nach oben

Erschienen in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Measures for Quality Assessment of Articles and Infoboxes in Multilingual Wikipedia

verfasst von : Włodzimierz Lewoniewski

Erschienen in: Business Information Systems Workshops

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

One of the most popular collaborative knowledge bases on the Internet is Wikipedia. Articles of this free encyclopaedia are created and edited by users from different countries in about 300 languages. Depending on topic and language version, quality of information there may vary. This study presents and classifies measures that can be extracted from Wikipedia articles for the purpose of automatic quality assessment in different languages. Based on a state of the art analysis and own experiments, specific measures for various aspects of quality have been defined. Additional, in this work they were also defined measures for quality assessment of data contained in the structural parts of Wikipedia articles - infoboxes. This study describes also an extraction methods for various sources of measures, that can be used in quality assessment.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Access Control and Quality Attributes of Open Data: Applications and Techniques

Nächstes Kapitel Supply Chain Modelling Using Data Science

Abramowicz, W., Auer, S., Heath, T.: Linked data in business. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 58(5), 323–326 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-016-0446-0CrossRef

Alexa: Wikipedia.org traffic, demographics and competitors. https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/wikipedia.org

Altmetric: free tools. https://www.altmetric.com/products/free-tools/

Anderka, M.: Analyzing and predicting quality flaws in user-generated content: the case of Wikipedia. Ph.D. Bauhaus-Universitaet Weimar Germany (2013)

Blumenstock, J.E.: Automatically assessing the quality of Wikipedia articles. Technical report (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880802324251CrossRef

Blumenstock, J.E.: Size matters: word count as a measure of quality on Wikipedia. In: WWW, pp. 1095–1096 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1145/1367497.1367673

Bormuth, J.R.: Readability: a new approach. Read. Res. Q. 1, 79–132 (1966)CrossRef

Brin, S., Page, L.: The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Comput. Netw. ISDN Syst. 30(1–7), 107–117 (1998)CrossRef

De la Calzada, G., Dekhtyar, A.: On measuring the quality of Wikipedia articles. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Information Credibility, pp. 11–18. ACM (2010)

10.

Caylor, J.S., Sticht, T.G.: Development of a simple readability index for job reading material (1973)

11.

Chen, H.H.: How to use readability formulas to access and select English reading materials. J. Educ. Media Libr. Sci. 50(2), 229–254 (2012)

12.

Coleman, M., Liau, T.L.: A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring. J. Appl. Psychol. 60(2), 283 (1975)CrossRef

13.

Conti, R., Marzini, E., Spognardi, A., Matteucci, I., Mori, P., Petrocchi, M.: Maturity assessment of Wikipedia medical articles. In: 2014 IEEE 27th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), pp. 281–286. IEEE (2014)

14.

Dale, E., Chall, J.S.: A formula for predicting readability: instructions. Educ. Res. Bull. 18, 37–54 (1948)

15.

Dalip, D.H., Gonçalves, M.A., Cristo, M., Calado, P.: Automatic quality assessment of content created collaboratively by web communities: a case study of Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, pp. 295–304 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1555400.1555449

16.

Dalip, D.H., Gonçalves, M.A., Cristo, M., Calado, P.: Automatic assessment of document quality in web collaborative digital libraries. J. Data Inf. Quality 2(3), 1–30 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/2063504.2063507CrossRef

17.

Dang, Q.V., Ignat, C.L.: Measuring quality of collaboratively edited documents: the case of Wikipedia. In: 2016 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC), pp. 266–275. IEEE (2016)

18.

DBpedia: Main Page. https://wiki.dbpedia.org

19.

Einstein, A.: The Meaning of Relativity. Routledge, Abingdon (2003)CrossRef

20.

English Wikipedia: API sandbox. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ApiSandbox

21.

English Wikipedia: Criticism of Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Wikipedia

22.

English Wikipedia: Featured article criteria. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_criteria

23.

English Wikipedia: Featured articles. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_articles

24.

English Wikipedia: Good articles. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_articles

25.

English Wikipedia: Verifiability. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability

26.

English Wikipedia: Wikiproject tabular data. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Tabular_Data

27.

Eppler, M.J.: Managing Information Quality: Increasing the Value of Information in Knowledge-Intensive Products and Processes. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32225-6CrossRef

28.

Ferschke, O., Gurevych, I., Rittberger, M.: FlawFinder: a modular system for predicting quality flaws in Wikipedia. In: CLEF (Online Working Notes/Labs/Workshop), pp. 1–10 (2012)

29.

Filipiak, D., Filipowska, A.: Improving the quality of art market data using linked open data and machine learning. In: Abramowicz, W., Alt, R., Franczyk, B. (eds.) BIS 2016. LNBIP, vol. 263, pp. 418–428. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52464-1_39CrossRef

30.

Flekova, L., Ferschke, O., Gurevych, I.: What makes a good biography? Multidimensional quality analysis based on Wikipedia article feedback data. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 855–866. ACM (2014)

31.

Flesch, R.: A new readability yardstick. J. Appl. Psychol. 32(3), 221 (1948)CrossRef

32.

Greenfield, G.R.: Classic readability formulas in an EFL context: are they valid for Japanese speakers? Ph.D. thesis. Temple University (1999)

33.

Gunning, R.: The Technique of Clear Writing. McGraw-Hill, New York (1952)

34.

Hazen, B.T., Boone, C.A., Ezell, J.D., Jones-Farmer, L.A.: Data quality for data science, predictive analytics, and big data in supply chain management: an introduction to the problem and suggestions for research and applications. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 154, 72–80 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.04.018CrossRef

35.

Infoboxes.net: quality comparison of infoboxes in Miltilingual Wikipedia. http://infoboxes.net

36.

Juran, J., Godfrey, A.B.: Quality Handbook, pp. 173–178. McGraw-Hill, New York (1999)

37.

Kane, G.C.: A multimethod study of information quality in Wiki collaboration. ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst. (TMIS) 2(1), 4 (2011)

38.

Kincaid, J.P., Fishburne Jr, R.P., Rogers, R.L., Chissom, B.S.: Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and Flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Technical report. Naval Technical Training Command Millington TN Research Branch (1975)

39.

Kittur, A., Kraut, R.E.: Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in Wikipedia: quality through coordination. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2008 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW 2008, p. 37 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460572

40.

Kontokostas, D., et al.: Test-driven evaluation of linked data quality. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 747–758. ACM (2014)

41.

Lerner, J., Lomi, A.: Knowledge categorization affects popularity and quality of Wikipedia articles. PloS One 13(1), e0190674 (2018)CrossRef

42.

Lewoniewski, W.: Completeness and reliability of Wikipedia infoboxes in various languages. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) BIS 2017. LNBIP, vol. 303, pp. 295–305. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69023-0_25CrossRef

43.

Lewoniewski, W.: Enrichment of information in multilingual Wikipedia based on quality analysis. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) BIS 2017. LNBIP, vol. 303, pp. 216–227. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69023-0_19CrossRef

44.

Lewoniewski, W., Härting, R.-C., Wecel, K., Reichstein, C., Abramowicz, W.: Application of SEO metrics to determine the quality of Wikipedia articles and their sources. In: Damaševičius, R., Vasiljevienė, G. (eds.) ICIST 2018. CCIS, vol. 920, pp. 139–152. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99972-2_11CrossRef

45.

Lewoniewski, W., Khairova, N., Węcel, K., Stratiienko, N., Abramowicz, W.: Using morphological and semantic features for the quality assessment of Russian Wikipedia. In: Damaševičius, R., Mikašytė, V. (eds.) ICIST 2017. CCIS, vol. 756, pp. 550–560. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67642-5_46CrossRef

46.

Lewoniewski, W., Węcel, K.: Relative quality assessment of Wikipedia articles in different languages using synthetic measure. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) BIS 2017. LNBIP, vol. 303, pp. 282–292. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69023-0_24CrossRef

47.

Lewoniewski, W., Węcel, K., Abramowicz, W.: Quality and importance of Wikipedia articles in different languages. In: Dregvaite, G., Damasevicius, R. (eds.) ICIST 2016. CCIS, vol. 639, pp. 613–624. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46254-7_50CrossRef

48.

Lewoniewski, W., Węcel, K., Abramowicz, W.: Relative quality and popularity evaluation of multilingual Wikipedia articles. Informatics 4 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics4040043CrossRef

49.

Lewoniewski, W., Węcel, K., Abramowicz, W.: Determining quality of articles in polish Wikipedia based on linguistic features. In: Damaševičius, R., Vasiljevienė, G. (eds.) ICIST 2018. CCIS, vol. 920, pp. 546–558. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99972-2_45CrossRef

50.

Lih, A.: Wikipedia as participatory journalism: reliable sources? Metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource. In: 5th International Symposium on Online Journalism, p. 31 (2004)

51.

Liu, J., Ram, S.: Using big data and network analysis to understand Wikipedia article quality. Data Knowl. Eng. 115, 80–93 (2018)CrossRef

52.

Lucassen, T., Schraagen, J.M.: Trust in Wikipedia: how users trust information from an unknown source. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Information Credibility, pp. 19–26. ACM (2010)

53.

Mc Laughlin, G.H.: SMOG grading-a new readability formula. J. Read. 12(8), 639–646 (1969)

54.

Mendes, P.N., Mühleisen, H., Bizer, C.: Sieve: linked data quality assessment and fusion. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Joint EDBT/ICDT Workshops, pp. 116–123. ACM (2012)

55.

Microsoft Azure: Cloud computing platform & services. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/

56.

Moyer, D., Carson, S.L., Dye, T.K., Carson, R.T., Goldbaum, D.: Determining the influence of reddit posts on Wikipedia pageviews. In: Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, pp. 75–82. AAAI Press Oxford, UK (2015)

57.

O’Brien, J.A., Marakas, G.M.: Introduction to Information Systems, vol. 13. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York City (2005)

58.

OECD Glossary of Statistical Terms: ISO 8402 - quality. http://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=5150

59.

Ransbotham, S., Kane, G.: Membership turnover and collaboration success in online communities: explaining rises and falls from grace in Wikipedia. MIS Q. 35(3), 613–627 (2011)CrossRef

60.

Ransbotham, S., Kane, G.C., Lurie, N.H.: Network characteristics and the value of collaborative user-generated content. Mark. Sci. 31(3), 387–405 (2012)CrossRef

61.

di Sciascio, C., Strohmaier, D., Errecalde, M., Veas, E.: WikiLyzer: interactive information quality assessment in Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 377–388. ACM (2017)

62.

Senter, R., Smith, E.A.: Automated readability index. Technical report, University of Cincinnati, Ohio (1967)

63.

Shang, W.: A comparison of the historical entries in Wikipedia and Baidu Baike. In: Chowdhury, G., McLeod, J., Gillet, V., Willett, P. (eds.) iConference 2018. LNCS, vol. 10766, pp. 74–80. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_9CrossRef

64.

Shen, A., Qi, J., Baldwin, T.: A hybrid model for quality assessment of Wikipedia articles. In: Proceedings of the Australasian Language Technology Association Workshop, pp. 43–52 (2017)

65.

Soonthornphisaj, N., Paengporn, P.: Thai Wikipedia article quality filtering algorithm. In: Proceedings of the International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, vol. 1 (2017)

66.

Stróżyna, M., Eiden, G., Abramowicz, W., Filipiak, D., Małyszko, J., Węcel, K.: A framework for the quality-based selection and retrieval of open data - a use case from the maritime domain. Electron. Mark. 28(2), 219–233 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-017-0277-yCrossRef

67.

Stvilia, B., Twidale, M.B., Gasser, L., Smith, L.C.: Information quality discussions in Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Knowledge Management, pp. 101–113. Citeseer (2005)

68.

Stvilia, B., Twidale, M.B., Smith, L.C., Gasser, L.: Assessing information quality of a community-based encyclopedia. In: Proceedings of ICIQ, pp. 442–454 (2005)

69.

Wang, R.Y., Strong, D.M.: Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 12(4), 5–33 (1996)CrossRef

70.

Warncke-wang, M., Cosley, D., Riedl, J.: Tell me more : an actionable quality model for Wikipedia. In: In: WikiSym 2013, pp. 1–10 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2491055.2491063

71.

Warncke-Wang, M., Ranjan, V., Terveen, L.G., Hecht, B.J.: Misalignment between supply and demand of quality content in peer production communities. In: ICWSM, pp. 493–502 (2015)

72.

Węcel, K., Lewoniewski, W.: Modelling the quality of attributes in Wikipedia infoboxes. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) BIS 2015. LNBIP, vol. 228, pp. 308–320. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26762-3_27CrossRef

73.

WikiBest: Online game about comparing data quality between various languages of the wikipedia. https://wikibest.net

74.

Wikidata: Main page. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Main_Page

75.

Wikimedia Downloads: English Wikipedia latest database backup dumps. https://dumps.wikimedia.org/enwiki/latest/

76.

Wikipedia Meta-Wiki: List of Wikipedias. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias

77.

Wikipedia Quality: Scientific works. https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Category:Scientific_works

78.

WikiRank: Quality and popularity assessment of Wikipedia. https://wikirank.net

79.

Wilkinson, D.M., Huberman, B.A.: Assessing the value of cooperation in Wikipedia. arXiv preprint arXiv: cs/0702140 (2007)

80.

Wilkinson, D.M., Huberman, B.A.: Cooperation and quality in Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Wikis WikiSym 2007, pp. 157–164 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1296951.1296968

81.

Wu, K., Zhu, Q., Zhao, Y., Zheng, H.: Mining the factors affecting the quality of Wikipedia articles. In: 2010 International Conference of Information Science and Management Engineering (ISME), vol. 1, pp. 343–346. IEEE (2010)

82.

Yaari, E., Baruchson-Arbib, S., Bar-Ilan, J.: Information quality assessment of community generated content: a user study of wikipedia. J. Inf. Sci. 37(5), 487–498 (2011)CrossRef

83.

Zaveri, A., Rula, A., Maurino, A., Pietrobon, R., Lehmann, J., Auer, S.: Quality assessment for linked data: a survey. Semant. Web 7(1), 63–93 (2016)CrossRef

84.

Zhang, S., Hu, Z., Zhang, C., Yu, K.: History-based article quality assessment on Wikipedia. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2018)

Titel: Measures for Quality Assessment of Articles and Infoboxes in Multilingual Wikipedia
verfasst von: Włodzimierz Lewoniewski
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Business Information Systems Workshops
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04848-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-04849-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04849-5_53

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"