Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 3/2016

01.05.2016

Collective decision with 100 Kilobots: speed versus accuracy in binary discrimination problems

verfasst von: Gabriele Valentini, Eliseo Ferrante, Heiko Hamann, Marco Dorigo

Erschienen in: Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Achieving fast and accurate collective decisions with a large number of simple agents without relying on a central planning unit or on global communication is essential for developing complex collective behaviors. In this paper, we investigate the speed versus accuracy trade-off in collective decision-making in the context of a binary discrimination problem—i.e., how a swarm can collectively determine the best of two options. We describe a novel, fully distributed collective decision-making strategy that only requires agents with minimal capabilities and is faster than previous approaches. We evaluate our strategy experimentally, using a swarm of 100 Kilobots, and we study it theoretically, using both continuum and finite-size models. We find that the main factor affecting the speed versus accuracy trade-off of our strategy is the agents’ neighborhood size—i.e., the number of agents with whom the current opinion of each agent is shared. The proposed strategy and the associated theoretical framework can be used to design swarms that take collective decisions at a given level of speed and/or accuracy.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Brambilla, M., Ferrante, E., Birattari, M., & Dorigo, M. (2013). Swarm robotics: A review from the swarm engineering perspective. Swarm Intelligence, 7(1), 1–41.CrossRef Brambilla, M., Ferrante, E., Birattari, M., & Dorigo, M. (2013). Swarm robotics: A review from the swarm engineering perspective. Swarm Intelligence, 7(1), 1–41.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Brutschy, A., Scheidler, A., Ferrante, E., Dorigo, M., & Birattari, M. (2012). Can ants inspire robots? Self-organized decision making in robotic swarms. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (pp. 4272–4273). IEEE Press. Brutschy, A., Scheidler, A., Ferrante, E., Dorigo, M., & Birattari, M. (2012). Can ants inspire robots? Self-organized decision making in robotic swarms. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (pp. 4272–4273). IEEE Press.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Campo, A., Garnier, S., Dédriche, O., Zekkri, M., & Dorigo, M. (2010). Self-organized discrimination of resources. PLoS One, 6(5), e19,888.CrossRef Campo, A., Garnier, S., Dédriche, O., Zekkri, M., & Dorigo, M. (2010). Self-organized discrimination of resources. PLoS One, 6(5), e19,888.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F., & Weisbuch, G. (2000). Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Advances in Complex Systems, 3(01–04), 87–98.CrossRef Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F., & Weisbuch, G. (2000). Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Advances in Complex Systems, 3(01–04), 87–98.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Franks, N. R., Dornhaus, A., Fitzsimmons, J. P., & Stevens, M. (2003). Speed versus accuracy in collective decision making. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, 2457–2463.CrossRef Franks, N. R., Dornhaus, A., Fitzsimmons, J. P., & Stevens, M. (2003). Speed versus accuracy in collective decision making. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, 2457–2463.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Franks, N. R., Pratt, S. C., Mallon, E. B., Britton, N. F., & Sumpter, D. J. T. (2002). Information flow, opinion polling and collective intelligence in house-hunting social insects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 357(1427), 1567–1583.CrossRef Franks, N. R., Pratt, S. C., Mallon, E. B., Britton, N. F., & Sumpter, D. J. T. (2002). Information flow, opinion polling and collective intelligence in house-hunting social insects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 357(1427), 1567–1583.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Galam, S. (1986). Majority rule, hierarchical structures, and democratic totalitarianism: A statistical approach. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 30(4), 426–434.CrossRefMATH Galam, S. (1986). Majority rule, hierarchical structures, and democratic totalitarianism: A statistical approach. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 30(4), 426–434.CrossRefMATH
