nach oben

Journal of Business Economics

Erschienen in:

01.06.2011 | State-of-the-Art

Technologiebasierte Spin-offs – Ein Forschungsüberblick zu Einflussgrößen ihrer Entwicklung

verfasst von: Dr. Arne Schmidt, Dipl.-Kfm. Simon Heinrichs, Prof. Dr. Achim Walter

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Economics | Ausgabe 6/2011

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Zusammenfassung

Technologiebasierte Spin-offs aus öffentlichen Forschungseinrichtungen und privatwirtschaftlichen Unternehmen stellen wichtige Untergruppen junger, innovationsorientierter Unternehmen dar. In diesem Beitrag wird der aktuelle Stand empirischer Forschungsarbeiten bezüglich Einflussfaktoren der Unternehmensentwicklung systematisch dargelegt und diskutiert. Besonderes Augenmerk wird dabei auch auf das methodische Vorgehen und die Messung der untersuchten Einflussfaktoren gelegt. Auf Basis der Literaturanalyse werden übergeordnete Faktoren identifiziert, die für beide Unternehmenstypen einen Einfluss auf deren Entwicklung nehmen. Darüber hinaus werden Lücken der jeweiligen Forschungsbereiche aufgedeckt und zukünftige Forschungsfelder aufgezeigt. Es werden methodische Einschränkungen bestehender Studien diskutiert, aus denen Implikationen für zukünftige Studien zu akademischen und privatwirtschaftlichen Spin-offs abgeleitet werden. Abschließend werden Schwerpunktaufgaben für das Management von Spin-offs herausgestellt.

Vorheriger Artikel Kapitalmarktorientierte Unternehmensbewertung bei asymmetrischer Besteuerung von Soll- und Habenzinsen

Nächster Artikel Sammelrezension – Dynamik der Kategorialen Umklammerung

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Journal of Business Economics

From January 2013, the Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft (ZfB) is published in English under the title Journal of Business Economics (JBE). The Journal of Business Economics (JBE) aims at encouraging theoretical and applied research in the field of business economics and business administration, promoting the exchange of ideas between science and practice.

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Agarwal R, Echambadi R, Franco AM, Sarkar MB (2004) Knowledge transfer through inheritance: spin-out generation, development, and survival. Acad Manage J 47(4):501–522CrossRef

Ahuja G (2000) The dualty of collaborations: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strateg Manage J 21:317–343CrossRef

Ardichvili A, Cardozo R, Ray S (2003) A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. J Bus Ventur 18:105–123CrossRef

Audretsch DB, Lehmann EE, Warning S (2005) University spillovers and new firm location. Res Policy 34(1):1113–1122CrossRef

Aw BY, Lee Y (2008) Firm heterogeneity and location choice of Taiwanese multinationals. J Int Econ 76:403–415CrossRef

Bachmann A (2007) Subjektive versus objektive Erfolgsmaße. In: Albers S, Klapper D, Konradt U et al (Hrsg) Methodik der empirischen Forschung. Gabler, Wiesbaden, S 89–102CrossRef

Becker B, Gassmann O (2006) Corporate incubators: industrial R&D and what universities can learn from them. J Technol Transf 31(4):469–483CrossRef

Beckman CM (2006) The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behaviour. Acad Manage J 49(4):741–758CrossRef

Bekkers R, Gilsing VA, Steen M Van Der (2006) Determining factors of the effectiveness of IP-based spin-offs: comparing the Netherlands and the US. J Technol Transf 31:545–566CrossRef

Bergmann Lichtenstein BM, Brush CG (2001) How do „Resource Bundles“ develop and chance in new ventures? A dynamic model and longitudinal exploration. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 25(Spring):37–58

Bollinger L, Hope K, Utterback JM (1983) A review of literature and hypotheses on new technology-based firms. Res Policy 12(1):1–14CrossRef

Bower DJ (2003) Business model fashion and the academic spinout firm. R&D Manage 33(2):97–106CrossRef

Breznitz SM, O’Shea RP, Allen TJ (2008) University commercialization strategies in the development of regional bioclusters. J Prod Innov Manage 25(2):129–142CrossRef

Brush CG, Manolova TS, Edelman LF (2008) Separated by a common language? Entrepreneurship research across the Atlantic. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 32:249–266CrossRef

Bruton GD, Rubanik Y (2002) Resources of the firm, Russian high-technology startups, and firm growth. J Bus Venturing 17(6):553–576CrossRef

Carayannopoulos S (2009) How technology-based new firms leverage newness and smallness to commercialize disruptive technologies. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 33:419–438CrossRef

Carolis DM de, Litzky BE, Eddleston KA (2009) Why networks enhance the progress of new venture creation: the influence of social capital and cognition. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 33:527–545CrossRef

Chandler ADJ (1962) Strategy and structure: chapters in the history of the American enterprise. MIT Press, Cambridge

Chandler GN, Lyon DW (2001) Issues of research design and construct measurement in entrepreneurship research: the past decade. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 25(Summer):101–113

Chesbrough H (2003) The governance and performance of Xerox’s technology spin-off companies. Res Policy 32(3):403–421CrossRef

Chiesa V, Piccaluga A (2000) Exploitation and diffusion of public research: the case of academic spin-off companies in Italy. R&D Manage 30(4):329–339CrossRef

Churchill GAJ (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J Market Res 16(1):64–73CrossRef

Clarysse B, Moray N (2004) A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of a research-based spin-off. J Bus Venturing 19(1):55–79CrossRef

Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on leardning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35(1):128–152CrossRef

Colombo MG, Grilli L (2005) Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: a competence-based view. Res Policy 34(6):795–816CrossRef

Cooper AC (1985) The role of incubator organizations in the founding of growth-oriented firms. J Bus Venturing 1(1):75–86CrossRef

Covin JG, Slevin DP (1989) Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strateg Manage J 10(1):75–87CrossRef

Covin JG, Green KM, Slevin DP (2006) Stratetic process effects on the entrepreneurial growth rate relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 30(1):57–81CrossRef

Dahl MS, Reichstein T (2006) Heritage and survival of spin-offs: quality and parent-tenure of founders. Working Paper, S 1–27

Dahl MS, Reichstein T (2007) Are you experienced? Prior experience and the survival of new organizations. Industry Innov 14(5):497–511

Das TK, Teng B-S (2000) A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. J Manage 26(1):31–61CrossRef

Davidsson P, Wiklund J (2001) Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: current research practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 25(Summer):81–99

Delmar F, Shane S (2003) Does business planning facilitate the development of new ventures? Strateg Manage J 24(12):1165–1185CrossRef

Delmar F, Shane S (2006) Does experience matter? The effect of founding team experience on the survival and sales of newly founded ventures. Strateg Organ 4(3):215–247CrossRef

DeTienne DR (2010) Entrepreneurial exit as a critical component of the entrepreneurial process: theoretical development. J Bus Venturing 25:203–215CrossRef

Dickel P (2008) Marktbezogenes Lernen in Akademischen Spin-offs. Gabler, Wiesbaden

Djokovic D, Souitaris V (2008) Spinouts from academic institutions: a literature review with suggestions for further research. J Technol Transf 33(3):225–247CrossRef

Dorfman NS (1983) Route 128: the development of a regional high technology economy. Res Policy 12(6):299–316CrossRef

Dougherty D (1990) Understanding new markets for new products. Strateg Manage J 11:59–78CrossRef

Doutriaux J (1987) Growth pattern of academic entrepreneurial firms. J Bus Venturing 2(4):285–297CrossRef

Ensley MD, Hmieleski KM (2005) A comparative study of new venture top management team composition, dynamics and performance between university-based and independent start-ups. Res Policy 34(7):1091–1105CrossRef

Eriksson T, Kuhn JM (2006) Firm spin-offs in Denmark 1981–2000 – patterns of entry and exit. Int J Ind Organ 24(5):1021–1040CrossRef

Etzkowitz H, Klofsten M (2005) The innovating region: toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development. R&D Manage 35(3):243–255CrossRef

Farjoun M (2002) Towards an organic perspective on strategy. Strateg Manage J 23(7):561–594CrossRef

Franke N, Gruber M, Harhoff D, Henkel J (2008) Venture capitalists’ evaluations of start-up teams: trade-offs, knock-out criteria, and the impact of VC experience. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 32(3):459–483CrossRef

Franklin SJ, Wright M, Lockett A (2001) Academic and surrogate entrepreneurs in university spin-out companies. J Technol Transfer 26(1–2):127–141CrossRef

Gartner WB (1985) A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Acad Manage Rev 10(4):696–706

Garvin DA (1983) Spin-offs and the new firm formation process. Calif Manage Rev 25(2):3–20

Gilsing VA, Burg E van, Romme AGL (2010) Policy principles for the creation and success of corporate and academic spin-offs. Technovation 30:12–23CrossRef

Grandi A, Grimaldi R (2003) Exploring the networking characteristics of new venture founding teams. Small Bus Econ 21(4):329–341CrossRef

Grandi A, Grimaldi R (2005) Academics’ organizational characteristics and the generation of successful business ideas. J Bus Venturing 20(6):821–845CrossRef

Gruber M, MacMillan IC, Thompson JD (2008) Look before you leap: market opportunity identification in emerging technology fields. Manag Sci 54(9):1652–1665CrossRef

Gupte MA (2007) Success of University Spin-offs. DeutscherUniversitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden

Hackett SM, Dilts DM (2004) A systematic review of business incubation research. J Technol Transf 29:55–82CrossRef

Hallen BH (2008) The causes and consequences of the initial network positions of new organizations: from whom do entrepreneurs receive investments? Adm Sci Q 53:685–718CrossRef

Heirman A, Clarysse B (2004) How and why do research-based start-ups differ at founding? A resource-based configurational perspective. J Technol Transf 29(3–4):247–268CrossRef

Helm R, Mauroner O (2004) Innovative Spin-offs aus der Forschung als neue Unternehmen. Jena Schriften zur Wirtschaftswissenschaft 28:1–27

Hite JM, Hesterly WS (2001) The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm. Strateg Manage J 22:275–286CrossRef

Hoang H, Antoncic B (2003) Network-based research in entrepreneurship, a critical review. J Bus Venturing 18(2):163–187

Hsu DH (2007) Experienced entrepreneurial founders, organizational capital, and venture capital funding. Res Policy 36(5):722–741CrossRef

Ito K (1995) Japanese spinoffs: unexplored survival strategies. Strateg Manage J 16(6):431–446CrossRef

Iturriaga FL (2008) Antecedents of corporate spin-offs in Spain: a resource-based approach. Res Policy 37(6/7):1047–1056

Jarillo JC (1989) Entrepreneurship and growth: the strategic use of external resources. J Bus Venturing 4:133–147CrossRef

Jensen R, Thursby M (2001) Proofs and prototypes for Sale: the licensing of university inventions. Am Econ Rev 91(1):240–259CrossRef

Klepper S (2001) Employee startups in high-tech industries. Ind Corporate Change 10(3):639–674CrossRef

Klepper S (2002) The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the US automobile industry. Ind Corporate Change 11(4):645–666CrossRef

Klepper S (2007) Disagreements, spinoffs, and the evolution of detroit as the capital of the U.S. automobile industry. Manag Sci 53(4):616–631CrossRef

Klepper S, Sleeper S (2005) Entry by spinoffs. Manag Sci 51(8):1291–1306CrossRef

Larson A, Starr JA (1993) A network model of organization formation. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 17:5–15

Lichtenstein BB, Dooley KJ, Lumpkin GT (2006) Measuring emergence in the dynamics of new venture creation. J Bus Venturing 21:153–175CrossRef

Lindholm A (1994) The economics of technology-related ownership changes. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg

Lindholm-Dahlstrand A (1997) Growth and inventiveness in technology-based spin-off firms. Res Policy 26(3):331–334CrossRef

Link AN, Scott JT (2005) Opening the ivory tower’s door: an analysis of the determinants of the formation of U.S. university spin-off companies. Res Policy 34(7):1106–1112CrossRef

Lockett A, Siegel D, Wright M, Ensley MD (2005) The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications. Res Policy 34:981–993CrossRef

Löfsten H, Lindelöf P (2005) R&D networks and product innovation patterns – academic and non-academic new technology-based firms on Science Parks. Technovation 25(9):1025–1037

Low MB, MacMillan IC (1988) Entrepreneurship: past research and future challenges. J Manage 14(2):139–161CrossRef

Lumpkin GT, Dess GG (1996) Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Acad Manage Rev 21(1):135–172

Lumpkin GT, Dess GG (2001) Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. J Bus Venturing 16(5):429–451CrossRef

Lyon DW, Lumpkin GT, Dess GG (2000) Enhancing entrepreneurial orientation research: operationalizing and measuring a key strategic decision making process. J Manage 26(5):1055–1085CrossRef

Maine E, Garnsey E (2006) Commercializing generic technology: the case of advanced materials ventures. Res Policy 35:375–393CrossRef

Mansfield E (1986) Patents and innovation: an empirical study. Manag Sci 32(2):173–181CrossRef

Maurer I, Ebers M (2006) Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Adm Sci Q 51:262–292CrossRef

