nach oben

Artificial Intelligence and Law

Erschienen in:

01.08.2011

Value-based argumentation for justifying compliance

verfasst von: Brigitte Burgemeestre, Joris Hulstijn, Yao-Hua Tan

Erschienen in: Artificial Intelligence and Law | Ausgabe 2-3/2011

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Compliance is often achieved ‘by design’ through a coherent system of controls consisting of information systems and procedures. This system-based control requires a new approach to auditing in which companies must demonstrate to the regulator that they are ‘in control’. They must determine the relevance of a regulation for their business, justify which set of control measures they have taken to comply with it, and demonstrate that the control measures are operationally effective. In this paper we show how value-based argumentation theory can be applied to the compliance domain. Corporate values motivate the selection of control measures (actions) which aim to fulfil control objectives, i.e. adopted norms (goals). In particular, we show how to formalize the audit dialogue in which companies justify their compliance decisions to regulators using value-based argumentation. The approach is illustrated by a case study of the safety and security measures adopted in the context of EU customs regulation.

Vorheriger Artikel Obligations and prohibitions in Talmudic deontic logic

Nächster Artikel A dynamic logic for privacy compliance

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

We noticed that under the definitions of Atkinson et al. (2006) there is no formal connection between goals and values; the two are only indirectly connected through the valuation of actions.

As an aside, we would like to make the point that methodologically, not only new approaches or logics deserve to be studied; also applications and empirical valuation of existing approaches deserves attention.

Alles M, Brennan G et al (2006) Continuous monitoring of business process controls: a pilot implementation of a continuous auditing system at Siemens. Acc Inf Syst 7:137–161

Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2007) Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems. Artif Intell 171:855–874MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T et al (2005) A dialogue game protocol for multi-agent argument for proposals over action. Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst 11(2):153–171CrossRef

Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T et al (2006) Computational representation of practical argument. Synthese 152(2):157–206MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Ayres I, Braithwaite J (1992) Responsive regulation: transcending the deregulation debate. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Burgemeestre B, Hulstijn J et al (2009a) Rule-based versus principle-based regulatory compliance. Proceedings of JURIX 2009, IOS Press

Burgemeestre B, Hulstijn J et al (2009b) Towards an architecture for self-regulating agents: a case study in international trade. COIN@MALLOW Turin, Springer

Burgemeestre B, Liu J et al (2009c) Early requirements engineering for e-customs decision support: assessing overlap in mental models. In: Yu E, Eder J, Rolland C (eds) Forum Proceedings of the 21st CAiSE conference. Amsterdam, pp 31–36

Burgemeestre B, Hulstijn J et al (2010). Norm emergence in regulatory compliance. Proceedings of Normas 2010, Leicester

COSO (1992) Internal Control—Integrated Framework, Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission

COSO (2004) Enterprise Risk Management—Integrated Framework, Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission

Dworkin R (1977) Taking rights seriously. Duckworth, London

European Commission (2006a) Commission Regulation No 1875/2006 of 18 December 2006. Off J Eur Union 360:64–125

European Commission (2006b) The AEO compact model

European Commission (2007) AEO guidelines

Fabian B, Gürses S et al (2010) A comparison of security requirements engineering methods. Requir Eng 15:7–40CrossRef

Gribnau H (2008) Soft law and taxation: the case of the Netherlands. Legisprudence 1(3)

Helderman J-K, Honingh ME (2009) Systeemtoezicht: Een onderzoek naar de condities en werking van systeemtoezicht in zes sectoren. Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, Nijmegen

Hofstede G, Neuijen B et al (1990) Measuring organizational cultures: a qualitative and quantitative study. Administr Sci Q 35(2):286–316CrossRef

IFAC (2008) IAASB. Audit sampling: redrafted international standard on auditing (ISA 530). International Federation of Accountants (IFAC)

ISACF (2007) Control objectives for information and related technology (COBIT 4.1), Information Systems Audit and Control Foundation

Jones AJI, Sergot M (1996) A formal characterisation of institutionalised power. J Interest Group Pure Appl Logic 3:427–443MathSciNet

Jureta I, Faulkner S (2007) Tracing the rationale behind UML model change through argumentation. International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER), Auckland, New Zealand, Springer

Jureta I, Mylopoulos J et al (2008) Revisiting the core ontology and problem in requirements engineering. Proceedings of the 2008 16th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference. IEEE Computer Society, pp 71–80

Knechel W, Salterio S et al (2007) Auditing: assurance and risk, 3rd edn. Thomson Learning, Cincinatti

Korobkin RB (2000) Behavioral analysis and legal form: rules vs. principles revisited. Oregon Law Rev 79(1):23–60

Mackenzie J (1979) Question-begging in non-cumulative systems. J Philos Log 8:117–133

McBurney P, Parsons S (2002) Games that agents play: a formal framework for dialogues between autonomous agents. J Logic Lang Inf 11(3):315–334MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Meyer JJ, Wieringa R (1993) Deontic logic in computer science: normative system specification. Wiley, LondonMATH

Mylopoulos J, Chung L, Nixon BA (1992) Representing and using nonfunctional requirements: a process-oriented approach. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 18(6):483–497CrossRef

NIST (2002) Risk management guide for information technology systems (NIST 800–30). National Institute for Security and Technology

Pathak J (2005) Information technology auditing: an evolving agenda. Springer Verlag

Perelman C (1980) Justice law and argument. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht

Power M (1997) The audit society: rituals of verification. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Power M (2007) Organized uncertainty: designing a world of risk management. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Prakken H (2008a) A formal model of adjudication dialogues. Artif Intell Law 16(3):305–328CrossRef

Prakken H (2008b) Formalising ordinary legal disputes: a case study. Artif Intell Law 16(4):333–359CrossRef

Rees J (1988) Self regulation: an effective alternative to direct regulation by OSHA? Policy Stud J 16(3):602–614MathSciNetCrossRef

Romney MB, Steinbart PJ (2006) Accounting information systems, 10e. Prentice Hall, NJ

Sadiq SW, Governatori G et al (2007) Modeling control objectives for business process compliance. Business Process Management (BPM 2007), Springer

Satava D, Caldwell C et al (2006) Ethics and the auditing culture: rethinking the foundation of accounting and auditing. J Bus Ethics 64:271–284CrossRef

Searle JR (1995) The construction of social reality. The Free Press, Illinois

Simons R (1995) Levers of control: how managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

Stefik M (1995) Knowledge systems. Morgan Kauffman, San Fransisco

van Lamsweerde A (2001) Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a guided tour. International Symposium on Requirements Engineering Toronto

Vazquez-Salceda J, Aldewereld H et al (2005) Norms in multiagent systems: from theory to practice. Intl J Comput Syst Sci Eng 20(4):225–236

Walton D (1996) Argument schemes for presumptive reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

Walton DN, Krabbe EC (1995) Commitment in dialogue: basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. State University of New York Press, Albany

Westerman P (2009a) Legal or non-legal reasoning: the problems of arguing about goals. Argumentation 24:211–226CrossRef

Westerman P (2009b) Who is regulating the self? Self-regulation as outsourced rule-making. In: Hertogh M, Westerman P (eds) Self-regulation and the future of the regulatory state: international and interdisciplinary perspectives. University of Groningen, Groningen, pp 23–36

Yin (2003) Case study research: design and methods, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

Yu E (1997) Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE’1997). IEEE CS Press, CA, pp 226–235

Titel: Value-based argumentation for justifying compliance
verfasst von: Brigitte Burgemeestre
Joris Hulstijn
Yao-Hua Tan
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2011
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Artificial Intelligence and Law / Ausgabe 2-3/2011
Print ISSN: 0924-8463
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8382
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-011-9113-4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2-3/2011

A dynamic logic for privacy compliance

Relationships between obligations and actions in the context of institutional agents, human agents or software agents

The modular logic of private international law

Obligations and prohibitions in Talmudic deontic logic

Moral particularism in the light of deontic logic

Premium Partner