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Garnier, S., Gautrais, J., Asadpour, M., Jost, C., & Theraulaz, G. (2009). Self-organized aggregation triggers collective decision making in a group of cockroach-like robots. Adaptive Behavior, 17(2), 109–133.CrossRef Garnier, S., Gautrais, J., Asadpour, M., Jost, C., & Theraulaz, G. (2009). Self-organized aggregation triggers collective decision making in a group of cockroach-like robots. Adaptive Behavior, 17(2), 109–133.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Garnier, S., Gautrais, J., & Theraulaz, G. (2007). The biological principles of swarm intelligence. Swarm Intelligence, 1(1), 3–31.CrossRef Garnier, S., Gautrais, J., & Theraulaz, G. (2007). The biological principles of swarm intelligence. Swarm Intelligence, 1(1), 3–31.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gillespie, D. T. (1977). Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 81(25), 2340–2361.CrossRef Gillespie, D. T. (1977). Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 81(25), 2340–2361.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamann, H. (2013). Towards swarm calculus: Urn models of collective decisions and universal properties of swarm performance. Swarm Intelligence, 7(2–3), 145–172.CrossRef Hamann, H. (2013). Towards swarm calculus: Urn models of collective decisions and universal properties of swarm performance. Swarm Intelligence, 7(2–3), 145–172.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hatano, Y., & Mesbahi, M. (2005). Agreement over random networks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 50(11), 1867–1872.MathSciNetCrossRef Hatano, Y., & Mesbahi, M. (2005). Agreement over random networks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 50(11), 1867–1872.MathSciNetCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jøsang, A., Ismail, R., & Boyd, C. (2007). A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decision Support Systems, 43(2), 618–644.CrossRef Jøsang, A., Ismail, R., & Boyd, C. (2007). A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decision Support Systems, 43(2), 618–644.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kernbach, S., Thenius, R., Kernbach, O., & Schmickl, T. (2009). Re-embodiment of honeybee aggregation behavior in an artificial micro-robotic system. Adaptive Behavior, 17(3), 237–259.CrossRef Kernbach, S., Thenius, R., Kernbach, O., & Schmickl, T. (2009). Re-embodiment of honeybee aggregation behavior in an artificial micro-robotic system. Adaptive Behavior, 17(3), 237–259.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lerman, K., Martinoli, A., & Galstyan, A. (2005). A review of probabilistic macroscopic models for swarm robotic systems. In Swarm robotics, LNCS (Vol. 3342, pp. 143–152). Berlin: Springer. Lerman, K., Martinoli, A., & Galstyan, A. (2005). A review of probabilistic macroscopic models for swarm robotic systems. In Swarm robotics, LNCS (Vol. 3342, pp. 143–152). Berlin: Springer.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Liggett, T. M. (1999). Stochastic interacting systems: Contact, voter and exclusion processes. In Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften (Vol. 324). Berlin: Springer. Liggett, T. M. (1999). Stochastic interacting systems: Contact, voter and exclusion processes. In Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften (Vol. 324). Berlin: Springer.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat List, C. (2004). Democracy in animal groups: A political science perspective. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19(4), 168–169.CrossRef List, C. (2004). Democracy in animal groups: A political science perspective. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19(4), 168–169.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Marshall, J. A., Bogacz, R., Dornhaus, A., \({\tilde{\rm P}}\)lanqué, R., Kovacs, T., & Franks, N. R. (2009). On optimal decision-making in brains and social insect colonies. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 6(40), 1065–1074. Marshall, J. A., Bogacz, R., Dornhaus, A., \({\tilde{\rm P}}\)lanqué, R., Kovacs, T., & Franks, N. R. (2009). On optimal decision-making in brains and social insect colonies. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 6(40), 1065–1074.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Martinoli, A., Easton, K., & Agassounon, W. (2004). Modeling swarm robotic systems: A case study in collaborative distributed manipulation. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 23(4–5), 415–436.CrossRef Martinoli, A., Easton, K., & Agassounon, W. (2004). Modeling swarm robotic systems: A case study in collaborative distributed manipulation. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 23(4–5), 415–436.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Martinoli, A., Ijspeert, A., & Mondada, F. (1999). Understanding collective aggregation mechanisms: From probabilistic modelling to experiments with real robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 29(1), 51–63.CrossRef Martinoli, A., Ijspeert, A., & Mondada, F. (1999). Understanding collective aggregation mechanisms: From probabilistic modelling to experiments with real robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 29(1), 51–63.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Mathews, N., Valentini, G., Christensen, A. L., O’Grady, R., Brutschy, A., & Dorigo, M. (2015). Spatially targeted communication in decentralized multirobot systems. Autonomous Robots, 38(4), 439–457.CrossRef Mathews, N., Valentini, G., Christensen, A. L., O’Grady, R., Brutschy, A., & Dorigo, M. (2015). Spatially targeted communication in decentralized multirobot systems. Autonomous Robots, 38(4), 439–457.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Mesbahi, M., & Egerstedt, M. (2010). Graph theoretic methods in multiagent networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefMATH Mesbahi, M., & Egerstedt, M. (2010). Graph theoretic methods in multiagent networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefMATH
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Montes de Oca, M., Ferrante, E., Scheidler, A., Pinciroli, C., Birattari, M., & Dorigo, M., (2011). Majority-rule opinion dynamics with differential latency: A mechanism for self-organized collective decision-making. Swarm Intelligence, 5, 305–327. Montes de Oca, M., Ferrante, E., Scheidler, A., Pinciroli, C., Birattari, M., & Dorigo, M., (2011). Majority-rule opinion dynamics with differential latency: A mechanism for self-organized collective decision-making. Swarm Intelligence, 5, 305–327.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Parker, C. A. C., & Zhang, H. (2009). Cooperative decision-making in decentralized multiple-robot systems: The best-of-n problem. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 14(2), 240–251.CrossRef Parker, C. A. C., & Zhang, H. (2009). Cooperative decision-making in decentralized multiple-robot systems: The best-of-n problem. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 14(2), 240–251.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Parker, C. A. C., & Zhang, H. (2010). Collective unary decision-making by decentralized multiple-robot systems applied to the task-sequencing problem. Swarm Intelligence, 4, 199–220.CrossRef Parker, C. A. C., & Zhang, H. (2010). Collective unary decision-making by decentralized multiple-robot systems applied to the task-sequencing problem. Swarm Intelligence, 4, 199–220.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Passino, K. M., & Seeley, T. D. (2006). Modeling and analysis of nest-site selection by honeybee swarms: The speed and accuracy trade-off. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 59(3), 427–442.CrossRef Passino, K. M., & Seeley, T. D. (2006). Modeling and analysis of nest-site selection by honeybee swarms: The speed and accuracy trade-off. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 59(3), 427–442.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Reina, A., Miletitch, R., Dorigo, M., & Trianni, V. (2015). A quantitative micro-macro link for collective decisions: The shortest path discovery/selection example. Swarm Intelligence, 9(2–3), 75–102.CrossRef Reina, A., Miletitch, R., Dorigo, M., & Trianni, V. (2015). A quantitative micro-macro link for collective decisions: The shortest path discovery/selection example. Swarm Intelligence, 9(2–3), 75–102.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Reina, A., Valentini, G., Fernández-Oto, C., Dorigo, M., & Trianni, V. (2015). A design pattern for decentralized decision making. PLoS One, 10(10), e0140950.CrossRef Reina, A., Valentini, G., Fernández-Oto, C., Dorigo, M., & Trianni, V. (2015). A design pattern for decentralized decision making. PLoS One, 10(10), e0140950.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Ren, W., Beard, R., & Atkins, E. (2005) A survey of consensus problems in multi-agent coordination. In Proceedings of the 2005 American Control Conference (Vol. 3, pp. 1859–1864). IEEE Press. Ren, W., Beard, R., & Atkins, E. (2005) A survey of consensus problems in multi-agent coordination. In Proceedings of the 2005 American Control Conference (Vol. 3, pp. 1859–1864). IEEE Press.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Ren, W., & Beard, R. W. (2008). Distributed consensus in multi-vehicle cooperative control: Theory and applications, communications and control engineering. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefMATH Ren, W., & Beard, R. W. (2008). Distributed consensus in multi-vehicle cooperative control: Theory and applications, communications and control engineering. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefMATH
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubenstein, M., Ahler, C., Hoff, N., Cabrera, A., & Nagpal, R. (2014). Kilobot: A low cost robot with scalable operations designed for collective behaviors. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 62(7), 966–975.CrossRef Rubenstein, M., Ahler, C., Hoff, N., Cabrera, A., & Nagpal, R. (2014). Kilobot: A low cost robot with scalable operations designed for collective behaviors. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 62(7), 966–975.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubenstein, M., Cabrera, A., Werfel, J., Habibi, G., McLurkin, J., & Nagpal, R. (2013). Collective transport of complex objects by simple robots: Theory and experiments. In T. Ito, C. Jonker, M. Gini, & O. Shehory (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, AAMAS ’13 (pp. 47–54). IFAAMAS. Rubenstein, M., Cabrera, A., Werfel, J., Habibi, G., McLurkin, J., & Nagpal, R. (2013). Collective transport of complex objects by simple robots: Theory and experiments. In T. Ito, C. Jonker, M. Gini, & O. Shehory (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, AAMAS ’13 (pp. 47–54). IFAAMAS.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubenstein, M., Cornejo, A., & Nagpal, R. (2014). Programmable self-assembly in a thousand-robot swarm. Science, 345(6198), 795–799.CrossRef Rubenstein, M., Cornejo, A., & Nagpal, R. (2014). Programmable self-assembly in a thousand-robot swarm. Science, 345(6198), 795–799.CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Sartoretti, G., Hongler, M. O., de Oliveira, M., & Mondada, F. (2014). Decentralized self-selection of swarm trajectories: From dynamical systems theory to robotic implementation. Swarm Intelligence, 8(4), 329–351.CrossRef Sartoretti, G., Hongler, M. O., de Oliveira, M., & Mondada, F. (2014). Decentralized self-selection of swarm trajectories: From dynamical systems theory to robotic implementation. Swarm Intelligence, 8(4), 329–351.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheidler, A. (2011). Dynamics of majority rule with differential latencies. Physical Review E, 83(031), 116. Scheidler, A. (2011). Dynamics of majority rule with differential latencies. Physical Review E, 83(031), 116.
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheidler, A., Brutschy, A., Ferrante, E., & Dorigo, M. (2015). The k-unanimity rule for self-organized decision-making in swarms of robots. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, PP(99), 1. Scheidler, A., Brutschy, A., Ferrante, E., & Dorigo, M. (2015). The k-unanimity rule for self-organized decision-making in swarms of robots. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, PP(99), 1.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Seeley, T. D. (2010). Honeybee democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Seeley, T. D. (2010). Honeybee democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Soysal, O., & Şahin, E. (2007). A macroscopic model for self-organized aggregation in swarm robotic systems. In E. Şahin, W. M. Spears, & A. F. Winfield (Eds.), Swarm robotics, LNCS (Vol. 4433, pp. 27–42). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef Soysal, O., & Şahin, E. (2007). A macroscopic model for self-organized aggregation in swarm robotic systems. In E. Şahin, W. M. Spears, & A. F. Winfield (Eds.), Swarm robotics, LNCS (Vol. 4433, pp. 27–42). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Sumpter, D. J. (2010). Collective animal behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefMATH Sumpter, D. J. (2010). Collective animal behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefMATH
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Toral, R., & Tessone, C. J. (2007). Finite size effects in the dynamics of opinion formation. Communications in Computational Physics, 2(2), 177–195.MathSciNet Toral, R., & Tessone, C. J. (2007). Finite size effects in the dynamics of opinion formation. Communications in Computational Physics, 2(2), 177–195.MathSciNet
42.
