nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Performance-Based Funding in the Italian Higher Education: A Critical Analysis

verfasst von : Alberto Ezza, Nicoletta Fadda, Gianfranco Pischedda, Ludovico Marinò

Erschienen in: Digital Business Transformation

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

University performance is playing an increasingly important role in financing public institutions. This has resulted in higher competitiveness and stronger emphasis on efficiency and effectiveness and a propensity to hold universities directly accountable. However, assessment tools are not consistently able to measure the achievements of universities in a reliable way due to the lack of indicators that can assess performance objectively. Furthermore, the formulas that are frequently used to determine achievements are complex, and the raw data that feeds such formulas are not unfailingly reliable. The aim of this theoretical study is underlining the potential criticalities of the performance-based approach in the Italian higher education system by critically analysing three of the main mechanisms that are employed to determine resource allocation. The paper also highlights the derived effects that influence the strategic choices and consequent actions that are implemented by universities.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Improving Invoice Allocation in Accounting—An Account Recommender Case Study Applying Machine Learning

Nächstes Kapitel Organizational Impacts on Sustainability of Industry 4.0: A Systematic Literature Review from Empirical Case Studies

Type B research fellow (from now RTD-B), as regulated by the L. 240/2010 is a three-year contract that can lead to a tenure-track to became associate professor for those who achieved the national qualification.

Agasisti, T. (2009). Market forces and competition in university systems: Theoretical reflections and empirical evidence from Italy. International Review of Applied Economics., 23(4), 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692170902954783.CrossRef

Agasisti, T., & Catalano, G. (2006). Governance models of university systems—towards quasi-markets? Tendencies and perspectives: A European comparison. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management., 28(3), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800600980056.CrossRef

Agasisti, T., & Pérez-Esparrells, C. (2010). Comparing efficiency in a cross-country perspective: The case of Italian and Spanish state universities. Higher Education, 59(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9235-8.CrossRef

Bartlett, W., Le Grand, J.: The theory of quasi-markets. In Quasi-markets and social policy (pp. 13–34). Berlin: Springer.

Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00322.CrossRef

Burke, J. C., Minassians, H. P.: Performance reporting: real. Accountability or accountability “lite”: Seventh annual survey 2003. Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, State University of New York.

Capano, G., et al. (2016). Changing governance in universities. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54817-7.

Cattaneo, M., et al. (2017). University spatial competition for students: the Italian case. Regional Studies, 51(5), 750–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1135240.CrossRef

Chan, S.-J., & Lin, L.-W. (2015). Massification of higher education in taiwan: shifting pressure from admission to employment. Higher Education Policy, 28(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2014.33.CrossRef

10.

Degli Esposti, M., & Geraci, M. (2010). Thirty years of higher-education policy in Italy: Vico’s Ricorsi and beyond? Bulletin of Italian Politics, 2(2), 111–122.

11.

Dill, D. (1997). Markets and higher education: an introduction. Higher Education Policy, 10(3–4), 163–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8733(97)81764-3.CrossRef

12.

Donina, D., et al. (2015). Higher education reform in Italy: Tightening regulation instead of steering at a distance. Higher Education Policy, 28(2), 215–234.CrossRef

13.

Donina, D., & Paleari, S. (2018). New public management: global reform script or conceptual stretching? Analysis of university governance structures in the Napoleonic administrative tradition. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0338-y.CrossRef

14.

Dougherty, K. J., et al. (2014). Performance Funding for Higher Education: Forms, Origins, Impacts, and Futures. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 655(1), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214541042.CrossRef

15.

Estermann, T., et al. (2013). Designing strategies for efficient funding of higher education in Europe. DEFINE Interim Report, Brussels.

16.

Ezza, A., et al. (2019). Il “grande gap”: gli effetti del performance budgeting sulle politiche di reclutamento delle Università italiane. Management Control, 2, 99–121. https://doi.org/10.3280/MACO2019-002005.CrossRef

17.

Ezza, A., et al. (2017). Performance-based funding in public competition. lights and shadows in the Italian higher education system. Journal of International Business and Economics, 17(2), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.18374/JIBE-17-2.1.

18.

Farhan, B. Y. (2016). Competitive behaviour in publicly funded academic institutions. Interchange., 47(4), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-016-9283-9.CrossRef

19.

Fowles, J. (2014). Funding and focus: Resource dependence in public higher education. Research in Higher Education, 55(3), 272–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9311-x.CrossRef

20.

Geuna, A. (2001). The changing rationale for european university research funding: Are there negative unintended consequences? Journal of Economic Issues, 35(3), 607–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2001.11506393.CrossRef

21.

Geuna, A., & Martin, B. R. (2003). University research evaluation and funding: an international comparison. Minerva, 41(4), 277–304. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MINE.0000005155.70870.bd.CrossRef

22.

Harnisch, T. L. (2011). Performance-based funding: A re-emerging strategy in public higher education financing, 12.

23.

Herbst, M. (2007). Performance-based budgeting or funding. In Financing public universities (pp. 65–94). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9503-0_4.

24.

Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007.CrossRef

25.

Hillman, N. W., et al. (2014). Performance funding in higher education: Do financial incentives impact college completions? The Journal of Higher Education, 85(6), 826–857. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2014.11777349.CrossRef

26.

Jeon, J., & Kim, S. Y. (2018). Is the gap widening among universities? On research output inequality and its measurement in the Korean higher education system. Quality & Quantity, 52(2), 589–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0652-y.CrossRef

27.

Jongbloed, B.: Funding Higher Education: A Comparative Overview. (2008).

28.

Jongbloed, B. (2004). Funding higher education: options, trade-offs and dilemmas.

29.

Jongbloed, B. (2003). Marketisation in higher education, Clark’s triangle and the essential ingredients of markets. Higher Education Quarterly, 57(2), 110–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2273.00238.CrossRef

30.

Jongbloed, B., & Vossensteyn, H. (2001). Keeping up performances: An international survey of performance-based funding in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 23(2), 127–145.CrossRef

31.

Le Grand, J.: Quasi-Markets and Social Policy. The Economic Journal. 101, 408, 1256 (1991). https://doi.org/10.2307/2234441.

32.

Liefner, I. (2003). Funding, resource allocation, and performance in higher education systems. Higher Education, 46(4), 469–489.CrossRef

33.

McKeown, M.P.: State Funding Formulas for Public Four-Year Institutions. (1996).

34.

Nisar, M. A. (2015). Higher education governance and performance based funding as an ecology of games. Higher Education, 69(2), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9775-4.CrossRef

35.

Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.

36.

Rabovsky, T. M. (2012). Accountability in higher education: Exploring impacts on state budgets and institutional spending patterns. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 675–700.CrossRef

37.

Rossi, P. (2015). Il Punto Organico: una storia italiana. RT. A Journal on Research Policy and Evaluation, 3, 1.

38.

Rothschild, M., & White, L. J. (1995). The analytics of the pricing of higher education and other services in which the customers are inputs. Journal of Political Economy, 103(3), 573–586.CrossRef

39.

Smethurst, R. (1995). Education: a public or private good? RSA Journal, 143(5465), 33–45.

40.

Thornton, Z. M., & Friedel, J. N. (2016). Performance-based funding: State policy influences on small rural community colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40(3), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2015.1112321.CrossRef

41.

Tilak, J. B. G. (2008). Higher education: a public good or a commodity for trade?: Commitment to higher education or commitment of higher education to trade. Prospects, 38(4), 449–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-009-9093-2.CrossRef

42.

Volkwein, J., & Tandberg, D. (2008). Measuring up: Examining the connections among state structural characteristics, regulatory practices, and performance. Research in Higher Education, 49, 180–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-007-9066-3.CrossRef

43.

van Vught, F. (2007). Diversity and differentiation in higher education systems, 22.

44.

Widiputera, F., et al. (2017). Measuring diversity in higher education institutions: A review of literature and empirical approaches. IAFOR Journal of Education, 5(1), 47–63.CrossRef

Titel: Performance-Based Funding in the Italian Higher Education: A Critical Analysis
verfasst von: Alberto Ezza
Nicoletta Fadda
Gianfranco Pischedda
Ludovico Marinò
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Digital Business Transformation
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47354-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-47355-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47355-6_11

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner