Lex X be a normed space and Y be a Banach fuzzy space. Let D = {(x, y) ∈ X × X : ||x|| + ||y|| ≥ d} where d > 0. We prove that the Pexiderized Jensen functional equation is stable in the fuzzy norm for functions defined on D and taking values in Y. We consider also the Pexiderized Cauchy functional equation.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
All authors carried out the proof. All authors conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
1. Introduction
The functional equation (ξ) is stable if any function g satisfying the equation (ξ) approximately is near to the true solution of (ξ).
The stability problem of functional equations originated from a question of Ulam [1] concerning the stability of group homomorphisms:
Anzeige
Let G1 be a group and let G2 be a metric group with the metric d(·,·). Given ε > 0, does there exist δ > 0 such that if a function h : G1 → G2 satisfies the inequality d(h(xy), h(x)h(y)) < δ for all x, y ∈ G1, then there exists a homomorphism H : G1 → G2 with d(h(x), H(x)) < ε for all x ∈ G1?
In other words, we are looking for situations when the homomorphisms are stable, i.e., if a mapping is almost a homomorphism, then there exists a true homomorphism near it. If we turn our attention to the case of functional equations, then we can ask the question: When the solutions of an equation differing slightly from a given one must be close to the true solution of the given equation.
In 1941, Hyers [2] gave a partial solution of Ulam's problem for the case of approximate additive mappings under the assumption that G1 and G2 are Banach spaces. In 1950, Aoki [3] provided a generalization of the Hyers' theorem for additive mappings, and in 1978, Th.M. Rassias [4] succeeded in extending the result of Hyers for linear mappings by allowing the Cauchy difference to be unbounded (see also [5]). The stability phenomenon that was introduced and proved by Th.M. Rassias is called the generalized Hyers-Ulam stability. Forti [6] and Gǎvruta [7] have generalized the result of Th.M. Rassias, which permitted the Cauchy difference to become arbitrary unbounded. The stability problems of several functional equations have been extensively investigated by a number of authors, and there are many interesting results concerning this problem. A large list of references can be found, for example, in [8‐29].
Following [30], we give the following notion of a fuzzy norm.
Anzeige
Definition 1.1. [30] Let X be a real vector space. A function N : X × ℝ → [0, 1] is called a fuzzy norm on X if, for all x, y ∈ X and s, t ∈ ℝ,
(N1) N(x, t) = 0 for all t ≤ 0;
(N2) x = 0 if and only if N(x, t) = 1 for all t > 0;
(N3) if c ≠ 0;
(N4) N(x + y, s + t) ≥ min{N(x, s), N(y, t)};
(N5) N(x,·) is a nondecreasing function on ℝ and limt→∞N(x, t) = 1;
(N6) for x ≠ 0, N(x,·) is continuous on ℝ.
The pair (X, N) is called a fuzzy normed vector space.
Example 1.2. Let (X, ||·||) be a normed linear space and let α, β > 0. Then,
is a fuzzy norm on X.
Example 1.3. Let (X, ||·||) be a normed linear space and let β > α > 0. Then,
is a fuzzy norm on X.
Definition 1.4. Let (X, N) be a fuzzy normed space. A sequence {xn} in X is said to be convergent if there exists x ∈ X such that limn→∞N(xn- x, t) = 1 for all t > 0. In this case, x is called the limit of the sequence {xn}, and we denote it by N - lim xn= x.
The limit of the convergent sequence {xn} in (X, N) is unique. Since if N - lim xn= x and N-lim xn= y for some x, y ∈ X, it follows from (N4) that
for all t > 0 and n ∈ ℕ. So, N(x - y, t) = 1 for all t > 0. Hence, (N2) implies that x = y.
Definition 1.5. Let (X, N) be a fuzzy normed space. A sequence {xn} in X is called a Cauchy sequence if, for any ε > 0 and t > 0, there exists such that, for all n ≥ M and p > 0,
It follows from (N4) that every convergent sequence in a fuzzy normed space is a Cauchy sequence. If, in a fuzzy normed space, every Cauchy sequence is convergent, then the fuzzy norm is said to be complete, and the fuzzy normed space is called a fuzzy Banach space.
Example 1.6. [21] Let N : ℝ × ℝ → [0, 1] be a fuzzy norm on ℝ defined by
Then, (ℝ, N) is a fuzzy Banach space.
Recently, several various fuzzy stability results concerning a Cauchy sequence, Jensen and quadratic functional equations were investigated in [17‐20].
2. A local Hyers-Ulam stability of Jensen's equation
In 1998, Jung [16] investigated the Hyers-Ulam stability for Jensen's equation on a restricted domain. In this section, we prove a local Hyers-Ulam stability of the Pexiderized Jensen functional equation in fuzzy normed spaces.
