Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction to Climate Change Mitigation Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2012 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Mass Media Roles in Climate Change Mitigation

verfasst von : Dr. Kristen Alley Swain

Erschienen in: Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation

Verlag: Springer US

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

News media portrayals of climate change have strongly influenced personal and global efforts to mitigate it through news production, individual media consumption, and personal engagement. This chapter explores the media framing of mitigation strategies, including the effects of media routines, factors that drive news coverage, the influences of claims-makers, scientists, and other information sources, the role of scientific literacy in interpreting climate change stories, and specific messages that mobilize action or paralysis. It also examines how journalists often explain complex climate science and legitimize sources, how audiences process competing messages about scientific uncertainty, how climate stories compete with other issues for public attention, how large-scale economic and political factors shape news production, and how the media can engage public audiences in climate change issues.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Ethics and Environmental Policy
Nächstes Kapitel Sustainable Development: Ecology and Economic Growth
Literatur
1.
Bennett WL (2002) News: the politics of illusion. Longman, New York, p 10
2.
Kenix LJ (2008) Framing science: climate change in the mainstream and alternative news of New Zealand. Polit Sci 60(1):117–132
3.
4.
5.
Hulme M (2006) Chaotic world of climate truth. BBC News
6.
Ungar S (1992) The rise and (relative) decline of global warming as a social problem. Sociol Quart 33(4):483–501MathSciNet
7.
Carpenter C (2002) Businesses, green groups and the media: the role of non-governmental organizations in the climate change debate. Int Aff 77(2):313–328MathSciNet
8.
Uusi-Rauva C (2010) The EU energy and climate package: a showcase for European environmental leadership? Environ Policy Governance 20(2):73–88
9.
10.
Gushee DE (2004) CAIChE offers technological insights to the public policy debate on global climate change. Environ Prog 19(3):F2–F4
11.
Weart SR (2009) The idea of anthropogenic global climate change in the 20th century. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 1(1):67–81
12.
Weisskopf M (1988) Two senate bills take aim at “greenhouse effect.” Washington Post p A17
13.
Trumbo C (1996) Constructing climate change: claims and frames in U.S. news coverage of an environmental issue. Public Underst Sci 5:269–283
14.
Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM (2004) Bias as balance: global warming and the U.S. Prestige Press. Glob Environ Change 14(2):125–136
15.
Gelbspan R (1998) The heat is on: the climate crisis, the cover-up, the prescription. Perseus Press, New York
16.
Schneider SS (2001) A constructive deconstruction of deconstructionists: a response to Demeritt. Ann Assoc Am Geog 91(2):338–344
17.
Luganda P (2005) Communication critical in mitigating climate change in Africa. Open meeting of the international human dimensions programme, Bonn, Germany
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
Good JE (2008) The framing of climate change in Canadian, American and international newspapers: a media propaganda model analysis. Can J Commun 33(2):233–255
24.
Herman ES, Chomsky N (1988) Manufacturing consent: the political economy of the mass media. Pantheon Books, New York
25.
Gamson WA, Croteau D, Hoynes W, Sasson T (1992) Media images and the social construction of reality. Ann Rev Sociol 18:373–393
26.
Price V, Nir L, Capella JN (2005) Framing public discussion of gay civil unions. Public Opin Quart 69(2):179–212
27.
Entman RM (1993) Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J Commun 43:51–58
28.
Hart PS (2010) One or many? The influence of episodic and thematic climate change frames on policy preferences and individual behavior change. Science Commun
29.
Listerman T (2010) Framing of science issues in opinion-leading news: international comparison of biotechnology issue coverage. Public Underst Sci 19(1):5–15
30.
Gamson WA, Modigliani A (1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach. Am J Sociol 95(1):1–37
31.
Takahashi B (2010) Framing and sources: a study of mass media coverage of climate change in Peru during the V ALCUE. Public Underst Sci
32.
Dirikx A, Gelders D (2010) To frame is to explain: a deductive frame-analysis of Dutch and French climate change coverage during the annual UN conferences of the parties. Public Underst Sci 19:732–742
33.
Garcia D (2010) Warming to a redefinition of international security: the consolidation of a norm concerning climate change. Int Relat 24(3):271–292
34.
Shove E (2010) Social theory and climate change: questions often, sometimes and not yet asked. Theor Cult Soc 27(2–3):277–288
35.
Weaver DA, Lively E, Bimber B (2009) Searching for a frame: news media tell the story of technological progress, risk, and regulation. Sci Commun 31(2):139–166
36.
Whitmarsh L (2009) What’s in a name? commonalities and differences in public understanding of “climate change” and “global warming. Public Underst Sci 18(4):401–420
37.
Lakoff G (2004) Don’t think of an elephant: know your values and frame the debate. Chelsea Green, White River Junction
38.
Woods R, Fernandez A, Coen S (2010) The use of religious metaphors by UK newspapers to describe and denigrate climate change. Public Underst Sci
39.
Stewart CO, Dickerson DL, Hotchkiss R (2009) Beliefs about science and news frames in audience evaluations of embryonic and adult stem cell research. Sci Commun 30:427–452
40.
41.
42.
Carvalho A, Burgess J (2005) Cultural circuits of climate change in UK broadsheet newspapers, 1985–2003. Risk Anal 25(6):1457–1469
43.
Weintraub D (2007) Newspaper coverage of global climate change: risk, frames and sources. Master’s thesis, University of South Carolina, Columbia
44.
Agarwal A, Narain S (1991) Global warming in an unequal world: a case of environmental colonialism. Center for Science and Environment, New Delhi
45.
Antilla L (2010) Self-censorship and science: a geographical review of media coverage of climate tipping points. Public Underst Sci 19:240–256
46.
Koteyko N (2010) From carbon markets to carbon morality: creative compounds as framing devices in online discourses on climate change mitigation. Sci Commun 32(1):25–54
47.
Boykoff MT (2008) Media and scientific communication: a case of climate change. Geol Soc 305:11–18, London, Special Publications
48.
49.
Hilgartner S, Bosk CL (1988) The rise and fall of social problems: a public arenas model. Am J Sociol 94(1):53–78
50.
Walton J (2007) Making sustainability matter: the effect of message framing on inclination to act. Master’s thesis, Colorado State University
51.
Manzo K (2010) Beyond polar bears? Re-envisioning climate change. Meteorol Appl 17(2):196–208
52.
Soroka S, Farnsworth SJ, Young L, Lawlor A (2009) Environment and energy policy: comparing reports from U.S. and Canadian network news. American Political Science Association, Toronto
53.
Shanahan J, Good J (2000) Heat and hot air: influence of local temperature on journalists’ coverage of global warming. Public Underst Sci 9:285–295
54.
Carvalho A (2010) Media(ted)discourses and climate change: a focus on political subjectivity and (dis)engagement. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 1(2):172–179
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
Farbotko C (2005) Tuvalu and climate change: constructions of environmental displacement in the Sydney Morning Herald. Hum Geogr 87(4):279–293
60.
Jay M, Marmot MG (2009) Health and climate change: will a global commitment be made at the UN climate change conference in December? Brit Med J 339:645–646
61.
Leiserowitz A (2005) American risk perceptions: is climate change dangerous? Risk Anal 25(6):1433–1442
62.
Maibach EW, Nisbet M, Baldwin MP, Akerlof K, Diao G (2010) Reframing climate change as a public health issue: an exploratory study of public reactions. BMC Public Health 10:299
63.
Liu X, Lindquist E, Vedlitz A (2009) Explaining media and congressional attention to global climate change, 1969–2005: an empirical test of agenda-setting theory. Polit Res Quart
64.
65.
66.
Nisbet MC, Brossard D, Kroepsch A (2003) Framing science: the stem cell controversy in an age of press/politics. Int J Press Polit 8(2):36–70
67.
Nisbet MC, Huge M (2006) Attention cycles and frames in the plant biotechnology debate: managing power and participation through the press/policy connection. Int J Press Polit 11(2):3–40
68.
McComas K, Shanahan J (1999) Telling stories about global climate change: measuring the impact of narratives on issue cycles. Commun Res 26(1):30–57
69.
Downs A (1972) Up and down with ecology: the issue-attention cycle. Public Int 28:38–50
70.
Dunlap RE (1992) Trends in public opinion toward environmental issues: 1965–1992. Soc Nat Resour 4(3):285–312
71.
Brossard D, Shanahan J, McComas K (2004) Are issue-cycles culturally constructed? A comparison of French and American coverage of global climate change. Mass Commun Soc 7(3):359–377
72.
Jordan A, O’Riordan T (2000) Environmental politics and policy processes. In: O’Riordan T (ed) Environmental science for environmental management. Prentice Hall, Harlow
73.
Major AM, Atwood LE (2004) Environmental risks in the news: issues, sources, problems, and values. Public Underst Sci 13:295–308
74.
75.
Bickerstaff K, Lorenzoni I, Pidgeon NF, Poortinga W, Simmons P (2008) Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste. Public Underst Sci 17(2):145–169
76.
Yearley S (2009) Sociology and climate change after Kyoto: what roles for social science in understanding climate change? Curr Sociol 57(3):389–405
77.
Sonnett J (2010) Climates of risk: a field analysis of global climate change in US media discourse, 1997–2004. Public Underst Sci 19(6):698–716
78.
Durfee JL (2006) “Social change” and “status quo” framing effects on risk perception: an exploratory experiment. Sci Commun 27(4):459–495
79.
Kahlor L, Rosenthal S (2009) If we seek, do we learn? Predicting knowledge of global warming. Sci Commun 30:380–414
80.
Lorenzoni I, Hulme M (2009) Believing is seeing: laypeople’s views of future socio-economic and climate change in England and in Italy. Public Underst Sci 18:383–400
81.
Brody SD, Zahran S, Vedlitz A, Grover H (2008) Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environ Behav 40(1):72–95
82.
Zhao X (2009) Media use and global warming perceptions: a snapshot of the reinforcing spirals. Commun Res 36(5):698–723
83.
Herzog HJ, Curry TE et al (2005) Climate change survey. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston
84.
Bell A (1994) Climate of opinion: public and media discourse on the global environment. Discourse Soc 5(1):33–64
85.
Lorenzoni I, Pidgeon NF (2006) Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Clim Change 77(1):73–95
86.
The Nielsen Company (2007) Global omnibus survey. Oxford, UK
87.
88.
Will GF (2009) Climate science in a tornado. Washington Post, 27 Feb 2009
89.
Marlowe E (2005) Seeing red in green news: credibility and perceived bias in environmental news articles. Master’s thesis, University of Missouri
90.
Kim KS (2010) Public understanding of the politics of global warming in the news media: the hostile media approach. Public Underst Sci
91.
92.
Slovic P (1987) Perceptions of risk. Science 236:280–285
93.
Krosnick JA, Holbrook AL (2006) The origins and consequences of democratic citizens’ policy agendas: a study of popular concern about global warming. Clim Change 77(1):7–43
94.
Jasanoff S (1997) Civilization and madness: the great BSE scare of 1996. Public Underst Sci 6:221–232
95.
Leiserowitz A (2006) Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Clim Change 77(1):45–72
96.
97.
Hansen A (1994) Journalistic practices and science reporting in the British press. Public Underst Sci 3:111–134
98.
Anderson A (2009) Media, politics and climate change: towards a new research agenda. Sociol Comp 3(2):166–182
99.
Einsiedel EF (1992) Framing science and technology in the Canadian press. Public Underst Sci 1:89–101
100.
Pellechia MG (1997) Trends in science coverage: a content analysis of three U.S. newspapers. Public Underst Sci 6:49–68
101.
Fedler F, Bender JR (1997) Reporting for the media. Harcourt Brace, Fort Worth
102.
Dunwoody S, Griffin RJ (1993) Journalistic strategies for reporting long-term environmental issues: a case study of three superfund sites. In: Hansen A (ed) The mass media and environmental issues. Leicester University Press, Leicester, pp 22–50
103.
Harbinson R, Mugara R et al (2006) Whatever the weather: media attitudes to reporting on climate change. Panos Institute, London
104.
Wilkins L, Patterson P (1987) Risk analysis and the construction of news. J Commun 37(3):80–92
105.
Ereaut G, Segnit N (2006) Warm words: how are we telling the climate story and can we tell it better. Institute for Public Policy Research, London
106.
Wilson KM (2000) Communicating climate change through the media: predictions, politics, and perceptions of risk. In: Allan S, Adam B, Carter C (eds) Environmental risks and the media. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 201–217
107.
Wilson KM (2002) Forecasting the future: how television weathercasters – attitudes and beliefs about climate change affect their cognitive knowledge on the science. Sci Commun 24:246–268
108.
Wilson KM (2000) Drought, debate, and uncertainty: measuring reporters’ knowledge and ignorance about climate change. Public Underst Sci 9:1–13
109.
Bell A (1994) Media (mis)communication on the science of climate change. Public Underst Sci 3(3):259–275
110.
Sundblad E, Biel A, Garling T (2009) Knowledge and confidence in knowledge about climate change among experts, journalists, politicians, and laypersons. Environ Behav 41:281–302
111.
Yaros RA (2006) Is it the medium or the message? Structuring complex news to enhance engagement and situational understanding by non-experts. Commun Res 33(4):285–309
112.
113.
Detjen J, Fico F, Li X, Kim Y (2000) Changing work environment of environmental reporters. Newspaper Res J 21:2–25
114.
Ryan C, Carrage KM, Schwerner C (1998) Media movements and the quest for social justice. J Appl Commun Res 26:165–181
115.
Stempel G, Culberston H (1984) The prominence and dominance of news sources in newspaper medical coverage. Journalism Q 61:671–676
116.
Roscho B (1975) Newsmaking. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
117.
Meyer P (1988) Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: developing an index. Journalism Q 65(567–574):588
118.
Mooney C (2009) Climate change myths and facts. Washington Post, 21 Mar 2009
119.
Flynn T (2002) Source credibility and global warming: a content analysis of environmental groups. Paper presented to the association for education in journalism and mass communication convention, Miami
120.
Boykoff MT (2007) Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003–2006. Area 39(4):470–481
121.
Miller MM, Riechert BP (2000) Interest group strategies and journalistic norms: news media framing of environmental issues. In: Allan S, Adam B, Carter C (eds) Environmental risks and the media. Routledge, London, pp 45–54
122.
McManus PA (2000) Beyond Kyoto? Media representation of an environmental issue. Aust Geogr Stud 38(3):306–319
123.
Pidgeon N, Gregory R (2004) Judgment, decision-making and public policy. In: Handbook of judgment and decision making. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 604–623
124.
McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2003) Defeating Kyoto: the conservative movement’s impact on U.S. climate change policy. Social Problems 50(3):348–373
125.
McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2000) Challenging global warming as a social problem: an analysis of the conservative movement’s counter-claims. Soc Probl 47(4):499–522
126.
Freudenburg WR (2000) Social construction and social constrictions: toward analyzing the social construction of ‘The Naturalized’ and well as ‘The Natural’. In: Spaargaren G, Mol APJ, Buttel FH (eds) Environment and global modernity. Sage, London, pp 103–119
127.
McKnight D (2010) A change in the climate? The journalism of opinion at News Corporation. Journalism 11(6):693–706
128.
Stocking SH, Holstein LW (2009) Manufacturing doubt: journalists’ roles and the construction of ignorance in a scientific controversy. Public Underst Sci 18:23–42
129.
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (2010) Michael E. Mann: a scientist in the crosshairs of climate-change denial. Bull Atom Sci 66(6):1–7
130.
Wilkins L (1993) Between facts and values: print media coverage of the greenhouse effect, 1987–1990. Public Underst Sci 2:71–84
131.
Newell P (2000) Climate for change: non-state actors and the global politics of the greenhouse. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 152
132.
Brittle C, Muthuswamy N (2009) Scientific elites and concern for global warming: the impact of disagreement, evidence strength, partisan cues, and exposure to news content on concern for global warming. Int J Sustain Commun 4:23–44
133.
Farnsworth SJ, Lichter SR (2009) The structure of evolving U.S. scientific opinion on climate change and its potential consequences. American Political Science Association, Toronto
134.
135.
Grundmann R (2006) Ozone and climate: scientific consensus and leadership. Sci Technol Hum Val 31(1):73–101
136.
Brittle C (2005) Global warnings! The impact of scientific elite disagreement on public opinion. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
137.
Carvalho A (2007) Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change. Public Underst Sci 16:223–243
138.
Hulme M, Mahony M (2010) Climate change: what do we know about the IPCC? Progr Phys Geogr 34(5):705–718
139.
Freudenburg WR, Musellia V (2010) Global warming estimates, media expectations, and the asymmetry of scientific challenge. Glob Environ Change 20(3):483–491
140.
Weingart P, Engels A et al (2000) Risks of communication: discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Underst Sci 9:261–283
141.
142.
Jennings N, Hulme M (2010) UK newspaper (mis)representations of the potential for a collapse of the Thermohaline Circulation. Area 42(4):444–456
143.
Pollack H (2003) Can the media help science? Skeptic 10(2):73–80
144.
Demeritt D (2001) The construction of global warming and the politics of science. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 91(2):307–337
145.
Zehr SC (2000) Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Underst Sci 9:85–103
146.
Zehr S (1999) Scientists’ representations of uncertainty. Communicating uncertainty: media representations of global warming. Sci Commun 26(2):129
147.
McCright AM (2007) Dealing with climate contrarians. In: Moser SC, Dilling L (eds) Creating a climate for change: communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
148.
Schneider SH (1993) Degrees of certainty. Res Explor 9(2):173–181
149.
Dunwoody S (1999) Scientists, journalists, and the meaning of uncertainty. In: Friedman SM, Dunwoody S, Rogers CL (eds) Communicating uncertainty: media coverage of new and controversial science. Routledge/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah
150.
Corbett JB, Durfee JL (2004) Testing public (un) certainty of science: media coverage of new and controversial science. In: Friedman SM, Dunwoody S, Rogers CL (eds) Communicating uncertainty: media coverage of new and controversial science. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 3–22
151.
Entman RM (1989) Democracy without citizens: media and the decay of American politics. Oxford University Press, New York
152.
Dunwoody S, Peters HP (1992) Mass media coverage of technological and environmental risks. Public Underst Sci 1(2):199–230
153.
Cunningham B (2003) Re-thinking objectivity. Columbia J Rev 42(2):24–32
154.
Augoustinos M, Crabb S, Shepherd R (2010) Genetically modified food in the news: media representations of the GM debate in the UK. Public Underst Sci 19:98–114
155.
Gordon JC, Deines T, Havice J (2010) Global warming coverage in the media: trends in a Mexico City Newspaper. Sci Commun 32:143–170
156.
Kuban A (2007) The U.S. broadcast news media as a social arena in the global climate change debate. Master’s thesis, Iowa State University, Ames
157.
Banning ME (2009) When poststructural theory and contemporary politics collide: the vexed case of global warming. Commun Crit Cult Stud 6(3):285–304
158.
Revkin A (2007) Climate change as news: challenges in communicating environmental science. In: DiMento JC, Doughman PM (eds) Climate change: what it means for us, our children, and our grandchildren. MIT Press, Boston, pp 139–160
159.
Boykoff MT, Rajan SR (2007) Signals and noise: mass-media coverage of climate change in the USA and the UK. Eur Mol Biol Organ Rep 8(3):1–5
160.
Lee G, Yoo CY (2004) Attribute salience transfer of global warming issue from online papers to the public. In: Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication convention, Toronto
161.
Andreadis E, Smith J (2007) Beyond the oozone layer. Brit J Rev 18(1):50–56
162.
163.
164.
Miller JD (2004) Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: what we know and what we need to know. Public Underst Sci 13:273–294
165.
Gavin NT, Leonard-Milsom L, Montgomery J (2010) Climate change, flooding and the media in Britain. Public Underst Sci
166.
167.
Collins HM, Evans R (2002) The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience. Soc Stud Sci 32(2):235–296
168.
Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, London
169.
170.
Soroka SN (2002) Agenda-setting dynamics in Canada. UBC Press, Vancouver
171.
