Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Historical and Procedural Overview of Forensic Speaker Recognition as a Science Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2012 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

7. Noise Robust Speaker Identification: Using Nonlinear Modeling Techniques

verfasst von : Raghunath S. Holambe, Ph.D., Mangesh S. Deshpande, M.E.

Erschienen in: Forensic Speaker Recognition

Verlag: Springer New York

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Session variability is one of the challenging tasks in forensic speaker identification. This variability in terms of mismatched environments seriously degrades the identification performance. In order to address the problem of environment mismatch due to noise, different types of robust features are discussed in this chapter. In state-of-the art features, the speech production system is modeled as a linear source-filter model. However, this modeling technique neglects some nonlinear aspects of speech production, which carry some speaker-specific information. Furthermore, the state-of-the art features are based on either speech production mechanism or speech perception mechanism. To overcome such limitations of existing features, features derived using non-linear modeling techniques are proposed in the chapter. The proposed features, Teager energy operator based cepstral coefficients (TEOCC) and amplitude-frequency modulation (AM-FM) based ‘Q’ features show significant improvement in speaker identification rate in mismatched environments. The performance of these features is evaluated for different types of noise signals in the NOISEX-92 database with clean training and noisy testing environments. The speaker identification rate achieved is 57% using TEOCC features and 97% using AM-FM based ‘Q’ features for 0 dB SNR compared to 25.5% using MFCC features, when the signal is corrupted by car engine noise. It is shown that, with the proposed features, speaker identification accuracy can be increased in presence of noise, without any additional pre-processing of the signal to remove noise.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Speaker Identification over Narrowband VoIP Networks
Nächstes Kapitel Robust Speaker Recognition in Noisy Environments: Using Dynamics of Speaker-Specific Prosody
Literatur
1.
Schmidt-Nielsen A, Crystal TH (1998) Human vs machine speaker identification with telephone speech. Proceedings ICSLP ’98, pp 1–4
2.
Przybocki MA, Martin AF, Le AN (2007) NIST speaker recognition evaluations utilizing the mixer corpora-2004, 2005, 2006. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process 15(7):1951–1959CrossRef
3.
Gonzalez-Rodriguez J, Rose P, Ramos D, Doroteo TT, Ortega-Garcia J (2007) Emulating DNA: rigorous quantification of evidential weight in transparent and testable forensic speaker recognition. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process 15(7):2072–2084CrossRef
4.
Marescal F (1999) The forensic speaker recognition method used by the French Gendrmerie. Internal publication, IRCGN, Paris
5.
González-Rodriguez J, Ortega-García J, Lucena-Molina J (2001) On the application of the Bayesian framework to real forensic conditions with GMM-based systems. A Speaker Odyssey, Crete, Greece, pp 135–138
6.
Nakasone H, Beck SD (2001) Forensic automatic speaker identification. A Speaker Odyssey, Crete, Greece, pp 139–144
7.
Kenny P, Boulianne G, Ouellet P, Dumouchel P (2007) Speaker and session variability in GMM-based speaker verification. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Signal Process 15(4):1448–1460CrossRef
8.
Vogt R, Sridharan S (2007) Explicit modelling of session variability for speaker verification. Comput Speech Lang 22(1):17–38CrossRef
9.
Atal BS (1974) Effectiveness of linear prediction of the speech wave for automatic speaker identification and verification. J Acoust Soc Am 55(6):1304–1312CrossRef
10.
Davis SB, Mermelstein P (1980) Comparison of parametric representations for monosyllabic word recognition in continuously spoken sentences. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process ASSP-28(4):357–366CrossRef
11.
Raynolds DA (1994) Experimental evaluation of features for robust speaker identification. IEEE Trans Speech Audio Process 2:639–643CrossRef
12.
Rabiner LR, Juang BH (1993) Fundamentals of speech recognition. Prentice-Hall, New Delhi
13.
Lu X, Dang J (2008) An investigation of dependencies between frequency components and speaker characteristics for text-independent speaker identification. Speech Commun 50:312–322CrossRef
14.
Gold B, Morgan N (2002) Speech and audio signal processing. Wiley, New York
15.
Shauhnessy DO (2001) Speech communications: human and machine, 2nd edn. University Press, Hyderabad
16.
Lin Q, Jan E-E, Che D-S, Flanagan J (1997) Selective use of speech spectrum and a VQGMM method for speaker identification. Proc. European conf. speech communication and technology, pp 2415–2418
17.
Quatieri TF (2004) Discrete-time speech signal processing, principles and practice. Pearson Education, Delhi
18.
Teager HM (1980) Some observations on oral air flow during phonation. IEEE Trans Speech Audio Process 28(5):599–601
19.
Hansen JHL, Liliana G-C, Kaiser JF (1998) Analysis method with application to vocal fold pathology assessment. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 45(3):300–313CrossRef
20.
Hayakawa S, Itakura F (1994) Text-dependent speaker recognition using the information in the higher frequency band. Proc. IEEE international conference on acoustic speech and signal Processing (ICASSP ’94), Adelaide, Australia, pp 137–140
21.
Lu X, Dang J (2007) Physiological feature extraction for text independent speaker identification using non-uniform subband processing. Proc. IEEE international conference on acoustic speech and signal processing (ICASSP ’07), Adelaide, Australia, IV-461-IV-464
22.
Wu J-D, Lin B-F (2009) Speaker identification using discrete wavelet packet transform technique with irregular decomposition. Expert Syst Appl 36:3136–3143MathSciNetCrossRef
23.
Honda K (2008) Physiological processes of speech production. In: Benesty J et al (eds) Springer handbook of speech processing. Springer, Berlin
24.
Dang J, Honda K (1997) Acoustic characteristics of the piriform fossa in models and humans. J Acoust Soc Am 101(1):456–465CrossRef
25.
Kitamura T, Takemoto H, Adachi S, Mokhtari P, Honda K (2006) Cyclicity of laryngeal cavity resonance due to vocal fold vibration. J Acoust Soc Am 120(6):2239–2249CrossRef
26.
Dang J, Honda K (1996) An improved vocal tract model of vowel production implementing piriform fossa resonance and transvelar nasal coupling. Proc. ICSLP1996, pp 965–968
27.
Rabiner LR, Shafer RW (1989) Digital signal processing of speech signals. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
28.
Rao A, Kumaresan R (2000) On decomposing speech into modulated components. IEEE Trans Speech Audio Process 8(3):240–254CrossRef
29.
Patterson RD (1987) A pulse ribbon model of monoaural phase perception. J Acoust Soc Am 82(5):1560–1586CrossRef
30.
Paliwal K, Arslan L (2003) Usefulness of phase spectrum in human speech perception. EUROSPEECH ’03, Geneva, pp 2117–2120
31.
Paliwal K, Alsteris LD (2005) On the usefulness of STFT phase spectrum in human listening tests. Speech Commun 45(2):153–170CrossRef
32.
Alsteris LD, Paliwal K (2006) Further intelligibility results from human listening tests using the short-time phase spectrum. Speech Commun 48(6):727–736CrossRef
33.
Lindemann E, Kates JM (1999) Phase relationships and amplitude envelopes in auditory perception. Proc. IEEE workshop on applications of signal processing to audio and acoustics, New Paltz, New York, pp 17–20
34.
Loughlin PJ, Tacer B (1996) On the amplitude and frequency modulation decomposition of signals. J Acoust Soc Am 100(3):1594–1601CrossRef
35.
Maragos P, Kaiser JF, Quatieri TF (1993) Energy separation in signal modulations with application to speech analysis. IEEE Trans Signal Process 41(10):3024–3051MATHCrossRef
36.
Zeng F-G, Nie K, Stickney GS, Kong Y-Y, Vongphoe M, Bhargave A, Wei C, Cao K (2005) Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(7):2293–2298CrossRef
37.
Mishra H, Ikbal S, Yegnanarayana B (2003) Speaker specific mapping for text-independent speaker recognition. Speech Commun 39:301–310CrossRef
38.
Deshpande MS, Holambe RS (2009) Improving speaker identification in noisy environment. Proceedings of the 4th Indian International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IICAI-09), Tumkur, Bangalore, pp 1687–1700
39.
Farooq O, Datta S (2001) Mel filter like admissible wavelet packet structure for speech recognition. IEEE Signal Process Lett 8(7):196–199CrossRef
40.
Hsieh CT, Lai E, Wang YC (2002) Robust speech features based on wavelet transform with application to speaker identification. IEE Proc Image Signal Process 149(2):108–114CrossRef
41.
Torres MH, Rufiner HL (2002) Automatic speaker identification by means of mel cepstrum, wavelets and wavelets packets. In Proc. IEEE international conference, EMBS, Chicago, IL, pp 978–981
