nach oben

Empirical Economics

Erschienen in:

26.11.2019

On the pernicious effects of oil price uncertainty on US real economic activities

verfasst von: Amélie Charles, Chew Lian Chua, Olivier Darné, Sandy Suardi

Erschienen in: Empirical Economics | Ausgabe 6/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The last five decades have witnessed dramatic changes in crude oil price dynamics. We identify the influence of extreme oil shocks and changing oil price uncertainty dynamics associated with economic and political events. Neglecting these features of the data can lead to model misspecification that gives rise to: firstly, an explosive volatility process for oil price uncertainty, and secondly, erroneous output growth dynamic responses to oil shocks. Unlike past studies, our results show that the sharp increase in oil price uncertainty after mid-1985 has a pernicious effect on output growth. There is evidence that output growth responds symmetrically (asymmetrically) to positive and negative shocks in the period when oil price uncertainty is lower (higher) and more (less) persistent before (after) mid-1985. These results highlight the importance of accounting for outliers and volatility breaks in oil price and output growth and the need to better understand the response of economic activity to oil shocks in the presence of oil price uncertainty. Our results remain qualitatively unchanged with the use of real oil price.

Vorheriger Artikel State-dependent biases and the quality of China’s preliminary GDP announcements

Nächster Artikel The trade creation effects of Africa’s reciprocal vis-à-vis non-reciprocal trade agreements

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Baumeister and Peersman (2013) use a time-varying-parameter VAR model to demonstrate that changes in the crude oil market have been gradual. While their model specification permit inference on the gradual dynamic of change in the price elasticity of oil supply and demand, we do not impose this structure to our model given that our basis of comparison is the model of Elder and Serletis (2009, 2010, 2011). Be that as it may, the application of the variance break test is able to detect whether there has been a change in the volatility process of oil price change partly explained by this gradual change in the price elasticity of oil supply and demand.

The proxy for uncertainty which is measured by the conditional variance of oil prices is subject to certain caveats. This proxy measures the dispersion in the forecast error produced by the econometric model estimated using historical data, and it therefore may not capture other forward-looking components of uncertainty other than the one parameterised in the model. Nevertheless, the use of autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity-based measures of uncertainty is widespread in the empirical literature for modelling output growth uncertainty (Grier et al. 2004; Chua et al. 2011), inflation uncertainty (Engle 1982; Elder 2004), and oil price uncertainty (Elder and Serletis 2009, 2010).

Recently, Rodrigues and Rubia (2011) have studied the size properties of Sansó et al.’s (2004) ICSS algorithm for detecting structural breaks in variance under the hypothesis of additive outliers. Their results indicate that neglected outliers tend to bias the ICSS test. They advise applying the modified ICSS algorithm on outlier-adjusted return series to identify sudden shifts in volatility.

Elder and Serletis (2010) undertook a robustness analysis post-1986, but this was for the purpose of addressing the effect of the 1986 Tax Reform Act on investment. Specifically, following the sharp drop in oil prices in 1986 the decline in real GDP growth rate was primarily due to declines in private nonresidential investment expenditures. The fall in private nonresidential investment expenditures can be attributed to provisions in TRA86 such as the repeal of the investment tax credit and the elimination of some real estate tax shelters.

Rahman and Serletis (2012) study the effects of oil price uncertainty on the Canadian economy using a multivariate conditional variance specification that does not impose this assumption.

One damaging aspect of the tax reform is its application of the alternative minimum tax (AMT) to the main tax mechanisms for drilling cost and capital recovery, which comprise current year expensing of intangible drilling costs and the remnants of percentage depletion. In theory, producers can recover AMT tax payments through credits when and if they become so profitable that their regular income tax exceeds AMT tax. However, most producers are not that profitable. To the extent they cannot recover AMT payments, and lost opportunity costs associated with them, producers pay taxes on drilling capital.

The test of Laurent et al. (2016) is similar to the non-parametric tests for jumps proposed by Lee and Mykland (2008) and Andersen et al. (2007) for low-frequency data.

The critical values are defined by \(g_{T,\lambda }=-\log \left( -\log (1-\lambda )\right) b_{T}+c_{T}\), with \(b_{T}=1/\sqrt{2\log T}\), and \( c_{T}=(2\log T)^{1/2}-[\log \pi +\log (\log T)]/[2(2\log T)^{1/2}]\). Laurent et al. (2016) suggest setting \(\lambda =0.5\)

Andersen TG, Bollerslev T, Dobrev D (2007) No arbitrage semi-martingale restrictions for continous-time volatility models subject to leverage effects, jumps and i.i.d. noise: theory and testable distributional implications. J Econ 138:125–180

Baffes J, Kose M, Ohnsorge F, Stocker M (2015) The great plunge in oil prices: causes, consequences, and policy responses. Policy Research Note No 15/01, World Bank Group

Barsky RB, Kilian L (2004) Oil and the macroeconomy since the 1970s. J Econ Perspect 18:115–134

Baumeister C, Peersman G (2013) The role of time-varying price elasticities in accounting for volatility changes in the crude oil market. J Appl Econ 28:1087–1109

Bernanke B (1983) Irreversibility, uncertainty and cyclical investment. Quart J Econ 98:85–106

Blanchard O, Gali J (2010) The macroeconomic effects of oil price shocks: why are the 2000s so different from the 1970s? In: Gal J, Gertler M (eds) International dimensions of monetary policy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 373–421

Boudt K, Danielsson J, Laurent S (2013) Robust forecasting of dynamic conditional correlation GARCH Models. Int J Forecast 29:244–257

Box G, Tiao G (1975) Intervention analysis with applications to economic and environmental problems. J Am Stat Assoc 70:70–79

Bredin D, Elder J, Fountas S (2011) Oil volatility and the option value of waiting: An analysis of the G-7. J Futures Mark 31:679–702

Brennan M, Schwartz E (1985) Evaluating natural resource investment. J Bus 58:1135–1157

Brennan M (1990) Latent assets. J Finance 45:709–730

Carrion-i-Silvestre JL, Kim D, Perron P (2009) GLS-based unit root tests with multiple structural breaks both under the null and the alternative hypotheses. Econ Theory 25:1754–1792

Charles A, Darné O (2014) Volatility persistence in crude oil markets. Energy Policy 65:729–742

Chua C, Kim D, Suardi S (2011) Are empirical measures of macroeconomic uncertainty alike? J Econ Surv 25:801–827

Diebold F (1986) Modeling the persistence of conditional variances: a comment. Econ Rev 5:51–56

Edelstein P, Kilian P (2009) How sensitive are consumer expenditures to retail energy prices? J Monet Econ 56:766–779

Elder J (2003) An impulse-response function for a vector autoregression with multivariate GARCH-in-mean. Econ Lett 79:21–26

Elder J (2004) Another perspective on the effects of inflation volatility. J Money Credit Bank 36:911–928

Elder J, Serletis A (2009) Oil price uncertainty in Canada. Energy Econ 31:852–856

Elder J, Serletis A (2010) Oil price uncertainty. J Money Credit Bank 42:1137–1159

Elder J, Serletis A (2011) Volatility in oil prices and manufacturing activity: an investigation on real options. Macroecon Dyn 15:379–395

Elliott G, Rothenberg TJ, Stock JH (1996) Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64:813–836

Engle RF (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econom 50:987–1007

Grier K, Henry O, Olekalns N, Shield K (2004) The asymmetric effects of uncertainty on inflation and output growth. J Appl Econ 19:551–565

Hamilton JD (1983) Oil and the macroeconomy since World-War-II. J Polit Econ 91:228–248

Hamilton JD (2008) Macroeconomics and ARCH. Working Paper No. 14151. NBER

Hamilton JD (2013) Historical oil shocks. In: Parker RE, Whaples R (eds) Handbook of major events in economic history. Taylor and Francis Group, Routledge, pp 239–265

Hillebrand E (2005) Neglecting parameter changes in GARCH models. J Econom 129:121–138

Inclan C, Tiao GC (1994) Use of cumulative sums of squares for retrospective detection of changes of variance. J Am Stat Assoc 89:913–923

Kilian L (2009) Not all oil price shocks are alike: disentangling demand and supply shocks in the cude oil market. Am Econ Rev 99:1053–69

Kilian L, Vigfusson RJ (2011) Are the responses of the US economy asymmetric in energy price increases and decreases? Quant Econ 2:419–453

Koop G, Pesaran MH, Potter SM (1996) Impulse response analysis in nonlinear multivariate models. J Econ 74:119–147

Lamoureux C, Lastrapes W (1990) Persistence in variance, structural change and the GARCH model. J Bus Econ Stat 8:225–234

Laurent S, Lecourt C, Palm FC (2016) Testing for jumps in GARCH models, a robust approach. Comput Stat Data Anal 100:383–400

Lee J, Strazicich MC (2001) Break point estimation and spurious rejections with endogenous unit root tests. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 63:535–558

Lee SS, Mykland PA (2008) Jumps in financial markets: a new nonparametric test and jump dynamics. Rev Financ Stud 21:2535–2563

Majd S, Pindyck R (1987) Time to build, option value and investment decisions. J Financ Econ 18:7–27

Mikosch T, Starica C (2004) Nonstationarities in financial time series, the long-range dependence, and the IGARCH effect. Rev Econ Stat 86:378–390

Muler N, Peña D, Yohai V (2009) Robust estimation for ARMA models. Ann Stat 37:816–840

Muler N, Yohai V (2008) Robust estimates for GARCH models. J Stat Plan Inference 138:2918–2940

Newey W, West K (1994) Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. Rev Econ Stud 61:631–653

Ng S, Perron P (2001) Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica 69:1519–1554

Perron P (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57:1361–1401

Perron P, Qu Z (2007) A simple modification to improve the finite sample properties of Ng and Perron’s unit root tests. Econ Lett 94:12–19

Pindyck R (1991) Irreversibility, uncertainty and investment. J Econ Lit 29:110–148

Rahman S, Serletis A (2012) Oil price uncertainty and the Canadian economy: evidence from a VARMA, GARCH-in-Mean, asymmetric BEKK model. Energy Econ 34:603–610

Rodrigues P, Rubia A (2011) The effects of additive outliers and measurement errors when testing for structural breaks in variance. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 73:449–468

Sansó A, Aragó V, Carrion-i-Silvestre J (2004) Testing for changes in the unconditional variance of financial time series. Revista de Economía Financiera 4:32–53

Stock J, Watson M (2012) Disentagling the channels of the 2007–2009 Recession. Working Paper No. 18094, NBER

Zivot E, Andrews DWK (1992) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat 10:251–270

Titel: On the pernicious effects of oil price uncertainty on US real economic activities
verfasst von: Amélie Charles
Chew Lian Chua
Olivier Darné
Sandy Suardi
Publikationsdatum: 26.11.2019
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Empirical Economics / Ausgabe 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0377-7332
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-8921
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01801-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2020

The unemployment effect of central bank transparency

Revisiting the trade effects of the euro: data sources and various samples

State-dependent biases and the quality of China’s preliminary GDP announcements

Forecasting financial stress indices in Korea: a factor model approach

The trade creation effects of Africa’s reciprocal vis-à-vis non-reciprocal trade agreements

Unemployment reduction through solo self-employment: A gender question?

Premium Partner