Skip to main content

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

12. National System Perspective on Entrepreneurship

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Christensen argues that, although the National Systems of Entrepreneurship literature has established metrics that potentially can bring research forward toward a holistic understanding of the entrepreneurship process, there is still a need to develop the operationalization of the theoretical base for a better assessment of the relevant metrics for entrepreneurship measurement. He maintains that the functionalist approach to innovation system analyses is better suited to bridge the theoretical foundation and the relevant empirics. Christensen also suggests that more attention should be paid to the implications for empirical analyses due to the fact that entrepreneurship is a process and that solely focusing on the output metrics of entrepreneurship renders analyses that cannot capture the full picture. Implications for renewed theoretical understanding, entrepreneurship measurement, teaching, and policy are put forward.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
To a large extent, the innovation system concept quickly gained appeal within policy circles because it was developed in an interaction between academia and policymakers, in particular the OECD (Weber and Truffer 2017).
 
2
Sharif (2006) provides an account of the evolution of the innovation system concept and how it found resonance in policymaking. See Rakas and Hain (2016) for a bibliometric analysis of recent developments in innovation system research traditions and Weber and Truffer (2017) for suggestions to further developments of the approach.
 
3
A very similar approach was developed by Baker et al. (2005). As the title of their paper indicates (‘A Framework for Comparing Entrepreneurship Processes across Nations’), the basic purpose was to present a framework that could be used for comparing entrepreneurship processes across nations, and, in content, their paper is very similar to the work of Acs et al. For example, they point to the consequences of ignoring the context of entrepreneurship processes and of focusing too much on the individual level, and they point to the need to incorporate institutional factors into the framework.
 
4
A number of studies within, for example, the cluster literature do, though, introduce the entrepreneur as a key driver of the creation and dynamics of clusters (e.g., Feldman et al. 2005; Feldman and Francis 2006; Christensen and Stoerring 2011).
 
5
It is a related point in this approach that, because the state provides funding for both successes and failures, there is no reason why the state should not have a share of the upside and behave to a larger extent similar to as in a venture capital model. In the current paradigm, the public sector bear risks and pay for failures but do not harvest proceeds from successes.
 
6
A Kirznerian entrepreneur has the ability and creativity to spot opportunities for, and facilitate, exchange, hence profiting from acting as a mediator for trade.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Acs, Z., L. Szerb, and E. Autio. 2013. Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2013. London: Edward Elgar.CrossRef Acs, Z., L. Szerb, and E. Autio. 2013. Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2013. London: Edward Elgar.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Acs, Z.J., E. Autio, and L. Szerb. 2014. National Systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement Issues and Policy Implications. Research Policy 43: 476–494.CrossRef Acs, Z.J., E. Autio, and L. Szerb. 2014. National Systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement Issues and Policy Implications. Research Policy 43: 476–494.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2015. National Systems of Entrepreneurship. In Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2014, Springer Briefs in Economics, ed. Z.J. Acs, E. Autio, and L. Szerb, 13–26. Heidelberg: Springer. ———. 2015. National Systems of Entrepreneurship. In Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2014, Springer Briefs in Economics, ed. Z.J. Acs, E. Autio, and L. Szerb, 13–26. Heidelberg: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Acs, Z., D.B. Audretsch, E.E. Lehmann, and G. Licht. 2016. National System of Entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics 46 (4): 527–535.CrossRef Acs, Z., D.B. Audretsch, E.E. Lehmann, and G. Licht. 2016. National System of Entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics 46 (4): 527–535.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Acs, Z.J., E. Stam, D.B. Audretsch, and A. O’Connor. 2017a. The Lineages of the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Approach. Small Business Economics 49: 1–10.CrossRef Acs, Z.J., E. Stam, D.B. Audretsch, and A. O’Connor. 2017a. The Lineages of the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Approach. Small Business Economics 49: 1–10.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Aldrich, H.E., and C.M. Fiol. 1994. Fools Rush In? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation. Academy of Management Review 19 (4): 645–670.CrossRef Aldrich, H.E., and C.M. Fiol. 1994. Fools Rush In? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation. Academy of Management Review 19 (4): 645–670.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Arnold, E. 2004. Evaluating Research and Innovation Policy: A Systems World Needs Systems Evaluations. Research Evaluation 13 (1): 3–17.CrossRef Arnold, E. 2004. Evaluating Research and Innovation Policy: A Systems World Needs Systems Evaluations. Research Evaluation 13 (1): 3–17.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baker, T., E. Gedajlovic, and M. Lubatkin. 2005. A Framework for Comparing Entrepreneurship Processes Across Nations. Journal of International Business 36: 492–504.CrossRef Baker, T., E. Gedajlovic, and M. Lubatkin. 2005. A Framework for Comparing Entrepreneurship Processes Across Nations. Journal of International Business 36: 492–504.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bergek, A., S. Jacobsson, B. Carlsson, S. Lindmark, and A. Rickne. 2008. Analyzing the Functional Dynamics of Technological Innovation Systems: A Scheme of Analysis. Research Policy 37 (3): 407–429.CrossRef Bergek, A., S. Jacobsson, B. Carlsson, S. Lindmark, and A. Rickne. 2008. Analyzing the Functional Dynamics of Technological Innovation Systems: A Scheme of Analysis. Research Policy 37 (3): 407–429.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2010. Functionality of Innovation Systems as a Rationale and Guide in Innovation Policy. In The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy: An International Research Handbook. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. ———. 2010. Functionality of Innovation Systems as a Rationale and Guide in Innovation Policy. In The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy: An International Research Handbook. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Zurück zum Zitat Borrissenko, J., and R. Boschma. 2017. A Critical Review of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Research: Towards a Future Research Agenda, Papers in Innovation Studies 2017/03, Circle. Lund University. Borrissenko, J., and R. Boschma. 2017. A Critical Review of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Research: Towards a Future Research Agenda, Papers in Innovation Studies 2017/03, Circle. Lund University.
Zurück zum Zitat Bowen, H.P., and D. De Clercq. 2008. Institutional Context and the Allocation of Entrepreneurial Effort. Journal of International Business Studies 39: 747–767.CrossRef Bowen, H.P., and D. De Clercq. 2008. Institutional Context and the Allocation of Entrepreneurial Effort. Journal of International Business Studies 39: 747–767.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Braczyk, H.J., P. Cooke, and M. Heidenreich. 1998. Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governances in a Globalized World. London: University College London. Braczyk, H.J., P. Cooke, and M. Heidenreich. 1998. Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governances in a Globalized World. London: University College London.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown, R., and C. Mason. 2017. Looking Inside the Spiky Bits: A Critical Review and Conceptualization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Small Business Economics (published ahead of print, May). Brown, R., and C. Mason. 2017. Looking Inside the Spiky Bits: A Critical Review and Conceptualization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Small Business Economics (published ahead of print, May).
Zurück zum Zitat Bruton, G.D., D. Ahlstrom, and H.L. Li. 2010. Institutional Theory and Entrepreneurship: Where Are We Now and Where Do Wo Need to Move in the Future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol.34 (3) (May): 421–440. Bruton, G.D., D. Ahlstrom, and H.L. Li. 2010. Institutional Theory and Entrepreneurship: Where Are We Now and Where Do Wo Need to Move in the Future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol.34 (3) (May): 421–440.
Zurück zum Zitat Busenitz, L.W., C. Gomez, and J.W. Spencer. 2000. Country Institutional Profiles: Unlocking Entrepreneurial Phenomena. Academy of Management Journal 43: 994–1003. Busenitz, L.W., C. Gomez, and J.W. Spencer. 2000. Country Institutional Profiles: Unlocking Entrepreneurial Phenomena. Academy of Management Journal 43: 994–1003.
Zurück zum Zitat Carlsson, B., and S. Jacobsson. 1997. In Search of Useful Public Policies—Key Lessons and Issues for Policy Makers. In Technological Systems and Industrial Dynamics, ed. B. Carlsson, 299–315. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef Carlsson, B., and S. Jacobsson. 1997. In Search of Useful Public Policies—Key Lessons and Issues for Policy Makers. In Technological Systems and Industrial Dynamics, ed. B. Carlsson, 299–315. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carlsson, B., and R. Stankiewicz. 1995. On the Nature, Function and Composition of Technological Systems. In Technological Systems and Industrial Dynamics, ed. B. Carlsson. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Carlsson, B., and R. Stankiewicz. 1995. On the Nature, Function and Composition of Technological Systems. In Technological Systems and Industrial Dynamics, ed. B. Carlsson. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang, H.J., and R. Kozul-Wright. 1994. Organising Development: Comparing the National Systems of Entrepreneurship in Sweden and South Korea. Journal of Development Studies 30: 859–891.CrossRef Chang, H.J., and R. Kozul-Wright. 1994. Organising Development: Comparing the National Systems of Entrepreneurship in Sweden and South Korea. Journal of Development Studies 30: 859–891.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Christensen, J.L., and D. Stoerring. 2011. Facilitating Cluster Evolution in Peripheral Regions—The Role of Clusterpreneurs. In Innovation and Learning in the New Globalised Economy, ed. B.T. Asheim and M.D. Pirelli. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Christensen, J.L., and D. Stoerring. 2011. Facilitating Cluster Evolution in Peripheral Regions—The Role of Clusterpreneurs. In Innovation and Learning in the New Globalised Economy, ed. B.T. Asheim and M.D. Pirelli. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Contractor, F., and P. Lorange. 2002. The Growth of Alliances in the Knowledge-Based Economy. International Business Review 11 (4): 485–502.CrossRef Contractor, F., and P. Lorange. 2002. The Growth of Alliances in the Knowledge-Based Economy. International Business Review 11 (4): 485–502.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cooke, P. 2001. Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters and the Knowledge Economy. Industrial and Corporate Change 10 (4): 945–974.CrossRef Cooke, P. 2001. Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters and the Knowledge Economy. Industrial and Corporate Change 10 (4): 945–974.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Edquist, C. 1997. Systems of Innovation Approaches—Their Emergence and Characteristics. In Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions, and Organizations, ed. C. Edquist, 1–35. London: Routledge. Edquist, C. 1997. Systems of Innovation Approaches—Their Emergence and Characteristics. In Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions, and Organizations, ed. C. Edquist, 1–35. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Edquist, C., and B. Johnson. 1997. Institutions and Organizations in Systems of Innovation. In Systems of Innovation-Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, ed. C. Edquist, 41–63. London: Pinter Publishers. Edquist, C., and B. Johnson. 1997. Institutions and Organizations in Systems of Innovation. In Systems of Innovation-Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, ed. C. Edquist, 41–63. London: Pinter Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Feldman, M.P., and J. Francis. 2006. Entrepreneurs as Agents in the Formation of Industrial Clusters. In Clusters and Regional Development, ed. B. Asheim, P. Cooke, and R. Martin, 115–136. London/New York: Routledge. Feldman, M.P., and J. Francis. 2006. Entrepreneurs as Agents in the Formation of Industrial Clusters. In Clusters and Regional Development, ed. B. Asheim, P. Cooke, and R. Martin, 115–136. London/New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Feldman, M., J. Francis, and J. Bercovitz. 2005. Creating a Cluster While Building a Firm: Entrepreneurs and the Formation of Industrial Clusters. Regional Studies 39 (1): 129–141.CrossRef Feldman, M., J. Francis, and J. Bercovitz. 2005. Creating a Cluster While Building a Firm: Entrepreneurs and the Formation of Industrial Clusters. Regional Studies 39 (1): 129–141.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gartner, B. 1988. Who Is an Entrepreneur? Is the Wrong Question. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol.13 (4) (May): 47–68. Gartner, B. 1988. Who Is an Entrepreneur? Is the Wrong Question. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol.13 (4) (May): 47–68.
Zurück zum Zitat Geels, F.W. 2004. From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-Technical Systems: Insights about Dynamics and Change from Sociology and Institutional Theory. Research Policy 33 (6–7): 897–920.CrossRef Geels, F.W. 2004. From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-Technical Systems: Insights about Dynamics and Change from Sociology and Institutional Theory. Research Policy 33 (6–7): 897–920.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hekkert, M.P., R.A.A. Suurs, S.O. Negro, R.E.H.M. Smits, and S. Kuhlmann. 2007. Functions of Innovation Systems: A New Approach for Analyzing Technological Change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74: 413–432. Hekkert, M.P., R.A.A. Suurs, S.O. Negro, R.E.H.M. Smits, and S. Kuhlmann. 2007. Functions of Innovation Systems: A New Approach for Analyzing Technological Change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74: 413–432.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirschman, A.O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press. Hirschman, A.O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Hung, S.C., and R. Whittington. 2011. Agency in National Innovation Systems: Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Professionalization of Taiwanese IT. Research Policy 40: 526–538.CrossRef Hung, S.C., and R. Whittington. 2011. Agency in National Innovation Systems: Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Professionalization of Taiwanese IT. Research Policy 40: 526–538.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kirzner, I. 1973. Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Kirzner, I. 1973. Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1997. Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach. Journal of Economic Literature 35: 60–85. ———. 1997. Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach. Journal of Economic Literature 35: 60–85.
Zurück zum Zitat Lafuente, E., L. Szerb, and Z.J. Acs. 2015. Country Level Efficiency and National Systems of Entrepreneurship: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41 (6), 1260–1283. Lafuente, E., L. Szerb, and Z.J. Acs. 2015. Country Level Efficiency and National Systems of Entrepreneurship: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41 (6), 1260–1283.
Zurück zum Zitat Landström, H., F. Åström, and G. Harichi. 2015. Innovation and Entrepreneurship Studies: One or Two Fields of Research? International Entrepreneurship Management Journal 11: 493–509.CrossRef Landström, H., F. Åström, and G. Harichi. 2015. Innovation and Entrepreneurship Studies: One or Two Fields of Research? International Entrepreneurship Management Journal 11: 493–509.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lenihan, H. 2011. Enterprise Policy Evaluation: Is There a ‘New’ Way of Doing It? Evaluation and Program Planning 34: 323–332.CrossRef Lenihan, H. 2011. Enterprise Policy Evaluation: Is There a ‘New’ Way of Doing It? Evaluation and Program Planning 34: 323–332.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lundvall, B.Å. 1992. National Systems of Innovation. London: Pinter Publishers. Lundvall, B.Å. 1992. National Systems of Innovation. London: Pinter Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1999. National Business Systems and National Systems of Innovation. International Studies of Management and Organization 29: 60–77.CrossRef ———. 1999. National Business Systems and National Systems of Innovation. International Studies of Management and Organization 29: 60–77.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2007. National Innovation Systems-Analytical Concept and Development Tool. Industry and Innovation 14: 95–119.CrossRef ———. 2007. National Innovation Systems-Analytical Concept and Development Tool. Industry and Innovation 14: 95–119.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Malecki, E.J. 2011. Connecting Local Entrepreneurial Ecosystems to Global Innovation Networks: Open Innovation, Double Networks and Knowledge Integration. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 14: 36–59.CrossRef Malecki, E.J. 2011. Connecting Local Entrepreneurial Ecosystems to Global Innovation Networks: Open Innovation, Double Networks and Knowledge Integration. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 14: 36–59.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Malerba, F. 2002. Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production. Research Policy 31 (2): 247–264.CrossRef Malerba, F. 2002. Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production. Research Policy 31 (2): 247–264.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Malerba, F., and S. Breschi. 1997. Sectoral Innovation Systems. In Innovation Systems, ed. C. Edquist. London: Edward Elgar. Malerba, F., and S. Breschi. 1997. Sectoral Innovation Systems. In Innovation Systems, ed. C. Edquist. London: Edward Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat Mazzucato, M. 2013. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking the Public vs. Private Myth in Risk and Innovation. London: Anthem Press. Mazzucato, M. 2013. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking the Public vs. Private Myth in Risk and Innovation. London: Anthem Press.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2016. From Market Fixing to Market-Creating: A New Framework for Innovation Policy. Industry and Innovation 23 (2): 140–156.CrossRef ———. 2016. From Market Fixing to Market-Creating: A New Framework for Innovation Policy. Industry and Innovation 23 (2): 140–156.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson, R.R. 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. Nelson, R.R. 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Niosi, J., P. Saviotti, B. Bellon, and M. Crow. 1993. National Systems of Innovation: In Search of a Workable Concept. Technology in Society 15: 207–227.CrossRef Niosi, J., P. Saviotti, B. Bellon, and M. Crow. 1993. National Systems of Innovation: In Search of a Workable Concept. Technology in Society 15: 207–227.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat North, D.C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef North, D.C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat OECD. 1999. Managing National Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD. OECD. 1999. Managing National Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2014. Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Growth Oriented Entrepreneurship. Paris: OECD. ———. 2014. Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Growth Oriented Entrepreneurship. Paris: OECD.
Zurück zum Zitat OECD/Eurostat. 2005. Oslo Manual. Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. Paris: OECD Publishers. OECD/Eurostat. 2005. Oslo Manual. Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. Paris: OECD Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Phan, P.H. 2004. Entrepreneurship Theory: Possibilities and Future Directions. Journal of Business Venturing 19: 617–620.CrossRef Phan, P.H. 2004. Entrepreneurship Theory: Possibilities and Future Directions. Journal of Business Venturing 19: 617–620.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rakas, M., and D.S. Hain. 2016. Varieties of the Concept of National Innovation Systems. In Paper for International Schumpeter Conference 2016. Montreal. Rakas, M., and D.S. Hain. 2016. Varieties of the Concept of National Innovation Systems. In Paper for International Schumpeter Conference 2016. Montreal.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarasvathy, S.D. 2008. Effectuation. Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Sarasvathy, S.D. 2008. Effectuation. Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat Schumpeter, J.A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Schumpeter, J.A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott, W.R. 2007. Institutions and Organisations: Ideas and Interests. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers. Scott, W.R. 2007. Institutions and Organisations: Ideas and Interests. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharif, N. 2006. Emergence and Development of the National Innovation Systems Concept. Research Policy 35 (5): 745–766.CrossRef Sharif, N. 2006. Emergence and Development of the National Innovation Systems Concept. Research Policy 35 (5): 745–766.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, K. 2001. Cross-Country Comparisons: Comparing Economic Performance in the Presence of Diversity. Science and Public Policy 28 (4): 267–276.CrossRef Smith, K. 2001. Cross-Country Comparisons: Comparing Economic Performance in the Presence of Diversity. Science and Public Policy 28 (4): 267–276.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stam, E. 2015. Entrepreneurial Eco-systems and Regional Policy—A Sympathetic Critique. European Planning Studies 23 (9): 1759–1769.CrossRef Stam, E. 2015. Entrepreneurial Eco-systems and Regional Policy—A Sympathetic Critique. European Planning Studies 23 (9): 1759–1769.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stenholm, P., Z.J. Acs, and R. Wuebker. 2013. Exploring Country-Level Institutional Arrangements on the Rate and Type of Entrepreneurial Activity. Journal of Business Venturing 28: 176–193.CrossRef Stenholm, P., Z.J. Acs, and R. Wuebker. 2013. Exploring Country-Level Institutional Arrangements on the Rate and Type of Entrepreneurial Activity. Journal of Business Venturing 28: 176–193.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tether, B.S. 2002. Who Co-operates for Innovation, and Why—An Empirical Study. Research Policy 31 (6): 947–967.CrossRef Tether, B.S. 2002. Who Co-operates for Innovation, and Why—An Empirical Study. Research Policy 31 (6): 947–967.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weber, K.M., and B. Truffer. 2017. Moving Innovation Systems Research to the Next Level: Towards an Integrative Agenda. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 33 (1): 101–121.CrossRef Weber, K.M., and B. Truffer. 2017. Moving Innovation Systems Research to the Next Level: Towards an Integrative Agenda. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 33 (1): 101–121.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Woolthuis, R.K., M. Lankhuizen, and V. Gilsing. 2005. A System Failure Framework for Innovation Policy Design. Technovation 25: 609–619.CrossRef Woolthuis, R.K., M. Lankhuizen, and V. Gilsing. 2005. A System Failure Framework for Innovation Policy Design. Technovation 25: 609–619.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
National System Perspective on Entrepreneurship
verfasst von
Jesper Lindgaard Christensen
Copyright-Jahr
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91611-8_12

Premium Partner