Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Policy Sciences 3/2015

01.09.2015 | Research article

Policy forums: Why do they exist and what are they used for?

verfasst von: Manuel Fischer, Philip Leifeld

Erschienen in: Policy Sciences | Ausgabe 3/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Policy forums are issue-based intermediary organizations where diverse types of political and societal actors repeatedly interact. Policy forums are important elements of modern governance systems as they allow actors to learn, negotiate, or build trust. They can vary in composition, size, membership logic, and other distinct features. This article lays the foundation of a theory of policy forums based on three interrelated elements: First, it discusses conditions for the formation of a forum and describes the logic of these organizations as one of an asymmetric multipartite exchange. Second, it enumerates the potential set of goals and motivations of participating actors that are fed into this exchange. Third, it proposes eight different dimensions on which policy forums differ and which affect the exchange mechanisms among actors. We claim that empirical work on policy forums should systematically take these elements into account and propose elements of a research agenda.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
These concepts are all interchangeably called “policy forums” in the remainder of this article because we would like to provide a unified framework for their analysis.
 
2
An example is the Global Policy Forum with its advocacy for accountability and citizen participation.
 
3
It may be possible to understand policy forums and participation of actors therein based on other theoretical premises. For example, sociological institutionalism would posit that all forums take a similar form because of prevalent norms in the wider political system (“institutional isomorphism,” see DiMaggio and Powell 1983) or that actors participate in forums due to mutually shared norms in a policy sector. Similarly, governance approaches would emphasize that forums per se come about as a functional requirement of horizontal coordination between political actors (Powell 1990). However, while insights from these theoretical strands may be valuable for explaining the existence of a phenomenon like policy forums per se, only an individual rational-choice institutionalist account permits us to discriminate between the different characteristics of policy forums and the actors’ related individual resources and needs.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Agrawala, S. (1999). Early science–policy interactions in climate change: Lessons from the advisory group on greenhouse gases. Global Environmental Change, 9(2), 157–169.CrossRef Agrawala, S. (1999). Early science–policy interactions in climate change: Lessons from the advisory group on greenhouse gases. Global Environmental Change, 9(2), 157–169.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.CrossRef Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bächtiger, A., & Hangartner, D. (2010). When deliberative theory meets empirical political science: Theoretical and methodological challenges in political deliberation. Political Studies, 58, 609–629.CrossRef Bächtiger, A., & Hangartner, D. (2010). When deliberative theory meets empirical political science: Theoretical and methodological challenges in political deliberation. Political Studies, 58, 609–629.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1991). Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. The Journal of Politics, 53(4), 1044–1074.CrossRef Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1991). Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. The Journal of Politics, 53(4), 1044–1074.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Berardo, R. (2009). Generalized trust in multi-organizational policy arenas: Studying its emergence from a network perspective. Political Research Quarterly, 62(1), 178–189.CrossRef Berardo, R. (2009). Generalized trust in multi-organizational policy arenas: Studying its emergence from a network perspective. Political Research Quarterly, 62(1), 178–189.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Berardo, R., Lubell, M., & Scholz, J. T. (2013). Who participates in an ecology of games and why? A comparison across weakly and strongly institutionalized policy-making systems. Paper presented at 2013 MPSA meeting, Chicago. Berardo, R., Lubell, M., & Scholz, J. T. (2013). Who participates in an ecology of games and why? A comparison across weakly and strongly institutionalized policy-making systems. Paper presented at 2013 MPSA meeting, Chicago.