Mazzoleni R, Nelson RR (1998) The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: a contribution to the current debate. Res Policy 27:273–284CrossRef

McEvily SK, Chakravarthy B (2002) The persistence of knowledge-based advantage: an empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge. Strateg Manage J 23(4):285–305CrossRef

Mellewigt T, Witt P (2002) Die Bedeutung des Vorgründungsprozesses für die Evolution von Unternehmen – Stand der empirischen Forschung. Z Betriebswirtschaft 72:81–110

Meyer M (2003) Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research-based ventures and public support mechanisms. R&D Manage 33(2):107–115CrossRef

Miller D (1983) The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Manag Sci 29(7):770–791CrossRef

Miller D, Friesen PH (1983) Strategy-making and environment: the third link. Strateg Manage J 4(3):221–235CrossRef

Mintzberg H (1973) Strategy-making in three modes. Calif Manage Rev 16(2):44–53

Mintzberg H (1978) Patterns in strategy formation. Manag Sci 24(9):934–948CrossRef

Mullen MR, Budeva DG, Doney PM (2009) Research methods in the leading small business-entrepreneurship journals: a critical review with recommendations for future research. J Small Bus Manage 47(3):287–307CrossRef

Murphy GB, Trailer JW, Hill RC (1996) Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research. J Bus Res 36(1):15–23CrossRef

Ndonzuau FN, Pirnay F, Surlemont B (2002) A stage model of academic spin-off creation. Technovation 22(5):281–289CrossRef

Nelsen LL (2005) The role of research institutions in the formation of the biotech cluster in Massachusetts: the MIT experience. J Commerc Biotechnol 11(4):330–336CrossRef

Nerkar A, Shane S (2003) When do start-ups that exploit patented academic knowledge survive? Int J Ind Organ 21(9):1391–1410CrossRef

Nerkar A, Shane S (2007) Determinants of invention commercialization: An empirical examination of academically sourced inventions. Strateg Manage J 28(11):1155–1166CrossRef

Niosi J (2006) Success factors in Canadian academic spin-offs. J Technol Transf 31(4):451–457CrossRef

Packalen KA (2007) Complementing capital: the role of status, demographic features, and social capital in founding teams’ abilities to obtain resources. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 31(6):873–891CrossRef

Pe’er A, Vertinsky I, King A (2008) Who enters, where and why? The influence of capabilities and initial resource endowments on the location choices of de novo enterprises. Strateg Organ 6(2):119–149CrossRef

Pérez MP, Sánchez AM (2003) The development of university spin-offs: early dynamics of technology transfer and networking. Technovation 23(10):823–831CrossRef

Phillips DJ (2002) A genealogical approach to organizational life chances: the parent-progeny transfer among silicon valley firms, 1946–1996. Adm Sci Q 47(3):474–506CrossRef

Pirnay F, Surlemont B, Nlemvo F (2003) Toward a typology of university spin-offs. Small Bus Econ 21(4):355–369CrossRef

Radosevich R (1995) A model for entrepreneurial spin-offs from public technology sources. Int J Technol Manage 10(7/8):879–893

Rajagopalan N, Rasheed AMA, Datta DK (1993) Strategic decision processes: critical review and future directions. J Manage 19(2):349–384

Rappert B, Webster A, Charles D (1999) Making sense of diversity and reluctance: academic – industrial relations and intellectual property. Res Policy 28(8):873–890CrossRef

Rauch A, Wiklund J, Lumpkin GT, Frese M (2009) Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: an assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 33(3):761–787CrossRef

Richard PJ, Devinney TM, Yip GS, Johnson G (2009) Measuring organizational performance: towards methodological best practice. J Manage 35(3):718–804CrossRef

Riesenhuber F (2008) Technologiebasierte Chancen und Wachstum akademischer Spin-offs. Gabler, Wiesbaden

Riesenhuber F, Walter A, Auer M (2006) Akademische Spin-offs: Eine empirische Untersuchung zum Umgang mit technischer Unsicherheit und der Steigerung des Wachstums. Z Betriebswirtschaftslehre (Special Issue)(4):117–139

Riesenhuber F, Auer M, Walter A, Wolf F (2007) Technologische Ressourcen und das Wachstum akademischer Spin-offs. In: Pechlaner H, Hinterhuber H, von Holzschuher W, Hamman E (Hrsg) Unternehmertum und Ausgründung. Gabler, Wiesbaden, S 141–164CrossRef

Roberts EB (1991a) Entrepreneurs in high technology – lessons from MIT and beyond. Oxford University Press, New York

Roberts EB (1991b) The technological base of the new enterprise. Res Policy 20(4):283–298CrossRef

Rogers EM (2003) The diffusion of innovation. Free Press, New York

Rothaermel FT, Thursby M (2005) Incubator firm failure or graduation? The role of university linkages. Res Policy 34(7):1–27

Sapienza HJ, Parhankangas A, Autio E (2004) Knowledge relatedness and post-spin-off growth. J Bus Venturing 19(6):809–829CrossRef

Shane S (2000) Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ Sci 11(4):448–469CrossRef

Shane S (2001a) Technological opportunities and new firm creation. Manag Sci 47(2):205–220CrossRef

Shane S (2001b) Technology regimes and new firm formation. Manag Sci 47(9):1173–1190CrossRef

Shane S (2002) Selling university technology: patterns from MIT. Manag Sci 48(1):122–137CrossRef

Shane S, Cable D (2002) Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Manag Sci 48(3):364–381CrossRef

Shane S, Stuart T (2002) Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Manag Sci 48(1):154–170CrossRef

Short JC, McKelvie A, Ketchen DJ, Chandler GN (2009) Firm and industry effects on firm performance: a generalization and extension for new ventures. Strateg Entrepreneurship J 3(1):47–65CrossRef

Slotte-Kock S, Coviello N (2010) Entrepreneurship research on network processes: a review and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 34(1):31–57CrossRef

Smilor RW, Gibson DV, Dietrich GB (1990) University spin-out companies: technology start-ups from UT-Austin. J Bus Venturing 5(1):63–76CrossRef

Song M, Podoynitsyna K, Bij H Van Der, Halman JIM (2008) Success factors in new ventures: a meta-analysis. J Prod Innov Manage 25(1):7–27

Spector PE (2006) Method variance in organizational research: truth or urban legend? Organ Res Methods 9(2):221–232CrossRef

Steffensen M, Rogers EM, Speakman K (2000) Spin-offs from research centers at a research university. J Bus Venturing 15(1):93–111CrossRef

Tübke A (2004) Success factors of corporate spin-offs. Springer, New York

Van de Velde, E, Clarysse B (2006) A model of antecedents and characteristics of corporate spin-offs. Woking Paper

Venkataraman S (1997) The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: an editor’s perspective. In: Katz J, Brockhaus R (Hrsg) Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth, Bd 3. JAI Press, Greenwich, S 119–138

Venkataraman S (2004) Regional transformation through technological entrepreneurship. J Bus Venturing 19(1):153–167CrossRef

Vohora A, Wright M, Lockett A (2004) Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spin-out companies. Res Policy 33(1):147–175CrossRef

Walter A, Auer M, Ritter T (2006) The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance. J Bus Venturing 21(4):541–567CrossRef

Weinzimmer LG, Nystrom PC, Freeman SJ (1998) Measuring organizational growth: issues, consequences and guidelines. J Manage 24(2):235–262CrossRef

Wiklund J (1999) The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation – performance relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 23(Fall):37–48

Wiklund J, Shepherd D (2003) Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strateg Manage J 24(13):1307–1314CrossRef

Wiklund J, Shepherd D (2005) Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach. J Bus Venturing 20:71–91CrossRef

Zahra SA, Velde E van de, Larraneta B (2007) Knowledge conversion capability and the performance of corporate and university spin-offs. Ind Corporate Change 16(4):569–608CrossRef

Zucker LG, Darby MR, Armstrong JS (2002) Commercializing knowledge: university science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Manag Sci 48:138–153CrossRef

Titel: Technologiebasierte Spin-offs – Ein Forschungsüberblick zu Einflussgrößen ihrer Entwicklung
verfasst von: Dr. Arne Schmidt
Dipl.-Kfm. Simon Heinrichs
Prof. Dr. Achim Walter
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2011
Verlag: SP Gabler Verlag
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Economics / Ausgabe 6/2011
Print ISSN: 0044-2372
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-8928
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-011-0466-7

Springer Professional

Zusammenfassung

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Journal of Business Economics

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2011

Editorial

Die Selektionsentscheidung bei postalisch zugestellter Direktkommunikation. Eine feldexperimentelle Überprüfung des Einflusses aktivierungsstarker Reize am Beispiel der Kundenzeitschrift

Sammelrezension – Dynamik der Kategorialen Umklammerung

Kapitalmarktorientierte Unternehmensbewertung bei asymmetrischer Besteuerung von Soll- und Habenzinsen

Premium Partner