nach oben

Social Justice Research

Erschienen in:

01.09.2007

Justice and Emotions

verfasst von: Jonathan H. Turner

Erschienen in: Social Justice Research | Ausgabe 3/2007

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Sociological theories of justice emphasize (a) the level of discrepancy or congruence between shares of resources received relative to individuals’ perceptions of “just shares” and (b) the emotions aroused with either discrepancy or congruence. While these theories tend to have precision and elegance, they generally do not specify the full range of reference points that can be used to establish what is considered a “just share,” nor do they explore the complete array of emotions (and targets of these emotions) aroused during justice evaluations. In this article, an effort is made to expand the conception of reference points elicited in justice evaluations, the structural processes that determine the specific emotions that will be aroused during justice evaluations, and the psychodynamics that mediate among reference points, structural processes, emotional arousal, and targeting of emotional reactions onto self, others, and social structures. The article concludes with some hypotheses about the emotions aroused and targeted during justice evaluations employing varying reference points and arising under specific structural conditions.

Vorheriger Artikel The Limits of Theoretical Integration

Nächster Artikel Towards an Integration of Distributive Justice, Procedural Justice, and Social Resource Theories

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422–436.CrossRef

Bacharach, S. B., & Lawler, E. J. (1981). Bargaining: Power, tactics, and outcomes. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Berger, J., Zelditch, M. Jr., Anderson, B., & Cohen, B. P. (1972). Structural aspects of distributive justice: A status value formulation. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (Vol. 2, pp. 119–146). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

Berger, J., & Webster, M. (2006). Expectations, status and behavior. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

Blau, P. M. (1994). The social context of opportunities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Brosnan, S., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2004). Fair refusal by Capuchin monkeys. Nature, 148, 128–140.

Burke, P. J. (2003). Relationships among multiple identities. In P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. Serpe, & P. A. Thoits (Eds.), Advances in identity theory and research (pp. 195–214). New York: Kluwer Academic.

Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24.CrossRef

Cohen, R. L. (1982). Perceiving justice; An attributional perspective. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 119–160). New York: Academic Press.

Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Cornelius, R. (1996). The science of emotion: Research and tradition in the psychology of emotions. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Cognition, 31, 187–276.PubMedCrossRef

Davies, J. C. (1969). The J-curve of rising expectations and declining satisfaction as a cause of some great revolutions and contained rebellions. In H. D. Graham & T. R. Gurr (Eds.), The history of violence in America (pp. 690–739). New York: Bantam.

Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Durkheim, É. (1947 [1912]). The elementary forms of religious life. New York: Free Press.

Ekeh, P. (1974). Social exchange theory: Two traditions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 282–298.CrossRef

Foa, U. B. (1971). Interpersonal and economic resources. Science 171, 345–351.PubMedCrossRef

Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1976). Resource theory and social exchange. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence & R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology (pp. 99–131). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

Foa U. G., Converse J., Törnblom, K. Y., & Foa, E. B. (Eds.) (1993). Resource theory: Explorations and applications. New York: Academic Press.

Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & Ter Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212–28.CrossRef

Garret, J., & Libby, W. L. (1973). Role of intentionality in mediating responses to inequity in the dyad. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 21–27.CrossRef

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R. L. (1982). Why justice? Normative and instrumental intepretations. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 437–470). New York: De Gruyter.

Hassebrauck, M. (1987). The influence of misattribution on reactions to inequity: Towards a further understanding of inequity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 295–304.CrossRef

Hechter, M. (1987). Principles of group solidarity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Hegtvedt, K. A. (1990). The effects of relationship structure on emotional responses to inequality. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 214–228.CrossRef

Hegtvedt, K. A. (2006). Justice frameworks. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary sociological social psychological theories. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Hegtvedt, K. A., & Killian, C. (1999). Fairness and emotional responses: Reactions to the process and outcomes of negotiations. Social Forces, 78, 269–303.CrossRef

Hegtvedt, K. A., & Markovsky, B. (1995). Justice and injustice. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine & J. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives in social psychology (pp. 257–80). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Hegtvedt, K. A., Thompson, E., & Cook, K. S. (1993). Power and equity: What counts in explaining exchange outcomes? Social Psychology Quarterly, 56, 100–119.CrossRef

Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt.

Homans, G. C. (1974). Social behavior: Its elementary forms, revised edition. New York: Harcourt.

Houser, J. A., & Lovaglia, M. J. (2002). Status, emotions, and the development of solidarity in stratified task groups. Advances in Group Processes, 18, 109–138.CrossRef

Jasso, G. (1980). A new theory of distributive justice. American Sociological Review, 45, 3–32.CrossRef

Jasso, G. (1993). Choice and emotion in comparison theory. Rationality and Society, 5, 231–274.CrossRef

Jasso, G. (2001a). Formal theory. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 37–69). New York: Kluwer Academic.

Jasso, G. (2001b). Comparison theory. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 669–98). New York: Kluwer Academic.CrossRef

Jasso, G. (2006). The theory of comparison processes. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Lamm, H., Kayser, E., & Schwinger, T. (1982). Justice norms and other determinants of allocation and negotiation behavior. In M. Irle (Ed.), Decision making: Social psychological and socio-economic analyses (pp. 359–410). New York: De Gruyter.

Lamm, H., Kayser, E., & Schanz, V. (1983). An attributional analysis of interpersonal justice: Ability and effort as inputs in the allocation of gain and loss. Journal of Social Psychology, 119, 269–281.CrossRef

Lawler, E. J. (1987). Comparison of dependence and punitive forms of power. Social Forces, 66, 446–462.CrossRef

Lawler, E. J. (2001). An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 321–352.CrossRef

Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1–52.CrossRef

Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Fairness in social relationships. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology (pp. 211–239). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

Markovsky, B. (1985). Toward a multi-level distributive justice theory. American Sociological Review, 50, 822–851.CrossRef

McCall, G. P, & Simmons, J. L. (1978). Identities and interactions. New York: Free Press.

Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Mauss, M. (1967 [1924]). The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. New York: Norton.

Mikula, G. (1980). On the role of justice in allocation decisions. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction: Experimental and theoretical contributions from psychological research (pp. 127–166). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Mills, J., & Clark, M. S. (1982). Exchange and communal relationships. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 3). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Molm, L. D. (1997). Coercive power in exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reis H. T. (1984). The multidimensionality of justice. In Folger R. (Ed.), The sense of injustice: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 25–62). New York: Plenum.

Ridgeway, C. (2000). The formation of status beliefs: Improving status construction theory. Advances in group processes, 17, 77–102.CrossRef

Ridgeway, C. (2006a). Status construction theory. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary sociological social psychological theories. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Ridgeway, C. (2006b). Status and emotion from an expectation states theory. In J. E. Stets & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions. New York: Springer.

Schwinger, T. (1980). Just allocations of goods: Decisions among three principles. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction: Experimental and theoretical contributions from psychological research (pp. 95–126). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin-Cummings.

Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.

Turner, J. H. (2000). On the origins of human emotions: A sociological inquiry into the evolution of human affect. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Turner, J. H. (2002). Face-to-face: Toward a theory of interpersonal behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Turner, J. H. (2006). Sociological psychoanalytic theories of emotion. In J. E. Stets & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions. New York: Springer.

Utne, M. K., & Kidd, R. F. (1984). Equity and attribution. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction: Experimental and theoretical contributions from psychological research (pp. 63–94). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Wagner, D. G, & Turner, J. H. (1998). Expectation states theory. The structure of sociological theory (6th ed.), Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Weiner, B. (2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions: An attributional approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Wittig, M. A., Marks, G., & Jones, G. A. (1981). Luck versus effort attributions: Effect on reward allocations to self and other. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 71–78.CrossRef

Zelditch, M. Jr., & Walker, H. A. (1984). Legitimacy and the stability of authority. Advances in Group Processes, 1, 1–27.

Zelditch, M. Jr. (2006). Legitimacy theory. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychology theories. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Titel: Justice and Emotions
verfasst von: Jonathan H. Turner
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2007
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Social Justice Research / Ausgabe 3/2007
Print ISSN: 0885-7466
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6725
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0043-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2007

Theoretical Integration and Unification: A Focus on Justice

The Limits of Theoretical Integration

Towards an Integration of Distributive Justice, Procedural Justice, and Social Resource Theories

Reflecting Upon Etic and Emic Perspectives on Distributive Justice

Theoretical Unification in Justice and Beyond

Distant Relations, a Review of “Social Psychology and Economics”

Premium Partner