Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Political Behavior
Erschienen in: Political Behavior 4/2020

05.03.2020 | Original Paper

The Urban–Rural Gulf in American Political Behavior

verfasst von: James G. Gimpel, Nathan Lovin, Bryant Moy, Andrew Reeves

Erschienen in: Political Behavior | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Urban–rural differences in partisan political loyalty are as familiar in the United States as they are in other countries. In this paper, we examine Gallup survey data from the early-2000s through 2018 to understand the urban–rural fissure that has been so noticeable in recent elections. We consider the potential mechanisms of an urban–rural political divide. We suggest that urban and rural dwellers oppose each other because they reside in far apart locations without much interaction and support different political parties because population size structures opinion quite differently in small towns compared with large cities. In particular, we consider the extent to which the compositional characteristics (i.e., race, income, education, etc.) of the individuals living in these locales drives the divide. We find that sizable urban–rural differences persist even after accounting for an array of individual-level characteristics that typically distinguish them.
Vorheriger Artikel The Cultural Realignment of State White Electorates in the 21st Century
Nächster Artikel Shades of Privilege: The Relationship Between Skin Color and Political Attitudes Among White Americans

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
While non-metropolitan locales may cast a far lower percentage of total statewide votes than found in metropolitan areas, these votes are often sufficiently one-sided in political preference to be decisive. The precise numbers depend on geographic definitions of “rural” or “non-metro.” The nation has become more metropolitan, but there remains a substantial population (19%) in rural areas the U.S. Census defines as “places” containing less than 2500 people. If one includes populations in towns of less than 25,000 but greater than 2500, there is about 26% of the total population in rural areas. (https://​www.​census.​gov/​prod/​cen2010/​cph-2-1.​pdf, see Table 6.)
 
2
The proportion of voters living in electoral landslide counties (i.e., a margin equal to or greater than 20% or the two-party vote in presidential elections) has steadily increased. In 2016, 60% of the electorate resided in a landslide county, up from 38% in 1992. The increase in landslide counties came primarily from Republicans in rural areas and small towns (Aisch et al. 2016).
 
3
Buttel and Flinn (1975, p. 135) comments that, “Agriculture was not viewed merely as the source of wealth, but as a fount of those human virtues and traits most congenial to self-government—a sociological rather than economic value.”
 
4
This is known as allopatric speciation.
 
5
Though Ripley et al. (2019) finds urban residents are less politically tolerant than rural ones.
 
6
See Gallup (n.d.). GPSS surveys started asking for ZIP Codes in 2003.
 
7
We choose to use ZIP Codes instead of counties or media markets because they are nearly always smaller in size and therefore a more precise measure of residence.
 
8
Our analysis includes 124,381 geocoded respondents, which may vary across analysis because of other missingness.
 
9
This is based on residential classification categories drawn from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s urban–rural continuum codes (US Department of Agriculture 2016).
 
10
Respondents were first asked, “In politics, as of today, do you consider yourself a Republican, a Democrat, or an independent?” If they identified as independents, they were then asked, “As of today, do you lean more to the Democratic Party or the Republican Party?”
 
11
Population density is highly correlated with average employer size in the respondent’s ZIP Code. This indicates that our measure captures and tracks the size of local intermediary institutions as one moves from rural to urban environments.
 
12
Our geographic measures are at the ZIP Code level. When referencing a locale, we are referencing a ZIP Code within that location. We include the ZIP Code to which we refer in parentheses.
 
13
It is a credit to Gallup that respondents are sampled from such faraway places as the Aleutian Islands.
 
14
The correlation between the logged variables is -.72.
 
15
For the distance variable, we add one to values of zero in order to avoid undefined values. When we present the exponentiated scale in the figures, the lowest value is 1 since log(1)=0 and exp(0)=1.
 
16
Based on comparisons using t-tests, each of these values are significantly different from each other.
 
17
The 95% confidence interval for the estimate of strong Democrat is .35 to .37 for the minimum value and .23 to .25 for the maximum value. The 95% confidence interval for the estimate of strong Republican is .21 to .22 for the minimum value and is .31 to .33 for the maximum value.
 
18
We explore whether the relationship between partisanship and density and distance change over time, but find no systematic evidence of this in our sample.
 
19
Though we did not develop hypotheses based on the strength of partisanship, we note that the relationships appear strongest for strong identifiers. We speculate that this could be related to strong partisans being more likely to sort as a function of characteristics related to geography (Bishop 2008).
 
