nach oben

Artificial Intelligence and Law

Erschienen in:

01.03.2012

Representing Popov v Hayashi with dimensions and factors

verfasst von: T. J. M. Bench-Capon

Erschienen in: Artificial Intelligence and Law | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Modelling reasoning with legal cases has been a central concern of AI and Law since the 1980s. The approach which represents cases as factors and dimensions has been a central part of that work. In this paper I consider how several varieties of the approach can be applied to the interesting case of Popov v Hayashi. After briefly reviewing some of the key landmarks of the approach, the case is represented in terms of factors and dimensions, and further explored using theory construction and argumentation schemes approaches.

Vorheriger Artikel Introduction to special issue on modelling Popov v. Hayashi

Nächster Artikel A Carneades reconstruction of Popov v Hayashi

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Popov v Hayashi, 2002 WL 31833731. (Cal.Superior Dec 18, 2002) (NO. 400545). The decision was given by the Honourable Kevin M McCarthy and is reprinted in the introduction to this volume.

This was the view of Rissland and Ashley (2002), where they explicitly say that F2 should be treated as the two extreme points on a dimension, rather than as two separate factors.

A suggestion supported by the fact that these were both cited in the decision on Popov.

This case, and another similar leading whaling case were both cited in the decision.

Although it has been suggested in Berger (2006) that Pierson did in fact wish to interfere because of friction between the different social groups to which the landowning Post and the small holder Pierson belonged. Berger also suggests that the incident took place very close to Pierson’s property and the land was less open than is usually thought.

The following may fruitfully be compared with the argumentation scheme approach of Sect. 5. The plaintiff argument is Fig. 1 and the defendant argument Fig. 2.

Or Young: it makes no difference in this representation since the factors actually used in T1 are the same in either case.

Compare the three distinctions in the HYPO style treatment at the end of Sect. 3.2.

Aleven V (1997) Teaching case based argumentation through an example and models. PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

Ashley KD (1990) Modeling Legal Argument. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA

Atkinson K, Bench-Capon TJM, McBurney P (2005) Arguing about cases as practical reasoning. In: ICAIL, ACM, pp 35–44. ISBN 1-59593-081-7

Bench-Capon TJM (2002) The missing link revisited: the role of teleology in representing legal argument. Artif Intell Law 10(1–3):79–94CrossRef

Bench-Capon T, Rissland EL (2001) Back to the future: dimensions revisited. In: Verheij B, Lodder A, Loui R, Muntjewerff A (eds) Proceedings of JURIX 2001, IOS Press, Amsterdman, pp 41–52

Bench-Capon TJM, Sartor G (2003) A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values. Artif Intell 150(1–2):97–143MATHCrossRef

Berger BR (2006) It’s not about the fox: the untold history of pierson v post. Duke Law Rev 55:1089–1135

Berman DH, Hafner CD (1993) Representing teleological structure in case-based legal reasoning: the missing link. In Proceedings of the 4th ICAIL, ACM Press, pp 50–59

Berman DH, Hafner CD (1995) Understanding precedents in a temporal context of evolving legal doctrine. In: ICAIL, pp 42–51

Brüninghaus S, Ashley KD (2005) Generating legal arguments and predictions from case texts. In: Proceedings of the 10th ICAIL, pp 65–74

Chorley A, Bench-Capon TJM (2005) An empirical investigation of reasoning with legal cases through theory construction and application. Artif Intell Law 13(3–4):323–371

Egly U, Gaggl SA, Woltran S (2008) Aspartix: implementing argumentation frameworks using answer-set programming. In: de la Banda MG, Pontelli E (eds), ICLP, volume 5366 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, pp 734–738. ISBN 978-3-540-89981-5

Finkelman P (2002) Fugitive baseballs and abandoned property: who owns the home run ball?. Cardozo Law Review 23:1609–1633

Gordon TF, Walton D (2006) Pierson vs. post revisited—a reconstruction using the carneades argumentation framework. In: Dunne PE, Bench-Capon TJM (eds), COMMA, vol 144 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, IOS Press, pp 208–219. ISBN 978-1-58603-652-2

Helmholz R (1983) Equitable division and the law of finders. Fordham Law Rev 52(3):313–328

Henderson J, Bench-Capon TJM (2001) Dynamic arguments in a case law domain. In: Proceedings of the 8th ICAIL, pp 60–69

Johnston B, Governatori G (2003) Induction of defeasible logic theories in the legal domain. In: Proceedings of the Ninth ICAIL, pp 204–213

Levi EH (1948) An introduction to legal reasoning. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Il

Lodder AR, Mommers L (eds) (2007) Legal knowledge and information systems—JURIX 2007: the twentieth annual conference on legal knowledge and information systems, Leiden, The Netherlands, 12–15 December 2007, volume 165 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. IOS Press. ISBN 978-1-58603-810-6

Prakken H (2002) An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning. Artif Intell Law 10(1–3):113–133CrossRef

Prakken H, Sartor G (1998) Modelling reasoning with precedents in a formal dialogue game. Artif Intell Law 6(2–4):231–287CrossRef

Rissland EL (1983) Examples in legal reasoning: legal hypotheticals. In IJCAI, pp 90–93

Rissland EL, Ashley KD (2002) A note on dimensions and factors. Artif Intell Law 10(1–3):65–77CrossRef

Rissland EL, Friedman MT (1995) Detecting change in legal concepts. In Proceedings of the 5th ICAIL, pp 127–136

Sartor G (2002) Teleological arguments and theory-based dialectics. Artif Intell Law 10(1–3):95–112CrossRef

Wyner AZ, Bench-Capon TJM (2007) Argument schemes for legal case-based reasoning. In: Lodder and Mommers, pp 139–149. ISBN 978-1-58603-810-6

Wyner AZ, Bench-Capon TJM, Atkinson K (2007) Arguments, values and baseballs: representation of popov v. hayashi. In: Lodder and Mommers, pp 151–160. ISBN 978-1-58603-810-6

Titel: Representing Popov v Hayashi with dimensions and factors
verfasst von: T. J. M. Bench-Capon
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2012
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Artificial Intelligence and Law / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0924-8463
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8382
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-012-9118-7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

A legal case OWL ontology with an instantiation of Popov v. Hayashi

Reconstructing Popov v. Hayashi in a framework for argumentation with structured arguments and Dungean semantics

A Carneades reconstruction of Popov v Hayashi

Introduction to special issue on modelling Popov v. Hayashi

Premium Partner