nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

4. Measuring the Quality of Non-financial Risk-Related Disclosure

verfasst von : Stefania Veltri

Erschienen in: Mandatory Non-financial Risk-Related Disclosure

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In the chapter we introduce the main research question of the book, namely, RQ: Does quality mandatory NF risk disclosure affect investors’ decisions? The answer to the research question requires a context in which to carry out the research (we justified the choice of Italy in the previous section), the analytical framework for NF risk-related disclosure to employ and an adequate methodology to measure quality NF risk disclosure. As for the framework for the mandatory NF risk disclosure, we focus on the NF risk disclosure categories as provided by the EU Directive implemented by the Legislative Decree 254/2016, preceded by a brief illustration of the other main existing frameworks of NF risk disclosure. As for the methodology, we focus on the most widely used method to measure narrative disclosure, the content analysis, focusing on the main approach that can be followed by researchers to content analyse corporate documents, that is, mechanistic and interpretive content analysis, also presenting the main empirical studies employing automated and manual content analysis. The last sections of the chapter are devoted to the concept of quality of disclosure and how it can be operationalized, to end with the self-constructed quality disclosure index used in our research to measure the mandatory NF risk-related information disclosure.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel The Mandatory Non-financial Disclosure in the European Union

Nächstes Kapitel The Relationship Between Financial and Non-financial Risk

According to Krippendorff (2004), content analysis as a research methodology has its early origins in the ‘inquisitional pursuits by the Church in the seventeenth century’, when the Church became worried about the spread of non-religious printed matter after the invention of the printing press and thus began the pursuit of analysing texts to ensure they were in keeping with the doctrines of the Church (Dovring 2008). At the end of the nineteenth century, the proliferation of newspapers reignited interest in content analysis as methodology to analyse the social content of newspaper (Weber 2008) conducted content analysis research using newspapers as a source until such time as other forms of mass media, such as radio, became prominent (Krippendorff 2004).

It is important here to make a distinction between the reliability and validity. According to Krippendorff (2008, p. 350), reliability ‘is the extent to which data can be trusted to represent the phenomena of interest rather than spurious ones’. Validity, on the other hand, occurs when ‘a measuring instrument … measures what it purports to measure’ (Janis 2008, p. 359).

Coverage is the percentage of environmental topics (sub-items) disclosed by the company out of the total number of topics disclosed within the index. Dispersion measures the concentration of the items disclosed. Depth depends on the type of measures used to disclose the environmental information. These measures range from no disclosure (score = 0; minimum score) to general narrative disclosure (score = 1 score) to benchmarking disclosure (score = 4; maximum score) to reflect the usefulness of disclosed information.

The term objectivity refers to an empiricist notion of objectivity where judgemental criteria are derived from the inherent ‘internal’ qualities of the disclosure contents. Subjectivity, on the other hand, relates to the instances where the judgemental criteria emanating from an ‘external’ framework or theory are superimposed on the disclosure contents.

The section is based on a work written with Francesco De Luca and Ho-Tan-Phat Phan (Veltri et al. 2020).

Abraham, S., & Cox, P. (2007). Analysing the determinants of narrative risk information in UK FTSE 100 annual reports. The British Accounting Review, 39(3), 227–248.

Abraham, S., & Shrives, P. J. (2014). Improving the relevance of risk factor disclosure in corporate annual reports. The British Accounting Review, 46(1), 91–107.

Adams, C. A. (2004). The ethical, social and environmental reporting-performance portrayal gap. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(5), 731–757.

Al-Hadi, A., Hasan, M. M., & Habib, A. (2016). Risk committee, firm life cycle, and market risk disclosures. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(2), 145–170.

Al-Tuwaijri, S., Christensen, T., & Hughes, K. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 447–471.

ASX Corporate Governance Council (ASX CGC). (2014). Corporate governance principles and recommendations (3rd ed.). Sydney: ASX Corporate Governance Council.

Barakat, A., & Hussainey, K. (2013). Bank governance, regulation, supervision, and risk reporting: Evidence from operational risk disclosures in European banks. International Review of Financial Analysis, 30, 254–273.

