nach oben

Policy Sciences

Erschienen in:

01.06.2015 | Research Note

Integration and interdisciplinarity: concepts, frameworks, and education

verfasst von: Susan G. Clark, Richard L. Wallace

Erschienen in: Policy Sciences | Ausgabe 2/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Humans face enormous and growing ecological and social problems. Knowledge and methods of inquiry are necessary to understand and address these problems. Although this seems obvious, arguments rage over which methods are reliable and whose perspectives and epistemology (disciplinary or otherwise) are best suited to address problems. To compound matters, knowledge is fragmented in its organization, classification, production, and use in academe, in the professions, and in society. A practical conceptualization of interdisciplinarity in the interests of integration is needed to address the multiple perspectives, epistemologies, and fragmentation inherent in these problems. Here, we offer a conception of integration that fosters an interrelated dynamic system of healthy people, society, and nature. Next, we look at “knowledge”—its classification, levels, and challenges. Following that, we review a model of integration almost a century old that has been abstracted into a practical, interdisciplinary meta-framework that organizes both diagnostics and prescriptive inquiry. Finally, educating about integration is a subject of central concern in many colleges and universities today, one that we discuss in terms of goals, student competence, educational designs, practical challenges, and how to address them. Our entire endeavor is couched in terms of the overarching goal of seeking the common interest of human dignity in healthy environments for all.

Vorheriger Artikel The composition of policy change: comparing Colorado’s 1977 and 2006 smoking bans

Nächster Artikel Only connect: Why government often ignores research

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abbott, A. (2001). Chaos of disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Anderies, J. M., Folke, C., Walker, B., & Ostrom, E. (2013). Aligning key concepts for global change policy: Robustness, resilience, and sustainability. Ecology and Society, 18(2), 8.

Apostel, L., & Vanlandschoot, J. (1994). Interdisciplinarity: The construction of worldviews and the dissemination of scientific results. Issues in Integrative Studies, 12, 9–22.

Arnspiger, C. V. (1959). Personality in social process: Values and strategies of individuals in a free society. Chicago: Follett.

Ascher, W., & Hirschfelder-Ascher, B. (2005). Revitalizing political psychology: The legacy of Harold D. Lasswell. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ash, N., Banco, H., Brown, C., Garcia, K., et al. (2010). Ecosystems and human well-being: A manual for assessment practitioners. Washington: Island Press.

Auer, M. R. (2006). The policy sciences in critical perspective. In J. Rabin, G. J. Miller, & W. B. Hildreth (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 541–562). London: Taylor & Francis.

Bammer, G. (2005). Integration and implementation sciences: Building a new specialization. Ecology and Society 10, 6. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art6/.

Ban, N. C., et al. (2013). A socio-ecological approach to conservation planning: Embedding social considerations. Ecology and Environment, 11(4), 194–202.

Barnosky, A. D., Hadly, E. A., Bascompte, J., Berlow, E. L., et al. (2012). Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere. Nature, 486, 52–58.

Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (Eds.). (2003). Navigating socio-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Biermann, F., Campe, S., & Jacob, K. (Eds.). (2004). Proceedings of the 2002 Berlin conference on the human dimensions of global environmental change—knowledge for the sustainability transition. The challenge for social science. Amsterdam, Berlin, Potsdam and Oldenburg: Global Governance Project.

Bohm, D., & Peat, F. D. (1987). Science, order, and creativity. New York: Bantam Books.

Bowers, C. A. (1997). The culture of denial: Why the environmental movement needs a strategy for reforming universities and public schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Brown, A. (1984). Forward. In D. H. Kerr (Ed.), Barriers to integrity: Modern modes of knowledge utilization (pp. ix–xi). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Brown, V. A. (2004). The more we are together…. Australian Planner, 41, 42–45.

Brown, S. R. (2006). A match made in heaven: A marginalized methodology for studying the marginalized. Quality & Quantity, 40, 361–382.

Brown, V. A. (2010). Collective inquiry and its wicked problems. In V. A. Brown, J. A. Harris, & J. Y. Russell (Eds.), Tackling wicked problems: Through the transdisciplinary imagination (pp. 61–81). London: Earthscan.