Zurück zum Zitat Bogason, P., & Musso, J. A. (2006). The democratic prospects of network governance. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 3–18.CrossRef Bogason, P., & Musso, J. A. (2006). The democratic prospects of network governance. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 3–18.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Börzel, T. A. (1998). Organizing Babylon—On the different conceptions of policy networks. Public Administration, 76(2), 253–273.CrossRef Börzel, T. A. (1998). Organizing Babylon—On the different conceptions of policy networks. Public Administration, 76(2), 253–273.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bouwen, P. (2004). Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Union institutions. European Journal of Political Research, 43(3), 337–369.CrossRef Bouwen, P. (2004). Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Union institutions. European Journal of Political Research, 43(3), 337–369.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Braun, D. (1993). Who governs intermediary agencies? Principal-agent relations in research policy-making. Journal of Public Policy, 13(2), 135–162.CrossRef Braun, D. (1993). Who governs intermediary agencies? Principal-agent relations in research policy-making. Journal of Public Policy, 13(2), 135–162.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Busch, A. (2009). Politikwissenschaft und Politikberatung: Reflektionen anlässlich der aktuellen Krise. Zeitschrift für Politikberatung, 2(3), 467–484.CrossRef Busch, A. (2009). Politikwissenschaft und Politikberatung: Reflektionen anlässlich der aktuellen Krise. Zeitschrift für Politikberatung, 2(3), 467–484.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cash, D. W., Adger, W. N., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., et al. (2006). Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 8–19. Cash, D. W., Adger, W. N., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., et al. (2006). Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 8–19.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi, T., & Robertson, P. J. (2014). Deliberation and decision in collaborative governance: A simulation of approaches to mitigate power imbalance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 495–518.CrossRef Choi, T., & Robertson, P. J. (2014). Deliberation and decision in collaborative governance: A simulation of approaches to mitigate power imbalance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 495–518.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Crona, B. I., & Parker, J. N. (2012). Learning in support of governance: Theories, methods, and a framework to assess how bridging organizations contribute to adaptive resource governance. Ecology and Society, 17(1), 32–50.CrossRef Crona, B. I., & Parker, J. N. (2012). Learning in support of governance: Theories, methods, and a framework to assess how bridging organizations contribute to adaptive resource governance. Ecology and Society, 17(1), 32–50.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Damro, C. (2006). The new trade politics and EU competition policy: Shopping for convergence and co-operation. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(6), 867–886.CrossRef Damro, C. (2006). The new trade politics and EU competition policy: Shopping for convergence and co-operation. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(6), 867–886.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.CrossRef DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dutton, W. H. (1995). The ecology of games and its enemies. Communication Theory, 5(4), 379–392.CrossRef Dutton, W. H. (1995). The ecology of games and its enemies. Communication Theory, 5(4), 379–392.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dutton, W., Schneider, V., & Vedel, T. (2012). Ecologies of games shaping large technical systems: Cases from telecommunications to the internet (pp. 49–68). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. Dutton, W., Schneider, V., & Vedel, T. (2012). Ecologies of games shaping large technical systems: Cases from telecommunications to the internet (pp. 49–68). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Edelenbos, J., Schie, N., & Gerrits, L. (2010). Organizing interfaces between government institutions and interactive governance. Policy Sciences, 43(1), 73–94.CrossRef Edelenbos, J., Schie, N., & Gerrits, L. (2010). Organizing interfaces between government institutions and interactive governance. Policy Sciences, 43(1), 73–94.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 1–29.CrossRef Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 1–29.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Feiock, R. C. (2013). The institutional collective action framework. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 397–425.CrossRef Feiock, R. C. (2013). The institutional collective action framework. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 397–425.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Feiock, R. C., & Scholz, J. T. (2010). Self-organizing governance of institutional collective action dilemmas (pp. 3–26). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. Feiock, R. C., & Scholz, J. T. (2010). Self-organizing governance of institutional collective action dilemmas (pp. 3–26). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Feldman, M. S., & Khademian, A. M. (2007). The role of the public manager in inclusion: Creating communities of participation. Governance, 20(2), 305–324.CrossRef Feldman, M. S., & Khademian, A. M. (2007). The role of the public manager in inclusion: Creating communities of participation. Governance, 20(2), 305–324.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 30, 441–473.CrossRef Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 30, 441–473.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gollier, C., & Treich, N. (2003). Decision-making under scientific uncertainty: The economics of the precautionary principle. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 27(1), 77–103.CrossRef Gollier, C., & Treich, N. (2003). Decision-making under scientific uncertainty: The economics of the precautionary principle. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 27(1), 77–103.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gornitzka, Å., & Sverdrup, U. (2008). Who consults? The configuration of expert groups in the European Union. West European Politics, 31(4), 725–750.CrossRef Gornitzka, Å., & Sverdrup, U. (2008). Who consults? The configuration of expert groups in the European Union. West European Politics, 31(4), 725–750.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Graz, J.-C. (2003). How powerful are transnational elite clubs? The social myth of the World Economic Forum. New Political Economy, 8(3), 321–340.CrossRef Graz, J.-C. (2003). How powerful are transnational elite clubs? The social myth of the World Economic Forum. New Political Economy, 8(3), 321–340.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gulbrandsen, M. (2011). Research institutes as hybrid organizations: Central challenges to their legitimacy. Policy Sciences, 44, 215–230.CrossRef Gulbrandsen, M. (2011). Research institutes as hybrid organizations: Central challenges to their legitimacy. Policy Sciences, 44, 215–230.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Guston, D. H. (2001). Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 26(4), 399–408.CrossRef Guston, D. H. (2001). Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 26(4), 399–408.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Habermas, J., Lennox, S., & Lennox, F. (1964). The public sphere: An encyclopedia article. In S. E. Bonner & D. Kellner (Eds.), Critical theory and society: A reader. New York: Routledge. Habermas, J., Lennox, S., & Lennox, F. (1964). The public sphere: An encyclopedia article. In S. E. Bonner & D. Kellner (Eds.), Critical theory and society: A reader. New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Hahn, T., Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Johansson, K. (2006). Trust-building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: The role of a bridging organization for adaptive comanagement of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden. Human Ecology, 34(4), 573–592.CrossRef Hahn, T., Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Johansson, K. (2006). Trust-building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: The role of a bridging organization for adaptive comanagement of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden. Human Ecology, 34(4), 573–592.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36, 175–195.CrossRef Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36, 175–195.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44, 936–957.CrossRef Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44, 936–957.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hardy, S. D., & Koontz, T. M. (2009). Rules for collaboration: Institutional analysis of group membership and levels of action in watershed partnerships. The Policy Studies Journal, 37, 3.CrossRef Hardy, S. D., & Koontz, T. M. (2009). Rules for collaboration: Institutional analysis of group membership and levels of action in watershed partnerships. The Policy Studies Journal, 37, 3.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Häusermann, S., Mach, A., & Papadopoulos, Y. (2004). From corporatism to partisan politics: Social policy making under strain in Switzerland. Swiss Political Science Review, 10(2), 33–59.CrossRef Häusermann, S., Mach, A., & Papadopoulos, Y. (2004). From corporatism to partisan politics: Social policy making under strain in Switzerland. Swiss Political Science Review, 10(2), 33–59.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Head, B. W. (2008). Assessing network-based collaborations: Effectiveness for whom? Public Management Review, 10(6), 733–749.CrossRef Head, B. W. (2008). Assessing network-based collaborations: Effectiveness for whom? Public Management Review, 10(6), 733–749.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Heclo, H. (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment. In A. King (Ed.), The new American political system (pp. 87–124). Washington: American Enterprise Institute. Heclo, H. (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment. In A. King (Ed.), The new American political system (pp. 87–124). Washington: American Enterprise Institute.
