Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Performance Management in the Public Sector: The State of Art

verfasst von : Shlomo Mizrahi

Erschienen in: Public Policy and Performance Management in Democratic Systems

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter explains the core characteristics of performance management and how it came to be part of the New Public Management movement. We explain the broad range of applications both at the macro and micro levels, and the advantages and disadvantages of such mechanisms. We also present a principal-agent framework of the nested relations in the public domain as the basis for further exploration to be carried out in the next chapters. The chapter then discusses the literature related to the ways in which public organizations can manage the core pathologies of performance management systems. The chapter also distinguishes between macro-level governance and policy making, and micro-level organizational management. Throughout the chapter we elaborate the research questions to be explored in the next chapters.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Introduction
Nächstes Kapitel Performance Management, Gaming, and Monitoring in Democratic Systems
Literatur
Andrews, R. (2010). New Public Management and the search for efficiency. In T. Christensen & P. Laegrid (Eds.), Ashgate research companion to the New Public Management. Aldershot: Ashgate Press.
Andrews, R. (2014). Performance management and public service improvement. Public Policy Institute for Wales, PPIW Report No.3.
Arnaboldi, M., Lapsley, I., & Steccolini, I. (2015). Performance management in the public sector: The ultimate challenge. Financial Accountability & Management, 31(1), 1–22.CrossRef
Baker, G. P. (1992). Incentive contracts and performance measurement. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 598–614.CrossRef
Baker, G. P., Gibbons, R., & Murphy, K. J. (1994). Subjective performance measures in optimal incentive contracts. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 1125–1156.CrossRef
Barzelay, M., & Gallego, R. (2006). From “New Institutionalism” to “Institutional Processualism”: Advancing knowledge about public management policy change. Governance, 19, 531–557.CrossRef
Behn, R. D. (2001). Rethinking democratic accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63, 586–606.CrossRef
Bendor, J. B. (1990). Formal models of bureaucracy: A review. In N. B. Lynn & A. Wildavsky (Eds.), Public administration: The state of the discipline (pp. 373–418). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Bevan, G., & Hood, C. (2006). What’s measured is what matters: Targets and gaming in the English health care system. Public Administration, 84, 517–538.CrossRef
Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2008). Managing performance: International comparisons. New York: Routledge.
Bouckaert, G., & Van de Walle, S. (2003). Comparing measures of citizen trust and user satisfaction as indicators of “good governance”: Difficulties in linking trust and satisfaction indicators. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69, 329–343.
Bovens, M. (2007). Analyzing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.CrossRef
Boyne, G. A. (2010). Performance management: Does it work? In R. M. Walker, G. A. Boyne, & G. A. Brewer (Eds.), Public management performance: Research directions (pp. 207–226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Boyne, G. A., & Chen, A. (2006). Performance targets and public service improvement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3), 455–477.CrossRef
Boyne, G. A., James, O., John, P., & Petrovsky, N. (2010). Does public service performance affect top management turnover? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, i261–i279.CrossRef
Broadbent, J., & Laughlin, R. (2009). Performance management systems: A conceptual model. Management Accounting Research, 20, 283–295.CrossRef
Burgess, S., Wilson, D., & Worth, J. (2010). A natural experiment in school accountability: The impact of school performance information on pupil progress and sorting. Centre for Markets and Public Organization. Bristol: Bristol University.
Chen, Z., Eisenberger, R., Johnson, K. M., Sucharski, I. L., & Aselage, J. (2009). Perceived organizational support and extra-role performance: Which leads to which? The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(1), 119–124.CrossRef
Christen, M., Iyer, G., & Soberman, D. (2006). Job satisfaction, job performance and effort: A reexamination using agency theory. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 137–150.CrossRef
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668.CrossRef
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71, 1–27.CrossRef
Dixit, A. (2002). Incentives and organizations in the public sector. Journal of Human Resources, 37, 696–727.CrossRef
Downs, G. W., & Rocke, D. M. (1994). Conflict, agency, and gambling for resurrection: The principal-agent problem goes to war. American Journal of Political Science, 38, 362–380.CrossRef
Dull, M. (2006). Why PART? The institutional politics of presidential budget reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 187–215.CrossRef
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchinson, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(5), 500–507.CrossRef
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Farrell, H. (2009). The political economy of trust: Institutions, interests, and inter-firm cooperation in Italy and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Ferreira, A., & Otley, D. (2005). The design and use of management control systems: An extended framework for analysis, AAA Management Accounting Section 2006 Meeting Paper. Available at SSRN: http://​ssrn.​com/​abstract=​682984.
Ferreira, A., & Otley, D. (2009). The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis. Management Accounting Research, 20, 263–282.CrossRef
Figlio, D., & Ladd, H. (2008). School accountability and student achievement. In H. Ladd & E. Fiske (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy. London: Routledge.
Fox, C. J., & Miller, H. T. (1996). Postmodern public administration: Toward discourse. London: Sage.
Gaynor, M., Moreno-Serra, R., & Propper, C. (2010). Death by market power: Reform, competition and patient outcomes in the National Health Service. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 16164.
Gerrish, E. (2016). The impact of performance management on performance in public organizations: A meta-analysis. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 48–66.CrossRef
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Introduction of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gormley, W. T., & Weimer, D. (1999). Organizational report cards. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hammond, T. H., & Knott, J. H. (1996). Who controls the bureaucracy? Journal of Law Economics and Organizations, 12, 119–166.CrossRef
Hardin, R. (2006). Trust. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hays, S. W., & Kearney, R. C. (1997). Riding the crest of a wave: The national performance review and public management reform. International Journal of Public Administration, 20(1), 11–40.CrossRef
Heinrich, C. J. (2007). False or fitting recognition? The use of high performance bonuses in motivating organizational achievements. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26, 281–304.CrossRef
Heinrich, C. J., & Marschke, G. (2010). Incentives and their dynamics in public sector performance management systems. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29(1), 183–208.CrossRef