Brunner, R. D. (1996). A milestone in the policy sciences. Policy Sciences, 29, 45–68.

Brunner, R. D. (1997a). Raising standards: A prototyping strategy for undergraduate education. Policy Sciences, 30, 167–189.

Brunner, R. D. (1997b). Introduction to the policy sciences. Policy Sciences, 30, 191–215.

Brunner, R. D. (1997c). Book review of “Barriers and bridges to renewable of ecosystems and institutions”. Journal of Wildlife Management, 61, 1437–1439.

Brunner, R. D. (2006). A paradigm for practice. Policy Sciences, 39, 135–167.

Brunner, R. D. (2007). The world revolution of our time: A review and update. Policy Sciences, 40, 191–219.

Burgess, P. M., & Slonaker, L. L. (1978). The decision seminar: A strategy for problem-solving. Merschon Center, Paper No. 1. Columbus: Ohio State University.

Cardinale, J., et al. (2012). Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 486, 59–67.

Chapin, F. S, III, Kofinas, G. P., & Folke, C. (Eds.). (2009). Principles of ecosystem stewardship: Resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. New York: Springer.

Chapin, F. S., III, Mark, A. F., Mitchell, R. A., & Dickinson, K. J. M. (2012). Design principles for social-ecological transformation toward sustainability: Lessons from New Zealand Sense of Place. Ecosphere 3(5): art40. doi:10.1890/ES12-00009.1.

Charlesworth, J. C. (Ed.). (1972). Integration of the social sciences through policy analysis. Monograph 14. Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science.

Chettiparamb, A. (2007). Interdisciplinarity: A literature review. Cardiff: Higher Education Academy, Interdisciplinary Teaching and Learning Group, Cardiff University.

Clark, S. G. (2002). The policy process: A practical guide for natural resource professionals. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Clark, S. G. (2009). An informational approach to sustainability: “Intelligence” in conservation and natural resource management policy. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 28, 363–662.

Clark, S. G., Rutherford, M. B., Auer, M. R., Cherney, D. N., Wallace, R. L., Mattson, D. J., et al. (2011a). College and university environmental programs as a policy problem (part 1): Integrating knowledge, education, and action for a better world? Environmental Management, 47(5), 701–715.

Clark, S. G., Rutherford, M. B., Auer, M. R., Cherney, D. N., Wallace, R. L., Mattson, D. J., et al. (2011b). College and university environmental programs as a policy problem (part 2): Strategies for improvement. Environmental Management, 47, 716–726.

Clark, S. G., & Wallace, R. L. (2010). Learning interdisciplinary problem solving and leadership skills: A comparison of four designs. Report No. 24, 171–208. New Haven: Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies.

Clark, S. G., & Wallace, R. L. (2012). Interdisciplinary environmental leadership: Learning and teaching integrated problem solving. In D. R. Gallagher (Ed.), Environmental leadership: A reference handbook (pp. 420–429). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Connole, R. J. (1937). A study of the concept of integration in present-day curriculum making. Ph.D. thesis. Washington: Catholic University of America.

Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S., & Turner, R. K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152–158.

Das, A. K. (1998). Fankle and the realm of meaning. Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 36, 199–211.

Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Davies, M., & Devlin, M. (2007). Interdisciplinary higher education: Implications for teaching and learning. Melbourne: University of Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education.

DeFries, R. S., Ellis, E. C., Chapin, F. S., III, Matson, P. A., Turner, B. L., II, Agrawal, A., et al. (2012). Planetary opportunities: A social contract for global change science to contribute to a sustainable future. BioScience, 62, 603–606.

Diamond, J. M. (2005). Collapse: How society chooses to fail or succeed. New York: Viking.

Dickinson, L. A. (2007). Toward a “new” New Haven School of international law? Yale Journal of International Law, 32, 547–552.

Dovers, S. (2005). Clarifying the imperative of integration research for sustainable environmental management. Journal of Research Practice, 1, 1–19.

Eagleton, T. (2007). The meaning of life: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Easton, D. (1950). Harold Lasswell: Policy scientist for a democratic society. The Journal of Politics, 12(03), 450–477.

Eulau, H. (1958). H.D. Lasswell’s developmental analysis. The Western Political Quarterly, 229–242.

Eulau, H. (1968). The behavioral movement in political science: Personal document. Social Research, 35, 1–2.

Farr, J., Hacker, J. S., & Kazee, N. (2006). The policy scientist of democracy: The discipline of Harold D. Lasswell. American Political Science Review, 100(4), 579–587.

Feller, I. (2007). Interdisciplinarity: Paths taken and not taken. Change, Nov/Dec, 46–51.

Ferguson, N. (2011). Civilization: The West and the rest. New York: Penguin Press.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Foucault, M. (1994). The order of things: An archeology of the human sciences. New York: Vantage Books.

Frank, R. (1988). “Interdisciplinarity:” The first half-century. Items, 40, 73–78.

Frodeman, R., Klein, J. T., Mitchum, C., & Holbrook, J. B. (Eds.). (2010). The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. New York: Oxford University Press.

Fuller, S. (2010). Deviant interdisciplinarity. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 50–64). New York: Oxford University Press.

Game, E. T., Meijaard, E., & McDonald-Madden, E. (2013). Conservation in a wicked complex world: Challenges and solutions. Conservation Letters, 2013, 1–7.

Gao, Y., & Clark, S. G. (2014). Elephant ivory trade in China: Trends and drivers. Biological Conservation, 180, 23–30.

Geary, D. C. (2005). The origin of mind: Evolution of brain, cognition, and general Intelligence. Washington: The American Psychological Association.

Glied, S., Bakken, S., Formicola, A., Gebbie, K., & Lason, E. L. (2007). Institutional challenges of interdisciplinary research centres. Journal of Research Administration, 38(2), 28–36.

Griffin, G. (2006). Interdisciplinarity in interdisciplinary research programmes in the UK. www.hull.ac.uk/researchintegration.

Gumport, P. J., & Snydman, S. K. (2002). The formal organization of knowledge: An analysis of academic structure. Journal of Higher Education, 73(3), 375–408.

Gunderson, L. L. H., Holling, C. S., & Light, S. S. (Eds.). (1995). Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. New York: Columbia University Press.

Hockstra, A. Y., & Wiedmann, T. O. (2014). Humanity’s unsustainable environmental footprint. Science, 344(6188), 1114–1117.

Hohl, A., & Clark, S. G. (2010). Best practices: The concept, an assessment, and recommendations. Report, 24, 151–170. New Haven: Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies.

Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 4, 390–405.

Hopkins, L. T. (1937). Integration: Its meaning and application. New York: D. Appleton-Century.

Jantsch, E. (1970). Inter- and transdisciplinary university: A systems approach to education and innovation. Policy Sciences, 1, 403–423.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Kegan, R., & Lahey, L. L. (2009). Immunity to change: How to overcome it and unlock potential in yourself and your organization. Boston: Harvard Business Review.

Kelman, H. C. (2006). Interests, relationships, identities: Three central issues for individuals and groups in negotiating their social environment. American Review of Psychology, 57, 1–26.

King, P. M. (2009). Principles of development and developmental change underlying theories of cognitive and moral development. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 97–620.

King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

Klein, J. T. (2005). Humanities, culture, and interdisciplinarity: The changing American academy. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Klein, J. T. (2010). A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 16–30). New York: Oxford University Press.

Kloss, R. J. (1994). A nudge is best helping students through the Perry scheme of intellectual development. College Teaching, 42(4), 151–164.

Krohn, W. (2010). Interdisciplinary case and disciplinary knowledge. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 31–49). New York: Oxford University Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Lasswell, H. D. (1968). Policy sciences. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 12, 181–189.

Lasswell, H. D. (1970). The emerging conception of the policy sciences. Policy Sciences, 1, 3–14.

Lasswell, H. D. (1971a). From fragmentation to configuration. Policy Sciences, 2, 439–446.

Lasswell, H. D. (1971b). A pre-view of policy sciences. New York: American Elsevier.

Lasswell, H. D., & Kaplan, A. (1950). Power and society: A framework for political inquiry. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Lasswell, H. D., & McDougal, M. S. (1943). Legal education and public policy: Professional training in the public interest. Yale Law Journal, 52, 203–295.

Lasswell, H. D., & McDougal, M. S. (1992). Jurisprudence for a free society: Studies in law, science, and policy. New Haven: New Haven Press.

Latour, B. (2004). The politics of nature: How to bring the sciences back into democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Lattuca, L. R. (2001). Considering interdisciplinarity. In L. R. Lattuca (Ed.), Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty (pp. 1–22). Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

Lerner, D., & Lasswell, H. D. (1951). The policy sciences: Recent developments in scope and method. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45(2), 123–152.

Lindblom, C. E., & Cohen, D. K. (1979). Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem solving. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Mandelbaum, M. (2011). The ideas that conquered the world: Peace, democracy, and free markets in the twenty-first century. New York: Public Affairs.

Maniates, M. (2013). Teaching for turbulence. In State of the world 2013: Is sustainability still possible? E. Assadourian & T. Prugh, project directors (pp. 255–268). Washington: Island Press.

Mann, T. E., & Ornstein, N. J. (2012). It’s even worse than it looks. New York: Basic Books.

Mansilla, V. B. (2010). Learning to synthesize: The development of interdisciplinarity understanding. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 288–306). New York: Oxford University Press.

Mattson, D. J., & Clark, S. G. (2011). Human dignity in concept and practice. Policy Sciences, 44, 303–320.

Mattson, D. J., Karl, H., & Clark, S. G. (2012). Values in natural resource management and policy. In H. Karl, et al. (Eds.), Restoring lands—Coordinating science, politics and action (pp. 239–260). New York: Springer.

McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model of personality and its application. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215.

McCroskey, J., & Einbinder, S. D. (Eds.). (1998). Universities and communities: Remaking professional and interprofessional education for the next century. Westport, CT: Praeger.

McDougal, M. S. (1971). Legal basis for securing the integrity of the earth-space environment. Annals New York Academy of Sciences, 184(1), 375–395.

McDougal, M. S., Lasswell, H. D., & Chen, L. (1980). Human rights and world public order: Basic policies of an international law of human dignity. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Mezirow, J. (2012). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformative theory. In E. W. Taylor, P. Cranton, & Associates (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 73–115). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Miller, R. C. (1982). Varieties of interdisciplinary approaches in the social sciences. Issues in Integrative Studies, 1, 1–37.

Morris, I. (2010). Why the west rules—for now. New York: Picador, Farrar, Straus and Giroux Publishers.

Mulkay, M. (1979). Science and the sociology of knowledge. London: George Allen & Unwin.

Muth, R., & Bolland, J. M. (1983). Social context: A key to effective problem-solving. Planning and Change, 14, 214–225.

Muth, R., Finley, M. M., & Muth, M. F. (Eds.). (1990). Harold D. Lasswell: An annotated bibliography. New York: Springer.

Nagan, W. P. (2013). Contextual-configurative jurisprudence: The law, science and polices of human dignity. Lake Mary, FL: Vandeplas Publishing.

National Research Council. (1999). Our common journey: A transition toward sustainability. Washington: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council of the National Academies. (2011). Sustainability and the U.S. EPA. Washington: The National Academies Press.

Ogden, L., et al. (2013). Global assemblages, resilience, and Earth stewardship in the Anthropocene. Ecology and Environment, 11(7), 341–347.

Orlov, D. (2013). The five stages of collapse. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.

Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and transition to a postmodern world. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Orr, D. W. (1994). Earth in mind: On education, environment, and the human prospect. Washington: Island Press.

Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Organization, 39, 7–25.

Ostrom, E., & Cox, M. (2010). Moving beyond panaceas: A multitiered diagnostic approach for social-ecological analysis. Environmental Conservation, 37, 455–463.

Pallant, E. (1997). Assessment and evaluation of environmental problems: Teaching students to think for themselves. Journal of College Science Teaching, 26(3), 167–171.

Palmer, M. A. (2012). Socioenvironmental sustainability and actionable science. BioScience, 62(1), 5–6.

Parker, J. (2010). Competencies for interdisciplinarity in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability, 11, 325–338.

Parsons, W. (1995). Public policy: An introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Petrie, H. G. (1976). Do you see what I see? The epistemology of interdisciplinary inquiry. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 10(1), 29–43.

Piaget, J. (1972). The epistemology of interdisciplinary relationships. In L. Apostel, G. Berger, A. Briggs, & G. Michaud (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities (pp. 127–140). Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

Pielke, R. A, Jr. (2007). The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Reisman, W. M. (2008). Development and nation-building: A framework for policy-oriented inquiry. Maine Law Review, 62, 310–315.

Rentfrow, P. J., Jost, J. T., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). A theory of the emergence, persistence, and expression of geographic variation in psychological characteristics. Perspective on Psychological Science, 3, 339–369.

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Russell, J. Y. (2006). Human ecology: A proposal for an open and critical transdisciplinary inquiry. PhD thesis. Canberra: Australian National University.

Russell, J. Y. (2010). A philosophical framework for an open and critical transdisciplinary inquiry. In V. Brown, et al. (Eds.), Tackling wicked problems: Through the transdisciplinary imagination (pp. 31–60). London: Earthscan.

Sarewitz, D. (2010). Against holism. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 65–75). New York: Oxford University Press.

Saylan, C., & Blumstein, D. T. (2011). The failure of environmental education. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Schmidt, J. C. (2011). What is a problem? On problem-orientd interdisciplinarity. Poiessi Prax, 7, 249–274.

Schön, D. A. (1987). Implications for improving professional education. In Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions (pp. 303–326). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Sharachchandra, L., & Norgaard, R. B. (2005). Practicing interdisciplinarity. BioScience, 55, 967–975.

Simon, H. (1983). Reason in human affairs. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Smith, G. A. (1992). Education and the environment: Learning to live within limits. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Smith, G. A., & Williams, D. R. (1999). Ecological education in action: On weaving education, culture, and the environment. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Tainter, J. A. (2006). Social complexity and sustainability. Ecological Complexity, 3, 91–103.

Taylor, P. C., & Medina, M. N. D. (2013). Educational research paradigms: From positivism to multiparadigmatic. Journal of Meaning-Centered Education, 1, 1–10.

Trompf, G. W. (2011). The classification of the sciences and the quest for interdisciplinarity: A brief history of ideas from ancient philosophy to contemporary environmental science. Environmental Conservation, 38, 113–128.

UNCSD (United Nations Commission for Sustainable Development). (2007). Indicators of sustainable development: Guidelines and methodologies (3rd ed.). New York: United Nations.

Walker, J., & Cooper, M. (2011). Genealogies of resilience: From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Security Dialogue, 42, 143. doi:10.1177/096701611399616.

Wallace, R. L., & Clark, S. G. (2014). Convergent evolution in the interest of integrative problem solving: Connecting the policy sciences and interdisciplinary studies. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 32, 134–169.

Weingart, P. (2010). A short history of knowledge formations. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 3–14). New York: Oxford University Press.

Weston, B. H. (2008). Human rights and nation-building in cross-cultural settings. Maine Law Review, 62, 318–346.

Wiessner, S. (2010). The New Haven School of Jurisprudence: A universal tool kit for understanding and shaping law. Asia Pacific Law Review, 18(1), 45–61.

Wilkinson, K. M., Clark, S. G., & Burch, W. R. (2007). Other voices, other ways, better practices: Bridging local and professional environmental knowledge. Report 14. New Haven: Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies.

Yalom, I. D. (1980). Existential psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.

Titel: Integration and interdisciplinarity: concepts, frameworks, and education
verfasst von: Susan G. Clark
Richard L. Wallace
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2015
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Policy Sciences / Ausgabe 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0032-2687
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0891
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9210-4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2015

Conceptualizing the policy work of partisan advisers

Only connect: Why government often ignores research

Foreign aid, economic globalization, and pollution

The composition of policy change: comparing Colorado’s 1977 and 2006 smoking bans

Integrated policy approaches and policy failure: the case of Australia’s Oceans Policy

Premium Partner