Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Polymer Research
Erschienen in: Journal of Polymer Research 7/2018

01.07.2018 | ORIGINAL PAPER

High performance forward osmosis cellulose acetate (CA) membrane modified by polyvinyl alcohol and polydopamine

verfasst von: Hai-ming Song, Li-jing Zhu, Zhi-xiang Zeng, Qun-ji Xue

Erschienen in: Journal of Polymer Research | Ausgabe 7/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Cellulose acetate (CA) is a low cost and readily available material widely used in forward osmosis (FO) membranes. However, the performance of pure CA membranes is not good enough in salt separation and the traditional modification methods are generally multistep and difficult to control. In this paper, we reported high performance cellulose acetate (CA) composite forward osmosis (FO) membranes modified with polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and polydopamine (PDA). PVA was first cross-linked onto the surface of CA membranes, and then PDA was coated with a rapid deposition method. The membranes were characterized with respect to membrane chemistry (FTIR and XPS), surface properties comprising wettability (by water contact angle), and osmosis performance. The modified membrane coated by PVA and PDA shown better hydrophilicity and exhibited 16.72 LMH osmotic water flux and 0.14 mMH reverse solute flux with DI water as feed solution and 2.0 M NaCl as draw solution and active layer facing the feed solution. This simple and highly effective modification method makes it as an excellent candidate for further exploration for FO.
Vorheriger Artikel Constituting a special redox surface-initiating system and realizing graft-polymerization of GMA on polysulfone microfiltration membrane
Nächster Artikel Photocurable shape-memory polyether-polythioether/graphene nanocomposites and the study of their thermal conductivity

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Seader JD, Henley EJ, Roper DK (2011) Separation process principles: Chemical and biochemical operations
2.
Cath TY, Childress AE, Elimelech M (2006) Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. J Membr Sci 281(1–2):70–87CrossRef
3.
Zhao S, Zou L, Tang CY, Mulcahy D (2012) Recent developments in forward osmosis: opportunities and challenges. J Membr Sci 396(1):1–21CrossRef
4.
Achilli A, Childress AE, Cath TY (2009) Power generation with pressure retarded osmosis: an experimental and theoretical investigation. J Membr Sci 343(1–2):42–52CrossRef
5.
Kravath RE, Davis JA (1975) Desalination of sea water by direct osmosis. Desalination 16(2):151–155CrossRef
6.
Mccutcheon JR, Mcginnis RL, Elimelech M (2005) A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process. Desalination 174(1):1–11CrossRef
7.
Cornelissen ER, Harmsen D, Korte KFD, Ruiken CJ, Qin JJ, Oo H, Wessels LP (2008) Membrane fouling and process performance of forward osmosis membranes on activated sludge. J Membr Sci 319(1–2):158–168CrossRef
8.
Martinetti CR, Childress AE, Cath TY (2009) High recovery of concentrated RO brines using forward osmosis and membrane distillation. J Membr Sci 331(1–2):31–39CrossRef
9.
Cornelissen ER, Harmsen D, Beerendonk EF, Qin JJ, Oo H, de Korte KF, Kappelhof JW (2011) The innovative osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) for reuse of wastewater. Water Sci Technol 63(8): 1557–1565
10.
Petrotos KB, Quantick P, Petropakis H, Petrotos KB, Quantick P, Petropakis H (1998) A study of the direct osmotic concentration of tomato juice in tubular membrane-module configuration. I The effect of certain basic process parameters on the process performance J Membr Sci 150(1):99–110
11.
Petrotos KB, Lazarides HN (2001) Osmotic concentration of liquid foods. J Food Eng 49(2):201–206CrossRef
12.
Hoover LA, Phillip WA, Tiraferri A, Yip NY, Elimelech M (2011) Forward with osmosis: emerging applications for greater sustainability. Environ Sci Technol 45(23):9824–9830CrossRefPubMed
13.
Mcginnis RL, Elimelech M (2009) Global challenges in energy and water supply: the promise of engineered osmosis. Environ Sci Technol 42(23):8625–8629CrossRef
14.
Gu Y, Chen L, Ng JW, Lee C, Chang WC, Tang CY (2015) Development of anaerobic osmotic membrane bioreactor for low-strength wastewater treatment at mesophilic condition. J Membr Sci 490:197–208CrossRef
15.
Wang KY, Chung TS, Qin JJ (2007) Polybenzimidazole (PBI) nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes applied in forward osmosis process. J Membr Sci 300(1–2):6–12CrossRef
16.
Yang Q, Wang KY, Chung TS (2009) Dual-layer hollow fibers with enhanced flux as novel forward osmosis membranes for water production. Environ Sci Technol 43(8):2800–2805CrossRefPubMed
17.
Kai YW, Rui CO, Chung TS (2010) Double-skinned forward osmosis membranes for reducing internal concentration polarization within the porous sublayer. Ind Eng Chem Res 49(10):4824–4831CrossRef
18.
Wang R, Shi L, Tang CY, Chou S, Qiu C, Fane AG (2010) Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes. J Membr Sci 355(1–2):158–167CrossRef
19.
Yip NY, Tiraferri A, Phillip WA, Schiffman JD, Elimelech M (2010) High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. Environ Sci Technol 44(10):3812–3818CrossRefPubMed
20.
Shuren C, Shi L, Wang R, Tang CY, Qiu CQ, Fane AG, Hasson D (2010) Characteristics and potential applications of a novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membrane. Desalination 261(3):365–372CrossRef
21.
Su J, Zhang S, Chen H, Chen H, Jean YC, Chung TS (2010) Effects of annealing on the microstructure and performance of cellulose acetate membranes for pressure-retarded osmosis processes. J Membr Sci 364(1–2):344–353CrossRef
22.
Ren J, Mccutcheon JR (2014) A new commercial thin film composite membrane for forward osmosis. Desalination 343(12):187–193CrossRef
23.
Wang KY, Chung TS, Amy G (2012) Developing thin-film-composite forward osmosis membranes on the PES/SPSf substrate through interfacial polymerization. AICHE J 58(3):770–781CrossRef
24.
Wang Y, Li X, Cheng C, He Y, Pan J, Xu T (2016) Second interfacial polymerization on polyamide surface using aliphatic diamine with improved performance of TFC FO membranes. J Membr Sci 498(15):30–38CrossRef
25.
Arribas P, Khayet M, García-Payo MC, Gil L (2014) Self-sustained electro-spun polysulfone nano-fibrous membranes and their surface modification by interfacial polymerization for micro- and ultra-filtration. Sep Purif Techno l138(138):118–129CrossRef
26.
Seman MNA, Khayet M, Hilal N (2011) Development of antifouling properties and performance of nanofiltration membranes modified by interfacial polymerisation. Desalination 273(1):36–47CrossRef
27.
Tsai CW, Tsai C, Ruaan RC, Hu CC, Lee KR (2013) Interfacially polymerized layers for oxygen enrichment: a method to overcome Robeson's upper-bound limit. Acs Appl Mater Inter 5(12):5563–5568CrossRef
28.
Duarte AP, Cidade MT, Bordado JC (2006) Cellulose acetate reverse osmosis membranes: optimization of the composition. Sep Purif Technol 100(5):4052–4058
29.
Idris A, Ismail AF, Noordin MY, Shilton SJ (2002) Optimization of cellulose acetate hollow fiber reverse osmosis membrane production using Taguchi method. J Membr Sci 205(1–2):223–237CrossRef
30.
Vásárhelyi K, Ronner JA, Mulder MHV, Smolders CA (1987) Development of wet-dry reversible reverse osmosis membrane with high performance from cellulose acetate and cellulose triactate blend. Desalination 61(3):211–235CrossRef
31.
Zhang C, Ou Y, Lei WX, Wan LS, Ji J, Xu ZK (2016) CuSO4/H2O2-induced rapid deposition of polydopamine coatings with high uniformity and enhanced stability. Angew Chem Int Edit 55(9):3106–3109CrossRef
32.
Yang FK, Zhao B (2011) Adhesion properties of self-polymerized dopamine thin film. Open Sur Sci J 3(1):115–122CrossRef
33.
34.
Lee H, Dellatore SM, Miller WM, Messersmith PB (2007) Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science 318(5849):426–430CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Bui NN, McCutcheon JR (2013) Hydrophilic nanofibers as new supports for thin film composite membranes for engineered osmosis. Environ Sci Technol 47(3):1761–1769CrossRefPubMed
36.
Hancock NT, Cath TY (2009) Solute coupled diffusion in osmotically driven membrane processes. Environ Sci Technol 43(17):6769–6775CrossRefPubMed
37.
She Q, Jin X, Tang CY (2012) Osmotic power production from salinity gradient resource by pressure retarded osmosis: effects of operating conditions and reverse solute diffusion. J Membr Sci 401-402:262–273CrossRef
38.
Zheng Y, Huang MH, Chen L, Zheng W, Xie PK, Xu Q (2015) Comparison of tetracycline rejection in reclaimed water by three kinds of forward osmosis membranes. Desalination 359:113–122CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
High performance forward osmosis cellulose acetate (CA) membrane modified by polyvinyl alcohol and polydopamine
verfasst von
Hai-ming Song
Li-jing Zhu
Zhi-xiang Zeng
Qun-ji Xue
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2018
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Polymer Research / Ausgabe 7/2018
Print ISSN: 1022-9760
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8935
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-018-1555-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2018

Journal of Polymer Research 7/2018 Zur Ausgabe

ORIGINAL PAPER

Constituting a special redox surface-initiating system and realizing graft-polymerization of GMA on polysulfone microfiltration membrane

ORIGINAL PAPER

Melting performance of single screw extruders with a grooved melting zone

ORIGINAL PAPER

Influence of ether bond on degradation property of PBS-based copolymers at molecular level using molecular simulations

ORIGINAL PAPER

Construction and evaluation of the hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose-sodium alginate composite hydrogel system for sustained drug release

ORIGINAL PAPER

Enhancement of adhesion, mechanical strength and anti-corrosion by multilayer superhydrophobic coating embedded electroactive PANI/CNF nanocomposite

ORIGINAL PAPER

Synthesis and characterization of conjugated porous polyazomethines with excellent electrochemical energy storage performance

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise