layer. Exp Fluids 4:49–55CrossRef

Lecordier B, Westerweel J (2004) The EUROPIV Synthetic Image Generator (S.I.G.). In: Proceedings of the EUROPIV 2 workshop, Zaragoza, Spain, 31 March–1 April 2003CrossRef

Lesieur M, Mètais O (1996) New trends in large-eddy simulations of turbulence. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 28:45–82MathSciNetCrossRef

Li Y, Perlman E, Wan M, Yang Y, Burns R, Meneveau C, Burns R, Chen S, Szalay A, Eyink G (2008) A public turbulence database cluster and applications to study Lagrangian evolution of velocity increments in turbulence. J Turbul 9:1–29CrossRef

Liu X, Katz J (2006) Instantaneous pressure and material acceleration measurements using a four-exposure PIV system. Exp Fluids 41(2):227–240CrossRef

Liu X, Katz J (2008) Cavitation phenomena occurring due to interaction of shear layer vortices with the trailing corner of a two-dimensional open cavity. Phys Fluids 20(4):041702–041702CrossRef

Liu X, Katz J (2013) Vortex-corner interactions in a cavity shear layer elucidated by time-resolved measurements of the pressure field. J Fluid Mech 728:417–457CrossRef

Liu X, Katz J (2017) Pressure–rate-of-strain, pressure diffusion, and velocity–pressure-gradient tensor measurements in a cavity flow. In: 55th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting AIAA SciTech forum, Grapevine, Texas, 9–13 January 2017

Liu S, Meneveau C, Katz J (1994) On the properties of similarity subgrid-scale models as deduced from measurements in a turbulent jet. J Fluid Mech 275:83–119CrossRef

Liu X, Moreto JR, Siddle-Mitchell S (2016) Instantaneous pressure reconstruction from measured pressure gradient using rotating parallel ray method. In: 54th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, San Diego, California, USA, 4–8 January 2016

Lynch K, Scarano F (2013) A high-order time-accurate interrogation method for time-resolved PIV. Meas Sci Technol 24:035305CrossRef

Lynch K, Scarano F (2014) Material acceleration estimation by four-pulse tomo-PIV. Meas Sci Technol 25:084005CrossRef

Morris MJ (1995) Use of pressure-sensitive paints in low speed flows. In: IEEE 16th International Congress on Instrumentation in Aerospace Simulation Facilities (ICIASF), Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, 18–21 July 1995

Naka Y, Stanislas M, Foucaut J, Coudert S, Laval J, Obi S (2015) Space–time pressure–velocity correlations in a turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 771:624–675CrossRef

Neeteson N, Rival D (2015) Pressure-field extraction on unstructured flow data using a Voronoi tessellation-based networking algorithm: a proof-of-principle study. Exp Fluids 56:44–57CrossRef

Panton RL, Goldamn AL, Lowery RL, Reischman MM (1980) Low-frequency pressure fluctuations in axisymmetric turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 97:299–319CrossRef

Perlman E, Burns R, Li Y, Meneveau C (2007) Data exploration of turbulence simulations using a database cluster. In: Supercomputing SC07 ACM IEEE, Reno, NV, USA, 10–16 Nov. 2007

Peterson JI, Fitzgerald VF (1980) New technique of surface flow visualization based on oxygen quenching of fluorescence. Rev Sci Instrum 51:670–671CrossRef

Pope SB (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef

Roache PJ (1976) Computational fluid dynamics, Hermosa Publs, Albuquerque, NM

Rogallo R, Moin P (1984) Numerical simulation of turbulent flows. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 16:99–137CrossRef

Schanz D, Gesemann S, Schröder A (2016) Shake-the-box: Lagrangian particle tracking at high particle image densities. Exp Fluids 57:70–97CrossRef

Schneiders JFG, Pröbsting S, Dwight RP, van Oudheusden BW, Scarano F (2016) Pressure estimation from single-snapshot tomographic PIV in a turbulent boundary layer. Exp Fluids 57(4):–53

Sexton MR, O’Brien WF, Moses HL (1973) An on Rotor Investigation of Rotating Stall in an Axial Compressor. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) Technical Report, Cameron Station, Alexandria, VA

Sheng J, Malkiel E, Katz J (2006) Digital holographic microscope for measuring three-dimensional particle distributions and motions. Applied optics 45:3893–3901CrossRef

Spanier EH (1966) Algebraic topology. Springer, New YorkMATH

Stanislas M, Okamoto K, Kähler CJ, Westerweel J (2005) Main results of the second international PIV challenge. Exp Fluids 39:170–191CrossRef

Talapatra S, Katz J (2013) Three-dimensional velocity measurements in a roughness sublayer using microscopic digital inline holography and optical index matching. Meas Sci Technol 24:024004CrossRef

Tronchin T, David L, Farcy A (2015) Evaluation of pressure field and fluid forces for 3D flow around flapping wing. Exp Fluids 56:7–23CrossRef

Tsuji Y, Ishihara T (2003) Similarity scaling of pressure fluctuation in turbulence. Phys Rev E 68:026309CrossRef

Tsuji Y, Fransson JHM, Alfredsson PH, Johansson V (2007) Pressure statistics and their scaling in high-Reynolds-number turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 585:1–40CrossRef

van Oudheusden BW (2013) PIV-based pressure measurement. Meas Sci Technol 24(3):32001CrossRef

van Oudheusden BW, Scarano F, Roosenboom E, Casimiri EWF, Souverein LJ (2007) Evaluation of integral forces and pressure fields from planar velocimetry data for incompressible and compressible flows. Exp Fluids 43:1–12CrossRef

van Gent LP, Michaelis D, van Oudheusden BW, Weiss PE, de Kat R, Laskari A, Jeon Y, David L, Schanz D, Huhn F, Gesemann S, Novara M, McPhaden C, Neeteson N, Rival DE, Schneiders JFG, Schrijer FFJ (2017) Comparative assessment of pressure feld reconstructions from particle image velocimetry measurements and Lagrangian particle tracking. Exp Fluids 58:33–56CrossRef

Villegas A, Diez FJ (2014) Evaluation of unsteady pressure fields and forces in rotating airfoils from time-resolved PIV. Exp Fluids 55(4):1–17CrossRef

Violato D, Moore P, Scarano F (2011) Lagrangian and Eulerian pressure field evaluation of rod-airfoil flow from time-resolved tomographic PIV. Exp Fluids 50(4):1057–1070CrossRef

Willmarth WW (1975) Pressure Fluctuations Beneath Turbulent Boundary Layers. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 7:13–36CrossRef

Worth NA, Nickels TB, Swaminathan N (2010) A tomographic PIV resolution study based on homogeneous isotropic turbulence DNS data. Exp Fluids 49:637–656CrossRef

Yu H, Kanov K, Perlman E, Graham J, Frederix E, Burns R, Szalay A, Eyink G, Meneveau C (2012) Studying Lagrangian dynamics of turbulence using on-demand fluid particle tracking in a public turbulence database. J Turbul 13:1–29MathSciNetCrossRef

Zhang C, Miorini R, Katz J (2015) Integrating Mach–Zehnder interferometry with TPIV to measure the time-resolved deformation of a compliant wall along with the 3D velocity feld in a turbulent channel flow. Exp Fluids 56:203–225CrossRef

Zhang C, Wang J, Blake W, Katz J (2017) Deformation of a compliant wall in a turbulent channel flow. J Fluid Mech 823:345–390MathSciNetCrossRef

Titel: GPU-based, parallel-line, omni-directional integration of measured pressure gradient field to obtain the 3D pressure distribution
verfasst von: Jin Wang
Cao Zhang
Joseph Katz
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2019
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Experiments in Fluids / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0723-4864
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1114
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2700-y

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Graphical abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

Temperature measurement and state determination of supercooled droplets using laser-induced fluorescence

On the subsonic near-wake of a space launcher configuration without jet

Control of long-range correlations in turbulence

Measurements of the single-point and joint turbulence statistics of high subsonic jets using hot-wire anemometry

Spectral random masking: a novel dynamic masking technique for PIV in multiphase flows

Dense motion estimation of particle images via a convolutional neural network

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten