Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Ambio 1/2013

01.02.2013 | Report

Net Present Biodiversity Value and the Design of Biodiversity Offsets

verfasst von: Jacob McC. Overton, R. T. Theo Stephens, Simon Ferrier

Erschienen in: Ambio | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

There is an urgent need to develop sound theory and practice for biodiversity offsets to provide a better basis for offset multipliers, to improve accounting for time delays in offset repayments, and to develop a common framework for evaluating in-kind and out-of-kind offsets. Here, we apply concepts and measures from systematic conservation planning and financial accounting to provide a basis for determining equity across type (of biodiversity), space, and time. We introduce net present biodiversity value (NPBV) as a theoretical and practical measure for defining the offset required to achieve no-net-loss. For evaluating equity in type and space we use measures of biodiversity value from systematic conservation planning. Time discount rates are used to address risk of non-repayment, and loss of utility. We illustrate these concepts and measures with two examples of biodiversity impact–offset transactions. Considerable further work is required to understand the characteristics of these approaches.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Ball, I.R., H.P. Possingham, and M. Watts. 2009. Marxan and relatives: Software for spatial conservation prioritisation. In Spatial conservation prioritisation: quantitative methods and computational tools, ed. A. Moilanen, K.A. Wilson, and H.P. Possingham, 304 pp. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ball, I.R., H.P. Possingham, and M. Watts. 2009. Marxan and relatives: Software for spatial conservation prioritisation. In Spatial conservation prioritisation: quantitative methods and computational tools, ed. A. Moilanen, K.A. Wilson, and H.P. Possingham, 304 pp. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Bekessy, S.A., B.A. Wintle, D.B. Lindenmayer, M.A. McCarthy, M. Colyvan, M.A. Burgman, and H.P. Possingham. 2010. The biodiversity bank cannot be a lending bank. Conservation Letters 3: 151–158.CrossRef Bekessy, S.A., B.A. Wintle, D.B. Lindenmayer, M.A. McCarthy, M. Colyvan, M.A. Burgman, and H.P. Possingham. 2010. The biodiversity bank cannot be a lending bank. Conservation Letters 3: 151–158.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bierman Jr., H., and S. Smidt. 1966. The capital budgeting decision, 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan. Bierman Jr., H., and S. Smidt. 1966. The capital budgeting decision, 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruggeman, D.J., M.L. Jones, F. Lupi, and K.T. Scribner. 2005. Landscape equivalency analysis: Methodology for estimating spatially explicit biodiversity credits. Environmental Management 36: 518–534.CrossRef Bruggeman, D.J., M.L. Jones, F. Lupi, and K.T. Scribner. 2005. Landscape equivalency analysis: Methodology for estimating spatially explicit biodiversity credits. Environmental Management 36: 518–534.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dunford, R.W., T.C. Ginn, and W.H. Desvousges. 2004. The use of habitat equivalency analysis in natural resource damage assessments. Ecological Economics 48: 49–70.CrossRef Dunford, R.W., T.C. Ginn, and W.H. Desvousges. 2004. The use of habitat equivalency analysis in natural resource damage assessments. Ecological Economics 48: 49–70.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Faith, D.P., and P.A. Walker. 1996. Integrating conservation and development: Effective trade-offs between biodiversity and in the selection of protected areas. Biodiversity and Conservation 5: 431–446.CrossRef Faith, D.P., and P.A. Walker. 1996. Integrating conservation and development: Effective trade-offs between biodiversity and in the selection of protected areas. Biodiversity and Conservation 5: 431–446.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Faith, D.P., P.A. Walker, J.R. Ive, and L. Belbin. 1996. Integrating conservation and forestry production: Exploring trade-offs between biodiversity and production in regional land-use assessment. Forest Ecology and Management 85: 251–260.CrossRef Faith, D.P., P.A. Walker, J.R. Ive, and L. Belbin. 1996. Integrating conservation and forestry production: Exploring trade-offs between biodiversity and production in regional land-use assessment. Forest Ecology and Management 85: 251–260.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrier, S., and M. Drielsma. 2010. Synthesis of pattern and process in biodiversity conservation assessment: A flexible whole-landscape modelling framework. Diversity and Distributions 16: 386–402.CrossRef Ferrier, S., and M. Drielsma. 2010. Synthesis of pattern and process in biodiversity conservation assessment: A flexible whole-landscape modelling framework. Diversity and Distributions 16: 386–402.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fox, J., and A. Nino-Murcia. 2005. Status of species conservation banking in the United States. Conservation Biology 19: 996–1007.CrossRef Fox, J., and A. Nino-Murcia. 2005. Status of species conservation banking in the United States. Conservation Biology 19: 996–1007.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gollier, C. 2010. Ecological discounting. Journal of Economic Theory 145: 812–829.CrossRef Gollier, C. 2010. Ecological discounting. Journal of Economic Theory 145: 812–829.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gordon A., W.T. Langford, J.A. Todd, M.D. White, D.W. Mullerworth, and S.A. Bekessy. (2011). Assessing the impacts of biodiversity offset policies. Environmental Modelling & Software 26: 1481–1488. Gordon A., W.T. Langford, J.A. Todd, M.D. White, D.W. Mullerworth, and S.A. Bekessy. (2011). Assessing the impacts of biodiversity offset policies. Environmental Modelling & Software 26: 1481–1488.
Zurück zum Zitat Hampicke, U. 2011. Climate change economics and discounted utilitarianism. Ecological Economics 72: 45–52.CrossRef Hampicke, U. 2011. Climate change economics and discounted utilitarianism. Ecological Economics 72: 45–52.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hartig, F., and M. Drechsler. 2008. The time horizon and its role in multiple species conservation planning. Biological Conservation 141: 2625–2631.CrossRef Hartig, F., and M. Drechsler. 2008. The time horizon and its role in multiple species conservation planning. Biological Conservation 141: 2625–2631.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kiesecker, J.M., H. Copeland, A. Pocewicz, N. Nibbelink, B. McKenney, J. Dahlke, M. Holloran, and D. Stroud. 2009. A framework for implementing biodiversity offsets, selecting sites and determining scale. BioScience 59: 77–84.CrossRef Kiesecker, J.M., H. Copeland, A. Pocewicz, N. Nibbelink, B. McKenney, J. Dahlke, M. Holloran, and D. Stroud. 2009. A framework for implementing biodiversity offsets, selecting sites and determining scale. BioScience 59: 77–84.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kiesecker, J.M., H. Copeland, A. Pocewicz, and B. McKenney. 2010. Development by design: Blending landscape-level planning with the mitigation hierarchy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8: 261–266.CrossRef Kiesecker, J.M., H. Copeland, A. Pocewicz, and B. McKenney. 2010. Development by design: Blending landscape-level planning with the mitigation hierarchy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8: 261–266.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Margules, C.R., and R.L. Pressey. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405: 243–253.CrossRef Margules, C.R., and R.L. Pressey. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405: 243–253.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McKenney, B.A., and J.M. Kiesecker. 2010. Policy development for biodiversity offsets: A review of offset frameworks. Environmental Management 45: 165–176.CrossRef McKenney, B.A., and J.M. Kiesecker. 2010. Policy development for biodiversity offsets: A review of offset frameworks. Environmental Management 45: 165–176.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moilanen, A. 2007. Landscape zonation, benefit functions and target-based planning: Unifying reserve selection strategies. Biological Conservation 134: 571–579.CrossRef Moilanen, A. 2007. Landscape zonation, benefit functions and target-based planning: Unifying reserve selection strategies. Biological Conservation 134: 571–579.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moilanen, A., A. van Teeffelen, Y. Ben-Haim, and S. Ferrier. 2008. How much compensation is enough? Explicit incorporation of uncertainty and time discounting when calculating offset ratios for impacted habitat. Restoration Ecology 17: 470–478.CrossRef Moilanen, A., A. van Teeffelen, Y. Ben-Haim, and S. Ferrier. 2008. How much compensation is enough? Explicit incorporation of uncertainty and time discounting when calculating offset ratios for impacted habitat. Restoration Ecology 17: 470–478.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moilanen, A., K.A. Wilson, and H.P. Possingham (eds.). 2009. Spatial conservation prioritization: Quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Moilanen, A., K.A. Wilson, and H.P. Possingham (eds.). 2009. Spatial conservation prioritization: Quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Nordhaus, W. 2007. A review of the “Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change”. Journal of Economic Literature XLV: 686–702. Nordhaus, W. 2007. A review of the “Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change”. Journal of Economic Literature XLV: 686–702.
Zurück zum Zitat Overton, J.McC., R. Price, R.T.T. Stephens, S. Cook, R. Earl, E. Wright, and S. Walker. 2010. Conservation planning and reporting using the vital sites model. Landcare Research Contract Report LC0910/064, 108 pp. Overton, J.McC., R. Price, R.T.T. Stephens, S. Cook, R. Earl, E. Wright, and S. Walker. 2010. Conservation planning and reporting using the vital sites model. Landcare Research Contract Report LC0910/064, 108 pp.
Zurück zum Zitat Quetier, F., and S. Lavorel. 2011. Assessing ecological equivalence in biodiversity offset schemes: Key issues and solutions. Biological Conservation 144: 2991–2999.CrossRef Quetier, F., and S. Lavorel. 2011. Assessing ecological equivalence in biodiversity offset schemes: Key issues and solutions. Biological Conservation 144: 2991–2999.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Quigley, J.T., and D.J. Harper. 2005a. Effectiveness of fish habitat compensation in Canada in achieving no net loss. Environmental Management 37: 351–366.CrossRef Quigley, J.T., and D.J. Harper. 2005a. Effectiveness of fish habitat compensation in Canada in achieving no net loss. Environmental Management 37: 351–366.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Quigley, J.T., and D.J. Harper. 2005b. Compliance with Canada’s Fisheries Act: A field audit of habitat compensation projects. Environmental Management 37: 336–350.CrossRef Quigley, J.T., and D.J. Harper. 2005b. Compliance with Canada’s Fisheries Act: A field audit of habitat compensation projects. Environmental Management 37: 336–350.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rodrigues, A.S.L., and T.M. Brooks. 2007. Shortcuts for biodiversity conservation planning: The effectiveness of surrogates. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 38: 713–773.CrossRef Rodrigues, A.S.L., and T.M. Brooks. 2007. Shortcuts for biodiversity conservation planning: The effectiveness of surrogates. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 38: 713–773.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Salzman, J., and J.B. Ruhl. 2000. Currencies and the commodification of environmental law. Stanford Law Review 53: 607–694.CrossRef Salzman, J., and J.B. Ruhl. 2000. Currencies and the commodification of environmental law. Stanford Law Review 53: 607–694.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, A.B. 2010. Caution with curves: Caveats for using the species-area relationship in conservation. Biological Conservation 143: 555–564.CrossRef Smith, A.B. 2010. Caution with curves: Caveats for using the species-area relationship in conservation. Biological Conservation 143: 555–564.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stephens, R.T.T., D.J. Brown, and N.J. Thornley. 2002. Measuring conservation achievement: concepts and their application over the Twizel area. Science for Conservation 200. Wellington: Department of Conservation. Stephens, R.T.T., D.J. Brown, and N.J. Thornley. 2002. Measuring conservation achievement: concepts and their application over the Twizel area. Science for Conservation 200. Wellington: Department of Conservation.
Zurück zum Zitat Stern, N., S. Peters, V. Bakhshi, A. Bowen, C. Cameron, S. Catovsky, D. Crane, S. Cruickshank, et al. 2006. Stern Review: The economics of climate change. London: HM Treasury. Stern, N., S. Peters, V. Bakhshi, A. Bowen, C. Cameron, S. Catovsky, D. Crane, S. Cruickshank, et al. 2006. Stern Review: The economics of climate change. London: HM Treasury.
Zurück zum Zitat ten Kate, K., J. Bishop, and R. Bayon. 2004. Biodiversity offsets: Views, experience, and the business case, 95. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN and Insight Investment. ten Kate, K., J. Bishop, and R. Bayon. 2004. Biodiversity offsets: Views, experience, and the business case, 95. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN and Insight Investment.
Zurück zum Zitat Veltman, V.C. 1995. Banking on the future of wetlands using federal law. Northwestern University Law Review 89: 654–689. Veltman, V.C. 1995. Banking on the future of wetlands using federal law. Northwestern University Law Review 89: 654–689.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker, S., A.L. Brower, R.T.T. Stephens, and W.G. Lee. 2009. Why bartering biodiversity fails. Conservation Letters 2: 149–157.CrossRef Walker, S., A.L. Brower, R.T.T. Stephens, and W.G. Lee. 2009. Why bartering biodiversity fails. Conservation Letters 2: 149–157.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weitzman, M.L. 2001. Gamma discounting. American Economic Review 91: 260–271.CrossRef Weitzman, M.L. 2001. Gamma discounting. American Economic Review 91: 260–271.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Net Present Biodiversity Value and the Design of Biodiversity Offsets
verfasst von
Jacob McC. Overton
R. T. Theo Stephens
Simon Ferrier
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2013
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Ambio / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0044-7447
Elektronische ISSN: 1654-7209
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0342-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

Ambio 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe