Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Environmental Earth Sciences 10/2014

Open Access 01.05.2014 | Original Article

Natural and artificial radioactivity levels and hazards of soils in the Kücük Menderes Basin, Turkey

verfasst von: Serpil Aközcan

Erschienen in: Environmental Earth Sciences | Ausgabe 10/2014

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this study, natural and artificial radionuclide activity concentrations in surface soils of Kücük Menderes Basin have been measured using gamma spectroscopy. The soil samples were collected from agricultural lands in the Kücük Menderes Basin in Turkey. The activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs in the soils were found to be range of 12.63 ± 2.28–72.51 ± 11.23, 11.45 ± 2.4–58.12 ± 4.76, 234.8 ± 14.85–1058.52 ± 24 Bq kg−1 dw and 2.31 ± 0.18–7.75 ± 1.14 Bq kg−1, respectively. The natural gamma radioactivity of the terrestrial radionuclides in soil samples and the gamma absorbed dose rate, the annual effective dose equivalent, the radium equivalent activity, the external hazard index, were calculated and compared with the international recommended values.

Introduction

Humans are exposed to background radiation that stems both from natural and artificial sources (Taskin et al. 2009). The two significant natural sources of external radiation to which human are exposed are cosmic rays and terrestrial gamma rays. Terrestrial gamma rays are essentially due to radionuclides belonging to uranium-238 (238U) and thorium-232 (232Th) series and singly occurring potassium-40 (40K) that are present in the earth’s crust (Murty and Karunakara 2008). Artificial radionuclides can also be present like Caesium-137 (137Cs) is a fission product which is formed through nuclear weapon tests and nuclear power plant accidents (Kurnaz et al. 2011).
Distributions of 238U, 226Ra, 232Th and 40K in soils depend on the radionuclide distribution in rocks from which they originate and on the processes through which the soils are concentrated (Song et al. 2012). Soil is the most important source of terrestrial gamma radiation levels, containing trace quantities of terrestrial radionuclides, whose concentrations depend on the local geology of each region in the world (UNSCEAR 2000; Montes et al. 2012; Turhan et al. 2012).
The main objective of this study is to: (i) determine the concentration of natural and artificial radionuclides (226Ra, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs) in the soil of Kucuk Menderes River Basin, Aegean Region, Turkey; (ii) calculate the important radiological parameters to assess the complete radiological hazardous nature of the soils.

Materials and methods

Study area

Kucuk Menderes River Basin, covering about 3,500 km2 area, extends westwards towards Aegean Region (Fig. 1). The region is located at western part of Turkey. Kucuk Menderes basin is a very productive agricultural area, with industrial sites concentrated in the west. Almost all irrigation and industrial water needs in the basin have been supplied using groundwater resources (Pusatli et al. 2009).

Sample collection and preparation for gamma ray spectrometry

Surface soil samples at 0–5 cm depth level weighing from to 1.5 to 2 kg were collected from 40 sites on the Kücük Menderes River, in August 2010. Samples were dried in an oven at about 105 °C for 24 h, pulverized, homogenized and sieved through 2 mm mesh. All samples were transferred to containers, weighed, hermetically sealed and stored for 4 weeks to ensure that 238U and 232Th attained the secular equilibrium with their short-lived decay products (Turhan et al. 2012).

Gamma ray spectrometry system

Measurement of the natural radioactivity (226Ra, 232Th and 40K) and 137Cs in the soil samples was conducted with the high-resolution gamma ray spectrometers with p-type coaxial HPGe detector. A solid nuclide mixture of gamma reference calibration source from Isotope Product Laboratories (containing the radionuclides 241Am, 109Cd, 57Co, 123mTe, 51Cr, 113Sn, 85Sr, 137Cs, 88Y, 60Co peaks for energy range between 80 and 2,500 keV) was used for the full-energy peak (FEP) efficiency calibration. Each sample was measured for an accumulating time between 12 and 24 h. Background measurements were taken under the same conditions of sample measurements and subtracted in order to get net counts for the sample. The activity concentrations of 232Th and 238U were calculated assuming secular equilibrium being established with their decay products. The gamma-ray line of the 351.9 keV from 214Pb and the 609.3 keV from 214Bi were used to determine the activity concentration of 226Ra. The gamma-ray line of the 911.1 keV from 228Ac and the 583.1 keV from 208Tl were used to determine the activity concentration of 232Th. The activity of 40K and 137Cs were evaluated using its 1,460 and 662 keV peaks.
The detection limits were estimated to be 3.4 Bq kg−1 for 226Ra, 5.2 Bq kg−1 for 232Th, 10.1 Bq kg−1 for 40K and 1.0 Bq kg−1 for 137Cs.

Results and discussions

The results of activity concentrations in soil samples collected from the studied site (Kucuk Menderes River Basin) varied from 13 to 73 Bq kg−1 for 226Ra, 11 to 58 Bq kg−1 for 232Th, 235 to 1,059 Bq kg−1 for 40K and 2 to 8 Bq kg−1 for 137Cs.
The average concentrations found in this study are 48.35, 20.48, 744.76 and 3.31 Bq kg−1, respectively, although the average concentrations obtained in surface soil samples in this study are comparable to those from some cities in Turkey and world (Table 1). The concentrations of the radionuclides 226Ra, 232Th and 40K in the world have averages in soil of 35, 30 and 400 Bq kg−1, respectively (UNSCEAR 2000). The mean activity concentration of 226Ra and 40K is higher than the reported International Limits. The artificial radioactive compound, 137Cs isotope does not exist in soil naturally and it is a product of fallout radioactivity (Karahan and Bayulken 2000). In the present study the highest recorded value of 137Cs equals 8 Bq kg−1.
Table 1
Comparison of the activity concentrations of the 226Ra, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs (dw) in soil samples with values reported for different regions of Turkey and different countries
Region
226Ra (Bq kg−1)
232Th (Bq kg−1)
40K (Bq kg−1)
137Cs (Bq kg−1)
References
Tripoli/Libya
10.5
9.5
270
 
Shenber (1997)
Jordan
52.9
24.0
442.6
Ahmad and Hussein (1998)
Istanbul/Turkey
37
342
18
Karahan and Bayulken (2000)
India
119
406
Kannan et al. (2002)
Tekirdağ/Turkey
39
579
5
Yarar and Kam (2005)
Manisa/Turkey
27
340
Erees et al. (2006)
Kastamonu/Turkey
37.4
27.2
431.4
8.0
Kam and Bozkurt (2007)
Rize/Turkey
42
653
85
Kurnaz et al. (2007)
Sanlıurfa/Turkey
25.0
298.6
9.1
Bozkurt et al. (2007)
Kirklareli/Turkey
37
40
667
8
Taskin et al. (2009)
Bakırçay River/Turkey
74.4
30.7
288
Saç et al. (2012)
Kucuk Menderes River/Turkey
48.4
20.5
744.8
3.3
Present study
The external terrestrial gamma radiation absorbed dose in air at 1 m above the ground level is calculated by using the following equation (UNSCEAR 2000; Kurnaz et al. 2007):
$${\text{D }}\left( {{\text{nGyh}}^{ - 1} } \right) \, = \, 0. 4 6 2 {\text{C}}_{\text{Ra}} + \, 0. 60 4 {\text{C}}_{\text{Th}} + \, 0.0 4 1 7 {\text{C}}_{\text{K}}^{{}} + \, 0.0 3 {\text{C}}_{\text{Cs}}$$
(1)
where D is the total absorbed dose rate (D) in air at 1 m above ground level; CRa, CTh, CK and CCs are the activity concentrations (Bq kg−1) of 226Ra, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs, respectively.
The absorbed gamma D’s in air at Kucuk Menderes Basin for soil samples are found between 22.62 and 112.97 nGyh−1. The mean absorbed gamma D in air was calculated as 66.77 nGyh−1and found to be comparable to the world average of 59 nGyh−1 (UNSCEAR 2000).