Lowi TJ (1972) Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Admin Rev 32(4):298–310
172.
Priest SH (2006) Public discourse and scientific controversy: a spiral-of-silence analysis of biotechnology opinion in the United States. Sci Commun 28(2):195–215
173.
Beck U (2010) Climate for change, or how to create a green modernity? Theory Cult Soc 27(2–3):254–266
174.
175.
Bord RJ, O’Connor RE, Fisher A (2000) In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change? Public Underst Sci 9:205–218
176.
177.
Nisbet MC, Goidel RK (2007) Understanding citizen perceptions of science controversy: bridging the ethnographic-survey research divide. Public Underst Sci 16(4):421–440
178.
Zia A, Todd AM (2010) Evaluating the effects of ideology on public understanding of climate change science: how to improve communication across ideological divides? Public Underst Sci 19(6):743–761
179.
Evans G, Durant J (1995) The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Underst Sci 4:57–74
180.
Sturgis P, Allum N (2004) Science in society: re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Underst Sci 13:55–74
181.
Eden S (1996) Public participation in environmental policy: considering scientific, counter-scientific and non-scientific contributions. Public Underst Sci 5:183–204
182.
Nisbet MC, Scheufele DA (2009) What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. Am J Bot 96:1767–1778
183.
Rowe G, Horlick-Jones T, Walls J, Pidgeon N (2005) Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? Public debate about transgenic crops. Public Underst Sci 14:331–352
184.
Hall NL, Taplin R, Goldstein W (2010) Empowerment of individuals and realization of community agency: applying action research to climate change responses in Australia. Action Res 8(1):71–91
185.
Kerr A, Cunningham-Burley S, Amos A (1998) The new genetics and health: mobilizing lay expertise. Public Underst Sci 7:41–60
186.
Olausson U (2009) Global warming: global responsibility? Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty. Public Underst Sci 18:421–436
187.
Irwin A (2001) Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Underst Sci 10:1–18
188.
Nisbet MC, Kotcher JE (2009) A two-step flow of influence? Opinion-leader campaigns on climate change. Sci Commun 30(3):328–354
189.
Ockwell D, Whitmarsh L, O’Neill S (2009) Reorienting climate change communication for effective mitigation: forcing people to be green or fostering grass-roots engagement? Sci Commun 30(3):305–327
190.
Akerlof K, DeBono R, Berry P, Leiserowitz A, Roser-Renouf C, Clarke KL, Rogaeva A, Nisbet MC, Weathers MR, Miabach EW (2010) Public perceptions of climate change as a human health risk: surveys of the United States, Canada and Malta. Int J Environ Res Public Health 7(6):2559–2606
191.
192.
Kreps G, Maibach E (2008) Transdisciplinary science: the nexus between communication and public health. J Commun 58:732–748
193.
Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Leiserowitz A (2008) Communication and marketing as climate change intervention assets: a public health perspective. Am J Prev Med 35(5):488–500
194.
Abroms L, Maibach E (2008) The effectiveness of mass communication to change public behavior. Ann Rev Publ Health 29:1–16
195.
196.
Ho SS, Brossard D, Scheufele DA (2008) Effects of value predispositions, mass media use, and knowledge on public attitudes toward embryonic stem cell research. Int J Publ Opin Res 20(2):171–192
197.
O’Neill S, Nicholson-Cole S (2009) “Fear won’t do it”: promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Sci Commun 30(3):355–379
198.
Lowe T, Brown K, Dessai S, de França DM, Haynes K, Vincent K (2006) Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change. Public Underst Sci 15(4):435–457
199.
Höijer B (2010) Emotional anchoring and objectification in the media reporting on climate change. Public Underst Sci 19(6):717–731
200.
Wynne B (1993) Public uptake of science: a case for institutional reflexivity. Public Underst Sci 2:321–337
Metadaten
Titel
Mass Media Roles in Climate Change Mitigation
verfasst von
Dr. Kristen Alley Swain
Copyright-Jahr
2012
Verlag
Springer US
Buch
Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation

Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7990-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-4419-7991-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2012

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7991-9_6