Theorem 2.1. Let X be a normed space, (Y, N) be a fuzzy Banach space, and f, g, h : X→ Y be mappings with f(0) = 0. Suppose that δ > 0 is a positive real number, and z0is a fixed vector of a fuzzy normed space (Z, N') such that
(2.1)
for all x, y ∈ X with ||x|| + ||y|| ≥ d and positive real numbers t, s. Then, there exists a unique additive mapping T : X→ Y such that
(2.2)
(2.3)
(2.4)
for all x ∈ X and t > 0.
Proof. Suppose that ||x|| + ||y|| < d holds. If ||x|| + ||y|| = 0, let z ∈ X with ||z|| = d. Otherwise,
It is easy to verify that
(2.5)
It follows from (N4), (2.1) and (2.5) that
for all x, y ∈ X with ||x|| + ||y|| < d and positive real numbers t, s. Hence, we have
(2.6)
for all x, y ∈ X and positive real numbers t, s. Letting x = 0 (y = 0) in (2.6), we get
(2.7)
for all x, y ∈ X and positive real numbers t, s. It follows from (2.6) and (2.7) that
for all x, y ∈ X and positive real numbers t, s. Hence,
(2.8)
for all x, y ∈ X and positive real numbers t, s. Letting y = x and t = s in (2.8), we infer that
(2.9)
for all x ∈ X and positive real number t. replacing x by 2nx in (2.9), we get
(2.10)
for all x ∈ X, n ≥ 0 and positive real number t. It follows from (2.10) that
(2.11)
for all x ∈ X, t > 0 and integers n ≥ m ≥ 0. For any s, ε > 0, there exist an integer l > 0 and t0 > 0 such that N'(10δz0, t0) > 1 - ε and for all n ≥ m ≥ l. Hence, it follows from (2.11) that
for all n ≥ m ≥ l. So is a Cauchy sequence in Y for all x ∈ X. Since (Y, N) is complete, converges to a point T(x) ∈ Y. Thus, we can define a mapping T : X → Y by . Moreover, if we put m = 0 in (2.11), then we observe that
Therefore, it follows that
(2.12)
for all x ∈ X and positive real number t.
Next, we show that T is additive. Let x, y ∈ X and t > 0. Then, we have
(2.13)
Since, by (2.8),
we get
By the definition of T, the first three terms on the right hand side of the inequality (2.13) tend to 1 as n → ∞. Therefore, by tending n → ∞ in (2.13), we observe that T is additive.
Next, we approximate the difference between f and T in a fuzzy sense. For all x ∈ X and t > 0, we have
Since , letting n → ∞ in the above inequality and using (N) and (2.12), we get (2.2). It follows from the additivity of T and (2.7) that
for all x ∈ X and t > 0. So, we get (2.3). Similarly, we can obtain (2.4).
To prove the uniqueness of T, let S : X→ Y be another additive mapping satisfying the required inequalities. Then, for any x ∈ X and t > 0, we have
Therefore, by the additivity of T and S, it follows that
for all x ∈ X, t > 0 and n ≥ 1. Hence, the right hand side of the above inequality tends to 1 as n → ∞. Therefore, T(x) = S(x) for all x ∈ X. This completes the proof. □
The following is a local Hyers-Ulam stability of the Pexiderized Cauchy functional equation in fuzzy normed spaces.
Theorem 2.2. Let X be a normed space, (Y, N) be a fuzzy Banach space, and f, g, h : X→ Y be mappings with f(0) = 0. Suppose that δ > 0 is a positive real number, and z0is a fixed vector of a fuzzy normed space (Z, N') such that
(2.14)
for all x, y ∈ X with ||x|| + ||y|| ≥ d and positive real numbers t, s. Then, there exists a unique additive mapping T : X→ Y such that
for all x ∈ X and t > 0.
Proof. For the case ||x|| + ||y|| < d, let z be an element of X which is defined in the proof of Theorem 2.1. It follows from (N4), (2.5) and (2.14) that
for all x, y ∈ X with ||x|| + ||y|| < d and positive real numbers t, s. Hence, we have
(2.15)
for all x, y ∈ X and positive real numbers t, s. Letting x = 0 (y = 0) in (2.15), we get
(2.16)
for all x, y ∈ X and positive real numbers t, s. It follows from (2.15) and (2.16) that
for all x, y ∈ X and positive real numbers t, s. The rest of the proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 2.1, and we omit the details. □
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Korea Research Foundation (KRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) (no. 2009-0075850).
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0
), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
All authors carried out the proof. All authors conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.