Beattie, V., McInnes, B., & Fearnley, S. (2004). A methodology for analysing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: A comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes. Accounting Forum, 28(3), 205–236.

Beck, A., Campbell, D., & Shrives, P. (2010). Content analysis in environmental reporting research: Enrichment and rehearsal of the method in a British-German context. The British Accounting Review, 42, 207–222.

Ben-Amar, W., & Chelli. (2018). What drives voluntary corporate water disclosures? The effect of country-level institutions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1609–1622.

Beretta, S., & Bozzolan, S. (2004). A framework for the analysis of firm risk communication. The International Journal of Accounting, 39(3), 265–288.

Beretta, S., & Bozzolan, S. (2008). Quality versus quantity: The case of forward-looking disclosure. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 23(3), 333–375.

Berger, T. (2012). Risk reporting practices of Indian companies in the SENSEX. Asia Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, 6(1), 1–14.

Boesso, G., & Kumar, K. (2007). Drivers of corporate voluntary disclosure: A framework and empirical evidence from Italy and the United States. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(2), 269–296.

Bowman, E. H. (1984). Content analysis of annual reports for corporate strategy and risk. Interfaces, 14, 61–71.

Bravo, F. (2017). Are risk disclosures an effective tool to increase firm value? Managerial and Decision Economics, 28, 1116–1124.

Cabedo, J. D., & Tirado, J. M. (2004). The disclosure of risk in financial statements. Accounting Forum, 28(2), 181–200.

Campbell, D. (2000). Legitimacy theory or managerial reality construction? Corporate social disclosure in Marks and Spencer Plc corporate reports, 1969–1997. Accounting Forum, 24(1), 80–100.

Caputo, F., Leopizzi, R., Pizzi, S., & Milone, V. (2020). The non-financial reporting harmonization in Europe: Evolutionary pathways related to the transposition of the Directive 95/2014/EU within the Italian context. Sustainability, 12(1), 92.

Cho, C., Roberts, R., & Patten, D. (2010). The language of US corporate environmental disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35, 431–443.

Cho, C. H., Laine, M., Roberts, R. W., & Rodrigue, M. (2015). Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 40, 78–94.

Cinquini, L., Passetti, E., Tenucci, A., & Frey, M. (2012). Analyzing intellectual capital information in sustainability reports: Some empirical evidence. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13(4), 531–561.

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2018). Enterprise risk management—Applying enterprise risk management to environmental, social and governance-related risks. New York: The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

Comyns, B. (2016). Determinants of GHG reporting: An analysis of global oil and gas companies. Journal of Business Ethics 136, 349–369.

Comyns, B., & Figge, F. (2015). Greenhouse gas reporting quality in the oil and gas industry: A longitudinal study using the typology of ‘search’, ‘experience’ and ‘credence’ information. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(3), 403–433.

Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & Velthoven, B. V. (2005). Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? The European Accounting Review, 14(1), 3–39.

Crawford, E. P., & Williams, C. C. (2010). Should corporate social reporting be voluntary or mandatory? Evidence from the banking sector in France and the United States. Corporate Governance, 10, 512–526.

D’Amico, E., Coluccia, D., Fontana, S., & Solimene, S. (2016). Factors influencing corporate environmental disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25, 178–192.

De Luca, F., & Phat, H. (2019). Informativeness assessment of risk and risk-management disclosure in corporate reporting: An empirical analysis of Italian large listed firms. Financial Reporting, 2, 9–41.

Deegan, C. (2002). The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311.

Deumes, R., & Knechel, W. R. (2008). Economic incentives for voluntary reporting on internal risk management and control systems. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 27(1), 35–66.

Diouf, D., & Boiral, O. (2017). The quality of sustainability reports and impression management: A stakeholder perspective. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(3), 643–667.

Dobler, M. (2008). Incentives for risk reporting –a discretionary disclosure and cheap talk approach. The International Journal of Accounting, 43, 184–206.

Dobler, M., Lajili, K., & Zéghal, D. (2011). Attributes of corporate risk disclosure: An international investigation in the manufacturing sector. Journal of International Accounting Research, 10(2), 1–22.

Domínguez, L. R., & Gámez, L. C. N. (2014). Corporate reporting on risks: Evidence from Spanish companies. Revista de Contabilidad, 17(2), 116–129.

Dovring, K. (2008). Quantitative semantics in 18th century Sweden. In K. Krippendorff & M. A. Bock (Eds.), The content analysis reader (pp. 4–8). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Dumay, J., & Cai, L. (2014a). A review and critique of content analysis as a methodology for inquiring into IC disclosure. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15(2), 264–290.

Dumay, J., & Cai, L. (2014b). Using content analysis as a research methodology for investigating intellectual capital disclosure: A critique. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(1), 121–155.

Dumay, J., & Cai, L. (2015). Using content analysis as a research methodology for investigating intellectual capital disclosure: A critique. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(1), 121–155.

Dumay, J., & Hossain, M. D. A. (2019). Sustainability risk disclosure practices of listed companies in Australia. Australian Accounting Review, 29(2), 343–359.

Dumay, J., Frost, G., & Beck, C. (2015). Material legitimacy. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 11(1), 2–23.

El-Haj, M., Rayson, P., Walker, M., Young, S., & Simaki, V. (2019). In search of meaning: Lessons, resources and next steps for computational analysis of financial discourse. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 46(3–4), 265–306.

Elshandidy, T., Fraser, I., & Hussainey, K. (2013). Aggregated, voluntary, and mandatory risk reporting incentives: Evidence from FTSE all-share. International Review of Financial Analysis, 30, 320–333.

Elshandidy, T., Fraser, I., & Hussainey, K. (2015). What drives mandatory and voluntary risk reporting variations across Germany, UK, and US? The British Accounting Review, 47(4), 376–394.

Elshandidy, T., Shrives, P. J., Bamber, M., & Abraham, S. (2018). Risk reporting: A review of the literature and implications for future research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 40, 54–82.

European Union. (2014). Directive as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups, 2014/95/EU. Accessed March 25, 2019, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0095&from=EN/

Global Reporting Initiative. (2013). G4 guidelines–reporting principles and standard disclosures. Accessed January 12, 2020, from www.globalreporting.org

Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Methodological themes: Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 78–101.

Gulenko, M. (2018). Mandatory CSR reporting—Literature review and future developments in Germany. Nachhaltigkeits Management Forum, 26, 3–17.

Guthrie, J., & Petty, R. (2000). Intellectual capital: Australian annual reporting practices. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(3), 241–251.

Hammond, K., & Miles, S. (2004). Assessing quality assessment of corporate social reporting: UK perspectives. Accounting Forum, 28, 61–79.

Hassan, O. (2018). The impact of voluntary environmental disclosure on firm value: Does organizational visibility play a mediation role? Business Strategy and the Environment, 27, 1569–1582.

Healy, P., & Palepu, K. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, 405–440.

Healy, P., Hutton, A., & Palepu, K. (1999). Stock performance and intermediation changes surrounding sustained increases in disclosures. Contemporary Accounting Research, 16(3), 485–520.

Helfaya, A., & Kotb, A. (2016). Environmental reporting quality: An analysis of global creditability initiatives. In M. Erdogdu, T. Arun, & I. Ahmad (Eds.), Handbook of research on green economic development initiatives and strategies (pp. 628–657). Hershey: IGI Global.

Helfaya, A., & Moussa, T. (2017). Do board’s corporate social responsibility strategy and orientation influence environmental sustainability disclosure? UK evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(8), 1061–1077.

Helfaya, A., & Whittington, M. (2019). Does designing environmental sustainability disclosure quality measures make a difference? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28, 525–541.

Helfaya, A., Whittington, M., & Alawattage, C. (2019). Exploring the quality of corporate environmental reporting: Surveying preparers’ and users’ perceptions. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(1), 163–193.

Hess, D. (2007). Social reporting and new governance regulation: The prospects of achieving corporate accountability through transparency. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(3), 453–476.

Hill, P., & Short, H. (2009). Risk disclosures on the second-tier markets of the London Stock Exchange. Accounting and Finance, 49(4), 753–780.

Hooks, J., Coy, D., & Howard, D. (2002). The information gap in annual reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 4, 501–522.

Hope, O.-K., Hu, D., & Lu, H. (2016). The benefits of specific risk-factor disclosures. Review of Accounting Studies, 21, 1005–1045.

ICAEW. (1997). Financial reporting of risk: Proposals for a statement of business risk. London: Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales.

Imhoff, E. (1992). The relation between perceived accounting quality and economic characteristics of the firm. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 11(2), 97–118.

International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). (2013). The International <IR> framework, London. Retrieved from https://integratedreporting.org/resource/international-ir-framework/

Janis, I. (2008). The problem of validating content analysis. In K. Krippendorff & M. A. Bock (Eds.), The content analysis reader (pp. 358–366). Los Angeles: Sage.

Jizi, M. (2017). The influence of board composition on sustainable development disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26, 640–655.

Kalu, J., Buang, A., & Aliagha, G. (2016). Determinants of voluntary carbon disclosure in the corporate real estate sector of Malaysia. Journal of Environmental Management, 182, 519–524.

Konishi, N., & Ali, M. M. (2007). Risk reporting of Japanese companies and its association with corporate characteristics. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 4(3), 263–285.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Krippendorff, K., & Bock, M. A. (2008). The content analysis reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Limited.

Krippendorff, K. (2008). Testing the reliability of content analysis data. In K. Krippendorff & M. A. Bock (Eds.), The content analysis reader (pp. 350–357). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

La Torre, M., Sabelfeld, S., Blomkvist, M., Tarquinio, L., & Dumay, J. (2018). Harmonising non-financial reporting regulation in Europe: Practical forces and projections for future research. Meditari Accountancy Research, 26(4), 598–621.

Lajili, K., & Zeghal, D. (2005). A content analysis of risk management disclosure in Canadian annual reports. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 22(2), 125–142.

Lee, K.-H. (2017). Does size matter? Evaluating corporate environmental disclosure in the Australian mining and metal industry: A combined approach of quantity and quality measurement. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26, 209–223.

Leopizzi, R., Iazzi, A., Venturelli, A., & Principale, S. (2020). Nonfinancial risk disclosure: The ‘state of the art’ of Italian companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 358–368.

Lev, B., & Zarowin, P. (1999). The boundaries of the financial reporting and how to extend them. Journal of Accounting Research, 2, 353–385.

Li, F. (2010). The information content of forward-looking statements in corporate filings-A Naïve Bayesian machine learning approach. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(5), 1049–1102.

Liesen, A., Hoepner, A., Patten, D., & Figge, F. (2015). Does stakeholder pressure influence corporate GHG emissions reporting? Empirical evidence from Europe. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(7), 1017–1074.

Linsley, P. M., & Lawrence, M. J. (2007). Risk reporting by the largest UK companies: Reliability and lack of obfuscation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(4), 620–627.

Linsley, P. M., & Shrives, P. J. (2005). Examining risk reporting in UK public companies. The Journal of Risk Finance, 6(4), 292–305.

Linsley, P., & Shrives, P. (2006). Risk reporting: A study of risk disclosure in the annual reports of UK companies. The British Accounting Review, 38(4), 387–404.

Linsley, P. M., Shrives, P. J., & Crumpton, M. (2006). Risk disclosure: An exploratory study of UK and Canadian banks. Journal of Banking Regulation, 7(3–4), 268–282.

Lokuwaduge, C. S. D. S., & Heenetigala, K. (2017). Integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure for a sustainable development: An Australian study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26, 438–450.

Malafronte, I., Porzio, C., & Starita, M. G. (2016). The nature and determinants of disclosure practices in the insurance industry: Evidence from European insurers. International Review of Financial Analysis, 45, 367–382.

Manes Rossi, F., Nicolò, G., & Levy Orelli, R. (2017). Reshaping risk disclosure through integrated reporting: Evidence from Italian early adopters. International Journal of Business and Management, 12(10), 11–23.

Marshall, A., & Weetman, P. (2007). Modelling transparency in disclosure: The case of foreign exchange risk management. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34(5–-6), 705–738.