Zurück zum Zitat van Kampen, N. G. (1992). Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry. Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier.MATH van Kampen, N. G. (1992). Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry. Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier.MATH
43.
Zurück zum Zitat von Frisch, K. (1967). The dance language and orientation of bees. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. von Frisch, K. (1967). The dance language and orientation of bees. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Valentini, G., Birattari, M., & Dorigo, M. (2013) Majority rule with differential latency: An absorbing Markov chain to model consensus. In Proceedings of the European conference on complex systems 2012, Proceedings in complexity (pp. 651–658). Berlin: Springer. Valentini, G., Birattari, M., & Dorigo, M. (2013) Majority rule with differential latency: An absorbing Markov chain to model consensus. In Proceedings of the European conference on complex systems 2012, Proceedings in complexity (pp. 651–658). Berlin: Springer.
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Valentini, G., & Hamann, H. (2015). Time-variant feedback processes in collective decision-making systems: Influence and effect of dynamic neighborhood sizes. Swarm Intelligence, 9(2–3), 153–176.CrossRef Valentini, G., & Hamann, H. (2015). Time-variant feedback processes in collective decision-making systems: Influence and effect of dynamic neighborhood sizes. Swarm Intelligence, 9(2–3), 153–176.CrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Valentini, G., Hamann, H., & Dorigo, M. (2014). Self-organized collective decision making: The weighted voter model. In A. Lomuscio, P. Scerri, A. Bazzan, & M. Huhns (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, AAMAS ’14 (pp. 45–52). IFAAMAS. Valentini, G., Hamann, H., & Dorigo, M. (2014). Self-organized collective decision making: The weighted voter model. In A. Lomuscio, P. Scerri, A. Bazzan, & M. Huhns (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, AAMAS ’14 (pp. 45–52). IFAAMAS.
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Valentini, G., Hamann, H., & Dorigo, M. (2015). Efficient decision-making in a self-organizing robot swarm: On the speed versus accuracy trade-off. In Proceedings of the 14th International conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, AAMAS ’15 (pp. 1305–1314). IFAAMAS. Valentini, G., Hamann, H., & Dorigo, M. (2015). Efficient decision-making in a self-organizing robot swarm: On the speed versus accuracy trade-off. In Proceedings of the 14th International conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, AAMAS ’15 (pp. 1305–1314). IFAAMAS.
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Valentini, G., Hamann, H., & Dorigo, M. (2015). Self-organized collective decisions in a robot swarm. In Proceedings of the 29th AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, AI Video Competition. AAAI Press. http://youtu.be/5lz_HnOLBW4. Valentini, G., Hamann, H., & Dorigo, M. (2015). Self-organized collective decisions in a robot swarm. In Proceedings of the 29th AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, AI Video Competition. AAAI Press. http://​youtu.​be/​5lz_​HnOLBW4.
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Vigelius, M., Meyer, B., & Pascoe, G. (2014). Multiscale modelling and analysis of collective decision making in swarm robotics. PLoS One, 9(11), e111542.CrossRef Vigelius, M., Meyer, B., & Pascoe, G. (2014). Multiscale modelling and analysis of collective decision making in swarm robotics. PLoS One, 9(11), e111542.CrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, Y., & Vassileva, J. (2003). Trust and reputation model in peer-to-peer networks. In Proceedings of the third international conference on peer-to-peer computing (P2P 2003) (pp. 150–157). IEEE Press. Wang, Y., & Vassileva, J. (2003). Trust and reputation model in peer-to-peer networks. In Proceedings of the third international conference on peer-to-peer computing (P2P 2003) (pp. 150–157). IEEE Press.
Metadaten
Titel
Collective decision with 100 Kilobots: speed versus accuracy in binary discrimination problems
verfasst von
Gabriele Valentini
Eliseo Ferrante
Heiko Hamann
Marco Dorigo
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1387-2532
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7454
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-015-9323-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 3/2016 Zur Ausgabe