Zurück zum Zitat Hendriks, C. M. (2005). Participatory storylines and their influence on deliberative forums. Policy Sciences, 38, 1–20.CrossRef Hendriks, C. M. (2005). Participatory storylines and their influence on deliberative forums. Policy Sciences, 38, 1–20.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hendriks, C. M. (2006). When the forum meets interest politics: Strategic uses of public deliberation. Politics and Society, 34(4), 571–602.CrossRef Hendriks, C. M. (2006). When the forum meets interest politics: Strategic uses of public deliberation. Politics and Society, 34(4), 571–602.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hoberg, G., & Morawski, E. (2008). Policy change through sector intersection: Forest and aboriginal policy in Clayoquot Sound. Canadian Public Administration, 40(3), 387–414.CrossRef Hoberg, G., & Morawski, E. (2008). Policy change through sector intersection: Forest and aboriginal policy in Clayoquot Sound. Canadian Public Administration, 40(3), 387–414.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hoppe, R. (2011). Institutional constraints and practical problems in deliberative and participatory policy making. Policy and Politics, 39(2), 163–168.CrossRef Hoppe, R. (2011). Institutional constraints and practical problems in deliberative and participatory policy making. Policy and Politics, 39(2), 163–168.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jamal, T., & Getz, D. (1999). Community roundtables for tourism-related conflicts: The dialectics of consensus and process structures. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 7(3–4), 290–313.CrossRef Jamal, T., & Getz, D. (1999). Community roundtables for tourism-related conflicts: The dialectics of consensus and process structures. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 7(3–4), 290–313.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jasanoff, S. S. (1987). Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science. Social Studies of Science, 17(2), 195–230.CrossRef Jasanoff, S. S. (1987). Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science. Social Studies of Science, 17(2), 195–230.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jasanoff, S. (1990). The fifth branch: Science advisors as policymakers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Jasanoff, S. (1990). The fifth branch: Science advisors as policymakers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Jasanoff, S. (2011). Designs on nature: Science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Jasanoff, S. (2011). Designs on nature: Science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Joerges, C., & Neyer, J. (1997). From intergovernmental bargaining to deliberative political processes: The constitutionalisation of comitology. European Law Journal, 3(3), 273–299.CrossRef Joerges, C., & Neyer, J. (1997). From intergovernmental bargaining to deliberative political processes: The constitutionalisation of comitology. European Law Journal, 3(3), 273–299.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jones, M. D., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (2009). Trans-subsystem dynamics: Policy topography, mass opinion, and policy change. The Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 37–58.CrossRef Jones, M. D., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (2009). Trans-subsystem dynamics: Policy topography, mass opinion, and policy change. The Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 37–58.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kinzig, A., & Starrett, D. (2003). Coping with uncertainty: A call for a new science-policy forum. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 32(5), 330–335.CrossRef Kinzig, A., & Starrett, D. (2003). Coping with uncertainty: A call for a new science-policy forum. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 32(5), 330–335.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Klijn, E.-H., Koppenjan, J., & Termeer, K. (1995). Managing networks in the public sector: A theoretical study of management strategies in policy networks. Public Administration, 73(3), 437–454.CrossRef Klijn, E.-H., Koppenjan, J., & Termeer, K. (1995). Managing networks in the public sector: A theoretical study of management strategies in policy networks. Public Administration, 73(3), 437–454.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Klijn, E.-H., & Skelcher, C. (2007). Democracy and governance networks: Compatible or not? Public Administration, 85(3), 587–608.CrossRef Klijn, E.-H., & Skelcher, C. (2007). Democracy and governance networks: Compatible or not? Public Administration, 85(3), 587–608.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Knight, J. (1992). Institutions and social conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Knight, J. (1992). Institutions and social conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Koontz, T. M., & Moore Johnson, E. (2004). One size does not fit all: Matching breadth of stakeholder participation to watershed groups accomplishments. Policy Sciences, 37, 185–204.CrossRef Koontz, T. M., & Moore Johnson, E. (2004). One size does not fit all: Matching breadth of stakeholder participation to watershed groups accomplishments. Policy Sciences, 37, 185–204.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Krause, G. A., & Douglas, J. W. (2012). Organizational structure and the optimal design of policymaking panels: Evidence from consensus group commissions’ revenue forecasts in the American states. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1), 135–149.CrossRef Krause, G. A., & Douglas, J. W. (2012). Organizational structure and the optimal design of policymaking panels: Evidence from consensus group commissions’ revenue forecasts in the American states. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1), 135–149.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Krick, E. (2006). Politikberatung durch Expertengremien: Legitimation und Funktion der ‘Hartz’- und der ‘Rürup’-Kommission. Arbeitspapier 2/2006, University of Osnabrück, Social Science Faculty, Osnabrück. Krick, E. (2006). Politikberatung durch Expertengremien: Legitimation und Funktion der ‘Hartz’- und der ‘Rürup’-Kommission. Arbeitspapier 2/2006, University of Osnabrück, Social Science Faculty, Osnabrück.
Zurück zum Zitat Krueger, A. O. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. The American Economic Review, 64(3), 291–303. Krueger, A. O. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. The American Economic Review, 64(3), 291–303.
