nach oben

Studies in Comparative International Development

Erschienen in:

01.12.2009

Nationalist Versus Dependent Capitalist Development: Alternate Pathways of Asia and Latin America in a Globalized World

verfasst von: Atul Kohli

Erschienen in: Studies in Comparative International Development | Ausgabe 4/2009

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

When compared to Latin America, Asian economies since 1980 have grown faster and have done so with relatively modest inequalities. Why? A comparison of Asia and Latin America underlines the superiority of the nationalist capitalist model of development, which has often been pursued more explicitly in Asia, over that of a dependent capitalist model, which has often been pursued in Latin America. In comparison to Latin America, the Asian model has facilitated higher and less volatile rates of economic growth and a greater political room to pursue social democratic policies. The “tap root” of these alternate pathways is relative autonomy from global constraints: states and economies in Asia have been more nationalist and autonomous than in Latin America.

Vorheriger Artikel Enclaves and Development: An Empirical Assessment

Nächster Artikel Transnationalization, Social Integration, and Capitalist Diversity in the East and the South

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Note that as early as 1971 (the year the Spanish edition of Dependency and Development was published), Cardoso and Faletto argued as follows: Continuation of industrialization in a dependent situation “requires changes favorable to development in the international market, and still more essential, elements favorable to a broader measure of autonomy within the socio-political game of the developing countries.” (Cardoso and Faletto 1979: 19–20). Then again: “When development and autonomy are achieved simultaneously, resources and economic and organizational creativity located within the nation have been mobilized…. This was not the course followed by Latin America as it attempted to enter the era of modern industrial production.” (Cardoso and Faletto 1979: 162), emphasis added.

It is difficult to provide specific country level detail in a short paper. I have analyzed these and related issues for at least the cases of South Korea, Brazil, and India in Kohli (2004).

The case Sachs (1985) made for the vastly superior export performance of Asian countries in the early 1980s rested on choosing the four most successful Asian exporters, Indonesia, South Korea, Malaysia, and Thailand.

These figures are calculated from the online data on “foreign direct investment,” United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

See Branstetter and Lardy (2008, Figure 16.4, p. 643 and footnote 11, p. 642). The foreign investment originating in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and “other” locations (much of which is from Taiwan but routed via such tax havens as Cayman Islands) clearly constitutes a majority of foreign investment coming into China.

Those familiar with my other work may wonder if there is a tension between the argument presented in this paper—with an emphasis on national autonomy from global constraints as driving development success—and that developed in the 2004 book, where the emphasis was on differing state capacities. The tension is real, but the way I resolve it in my own mind at present is that national autonomy is a necessary but far from a sufficient condition for creating developmentally efficacious states.

It is difficult to support such a generalization with detailed case material in a short essay. For the important case of Brazil at least I developed such an argument in more detail elsewhere. See Kohli (2004), Chapters 4 and 5, esp. p. 182.

Amann E, Werner B. Economic orthodoxy versus social development: the dilemmas facing Brazil’s labour government. Oxf Dev Stud. 2006;34(2):219–41.CrossRef

Amsden AH. Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989.

Bornschier V, Chase-Dunn C. Transnational corporations and underdevelopment. New York: Praeger; 1985. p. 156–9.

Branstetter L, Lardy NR. China’s embrace of globalization. In: Laven B, Thomas GR, editors. China’s great economic transformation. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008. p. 633–82.

Cardoso FH. Associated-dependent development. In: Stepan A, editor. Authoritarian Brazil: origins, policies, and future. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1973.

Cardoso FH, Faletto E. Dependency and development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1979.

Chang H-J. Kicking away the ladder: development strategy in historical perspective. London: Anthem; 2003.

Eichengreen B, Duck-Koo C, editors. The Korean economy: beyond the crisis. Aldershot: Edward Elgar; 2004.

Evans P. Dependent development: the alliance of multinational, state, and local capital. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1979.

Evans P. Class, state, and dependence in East Asia: some lessons for Latin Americanists. In: Deyo FC, editor. The political economy of the new Asian industrialism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1986. p. 203–26.

Evans P. Embedded autonomy: states and industrial transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1995.

Fields GS. Distribution and development: a new look at the developing world. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2001.

Firebaugh G. Growth effects of foreign and direct investment. Am J Soc. 1992;98:105–30.CrossRef

Fishlow A. “Some reflections on comparative Latin American economic performance and policy,” Wider Working Papers; 1987.

Johnson C. Peasant nationalism and communist power: the emergence of revolutionary China. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1962.

Johnson C. Political institutions and economic performance. In: Fredric D, editor. The political economy of the new Asian industrialism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1986.

Hart-Landsberg M. Rush to development: economic change and political struggle in South Korea. New York: Monthly Review Press; 1993.

Kohli A. State-directed development: political power and industrialization in the global periphery. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2004.

Kohli A. “Politics of economic growth in India, 1980–2005,” Economic and political weekly, (in two parts), April 1 and April 8, 2006.

Krieckhaus J. Dictating development: how Europe shaped the global periphery. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press; 2006.

Newcombe H, et al. United Nations voting. Int Organ. 1970;24(2):100–21. Winter.CrossRef

Nayar BR. India’s mixed economy: the role of ideology and interest in its development. Popular Prakashan: Bombay; 1989.

Nguyen NA, Nguyen T. “Foreign direct investment in Vietnam,” Munich Personal RePEC Archive, paper number 1921, 2007 (http://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/1921/).

Rodriguez, CA. Differences in the economic development of Latin America and East Asian countries. Paper presented at a conference of the Latin America-Caribbean and Asia-Pacific Economic and Business Association (LAEBA), Tokyo; 2003).

Rodrik D, editor. In search of prosperity: analytic narratives on economic growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2003.

Sachs J. External debt and macroeconomic performance in Latin America and East Asia. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 1985;2:523–64.CrossRef

Schurmann F. Ideology and organization in communist China. University of California Press: Berkeley; 1968.

Skidmore T. Politics in Brazil, 1930-1964: an experiment in democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1967.

Solimano A. Vanishing growth in Latin America: the late twentieth century experience. Aldershot: Edward Elgar; 2006.

Stallings B, editor. Global change, regional response: the new international context of development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995.

Stallings B, Peres W. Growth employment and equity: the impact of the economic reforms in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington: Brookings Institution Press; 2000.

Stiglitz J. Globalization and its discontents. New York: W.W. Norton; 2003.

Serra N, Stiglitz JE, editors. Washington consensus reconsidered: toward new global governance. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.

Tai H-C. Land reform and politics: a comparative analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1974.

United Nations. Human development report. New York: United Nations; 2007.

Velde DW. Foreign direct investment and income inequality in Latin America. Overseas Development Institute: 2003 (unpublished; available on the web).

Wade R. Governing the market: economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1990.

Williamson J. Latin American adjustment: how much has happened?. Washington: Institute for International Economics; 1990.

Wong J. Healthy democracies: welfare politics in Taiwan and South Korea. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2004.

World Bank. World development report. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1991.

World Bank. Economic growth in the 1990s: learning from a decade of reform. Washington: World Bank; 2005.

World Bank. World development indicators. Washington: World Bank; 2007.

Titel: Nationalist Versus Dependent Capitalist Development: Alternate Pathways of Asia and Latin America in a Globalized World
verfasst von: Atul Kohli
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2009
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Studies in Comparative International Development / Ausgabe 4/2009
Print ISSN: 0039-3606
Elektronische ISSN: 1936-6167
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-009-9048-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2009

Transnationalization, Social Integration, and Capitalist Diversity in the East and the South

Dependency and Development in a Globalized World: Looking Back and Forward

Cores, Peripheries, and Contemporary Political Economy

Response

How Much Space is there for Political Agency in Dependent Economies? Reflections on Papers on Contemporary Development Inspired by Cardoso and Faletto’s Dependencia y Desarrollo en America Latina

Democracy and Development in a Globalized World: Thinking About Latin America from Within

Premium Partner