The average D value was calculated as 65, 60.9, 59, 56.8 nGy/h, in Istanbul (Karahan and Bayulken 2000), in Sanlıurfa (Bozkurt et al. 2007), in Trabzon (Kurnaz et al. 2011), in Bakırcay (western Turkey) (Saç et al. 2012), respectively. These average values in general are similar to our result.
To estimate the annual effective D’s, the conversion coefficient of 0.7 Sv Gy−1 from absorbed dose in air to effective dose received by adults, and 0.2 for the outdoor occupancy factor were used according to UNSCEAR (2000).
The annual effective dose equivalent (AEDE) given by UNSCEAR (2000) was calculated from the equation:
$$\left( {\text{AEDE}} \right) \, \left( {{\text{mSv y}}^{ - 1} } \right) \, = {\text{ D }}\left( {{\text{nGy h}}^{ - 1} } \right) \, \times { 8{,}76}0 \, \left( {{\text{h y}}^{ - 1} } \right) \, \times \, 0. 2 { } \times \, 0. 7\left( {{\text{Sv Gy}}^{ - 1} } \right) \, \times 10^{ - 6}.$$
(2)
The calculated values of annual effective dose due to gamma radiation range from 0.03 to 0.14 mSv y−1 with a mean value of 0.08 mSv y−1 which is higher than the world average of 0.07 mSv y−1 (UNSCEAR 2000).
The distribution of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K in soil is not uniform. Uniformity with respect to radiation exposure has been defined in terms of radium equivalent activity (Raeq) in Bq kg−1. Radium equivalent activity is a widely used hazard index, with a formula for comparing the specific activity of materials containing different amounts of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K (Abdi et al. 2009). The Raeq calculated by (Beretka and Mathew 1985):
$${\text{Ra}}_{\text{eq}}^{{}} \left( {{\text{Bq kg}}^{ - 1} } \right) \, = {\text{ C}}_{\text{Ra}} + 1. 4 3 {\text{C}}_{\text{Th}} + \, 0.0 7 {\text{C}}_{\text{K}}.$$
where CRa, CTh and CK are the activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K, respectively.
The average Raeq was calculated as 129.8 Bq kg−1, which is within the range of 45.44–229.7 Bq kg−1. The estimated values of Raeq in the present study are lower than the recommended maximum value of 370 Bq kg−1 (Kurnaz et al. 2007; Baykara et al. 2011).
The external hazard index (Hex) is defined as follows (Sroor et al. 2002):
$${\text{H}}_{\text{ex}} = {\text{ C}}_{\text{Ra}} / 3 70 \, + {\text{ C}}_{\text{Th}} / 2 5 9 { } + {\text{ C}}_{\text{K}} / 4 {,} 8 10.$$
where CRa, CTh and CK are the activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K Bq kg−1, respectively. The results range from 0.13 to 0.64 and average value was found to be 0.37. The average values of Hex were found to be 0.99 for Eskisehir/Turkey (Orgun et al. 2005), 0.45 for Rize/Turkey (Kurnaz et al. 2007), and 1.2 for China (Song et al. 2012).

Conclusion

In this study, the distributions of terrestrial and artificial radionuclides in the soil samples from 40 areas of Kucuk Menderes River Basin, Western Turkey (Aegean Region) were determined using gamma ray spectrometry with HPGe detector. The results showed that the mean concentrations of the 226Ra, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs in soil samples are comparable to the reported literature values. From the measured values, the average values of absorbed gamma dose rate in air (D), AEDE, the Raeq, the Hex were calculated. The estimated average air-absorbed D and annual effective dose for all samples are 67 nGy h−1 and 0.08 mSv, respectively. All the calculated external hazard indices were found to be <1, indicating a low dose.
This study may be used as a baseline for future investigations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Abdi MR, Hassanzadeh S, Kamali M, Raji HR (2009) 238U, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs activity concentrations along the southern coast of the Caspian Sea. Iran Mar Pollut Bull 58:658–662CrossRef Abdi MR, Hassanzadeh S, Kamali M, Raji HR (2009) 238U, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs activity concentrations along the southern coast of the Caspian Sea. Iran Mar Pollut Bull 58:658–662CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmad N, Hussein AJA (1998) radiation doses in jordanian dwellings due to natural radioactivity in construction materials and soil. Environ Radioactivity 41(2):127–136 Ahmad N, Hussein AJA (1998) radiation doses in jordanian dwellings due to natural radioactivity in construction materials and soil. Environ Radioactivity 41(2):127–136
Zurück zum Zitat Baykara O, Karatepe Ş, Doğru M (2011) Assessments of natural radioactivity and radiological hazards in construction materials used in Elazig, Turkey. Radiat Meas 46:153–158CrossRef Baykara O, Karatepe Ş, Doğru M (2011) Assessments of natural radioactivity and radiological hazards in construction materials used in Elazig, Turkey. Radiat Meas 46:153–158CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Beretka J, Mathew PJ (1985) Natural radioactivity of Australian building materials, industrial wastes and byproducts. Health Phys 48:87–95CrossRef Beretka J, Mathew PJ (1985) Natural radioactivity of Australian building materials, industrial wastes and byproducts. Health Phys 48:87–95CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bozkurt A, Yorulmaz N, Kam E, Karahan G, Osmanlioglu AE (2007) Assessment of environmental radioactivity for Sanliurfa region of Southeastern Turkey. Radiat Meas 42:1387–1391CrossRef Bozkurt A, Yorulmaz N, Kam E, Karahan G, Osmanlioglu AE (2007) Assessment of environmental radioactivity for Sanliurfa region of Southeastern Turkey. Radiat Meas 42:1387–1391CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Erees¸ FS, Aközcan S, Parlak Y, Cam S (2006) Assessment of dose rates around Manisa (Turkey). Radiat Meas 41:598–601CrossRef Erees¸ FS, Aközcan S, Parlak Y, Cam S (2006) Assessment of dose rates around Manisa (Turkey). Radiat Meas 41:598–601CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kam E, Bozkurt A (2007) Environmental radioactivity measurements in Kastamonu region of northern Turkey. Appl Radiat Isot 65:440–444CrossRef Kam E, Bozkurt A (2007) Environmental radioactivity measurements in Kastamonu region of northern Turkey. Appl Radiat Isot 65:440–444CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kannan V, Rajan MP, Iyengar MAR, Ramesh R (2002) Distribution of natural and anthropogenic radionuclides in soil and beach sand samples of Kalpakkam (India) using hyperpure germanium (HPGe) gamma ray spectrometry. Appl Radiat Isot 57:109–119CrossRef Kannan V, Rajan MP, Iyengar MAR, Ramesh R (2002) Distribution of natural and anthropogenic radionuclides in soil and beach sand samples of Kalpakkam (India) using hyperpure germanium (HPGe) gamma ray spectrometry. Appl Radiat Isot 57:109–119CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Karahan G, Bayulken A (2000) Assessment of gamma dose rates around Istanbul (Turkey). J Environ Radioact 47:213–221CrossRef Karahan G, Bayulken A (2000) Assessment of gamma dose rates around Istanbul (Turkey). J Environ Radioact 47:213–221CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kurnaz A, Küçükömeroglu B, Keser R, Okumusoglu NT, Korkmaz F, Karahan G, Çevik U (2007) Determination of radioactivity levels and hazards of soil and sediment samples in Fırtına Valley (Rize, Turkey). Appl Radiat Isot 65:1281–1289CrossRef Kurnaz A, Küçükömeroglu B, Keser R, Okumusoglu NT, Korkmaz F, Karahan G, Çevik U (2007) Determination of radioactivity levels and hazards of soil and sediment samples in Fırtına Valley (Rize, Turkey). Appl Radiat Isot 65:1281–1289CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kurnaz A, Kucukomeroglu B, Damla N, Cevik U (2011) Radiological maps for Trabzon, Turkey. J Environ Radioact 102:393–399CrossRef Kurnaz A, Kucukomeroglu B, Damla N, Cevik U (2011) Radiological maps for Trabzon, Turkey. J Environ Radioact 102:393–399CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Montes ML, Mercader RC, Taylor MA, Runco J, Desimoni J (2012) Assessment of natural radioactivity levels and their relationship with soil characteristics in undisturbed soils of the northeast of Buenos Aires province, Argentina. J Environ Radioact 105:30–39CrossRef Montes ML, Mercader RC, Taylor MA, Runco J, Desimoni J (2012) Assessment of natural radioactivity levels and their relationship with soil characteristics in undisturbed soils of the northeast of Buenos Aires province, Argentina. J Environ Radioact 105:30–39CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Murty VRK, Karunakara N (2008) Natural radioactivity in the soil samples of Botswana. Radiat Meas 43:1541–1545CrossRef Murty VRK, Karunakara N (2008) Natural radioactivity in the soil samples of Botswana. Radiat Meas 43:1541–1545CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Orgun Y, Altınsoy N, Gultekin AH, Karahan G, Celebi N (2005) Natural radioactivity levels in granitic plutons and groundwaters in Southeast part of Eskisehir, Turkey. Appl Radiat Isot 63:267–275CrossRef Orgun Y, Altınsoy N, Gultekin AH, Karahan G, Celebi N (2005) Natural radioactivity levels in granitic plutons and groundwaters in Southeast part of Eskisehir, Turkey. Appl Radiat Isot 63:267–275CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pusatli OT, Camur MZ, Yazicigil H (2009) Susceptibility indexing method for irrigation water management planning: applications to K. Menderes river basin, Turkey. J Environ Manage 90(1):341–347CrossRef Pusatli OT, Camur MZ, Yazicigil H (2009) Susceptibility indexing method for irrigation water management planning: applications to K. Menderes river basin, Turkey. J Environ Manage 90(1):341–347CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Saç MM, Ortabuk F, Kumru MN, İçhedef M, Sert Ş (2012) Determination of radioactivity and heavy metals of Bakirçay river in Western Turkey. Appl Radiat Isot 70(10):2494–2499CrossRef Saç MM, Ortabuk F, Kumru MN, İçhedef M, Sert Ş (2012) Determination of radioactivity and heavy metals of Bakirçay river in Western Turkey. Appl Radiat Isot 70(10):2494–2499CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shenber MA (1997) Measurement of natural radioactivity levels in soil in tripoli. Appl Radiat Isot 48:147–148CrossRef Shenber MA (1997) Measurement of natural radioactivity levels in soil in tripoli. Appl Radiat Isot 48:147–148CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Song G, Chen D, Tang Z, Zhang Z, Xie W (2012) Natural radioactivity levels in topsoil from the Pearl River Delta Zone, Guangdong, China. J Environ Radioact 103:48–53CrossRef Song G, Chen D, Tang Z, Zhang Z, Xie W (2012) Natural radioactivity levels in topsoil from the Pearl River Delta Zone, Guangdong, China. J Environ Radioact 103:48–53CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sroor A, Afifi SY, Abdel-Haleem AS, Salman AB, Abdel-Sammad M (2002) Environmental pollutant isotope measurements and natural radioactivity assessment for North Tushki area, south Western desert, Egypt. Appl Radiat Isot 57(3):427–436CrossRef Sroor A, Afifi SY, Abdel-Haleem AS, Salman AB, Abdel-Sammad M (2002) Environmental pollutant isotope measurements and natural radioactivity assessment for North Tushki area, south Western desert, Egypt. Appl Radiat Isot 57(3):427–436CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Taşkın H, Karavus M, Ay P, Topuzoğlu A, Hidiroğlu S, Karahan G (2009) Radionuclide concentrations in soil and lifetime cancer risk due to gamma radioactivity in Kirklareli, Turkey. J Environ Radioact 100:49–53CrossRef Taşkın H, Karavus M, Ay P, Topuzoğlu A, Hidiroğlu S, Karahan G (2009) Radionuclide concentrations in soil and lifetime cancer risk due to gamma radioactivity in Kirklareli, Turkey. J Environ Radioact 100:49–53CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Turhan Ş, Köse A, Varinlioğlu A, Şahin NK, Arıkan İ, Oğuz F, Yücel B, Özdemir T (2012) Distribution of terrestrial and anthropogenic radionuclides in Turkish surface soil samples. Geoderma 187–188:117–124CrossRef Turhan Ş, Köse A, Varinlioğlu A, Şahin NK, Arıkan İ, Oğuz F, Yücel B, Özdemir T (2012) Distribution of terrestrial and anthropogenic radionuclides in Turkish surface soil samples. Geoderma 187–188:117–124CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat UNSCEAR (2000) United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation, Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Report to the General Assembly. United Nations, New York UNSCEAR (2000) United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation, Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Report to the General Assembly. United Nations, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Yarar Y, Kam E (2005) Environmental radioactivity concentrations of Tekirdag. Int Congr Ser 1276:387–389CrossRef Yarar Y, Kam E (2005) Environmental radioactivity concentrations of Tekirdag. Int Congr Ser 1276:387–389CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Natural and artificial radioactivity levels and hazards of soils in the Kücük Menderes Basin, Turkey
verfasst von
Serpil Aközcan
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Environmental Earth Sciences / Ausgabe 10/2014
Print ISSN: 1866-6280
Elektronische ISSN: 1866-6299
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2861-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2014

Environmental Earth Sciences 10/2014 Zur Ausgabe