Zurück zum Zitat Landau, M. (1969). Redundancy, rationality, and the problem of duplication and overlap. Public Administration Review, 29(4), 346–358.CrossRef Landau, M. (1969). Redundancy, rationality, and the problem of duplication and overlap. Public Administration Review, 29(4), 346–358.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Landre, B. K., & Knuth, B. A. (1993). Success of citizen advisory committees in consensus-based water resources planning in the Great Lakes basin. Society and Natural Resources, 6(3), 229–257.CrossRef Landre, B. K., & Knuth, B. A. (1993). Success of citizen advisory committees in consensus-based water resources planning in the Great Lakes basin. Society and Natural Resources, 6(3), 229–257.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leach, W. D., Pelkey, N. W., & Sabatier, P. A. (2002). Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(4), 645–670.CrossRef Leach, W. D., Pelkey, N. W., & Sabatier, P. A. (2002). Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(4), 645–670.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leifeld, P., & Schneider, V. (2012). Information exchange in policy networks. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 731–744.CrossRef Leifeld, P., & Schneider, V. (2012). Information exchange in policy networks. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 731–744.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lentsch, J., & Weingart, P. (2011). The politics of scientific advice: Institutional design for quality assurance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Lentsch, J., & Weingart, P. (2011). The politics of scientific advice: Institutional design for quality assurance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Long, N. E. (1958). The local community as an ecology of games. American Journal of Sociology, 64, 251–261.CrossRef Long, N. E. (1958). The local community as an ecology of games. American Journal of Sociology, 64, 251–261.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lövbrand, E. (2007). Pure science or policy involvement? Ambiguous boundary-work for Swedish carbon cycle science. Environmental Science and Policy, 10(1), 39–47.CrossRef Lövbrand, E. (2007). Pure science or policy involvement? Ambiguous boundary-work for Swedish carbon cycle science. Environmental Science and Policy, 10(1), 39–47.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lubell, M. (2003). Collaborative institutions, belief-systems, and perceived policy effectiveness. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 309–323.CrossRef Lubell, M. (2003). Collaborative institutions, belief-systems, and perceived policy effectiveness. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 309–323.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lubell, M. (2004). Collaborative environmental institutions: All talk and no action? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(3), 549–573.CrossRef Lubell, M. (2004). Collaborative environmental institutions: All talk and no action? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(3), 549–573.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lubell, M. (2007). Familiarity breeds trust: Collective action in a policy domain. Journal of Politics, 69, 237–250.CrossRef Lubell, M. (2007). Familiarity breeds trust: Collective action in a policy domain. Journal of Politics, 69, 237–250.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lubell, M. (2013). Governing institutional complexity: The ecology of games framework. The Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 537–559.CrossRef Lubell, M. (2013). Governing institutional complexity: The ecology of games framework. The Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 537–559.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lubell, M., Henry, A. D., & McCoy, M. (2010). Collaborative institutions in an ecology of games. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 287–300.CrossRef Lubell, M., Henry, A. D., & McCoy, M. (2010). Collaborative institutions in an ecology of games. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 287–300.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lubell, M., Schneider, M., Scholz, J. T., & Mete, M. (2002). Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 148–163.CrossRef Lubell, M., Schneider, M., Scholz, J. T., & Mete, M. (2002). Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 148–163.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lundin, M., & Öberg, P. (2014). Expert knowledge use and deliberation in local policy making. Policy Sciences, 47, 25–49.CrossRef Lundin, M., & Öberg, P. (2014). Expert knowledge use and deliberation in local policy making. Policy Sciences, 47, 25–49.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McAllister, R. R. J., McCrea, R., & Lubell, M. N. (2013). Policy networks, stakeholder interactions and climate adaptation in the region of South East Queensland, Australia. Regional Environmental Change, 14(2), 527–539.CrossRef McAllister, R. R. J., McCrea, R., & Lubell, M. N. (2013). Policy networks, stakeholder interactions and climate adaptation in the region of South East Queensland, Australia. Regional Environmental Change, 14(2), 527–539.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Molina, O., & Rhodes, M. (2002). Corporatism: The past, present, and future of a concept. Annual Review of Political Science, 5, 305–331.CrossRef Molina, O., & Rhodes, M. (2002). Corporatism: The past, present, and future of a concept. Annual Review of Political Science, 5, 305–331.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nagel, P. (2006). Policy games and venue-shopping: Working the stakeholder interface to broker policy change in rehabilitation services. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 65(4), 3–16.CrossRef Nagel, P. (2006). Policy games and venue-shopping: Working the stakeholder interface to broker policy change in rehabilitation services. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 65(4), 3–16.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Öberg, P. (2002). Does administrative corporatism promote trust and deliberation? Governance, 15(4), 455–475.CrossRef Öberg, P. (2002). Does administrative corporatism promote trust and deliberation? Governance, 15(4), 455–475.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Parkins, J. (2002). Forest management and advisory groups in Alberta: An empirical critique of an emergent public sphere. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 27(2), 163–184.CrossRef Parkins, J. (2002). Forest management and advisory groups in Alberta: An empirical critique of an emergent public sphere. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 27(2), 163–184.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
Zurück zum Zitat Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336. Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.
Zurück zum Zitat Pralle, S. B. (2003). Venue shopping, political strategy, and policy change: The internationalization of Canadian forest advocacy. Journal of Public Policy, 23(3), 233–260.CrossRef Pralle, S. B. (2003). Venue shopping, political strategy, and policy change: The internationalization of Canadian forest advocacy. Journal of Public Policy, 23(3), 233–260.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 229–252.CrossRef Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 229–252.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rhodes, R. A. W., & Marsh, D. (1992). New directions in the study of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21(1–2), 181–205.CrossRef Rhodes, R. A. W., & Marsh, D. (1992). New directions in the study of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21(1–2), 181–205.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 25(1), 3–29.CrossRef Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 25(1), 3–29.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sabatier, P. A. (1987). Knowledge, policy-oriented learning, and policy change: An advocacy coalition framework. Science Communication, 8, 649–692.CrossRef Sabatier, P. A. (1987). Knowledge, policy-oriented learning, and policy change: An advocacy coalition framework. Science Communication, 8, 649–692.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scharpf, F. W. (1988). The joint-decision trap: Lessons from German federalism and European integration. Public Administration, 66, 239–278.CrossRef Scharpf, F. W. (1988). The joint-decision trap: Lessons from German federalism and European integration. Public Administration, 66, 239–278.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scharpf, F. W. (2006). The joint-decision trap revisited. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(4), 845–864.CrossRef Scharpf, F. W. (2006). The joint-decision trap revisited. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(4), 845–864.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scholz, J. T., & Stiftel, B. (2005). Adaptive governance and water conflict. Resources for the future. Washington, DC: RFF Press. Scholz, J. T., & Stiftel, B. (2005). Adaptive governance and water conflict. Resources for the future. Washington, DC: RFF Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6), 849–873.CrossRef Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6), 849–873.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Siaroff, A. (1999). Corporatism in 24 industrial democracies: Meaning and measurement. European Journal of Political Research, 36, 175–205. Siaroff, A. (1999). Corporatism in 24 industrial democracies: Meaning and measurement. European Journal of Political Research, 36, 175–205.
Zurück zum Zitat Smaldino, P. E., & Lubell, M. (2011). An institutional mechanism for assortment in an ecology of games. PLoS One, 6(8), e23019.CrossRef Smaldino, P. E., & Lubell, M. (2011). An institutional mechanism for assortment in an ecology of games. PLoS One, 6(8), e23019.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sörensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). The democratic anchorage of governance networks. Scandinavian Political Studies, 28(3), 195–218.CrossRef Sörensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). The democratic anchorage of governance networks. Scandinavian Political Studies, 28(3), 195–218.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Steelman, T. A., & Ascher, W. (1997). Public involvement methods in natural resource policy making: Advantages, disadvantages and trade-offs. Policy Sciences, 30, 71–90.CrossRef Steelman, T. A., & Ascher, W. (1997). Public involvement methods in natural resource policy making: Advantages, disadvantages and trade-offs. Policy Sciences, 30, 71–90.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Streeck, W., & Schmitter, P. C. (1985). Community, market, state—and associations? The prospective contribution of interest governance to social order. European Sociological Review, 1(2), 119–138. Streeck, W., & Schmitter, P. C. (1985). Community, market, state—and associations? The prospective contribution of interest governance to social order. European Sociological Review, 1(2), 119–138.
Zurück zum Zitat The LSE GV314 Group. (2013). Evaluation under contract: Government pressure and the production of policy research. Public Administration, 92(1), 224–239.CrossRef The LSE GV314 Group. (2013). Evaluation under contract: Government pressure and the production of policy research. Public Administration, 92(1), 224–239.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson, D. F. (2008). Deliberative democratic theory and empirical political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 497–520.CrossRef Thompson, D. F. (2008). Deliberative democratic theory and empirical political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 497–520.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66, 20–32.CrossRef Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66, 20–32.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Turcotte, M.-F., & Pasquero, J. (2001). The paradox of multistakeholder collaborative roundtables. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37(4), 447–464.CrossRef Turcotte, M.-F., & Pasquero, J. (2001). The paradox of multistakeholder collaborative roundtables. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37(4), 447–464.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van Waarden, F. (1992). Dimensions and types of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21(1), 29–52.CrossRef van Waarden, F. (1992). Dimensions and types of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21(1), 29–52.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vasseur, L., Lafrance, L., Ansseau, C., Renaud, D., Morin, D., & Audet, T. (1997). Advisory committee: A powerful tool for helping decision makers in environmental issues. Environmental Management, 21(3), 359–365.CrossRef Vasseur, L., Lafrance, L., Ansseau, C., Renaud, D., Morin, D., & Audet, T. (1997). Advisory committee: A powerful tool for helping decision makers in environmental issues. Environmental Management, 21(3), 359–365.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat von Beyme, K. (Ed.). (1988). Politik und wissenschaftliche Information der Politiker in modernen Industriegesellschaften. In Der Vergleich in der Politikwissenschaft (pp. 347–368). München: Piper. von Beyme, K. (Ed.). (1988). Politik und wissenschaftliche Information der Politiker in modernen Industriegesellschaften. In Der Vergleich in der Politikwissenschaft (pp. 347–368). München: Piper.
Zurück zum Zitat Weingart, P. (2006). ‘Demokratisierung’ der wissenschaftlichen Politikberatung. Eine Antwort auf die Legitimationsdilemmata im Verhältnis von Wissenschaft und Politik? In A. Heidelberger (Ed.), Politikberatung in Deutschland (pp. 73–84). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.CrossRef Weingart, P. (2006). ‘Demokratisierung’ der wissenschaftlichen Politikberatung. Eine Antwort auf die Legitimationsdilemmata im Verhältnis von Wissenschaft und Politik? In A. Heidelberger (Ed.), Politikberatung in Deutschland (pp. 73–84). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wilks, S. (2007). Boardization and corporate governance in the UK as a response to depoliticization and failing accountability. Public Policy and Administration, 22(4), 443–460. Wilks, S. (2007). Boardization and corporate governance in the UK as a response to depoliticization and failing accountability. Public Policy and Administration, 22(4), 443–460.
Zurück zum Zitat Woldendorp, J., & Keman, H. (2010). Dynamic institutional analysis: Measuring corporatist intermediation. Quality and Quantity, 44, 259–275.CrossRef Woldendorp, J., & Keman, H. (2010). Dynamic institutional analysis: Measuring corporatist intermediation. Quality and Quantity, 44, 259–275.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wolfe, M., Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2013). A failure to communicate: Agenda setting in media and policy studies. Political Communication, 30(2), 175–192.CrossRef Wolfe, M., Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2013). A failure to communicate: Agenda setting in media and policy studies. Political Communication, 30(2), 175–192.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Policy forums: Why do they exist and what are they used for?
verfasst von
Manuel Fischer
Philip Leifeld
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Policy Sciences / Ausgabe 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0032-2687
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0891
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9224-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2015

Policy Sciences 3/2015 Zur Ausgabe