42.
Sarikaya R, Pellon BL, Hansen JHL (1998) Wavelet packet transforms features with application to speaker identification. IEEE nordic signal processing symp., pp 81–84
43.
Sarikaya R, Hansen JHL (2000) High resolution speech feature parameterization for mono-phone based stressed speech recognition. IEEE Signal Process Lett 7(7):182–185CrossRef
44.
Patil HA, Dutta PK, Basu TK (2006) The wavelet packet based cepstral features for open set speaker classification in Marathi. In: Spiliopoulou M et al (eds) Studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization. Springer, Berlin, pp 134–141
45.
Patil HA, Basu TK (2004) Comparison of subband cepstrum and Mel cepstrum for open set speaker classification. In IEEE INDICON, IIT Kharagpur, pp 35–40
46.
Zhau G, Hanscn JHL, Kaiser JF (2001) Non-linear feature based classification of speech under stress. IEEE Trans Speech Audio Process 9:201–216CrossRef
47.
Jankowski CR (1996) Fine structure features for speaker identification. PhD thesis, MIT, USA
48.
Jabloun F, Cetin AE, Erzin E (1999) Teager energy based feature parameters for speech recognition in car noise. IEEE Signal Process Lett 6(10):159–261CrossRef
49.
Kaiser JF (1993) Some useful properties of Teagers energy operator. Proc. IEEE int. conf. acoustics, speech, and signal processing, vol 3, pp 149–152
50.
Kaiser JF (1990) On a simple algorithm to calculate the energy of a signal. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. acoustics, speech, and signal processing, Albuquerque, NM, pp 381–384
51.
Deshpande MS, Holambe RS (2009) Teager energy operator based robust speaker identification in noisy environment. International conference on VLSI and communication (ICVcom-2009), Kottayam, pp 541-545
52.
53.
Deshpande MS, Holambe RS (2009) Speaker identification based on robust AM-FM features. Proceedings of second IEEE international conference on emerging trends in engineering and technology (ICETET-2009), Nagpur, pp 880–884
54.
Deshpande MS, Holambe RS (2009) Robust Q features for speaker identification. Proceedings of IEEE international conference on Advances in Recent Technologies in Communication and computing (ARTCom-2009), Kottayam, Kerala, pp 209–213
55.
Grimaldi M, Cummins F (2008) Speaker identification using instantaneous frequencies. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process 16(6):1097–1111CrossRef
56.
Quatieri TF, Hanna TE, O’Leary GC (1997) AM-FM separation using auditory-motivated filters. IEEE Trans Speech Audio Process 5(5):465–480CrossRef
57.
Saberi K, Hafter ER (1995) A common neural code for frequency and amplitude-modulated sounds. Nature 374:537–539CrossRef
58.
Potamianos A, Maragos P (1994) A comparison of the energy operator and the Hilbert transform approach to signal and speech demodulation. Signal Process 37:95–120MATHCrossRef
59.
Francesco G, Giorgio B, Paolo C, Claudio T (2007) Multicomponent AM-FM representations: an asymptotically exact approach. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process 15(3):823–837CrossRef
60.
Potamianos A, Maragos P (1996) Speech formant frequency and bandwidth tracking using multiband energy demodulation. J Acoust Soc Am 99(6):3795–3806CrossRef
61.
Boashash B (1992) Estimating and interpreting the instanteneous frequency of a signal—Part 1: fundamentals. Proc IEEE 80(4):519–538
62.
Jankowski CR, Quatieri TF, Reynolds DA (1995) Measuring fine structure in speech: application to speaker identification. Proc. IEEE int. conf. acoustics, speech, and signal processing, pp 325–328
63.
Potamianos A, Maragos P (1995) Speech formant frequency and bandwidth tracking using multiband energy demodulation. Proc. IEEE int. conf. acoustics, speech, signal processing, pp 784–787
64.
Dimitriadis DV, Maragos P, Potamianos A (2005) Robust AM-FM features for speech recognition. IEEE Signal Process Lett 12(9):621–624CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Noise Robust Speaker Identification: Using Nonlinear Modeling Techniques
verfasst von
Raghunath S. Holambe, Ph.D.
Mangesh S. Deshpande, M.E.
Copyright-Jahr
2012
Verlag
Springer New York
Buch
Forensic Speaker Recognition

Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-0262-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-4614-0263-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2012

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0263-3_7

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise