Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Schmalenbach Business Review 3/2019

13.12.2018 | Original Article

The Second Glass Ceiling: Women’s Role in Supervisory Boards of German Firms

verfasst von: Viktor Bozhinov, Christopher Koch, Thorsten Schank

Erschienen in: Schmalenbach Business Review | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study analyzes the role of women on supervisory boards of German companies. In particular, we investigate the likelihood of women to hold senior positions such as (vice) chair of the board and their membership in standing committees. Based on the logic of the lack of fit model, we argue that once women overcome the first glass ceiling and become board members, they still face a second glass ceiling preventing them from gaining senior board positions. We test our hypotheses using a sample of 103 parity co-determined and publicly quoted companies from 2009 to 2016. We find that women directors are underrepresented in senior board positions. This gap is particularly large and even increasing for the position of the board chair. It is also present for the position of the vice chair and (in the case of shareholder representatives) for memberships in standing committees except for the nomination committee. These findings are consistent with the presence of a second glass ceiling. Our study contributes to the literature on the prevalence of women in senior board positions. In particular, we provide novel evidence on the progress of women on boards in a two-tier system with co-determination. One potential implication of our study is that women’s influence on board decision-making might still be limited despite the recent increase of the number of women on boards.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Norway and Sweden have a semi two-tier system. That means that companies have the choice whether the board includes only non-executive directors or both non-executive and executive directors. In Norway, the CEO may not be part of the board. In Sweden, only one executive director, usually the CEO, may be part of the board. Furthermore, Norway requires that one third of board members are employee representatives and Sweden requires two or three employee representatives on the board. Therefore, Norway and Sweden share similarities with the German two-tier system with employee representatives being required on the board for companies with more than 500 employees.
 
2
Relatedly, Hoyt and Murphy (2016) mention a masculine environment as an additional factor mediating gender stereotype threat—a condition applicable to supervisory boards in Germany. For example, a study of German top executives revealed the existence of a mentality pattern supporting role incongruity of women in leadership (BMFSFJ 2010).
 
3
Closely related, the study of Beamen et al. (2009) shows that exposure to female leadership reduces gender-based bias.
 
4
Appendix Table 5 contains a full list of all companies included in the analysis.
 
5
The difference in the number of observations between shareholder and employee representatives arises from the non-availability of age information in the sub-sample of employee representatives.
 
6
While shareholder representatives are appointed to the board at the annual general meeting, employee representatives are elected by the employees of the firm (e. g., Plessis et al. 2017).
 
7
There is considerable variation of board members in committee participation. For example, some shareholder representatives work in six committees, while almost 30% of shareholder representatives are not member of any committee.
 
8
Adding up these six dummies yields the value for the variable number of committees.
 
9
This procedure ensures an equal sample size across committees. Note that this procedure does not affect the variable number of committees.
 