Holmstrom, B. (1979). Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 74–91.CrossRef
Holmstrom, B., & Milgrom, P. (1991). Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 7, 24–52.CrossRef
Holzer, M., & Yang, K. (2004). Performance measurement and improvement: An assessment of the state of art. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70, 15–31.CrossRef
Holzer, M., Mullins, L. B., Ferreira, M., & Hoontis, P. (2016). Implementing performance budgeting at the state level: Lessons learned from New Jersey. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(2), 95–106.CrossRef
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69, 3–19.CrossRef
Hood, C. (1995). Contemporary public management: A new global paradigm? Public Policy and Administration, 10, 104–117.CrossRef
Hood, C. (2006). Gaming in target world: The targets approach to managing British public services. Public Administration Review, 66, 515–521.CrossRef
Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2010). The political pay-off from performance target systems: No-brainer or no-gainer? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), I281–I298.CrossRef
Hood, C., & Lodge, M. (2006). The politics of public service bargain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Hood, C., Rothstein, H., & Baldwin, R. (2001). The government of risk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Horn, M. (1995). The political economy of public administration. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Houston, D. J. (2006). “Walking the walk” of public service motivation: Public employees and charitable gifts of time, blood, and memory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 67–86.CrossRef
Hoyle, R., & Robinson, J. (2003). League tables and school effectiveness: A mathematical model. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 270, 113–119.CrossRef
Hvidman, U., & Andersen, S. C. (2013). The impact of performance management in public and private organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24, 35–58.CrossRef
James, O., & John, P. (2006). Public management at the ballot box: Performance information and electoral support for incumbent English local governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 567–580.CrossRef
Johnsen, A. (2005). What does 25 years of experience tell us about the state of performance measurement in public policy and management? Public Money and Management, 25, 9–17.
Jones, G., & Potrafke, N. (2014). Human capital and national institutional quality: Are TIMSS, PISA, and National Average IQ robust predictors? CESIFO Working paper no. 4790.
Kelman, S., & Friedman, J. N. (2009). Performance improvement and performance dysfunction: An empirical examination of distortionary impacts of the emergency room wait-time target in the English National Health Service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 917–946.CrossRef
Lane, J.-E. (2000). New Public Management. London: Routledge.
Lindberg, S. I. (2013). Mapping accountability: Core concept and subtypes. International Review of Administrative Science, 79, 202–226.CrossRef
Lockwood, B., & Porcelli, F. (2013). Incentive schemes for local government: Theory and evidence from comprehensive performance assessment in England. CESIfo DICE Report, 11(1), 55–63.
Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54(1), 123–136.CrossRef
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. G. (2011). Comparing public and private management: Theoretical expectations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, i283–i299.CrossRef
Miller, G. J. (2005). The political evolution of principal-agent models. Annual Review of Political Science, 8, 203–225.CrossRef
Mizrahi, S. (2013). A new institutionalism analysis of performance management reform: Theoretical outline and evidence from Israel. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 15(3), 220–234.CrossRef
Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management constructing information and reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Mulgan, R. (2000). “Accountability”: An ever-expanding concept? Public Administration, 78(3), 555–573.CrossRef
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Addison Wesley.
Otley, D. (1987). Accounting control and organizational behavior. London: CIMA.
Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: A framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 363–382.CrossRef
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public management reform: A comparative perspective. Supporting the International Conference on Modernization and State Reform. Rio De Janeiro, 13.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2010). Public management reform: A comparative perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Radin, B. A. (2006). Challenging the performance movement. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Rainey, H. G. (1983). Public agencies and private firms: Incentive structures, goals, and individual roles. Administration and Society, 15, 207–242.CrossRef
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698–714.CrossRef
Rosenfeld, R., Fornango, R., & Baumer, E. (2005). Did ceasefire, CompStat, and exile reduce homicide? Criminology and Public Policy, 4(3), 419–449.CrossRef
Rothstein, R. (2008). Holding accountability to account: How scholarship and experience in other fields inform exploration of performance incentives in education. National Center on Performance Incentives Working paper 2008–2004, Vanderbilt University, Peabody College.
Rudalevige, A. (2002). Managing the President’s program: Performance leadership and legislative policy formulation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schedler, A. (1999). Conceptualizing accountability. In A. Schedler, L. Diamond, & M. F. Plattner (Eds.), The self-restraining state: Power and accountability in new democracies (pp. 13–28). London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Shavell, S. (1979). Risk sharing and incentives in the principal and agent relationship. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 55–73.CrossRef
Talbot, C. (2010). Theories of performance: Organizational and service improvement in the public domain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thompson, D. F. (2014). Responsibility for failures of government: The problem of many hands. American Review of Public Administration, 44(3), 259–273.CrossRef
Van Slyke, D. M. (2007). Agents or stewards: Using theory to understand the government-nonprofit social service contracting relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 157–187.CrossRef
Vibert, F. (2007). The rise of the unelected. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Walker, R. M., Boyne, G. A., & Brewer, G. A. (Eds.). (2010). Public management performance: Research directions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weikart, L. A. (2001). The Giuliani administration and the New Public Management in New York City. Urban Affairs Review, 36(3), 359–381.CrossRef
Wood, D. B. (2010). Agency theory of the bureaucracy. In R. F. Durant (Ed.), Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Metadaten
Titel
Performance Management in the Public Sector: The State of Art
verfasst von
Shlomo Mizrahi
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
Public Policy and Performance Management in Democratic Systems

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52349-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-52350-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52350-7_2

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise