Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Weighted Dissemination of Bundles in Probabilistic Spray and Wait Routing Protocol Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Organizational Readiness for Managing Large-Scale Data Storage in Virtualized Server Environments

verfasst von : Said Ally

Erschienen in: Advances in Data and Information Sciences

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Storage management is a challenging issue due to exponential growth of data and computing workloads transacted per day. Although storage virtualization plays a prominent role in addressing this problem, there exist complexities in the adoption process of virtualization technologies because the transition from a non-virtualized to a virtualized environment is not always a smooth process. Using a survey of 24 public and private institutions in Tanzania, the organizational readiness for managing data storage in virtualized servers is studied. While there is a satisfactory awareness level for most adopters of the existing virtual-based data storage technologies and disk partition techniques, the attention given to securing adopter’s practices for virtual resource allocation is inefficient for countering virtual machine attacks. Adopters are prone to starve their virtual machines as soon as their computing workloads expand. The study reveals a serious ad hoc allocation of virtual HDDs with high discrepancy between adopters from the same sector and with similar IT infrastructure, and computing level and demands. Organizations are prompted about the limitations of their current practices which would hardly bring maximum benefits of storage virtualization when expanding from small- to large-scale data workloads.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Internet of Things: Industry Use Cases (SAP-HCP)
Nächstes Kapitel Classification of Forest Cover Type Using Random Forests Algorithm
Literatur
1.
2.
3.
4.
Padhy, R. P. (2012). Virtualization techniques and technologies: state-of-the-art. International Journal of Global Research in Computer Science, (UGC Approved Journal), 2(12), 29–43.
5.
Kanoongo, B., Jagani, P., Mehta, P., & Kurup, L. (2014). Exposition of solutions to hypervisor vulnerabilities. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 4(5), 3244–3247. International Press Corporation (INPRESSCO), ISSN 2277–4106.
6.
7.
8.
HP. (2009) Server virtualization technologies for x86-based HP blade system and HP ProLiant server’s technology brief (3rd ed.) Hewlett Packard Development Company, L.P.
9.
Chirammal, H. D., Mukhedkar, P., & Vettathu, A. (2016). Mastering KVM virtualization (1st ed), Birmingham, UK: PACKT Publishing Ltd. ISBN 978-1-78439-905-4.
10.
Fleischer, T., Decker, M., & Fiedeler, U. (2005). Assessing emerging technologies-methodological challenges and the case of nanotechnologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72, 1112–1121.CrossRef
11.
Ally, S. (2018). A holistic approach to determine security levels of virtual machines in the adoption and use of open source hypervisors. Ph.D. thesis, The Open University of Tanzania, pp. 320.
12.
Cetindamar, D., Phaal, R., & Probert, D. (2009). Understanding technology management as a dynamic capability: A framework for technology management activities. Technovation, 29, 237–246.CrossRef
13.
Osakiand, N., Yamamoto, A. (2009). Method and apparatus incorporating virtualization for data storage and protection. Hitachi Ltd. U.S. Patent 7,594,072.
14.
Scarfone, K. (2011). Guide to security for full virtualization technologies. DIANE Publishing.
15.
Yang, Z., Bhimani, J., Wang, J., Evans, D., & Mi, N. (2017). Automatic and scalable data replication manager in distributed computation and storage infrastructure of cyber-physical systems. Journal of Scalable Computing, 18(4). Special Issue on Communication, Computing, and Networking in Cyber-Physical Systems.
16.
Maskalik, S., Aravind, S., Debashis, B., Sachin, T., & Allwyn, S. (2017). Multi-spoke connectivity of private data centers to the cloud. U.S. Patent Application 14/981,424, filed March 2, 2017.
17.
Yang, Q. (2018). Storage of data reference blocks and deltas in different storage devices. Western Digital Technologies Inc, 2018, U.S. Patent Application 10/108,348.
18.
Patil, P. T. (2016). A study on evolution of storage infrastructure. International Journal, 6(7).
19.
Rezaei, A., Suri, T., & Brennan, B. (2018). Versioning storage devices and methods. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, 2018. U.S. Patent Application 10/061,523.
20.
Dube, S. J., Ahmed, S., Shetty, S. V., & Palmer, J. R. (2017). System and method for providing management network communication and control in a data center. Dell Products LP, 2017. U.S. Patent Application 15/015,961.
21.
Choi, Y. S., & Kwon, H. J. (2017) SATA host bus adapter using optical signal and method for connecting SATA storage using the same. Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, 2017. U.S. Patent 9,722,702.
22.
Wu, W., Wei, X., Zibin, Y., & Qingbin, L. (2018). Exploring the potential of coupled array of SSD and HDD for multi-tenant. In 2018 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data Analysis (ICCCBDA), pp. 653–657. IEEE.
23.
Bernal, E. R., & Heninger, I. M. (2019). Addressing usage of shared ssd resources in volatile and unpredictable operating environments. January 3, 2019.
24.
Chang, H. P., Yu-Cheng, Y., & Chung, P. Y. (2018). Design and implementation of a shared multi-tiered storage system. In 2018 3rd International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems (ICCCS), pp. 94–98. IEEE.
25.
Yashwanth, Y. K. (2018). Different forensic tools on a single SSD and HDD, their differences and drawbacks.
26.
Yoo, B., Seongjin, L., & Youjip, W. (2018). Analyzing the storage defects from the perspective of synthetic fault injection. Journal of Information Science and Engineering, 34(1), 1–20.
27.
Aazam, M., Eui-Nam, H., & Marc, S. (2018). Towards media inter-cloud standardization–evaluating impact of cloud storage heterogeneity. Journal of Grid Computing, 16(3), 425–443.CrossRef
28.
Raj, P., & Anupama, R. (2018). Software-defined storage (SDS) for storage virtualization. In Software-defined cloud centers (pp. 35–64). Springer, Cham.
29.
Park, J. K., & Jaeho, K. (2018). Big data storage configuration and performance evaluation utilizing NDAS storage systems. AKCE International Journal of Graphs and Combinatorics, 15(2), 197–201.CrossRef
30.
Lanka, A., & Ariun, G. (2018). Remotely accessible, low power network attached storage device. In 2018 Second International Conference on Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies (ICICCT), pp. 1083–1088. IEEE.
31.
Silverman, D. (2010). Doing qualitative research–A practical handbook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd. ISBN: 978-1-84860-033-1.
32.
Vagias, W. M. (2006). Likert-type scale response anchors. Clemson International Institute for Tourism & Research Development, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, Clemson University.
33.
DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications–Applied social research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications. ISBN-13: 978-1412980449.
Metadaten
Titel
Organizational Readiness for Managing Large-Scale Data Storage in Virtualized Server Environments
verfasst von
Said Ally
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Advances in Data and Information Sciences

Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0693-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-15-0694-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0694-9_36

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise