nach oben

Social Indicators Research

Erschienen in:

16.11.2014

Priming Effects in Measuring Life Satisfaction

verfasst von: Bogdan Voicu

Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research | Ausgabe 3/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Life satisfaction, as an indicator of subjective well-being, has received increasing attention in the recent decades. It has become a potential indicator of development, to be used complementary to objective measures. However, no clear consensus exists on the relationship between life satisfaction and satisfaction with the various domains of life as well as on the measurement of life satisfaction. This paper addresses the relationship between overall life satisfaction and domain satisfaction (DS). The objective is to identify potential biases induced by priming effects when measuring DS. Four types of theoretical models, derived from existing literature, are tested in different scenarios. Data from three waves of the European Quality of Life Surveys are analyzed using a structural equation modeling framework to provide empirical evidence. An original experimental design is employed to demonstrate that priming effects cannot be ignored. A comparison of models including priming effects and those ignoring such biases shows that the former is a better fit and has higher propensity to explain the variations in life satisfaction and DS.

Vorheriger Artikel The Dark Side of Possessing Power: Power Reduces Happiness in a Collectivist Context

Nächster Artikel Belief in the Afterlife, Death Anxiety, and Life Satisfaction of Buddhists and Christians in Thailand: Comparisons Between Different Religiosity

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

For all the pure-simultaneity models that are non-recursive, the stability indexes are <1. With some caution (see Kline 2006, 59), this means that the estimates can be analyzed as such. When not including priming effects, minimization is unsuccessful, indicating the extremely poor fit of the model.

Althaus, S. L., & Kim, Y. M. (2006). Priming effects in complex information environments: Reassessing the impact of news discourse on presidential approval. Journal of Politics, 68(4), 960–976.CrossRef

Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social Indicators of well-being. Americans’ perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRef

Biemer, P. P., & Lyberg, L. E. (2003). Introduction to survey quality. New York: Wiley.CrossRef

Böhnke, P. (2005). First European quality of life survey: Life satisfaction, happiness and sense of belonging. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Brief, A. P., Butcher, A. H., George, J. M., & Link, K. E. (1993). Integrating bottom-up and top-down theories of subjective well-being: The case of health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 646–653.CrossRef

Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Casas, F., Figuer, C., González, M., & Coenders, G. (2004). Satisfaction with life domains and salient values for future: Data from children and their parents in five different countries. In W. Glatzer, S. von Below, & M. Stoffregen (Eds.), Challenges for the quality of life in contemporary societies (pp. 233–248). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef

Cesario, J. (2014). Priming, replication, and the hardest science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(1), 40–48.CrossRef

Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504.CrossRef

Christoph, B., & Noll, H. (2003). Subjective well-being in the European Union during the 90s. Social Indicators Research, 64(3), 521–546.CrossRef

Comşa, M. (2010). How to compare means of latent variables across countries and waves: Testing for invariance measurement. An application using eastern European societies. Sociológia, 42(6), 639–669.

Converse, J. M., & Presser, S. (1986). Survey questions: Handcrafting the standardized questionnaire. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef

Costa, P. T., & McRae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668–678.CrossRef

Crano, W. D., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Principles and methods of social research. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cummins, R. A. (2003). Normative life satisfaction: Measurement issues and a homeostatic model. Social Indicators Research, 64(2), 225–256.CrossRef

Cummins, R. A., Lau, A. L. D., & Davern, M. T. (2012). Subjective wellbeing homeostasis. In K. C. Land, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research (pp. 79–98). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef

Delhey, J. (2004). Life satisfaction in an enlarged Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.CrossRef

Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31, 103–157.CrossRef

Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40, 189–216.CrossRef

Domke, D., Shah, D. V., & Wackman, D. B. (1998). Media priming effects: Accessibility, association, and activation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 10(1), 51–74.CrossRef

Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. G, Jr. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement of belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 421–435.CrossRef

Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.CrossRef

Harris, J. L., Bargh, J. A., & Brownell, K. D. (2009). Priming effects of television food advertising on eating behavior. Health Psychology, 28(4), 404.CrossRef

Headey, B., Veenhoven, R., & Wearing, A. (1991). Top-down versus bottom-up theories of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 24(1), 81–100.CrossRef

Hsieh, C. M. (2008). The relative importance of health. Social Indicators Research, 84(1), 127–137.CrossRef

Hutchison, K. A., et al. (2013). The semantic priming project. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1099–1114.CrossRef

Kaplan, S. A., Luchman, J. N., & Mock, L. (2013). General and specific question sequence effects in satisfaction surveys: Integrating directional and correlational effects. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(5), 1443–1458.CrossRef

Kim, S.-H., Han, M., & Scheufele, D. A. (2010). Think about him this way: Priming, news media, and South Koreans’ evaluation of the president. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(3), 299–319.CrossRef

Kline, R. B. (2006). Reversed arrows dynamics. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 43–68). Charlotte, NC: IAP.

Krosnick, J. A., & Alwin, D. F. (1987). An evaluation of a cognitive theory of response order effects in survey measurement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 201–219.CrossRef

Lance, C. E., Lautenschlager, G. J., Sloan, C. E., & Varca, P. E. (1989). A comparison between bottom-up, top-down, and bidirectional models of relationships between global and life facet satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 57(3), 601–624.CrossRef

Leonardi, F., Spazzafumo, L., & Marcellini, F. (2005). Subjective well-being: The constructionist point of view. A longitudinal study to verify the predictive power of top-down effects and bottom-up processes. Social Indicators Research, 70, 53–77.CrossRef

Michalos, A. C. (1985). Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT). In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Citation Classics from social indicators research. The most cited articles edited and introduced by Alex C. Michalos (pp. 305–372). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Mihalache, F. F. (2008). Top-down vs. bottom-up: Two perspectives in explaining life satisfaction. Calitatea vieţii, 1–2, 71–83.

Ortells, J. J., Vellido, C., Daza, M. T., & Noguera, C. (2007). Semantic priming effects with and without perceptual awareness. Psicológica, 27(2), 225–242.

Rode, J. C. (2004). Job satisfaction and life satisfaction revisited: A longitudinal test of an integrated model. Human Relations, 57(9), 1205–1230.CrossRef

Rode, J. C., & Near, J. P. (2005). Spillover between work attitude and overall life attitudes: Myth or reality? Social Indicators Research, 70(1), 79–100.CrossRef

Schimmack, U., Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Life-satisfaction is a momentary judgment and a stable personality characteristic: The use of chronically accessible and stable sources. Journal of Personality, 70, 345–384.CrossRef

Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context. New York: Academic Press.

Suls, J., & Wheeler, L. (2012). Social comparison. In P. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 460–482). London: Sage Publications.CrossRef

Tourangeau, R., & Rasinski, K. A. (1988). Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 299–314.CrossRef

Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Veenhoven, R. (2007). Subjective measures of well-being. In McGillivray (Ed.), Human well-being. Concept and measurement, houndmills, New Hampshire (pp. 214–239). USA: Palgrave/McMillan.

Voicu, B., & Pop, C. (2011). Measurement models of life satisfaction: A SEM approach. Calitatea Vieţii, 2(2011), 137–154.

Titel: Priming Effects in Measuring Life Satisfaction
verfasst von: Bogdan Voicu
Publikationsdatum: 16.11.2014
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research / Ausgabe 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0818-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2015

The Personal Wellbeing Index in the South African IsiXhosa Translation: A Qualitative Focus Group Study

Welfare Participation and Time Use in China

Applying the Consensual Method of Estimating Poverty in a Low Income African Setting

The Dark Side of Possessing Power: Power Reduces Happiness in a Collectivist Context

The Role of Visible Wealth for Deprivation

Erratum to: Mapping the Regional Divide in Europe: A Measure for Assessing Quality of Government in 206 European Regions

Premium Partner