10
Note that summing up the displayed coefficients for shareholder representatives (respectively for employee representatives) yields the coefficient on the female dummy in the regression with the number of committees as the dependent variable, reported in Table 2.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Adams, Renée B., and Daniel Ferreira. 2009. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics 94(2):291–309.CrossRef Adams, Renée B., and Daniel Ferreira. 2009. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics 94(2):291–309.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ahern, Kenneth R., and Amy K. Dittmar. 2012. The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 127(1):137–197.CrossRef Ahern, Kenneth R., and Amy K. Dittmar. 2012. The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 127(1):137–197.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Allport, Gordon W. 1954. The nature of prejudice. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley. Allport, Gordon W. 1954. The nature of prejudice. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.
Zurück zum Zitat Amanatullah, Emily T., and Michael W. Morris. 2010. Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 98(2):256–267.CrossRef Amanatullah, Emily T., and Michael W. Morris. 2010. Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 98(2):256–267.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Arnegger, Martin, and Christian Hofmann. 2014. Überprüfung des Zusammenhangs von Eigenschaften, Aufgaben und Vergütung von Aufsichtsräten deutscher Unternehmen. zfbf – Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 66(7):518–566.CrossRef Arnegger, Martin, and Christian Hofmann. 2014. Überprüfung des Zusammenhangs von Eigenschaften, Aufgaben und Vergütung von Aufsichtsräten deutscher Unternehmen. zfbf – Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 66(7):518–566.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Beaman, Lori, Raghabendra Chattopadhyay, Esther Duflo, Rohini Pande, and Petia Topalova. 2009. Powerful women: does exposure reduce bias? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(4):1497.CrossRef Beaman, Lori, Raghabendra Chattopadhyay, Esther Duflo, Rohini Pande, and Petia Topalova. 2009. Powerful women: does exposure reduce bias? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(4):1497.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bilimoria, Diana, and Sandy K. Piderit. 1994. Board committee membership: Effects of sex-based bias. The Academy of Management Journal 37(6):1453–1477. Bilimoria, Diana, and Sandy K. Piderit. 1994. Board committee membership: Effects of sex-based bias. The Academy of Management Journal 37(6):1453–1477.
Zurück zum Zitat Brescoll, Victoria L. 2016. Leading with their hearts? How gender stereotypes of emotion lead to biased evaluations of female leaders. Leadership Quarterly 27(3):415–428.CrossRef Brescoll, Victoria L. 2016. Leading with their hearts? How gender stereotypes of emotion lead to biased evaluations of female leaders. Leadership Quarterly 27(3):415–428.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brunzell, Tor, and Eva Liljeblom. 2014. Chairmen’s perceptions of female board representation: a study on Nordic listed companies. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 33(6):523–534.CrossRef Brunzell, Tor, and Eva Liljeblom. 2014. Chairmen’s perceptions of female board representation: a study on Nordic listed companies. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 33(6):523–534.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bugeja, Martin, Zoltan Matolcsy, and Helen Spiropoulos. 2016. The association between gender-diverse compensation committees and CEO compensation. Journal of Business Ethics 139(2):375–390.CrossRef Bugeja, Martin, Zoltan Matolcsy, and Helen Spiropoulos. 2016. The association between gender-diverse compensation committees and CEO compensation. Journal of Business Ethics 139(2):375–390.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Case, Susan S. 1993. The collaborative advantage: the usefulness of women’s language to contemporary business problems. Business in the Contemporary World 5(3):81–105. Case, Susan S. 1993. The collaborative advantage: the usefulness of women’s language to contemporary business problems. Business in the Contemporary World 5(3):81–105.
Zurück zum Zitat Dovidio, John F., Samuel L. Gaertner, and Kerry Kawakami. 2003. Intergroup contact: the past, the present, and the future. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 6(1):5–21.CrossRef Dovidio, John F., Samuel L. Gaertner, and Kerry Kawakami. 2003. Intergroup contact: the past, the present, and the future. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 6(1):5–21.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eagly, Alice.H., and Steven J. Karau. 2002. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review 109(3):573–598.CrossRef Eagly, Alice.H., and Steven J. Karau. 2002. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review 109(3):573–598.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fehre, Kerstin, and Rebecca Spiegelhalder. 2017. Same same, but different: Eine Analyse des Humankapitals weiblicher und männlicher Aufsichtsräte in Deutschland. zfbf – Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 69(3):311–343.CrossRef Fehre, Kerstin, and Rebecca Spiegelhalder. 2017. Same same, but different: Eine Analyse des Humankapitals weiblicher und männlicher Aufsichtsräte in Deutschland. zfbf – Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 69(3):311–343.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Green, Colin P., and Swarnodeep Homroy. 2018. Female directors, board committees and firm performance. European Economic Review 102(C):19–38.CrossRef Green, Colin P., and Swarnodeep Homroy. 2018. Female directors, board committees and firm performance. European Economic Review 102(C):19–38.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Harrison, David A., Kenneth H. Price, and Myrtle P. Bell. 1998. Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal 41(1):96–107. Harrison, David A., Kenneth H. Price, and Myrtle P. Bell. 1998. Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal 41(1):96–107.
Zurück zum Zitat Heilman, Madeline E. 1983. Sex bias in work settings: the lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior 5:269–298. Heilman, Madeline E. 1983. Sex bias in work settings: the lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior 5:269–298.
Zurück zum Zitat Heilman, Madeline E. 2001. Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues 57(4):657–674.CrossRef Heilman, Madeline E. 2001. Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues 57(4):657–674.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Heilman, Madeline E., and Michelle C. Haynes. 2005. No credit where credit is due: Attributional rationalization of women’s success in male-female teams. Journal of Applied Psychology 90(5):905–916.CrossRef Heilman, Madeline E., and Michelle C. Haynes. 2005. No credit where credit is due: Attributional rationalization of women’s success in male-female teams. Journal of Applied Psychology 90(5):905–916.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Heilman, Madeline E., Caryn J. Block, and Richard F. Martell. 1995. Sex stereotypes: Do they influence perceptions of managers? Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 10(4):237–252. Heilman, Madeline E., Caryn J. Block, and Richard F. Martell. 1995. Sex stereotypes: Do they influence perceptions of managers? Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 10(4):237–252.
Zurück zum Zitat Hillman, Amy J., Albert A. Cannella, and Ira C. Harris. 2002. Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: how do directors differ? Journal of Management 28(6):747–763.CrossRef Hillman, Amy J., Albert A. Cannella, and Ira C. Harris. 2002. Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: how do directors differ? Journal of Management 28(6):747–763.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hoyt, Crystal L., and Susan E. Murphy. 2016. Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership. Leadership Quarterly 27(3):387–399.CrossRef Hoyt, Crystal L., and Susan E. Murphy. 2016. Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership. Leadership Quarterly 27(3):387–399.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ibarra, Herminia. 1992. Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 37(3):422–447.CrossRef Ibarra, Herminia. 1992. Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 37(3):422–447.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jago, Arthur G., and Victor H. Vroom. 1982. Sex differences in the incidence and evaluation of participative leader behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology 67(6):776–783.CrossRef Jago, Arthur G., and Victor H. Vroom. 1982. Sex differences in the incidence and evaluation of participative leader behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology 67(6):776–783.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kesner, Idalene F. 1988. Directors’ characteristics and committee membership: an investigation of type, occupation, tenure, and gender. The Academy of Management Journal 31(1):66–84. Kesner, Idalene F. 1988. Directors’ characteristics and committee membership: an investigation of type, occupation, tenure, and gender. The Academy of Management Journal 31(1):66–84.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim, Daehyun, and Laura T. Starks. 2016. Gender diversity on corporate boards: do women contribute unique skills? American Economic Review 106(5):267–271.CrossRef Kim, Daehyun, and Laura T. Starks. 2016. Gender diversity on corporate boards: do women contribute unique skills? American Economic Review 106(5):267–271.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kirsch, Anja. 2018. The gender composition of corporate boards: a review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly 29(2):346–364.CrossRef Kirsch, Anja. 2018. The gender composition of corporate boards: a review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly 29(2):346–364.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Koenig, Anne M., Alice H. Eagly, Abigail A. Mitchell, and Tiina Ristikari. 2011. Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin 137(4):616–642.CrossRef Koenig, Anne M., Alice H. Eagly, Abigail A. Mitchell, and Tiina Ristikari. 2011. Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin 137(4):616–642.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li, Carmen A., and Bob Wearing. 2004. Between glass ceilings: female non-executive directors in UK quoted companies. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 1(4):355–371.CrossRef Li, Carmen A., and Bob Wearing. 2004. Between glass ceilings: female non-executive directors in UK quoted companies. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 1(4):355–371.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Peterson, Craig A., and James Philpot. 2007. Women’s roles on U.S. Fortune 500 boards: director expertise and committee memberships. Journal of Business Ethics 72(2):177–196.CrossRef Peterson, Craig A., and James Philpot. 2007. Women’s roles on U.S. Fortune 500 boards: director expertise and committee memberships. Journal of Business Ethics 72(2):177–196.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat du Plessis, Jean J., B. Großfeld, I. Saenger, O. Sandrock, and Matthias Casper. 2017. German Corporate Governance in International and European Context. German corporate governance in international and European context, 3rd edn., Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef du Plessis, Jean J., B. Großfeld, I. Saenger, O. Sandrock, and Matthias Casper. 2017. German Corporate Governance in International and European Context. German corporate governance in international and European context, 3rd edn., Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reding, Viviane. 2013. Winning the board game: Europe’s economy needs more women in business. In Getting women on to corporate boards: a snowball starting in Norway, ed. Silke Machold, Morten Huse, Katrin Hansen, and Marina Brogi, 201–209. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Reding, Viviane. 2013. Winning the board game: Europe’s economy needs more women in business. In Getting women on to corporate boards: a snowball starting in Norway, ed. Silke Machold, Morten Huse, Katrin Hansen, and Marina Brogi, 201–209. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 2001. Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues 57(4):637–655.CrossRef Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 2001. Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues 57(4):637–655.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ruigrok, Winfried, Wolfgang Amann, and Hardy Wagner. 2007. The internationalization-performance relationship at Swiss firms: a test of the S‑shape and extreme degrees of internationalization. Management International Review 47(3):349–368.CrossRef Ruigrok, Winfried, Wolfgang Amann, and Hardy Wagner. 2007. The internationalization-performance relationship at Swiss firms: a test of the S‑shape and extreme degrees of internationalization. Management International Review 47(3):349–368.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schulz-Strelow, Monika. 2013. Women on boards: lessons learnt from Norway. In Getting women on to corporate boards: a snowball starting in Norway, ed. Silke Machold, Morten Huse, Katrin Hansen, and Marina Brogi, 179–183. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Schulz-Strelow, Monika. 2013. Women on boards: lessons learnt from Norway. In Getting women on to corporate boards: a snowball starting in Norway, ed. Silke Machold, Morten Huse, Katrin Hansen, and Marina Brogi, 179–183. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat Sealy, Ruth H.V., and Val Singh. 2010. The importance of role models and demographic context for senior women’s work identity development. International Journal of Management Reviews 12(3):284–300. Sealy, Ruth H.V., and Val Singh. 2010. The importance of role models and demographic context for senior women’s work identity development. International Journal of Management Reviews 12(3):284–300.
Zurück zum Zitat Seierstad, Cathrine, Patricia Gabaldon, and Heike Mensi-Klarbach. 2017a. Volume 1: the use of different quota regulations. Gender diversity in the boardroom. Cham: Springer. Seierstad, Cathrine, Patricia Gabaldon, and Heike Mensi-Klarbach. 2017a. Volume 1: the use of different quota regulations. Gender diversity in the boardroom. Cham: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Seierstad, Cathrine, Patricia Gabaldon, and Heike Mensi-Klarbach. 2017b. Volume 2: Multiple approaches beyond quotas. Gender diversity in the boardroom. Cham: Springer. Seierstad, Cathrine, Patricia Gabaldon, and Heike Mensi-Klarbach. 2017b. Volume 2: Multiple approaches beyond quotas. Gender diversity in the boardroom. Cham: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Seierstad, Cathrine, Gillian Warner-Søderholm, Mariateresa Torchia, and Morten Huse. 2017c. Increasing the number of women on boards: the role of actors and processes. Journal of Business Ethics 141(2):289–315.CrossRef Seierstad, Cathrine, Gillian Warner-Søderholm, Mariateresa Torchia, and Morten Huse. 2017c. Increasing the number of women on boards: the role of actors and processes. Journal of Business Ethics 141(2):289–315.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Singh, Val, Siri Terjesen, and Susan Vinnicombe. 2008. Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: how do women and men differ? European Management Journal 26(1):48–58.CrossRef Singh, Val, Siri Terjesen, and Susan Vinnicombe. 2008. Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: how do women and men differ? European Management Journal 26(1):48–58.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sojo, Victor E., Robert E. Wood, Sally A. Wood, and Melissa A. Wheeler. 2016. Reporting requirements, targets, and quotas for women in leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 27(3):519–536.CrossRef Sojo, Victor E., Robert E. Wood, Sally A. Wood, and Melissa A. Wheeler. 2016. Reporting requirements, targets, and quotas for women in leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 27(3):519–536.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Second Glass Ceiling: Women’s Role in Supervisory Boards of German Firms
verfasst von
Viktor Bozhinov
Christopher Koch
Thorsten Schank
Publikationsdatum
13.12.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Schmalenbach Business Review / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1439-2917
Elektronische ISSN: 2194-072X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41464-018-0063-1

Premium Partner