nach oben

Artificial Intelligence and Law

Erschienen in:

01.03.2012

A Carneades reconstruction of Popov v Hayashi

verfasst von: Thomas F. Gordon, Douglas Walton

Erschienen in: Artificial Intelligence and Law | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Carneades is an open source argument mapping application and a programming library for building argumentation support tools. In this paper, Carneades’ support for argument reconstruction, evaluation and visualization is illustrated by modeling most of the factual and legal arguments in Popov v Hayashi.

Vorheriger Artikel Representing Popov v Hayashi with dimensions and factors

Nächster Artikel Reconstructing Popov v. Hayashi in a framework for argumentation with structured arguments and Dungean semantics

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

http://carneades.github.com.

Weights do not play a role in the legal arguments modeled below, since the proof standard used to resolve legal issues is dialectical validity, where weights are irrelevant.

Incidentally, this finding renders Judge McCarthy’s proposed rule about a qualified right to possession being sufficient to meet the ownership requirement of the conversion cause of action obiter dictum, not relevant for the decision of the case and thus not binding precedent. According to Black (1979), obiter dictum is “an observation or remark made by a judge when pronouncing an opinion on a case, concerning some rule, principal or application of law, or the solution of a question suggested by the case at bar, but not necessarily involved in the case or essential for its determination.”

Fresno Air Service v Wood (1965) 232 Cal. App. 2d 801, 806.

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v San Francisco Bank. (1943) 58 Cal. App. 2d 528, 534.

Pierson v Post, 3 Caines R. (N.Y. 1805).

Young v Hutchinson, 6 Q.B. 606 (1844).

The screen shots have been edited slightly to overcome the lack of color printing, by adding check marks and Xs to accepted and rejected statements, respectively.

http://www.computing.dundee.ac.uk/staff/creed/araucaria.

http://compendium.open.ac.uk/institute/index.htm.

http://www.argunet.org/debates. See also (Betz 2009).

In Germany, for example, see KnowledgeTools (http://www.knowledgetools.de), FallSoft (http://www.fallsoft.de/) and Normfall (http://www.normfall.de).

Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T, McBurney P (2004) Justifying practical reasoning. In Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on computational models of natural argument (CMNA), pp 87–90, Valencia, ECAI

Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T, McBurney P (2005) Arguing about cases as practical reasoning. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 35–44, Bologna

Beardsley MC (1950) Practical logic. Prentice Hall, New York

Bench-Capon T (2003) Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. J Logic Comput 13(3):429–448MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Betz G (2009) Evaluating dialectical structures. J Philos Logic 38(3):283–312MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Black HC (1979) Black’s law dictionary, 5th edn. West Publishing Co, St Paul, MN

Conklin J, Begeman M (1988) gIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion. ACM Transact Office Inf Syst 6(4):303–331CrossRef

Dung PM (1995) On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif Intell, 77(2):321–357. ISSN 0004-3702

Freeman JB (1991) Dialectics and the macrostructure of arguments: a theory of argument structure. Walter de Gruyter, BerlinCrossRef

Gordon TF (2007) Visualizing Carneades argument graphs. Law Probab Risk 6(1–4):109–117CrossRef

Gordon TF, Karacapilidis N (1997) The Zeno argumentation framework. In Proceedings of the sixth international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 10–18, ACM Press, Melbourne

Gordon TF, Walton D (2006) Pierson vs. post revisted—a reconstruction using the Carneades argumentation framework. In: Dunne PE, Bench-Capon T (eds). Proceedings of the first international conference on computational models of argument (COMMA 06), IOS Press, Liverpool

Gordon TF, Walton D (2009) Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes. In Hafner CD (ed). 12th international conference on artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL 2009), ACM Press, New York

Gordon TF, Prakken H, Walton D (2007) The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artif Intell 171(10–11):875–896MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Karacapilidis N, Papadias D (2001) Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: the HERMES system. Inf Syst 26(4):259–277MATHCrossRef

Mochales R, Leven A (2009) Creating an argumentation corpus: do theories apply to real arguments? A case study on the legal argumentation of the echr. In ICAIL ’09: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 21–30, ACM, New York, NY

Reed CA, Rowe GWA (2004) Araucaria: software for argument analysis, diagramming and representation. Int J AI Tools 13(4):961–980CrossRef

Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169CrossRef

Selvin A, Shum SB, Maarten S et al (2001) Compendium: making meetings into knowledge events. In: Knowledge technologies 2001, Austin, TX

South M, Vreeswijk G, Fox J (2008) Dungine: a java dung reasoner. In Proceeding of the 2008 conference on computational models of argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008, pp 360–368. IOS Press

Toulmin SE (1958) The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Verheij B (2005) Virtual arguments. TMC Asser Press, The HagueCrossRef

Walton D (2005) Argumentation methods for artificial intelligence in law. Springer, Berlin

Walton D (2006) Fundamentals of critical argumentation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Wigmore JH (1908) A treatise on the system of evidence in trials at common law: including the statutes and judicial decisions of all jurisdictions of the United States. Little, Brown and Company, Boston, MA

Witkin BE (1990) Summary of California law. Bancroft-Whitney Co, San Francisco

Wyner A, Bench-Capon T, Atkinson K (2007) Arguments, values and baseballs: Representation of Popov v. Hayashi. Legal knowledge and information systems. JURIX, pp 151–160

Titel: A Carneades reconstruction of Popov v Hayashi
verfasst von: Thomas F. Gordon
Douglas Walton
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2012
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Artificial Intelligence and Law / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0924-8463
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8382
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-012-9120-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

A legal case OWL ontology with an instantiation of Popov v. Hayashi

Introduction to special issue on modelling Popov v. Hayashi

Representing Popov v Hayashi with dimensions and factors

Reconstructing Popov v. Hayashi in a framework for argumentation with structured arguments and Dungean semantics

Premium Partner