Mazumder, M. M. M., & Hossain, D. M. (2018). Research on corporate risk reporting: Current trends and future avenues. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 5(1), 29–41.

Meng, X., Zeng, S., Shi, J., Qi, G., & Zhang, Z. (2014). The relationship between corporate environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical study in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 145, 357–367.

Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59–78.

Miihkinen, A. (2012). What drives the quality of firm risk disclosure? The International Journal of Accounting, 47(4), 437–468.

Milne, M., & Adler, R. (1999). Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 12(2), 237–256.

Mion, G., & Loza Adaui, C. R. (2019). Mandatory nonfinancial disclosure and its consequences on the sustainability reporting quality of Italian and German companies. Sustainability, 11(17), 4612.

Mokhtar, E. S., & Mellett, H. (2013). Competition, corporate governance, ownership structure and risk reporting. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(9), 838–865.

Neri, L., & Russo, A. (2013). Risk disclosures in the annual reports of Italian listed companies. Financial Reporting, 3–4, 141–168.

Ntim, C. G., Lindop, S., & Thomas, D. A. (2013). Corporate governance and risk reporting in South Africa: A study of corporate risk disclosures in the pre- and post-2007/2008 global financial crisis period. International Review of Financial Analysis, 30, 363–383.

Oliveira, J., Lima Rodrigues, L., & Craig, R. (2011). Risk-related disclosures by non-finance companies: Portuguese practices and disclosure characteristics. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(9), 817–839.

Patten, D., & Zhao, N. (2014). Standalone CSR reporting by U.S. retail companies. Accounting Forum, 38(2), 132–144.

Radu, C., & Francoeur, C. (2017). Does innovation drive environmental disclosure? A new insight into sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26, 893–911.

Reverte, C. (2009). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 351–366.

Roberts, C., Weetman, P., & Gordon, P. (2008). International financial reporting. A comparative approach (3rd ed.). Essex: Pearson Education.

Sengupta, P. (1998). Corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt. The Accounting Review, 73(4), 459–474.

Smith, M., & Taffler, R. (2000). The chairman’s statement: A content analysis of discretionary narrative disclosures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(5), 624–646.

Taylor, G., Tower, G., & Neilson, J. (2010). Corporate communication of financial risk. Accounting and Finance, 50(2), 417–446.

Toms, J. (2002). Firm resources, quality signals, and the determinants of corporate environmental reputation: Some UK evidence. The British Accounting Review, 34, 257–282.

Truant, E., Corazza, L., & Scagnelli, D. S. (2017). Sustainability and risk disclosure: An exploratory study on sustainability reports. Sustainability, 9(636), 1–20.

Unerman, J. (2000). Methodological issues reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(5), 667–680.

Urquiza, F., Abed, M., & Trombetta, M. (2009). Disclosure indices design: Does it make a deference? Spanish Accounting Review, 12(2), 253–278.

van Staden, C., & Hooks, J. (2007). A comprehensive comparison of corporate environmental reporting and responsiveness. The British Accounting Review, 39, 197–210.

Veltri, S., De Luca, F., & Phat, H. (2020). Do investors value companies mandatory nonfinancial risk disclosure? An empirical analysis of the Italian context after the EU Directive. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2497.

Venturelli, A., Caputo, F., Cosma, S., Leopizzi, R., & Pizzi, S. (2017). Directive 2014/95/EU: Are Italian Companies Already Compliant? Sustainability, 9(8), 1385.

Weber, M. (2008). Towards a sociology of the press: An early proposal for content analysis. In K. Krippendorff & M. A. Bock (Eds.), The content analysis reader (pp. 9–11). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Wilmshurst, T., & Frost, G. (2000). Corporate environmental reporting: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(1), 10–26.

Zadeh, F. O., Rasid, S. Z. A., Basiruddin, R., Zamil, N. A. M., & Vakilbashi, A. (2016). Risk disclosure practices among Malaysian listed firms. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(3), 1092–1096.

Titel: Measuring the Quality of Non-financial Risk-Related Disclosure
verfasst von: Stefania Veltri
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Mandatory Non-financial Risk-Related Disclosure
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47920-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-47921-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47921-3_4