Literatur
Acharya, A., Blackwell, M., & Sen, M. (2017). Deep roots: The political legacy of Southern slavery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Anselin, L. (2002). Under the hood issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agricultural Economics, 27, 247–267.
Anselin, L., & Bera, A. K. (1998). Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In A. Ullah & D. E. A. Giles (Eds.), Handbook of applied economic statistics (pp. 237–290). New York: CRC Press.
Bafumi, J., & Shapiro, R. Y. (2009). A new partisan voter. Journal of Politics, 71(1), 1–24.
Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Berreman, G. D. (1978). Scale and social relations. Current Anthropology, 19(2), 225–237.
Bishop, B. (2008). The big sort: Why the clustering of like-minded America is tearing us apart. New York: Mariner Books.
Bivand, R., & Piras, G. (2015). Comparing implementations of estimation methods for spatial econometrics. Journal of Statistical Software, 63(18), 1–36.
Bivand, R., Hauke, J., & Kossowski, T. (2013a). Computing the jacobian in gaussian spatial autoregressive models: An illustrated comparison of available methods. Geographical Analysis, 45(2), 150–179.
Bivand, R. S., Pebesma, E., & Gomez-Rubio, V. (2013b). Applied spatial data analysis with R (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
Buttel, F. H., & Flinn, W. L. (1975). Sources and consequences of agrarian values in American society. Rural Sociology, 40(2), 134–151.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Carlson, C., & Gimpel, J. G. (2019). Political implications of residential mobility and stasis on the partisan balance of locales. Political Geography, 71, 103–114.
Chalfant, H. P., & Heller, P. L. (1991). Rural/urban versus regional differences in religiosity. Review of Religious Research, 33(1), 76–86.
Cho, W. K. T., Gimpel, J. G., & Hui, I. S. (2013). Voter migration and the geographic sorting of the American electorate. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(4), 856–870.
Cramer, K. J. (2016). The politics of resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Darmofal, D. (2015). Spatial analysis for the social sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Davidson, J. (2017). Cities vs. Trump: Red state, blue state? the urban-rural divide is more significant. New York Magazine.
DellaPosta, D., Shi, Y., & Macy, M. (2015). Why do liberals drink lattes? American Journal of Sociology, 120(5), 1473–1511.
Dillon, R. T. (1984). Geographic distance, environmental difference and divergence between isolated populations. Systematic Zoology, 33(1), 69–82.
Duranton, G., & Pug, D. (2001). Nursery cities: Urban diversity, process innovation, and the life cycles of products. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1454–1477.
Fischer, C. S. (1974). The effect of urban life on traditional values. Social Forces, 53, 420–432.
Fischer, C. S. (1975). Toward a subcultural theory of urbanism. American Journal of Sociology, 80(6), 1319–1341.
Fischer, C. S. (1982). To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Fischer, C. S. (1984). The urban experience. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanonvich.
Fischer, C. S. (2010). Made in America: A social history of American culture and character. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Fuchs, L. H. (1955). American jews and the presidential vote. American Political Science Review, 49(2), 385–401.
George, L. M., & Waldfogel, J. (2006). The New York Times and the market for local newspapers. American Economic Review, 96(1), 435–447.
Gimpel, J. G., & Hui, I. S. (2015). Seeking politically compatible neighbors? The role of neighborhood partisan composition in residential sorting. Political Geography, 48, 130–142.
Gimpel, J. G., & Hui, I. S. (2017). Inadvertent and intentional partisan residential sorting. The Annals of Regional Science, 58, 441–468.
Gimpel, J. G., & Karnes, K. A. (2006). The rural side of the urban-rural gap. PS: Political Science & Politics, 39(3), 467–472.
Gimpel, J. G., & Schuknecht, J. E. (2004). Patchwork Nation: Sectionalism and Political Change in American Politics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Goedert, N. (2014). Gerrymandering or geography? How Democrats won the popular vote but lost the congress in 2012. Research & Politics, 1, 1–8.
Graham, D. A. (2017). Red state, blue city. The Atlantic, 319(2), 24–26.
Greenfield, P. M. (2009). Linking social change and developmental change: Shifting pathways of human development. Developmental Psychology, 45(2), 401–418.
Greenfield, P. M. (2013). The changing psychology of culture from 1800 through 2000. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1722–1731.
Holbrook, T. M. (2016). Altered states: Changing populations, changing parties, and the transformation of the American political landscape. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Holcombe, A. (1933). The New Party Politics. New York: WW Norton & Company.
Hopkins, D. J. (2018). The increasingly United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Huckfeldt, R. (2007). Unanimity, discord, and the communication of public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 978–995.
Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51.
Jacobson, G. C. (2013). Partisan polarization in american politics: A background paper. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 43(4), 688–708.
Key, V.O., Jr. (1959). Secular realignment and the party system. Journal of Politics, 21(2), 198–210.
Key, V.O., Jr. (1964). Politics, parties, and pressure groups (5th ed.). New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company.
Knoke, D., & Henry, C. (1977). Political structure of rural America. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 429, 51–62.
Kwan, M. P. (1999). Gender and individual access to urban opportunities: A study using space-time measures. The Professional Geographer, 51(2), 210–227.
Lewis-Beck, M. S., Jacoby, W. G., Norpoth, H., & Weisberg, H. F. (2008). The American voter revisited. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Loftin, C., & Ward, S. K. (1983). A spatial autocorrelation model of the effects of population density on fertility. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 121–128.
Marx, K. (1992)[1867]. Capital. Trans. by Ben Fowkes. Volume 1. New York: Penguin Books.
Maxwell, R. (2019). Cosmopolitan immigration attitudes in large European cities: Contextual or compositional effects. American Political Science Review, 113(2), 456–474.
McCarthy, A. F., Davis, N. T., Garand, J. C., & Olson, L. R. (2016). Religion and attitudes toward redistributive policies among Americans. Political Research Quarterly, 69(1), 121–133.
McKee, S. C. (2008). Rural voters and the polarization of American presidential elections. PS: Political Science & Politics, 41(1), 101–108.
McKee, S. C., & Teigen, J. M. (2009). Probing the reds and blues: Sectionalism and voter location in the 2000 and 2004 U.S. presidential elections. Political Geography, 28(8), 484–495.
McPherson, M. (2004). A blau space primer: Prolegomenon to an ecology of affiliation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(1), 263–280.
Milgram, S. (1970). The experience of living in cities. Science, 167(3924), 1461–1468.
Moore, R. T., & Reeves, A. (2017). Learning from place in the era of geolocation. In B. Ginsberg, K. W. Hill, & J. Bachner (Eds.), Analytics, Policy and Governance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Moore, R.T., & Reeves, A. (Forthcoming), “Defining racial and ethnic context with geolocation data”. Political Science Research and Methods.
Morrill, R., & Combs, J. (2018). Atlas of the 2016 elections. In R. Watrel, et al. (Eds.), Metropolitan concentration of the Democratic vote. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Nicholls, W. J., & Uitermark, J. (2016). Migrant cities: Place, power, and voice in the era of super diversity. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(6), 877–892.
Okulicz-Kozaryn, A., & Valente, R. R. (2017). Psychoanalysis and the global. In I. Kapoor (Ed.), City Life: Glorification, desire, and the unconscious size fetish. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Perez-Truglia, R. (2018). Political conformity: Event-study evidence from the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(1), 14–28.
Scala, D. J., & Johnson, K. (2017). Political polarization along the rural-urban continuum? The geography of the presidential vote, 2000–2016. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 672(1), 162–184.
Scala, D. J., Johnson, K., & Rogers, L. (2015). Red rural, blue rural? Presidential voting patterns in a changing rural America. Political Geography, 48, 108–118.
Shearmur, R. (2012). Are cities the font of innovation? A critical review of the literature on cities and innovation. Cities, 29(2), S9–S18.
Silver, D. (2001). The American scenescape: Amenities, scenes and the qualities of local life. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 5(1), 97–114.
Simmel, G. (1903/2013). The metropolis and mental life. In J. Lin & C. Mele (Eds.), The urban sociolgy reader. New York: Routledge.
Spence, M., & Owen, B. (1977). Television programming, monopolistic competition, and welfare. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103–126.
Stark, R. (1996). Religion as context: Hellfire and delinquency one more time. Sociology of Religion, 57(2), 163–173.
Wang, I. J., Glor, R. E., & Losos, J. B. (2013). Quantifying the roles of ecology and geography in spatial genetic divergence. Ecology Letters, 16(2), 175–182.
Ward, M. D., & Gleditsch, K. S. (2008). Spatial regression models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wilson, T. C. (1995). Urbanism and unconventionality: The case of sexual behavior. Social Science Quarterly, 76(2), 346–363.
Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 1–24.
Metadaten
Titel
The Urban–Rural Gulf in American Political Behavior
verfasst von
James G. Gimpel
Nathan Lovin
Bryant Moy
Andrew Reeves
Publikationsdatum
05.03.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Political Behavior / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0190-9320
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6687
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09601-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Political Behavior 4/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Partisanship, Political Awareness, and Retrospective Evaluations, 1956–2016

Original Paper

Do Means of Program Delivery and Distributional Consequences Affect Policy Support? Experimental Evidence About the Sources of Citizens’ Policy Opinions

Original Paper

A Healthy Democracy? Evidence of Unequal Representation Across Health Status

Original Paper

The Partisan and Policy Motivations of Political Donors Seeking Surrogate Representation in House Elections

Original Paper

Compassionate Democrats and Tough Republicans: How Ideology Shapes Partisan Stereotypes

Original Paper

The Resistance as Role Model: Disillusionment and Protest Among American Adolescents After 2016

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise