Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9966-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The comparison of subjective well-being scores across countries is increasingly being used as an indicator of societal progress. In this study we examined measurement invariance for the Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI), which measures subjective well-being, across Australia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, and Serbia. The sample included a total of 5275 adult participants. Initially, the single-factor model of the PWI showed an adequate fit to the data only in Australia. Due to a poor fit in the remaining three countries we decided to test the single-factor structure on an abbreviated version of the scale. In order to shorten the PWI, we excluded two items (satisfactions with community-connectedness and future security) which demonstrated the lowest unique value in predicting global life satisfaction. The single-factor structure of the 5-item PWI (PWI-5) was supported in all four countries. Measurement invariance testing supported the partial scalar invariance of the PWI-5, thus allowing for latent mean comparisons. Latent mean analysis indicated higher life satisfaction in Australia, as compared with the other three countries. The PWI-5 correlated highly with the full scale. These findings suggest that the 5-item version of the PWI may be more suitable for cross-cultural comparisons.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)10902_2018_9966_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Bentler, P. M. (2006). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.
Blore, J. D., Stokes, M. A., Mellor, D., Firth, L., & Cummins, R. A. (2011). Comparing multiple discrepancies theory to affective models of subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 100, 1–16. CrossRef
Brown, T. A., & Moore, M. T. (2012). Confirmatory factor analysis. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 361–379). New York: Guilford Press.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Byrne, B. M. (2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: A walk through the process. Psicothema, 20, 872–882.
Byrne, B. M., & van de Vijver, F. (2010). Testing for measurement and structural equivalence in large-scale cross-cultural studies: Addressing the issue of nonequivalence. International Journal of Testing, 10, 107–132. CrossRef
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. CrossRef
Chen, F. F. (2008). What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1005–1018. CrossRef
Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–332. CrossRef
Cummins, R. A., & Lau, A. L. D. (2010). Wellbeing across cultures: Issues of measurement and the interpretation of data. In K. D. Keith (Ed.), Cross-cultural psychology: A contemporary reader (pp. 365–379). New York: Wiley/Blackwell.
Davern, M., Cummins, R. A., & Stokes, M. (2007). Subjective wellbeing as an affective-cognitive construct. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 429–449. CrossRef
Davidov, E., Dülmer, H., Schlüter, E., Schmidt, P., & Meuleman, B. (2012). Using a multilevel structural equation modeling approach to explain cross-cultural measurement noninvariance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 558–575. CrossRef
Diener, E. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist, 67, 590–597. CrossRef
Diener, E., Diener, M., & Diener, C. (1995). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 851–864. CrossRef
Diener, E., Helliwell, J. F., & Kahneman, D. (2010a). International differences in well-being. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010b). Wealth and happiness around the world: Material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychological prosperity predicts positive feelings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 52–61. CrossRef
Diener, E., & Tay, L. (2015). Subjective well-being and human welfare around the world as reflected in the Gallup World Poll. International Journal of Psychology, 50, 135–149. CrossRef
Dimitrov, V. D. (2006). Comparing groups of latent variables: a structural equation modeling approach. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 26, 429–439.
Gallup, Inc. (2015). State of global well-being: Results of the Gallup-Healthways Global Well-being Index. Retrieved 10 Jan 2015. http://info.healthways.com/hubfs/Well-Being_Index/2014_Data/Gallup-Healthways_State_of_Global_Well-Being_2014_Country_Rankings.pdf.
Gasper, D. (2005). Subjective and objective well-being in relation to economic inputs: Puzzles and responses. Review of Social Economy, 63, 177–206. CrossRef
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River.
He, J., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2012). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural research. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(2), 8. CrossRef
Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2015). World happiness report. New York: Earth Institute, Columbia University.
Helliwell, J. F. K., & Putnam, R. D. K. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359, 1435–1446. CrossRef
Hofstede, G. H., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. CrossRef
Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom, and rising happiness: A global perspective (1981–2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 264–285. CrossRef
International Wellbeing Group. (2006). Personal Wellbeing Index—Adult (PWI-A). Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University.
International Wellbeing Group. (2013). Personal Wellbeing Index (5th ed.). Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University.
Jovanović, V., Joshanloo, M., Đunda, D., & Bakhshi, A. (2017). Gender differences in the relationship between domain-specific and general life satisfaction: A study in Iran and Serbia. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 12, 185–204. CrossRef
Kaliterna Lipovčan, Lj., & Prizmic-Larsen, Z. (2006). What makes Croats happy? Predictors of happiness in representative sample. In A. Delle Fave (Ed.), Dimensions of well-being. Research and intervention (pp. 53–59). Milano: Franco Angeli.
Kaliterna, Lj., & Prizmic-Larsen, Z. (2014). Personal Wellbeing Index in Croatia. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 1351–1354). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. CrossRef
Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44, 486–507. CrossRef
Keyes, C. L. M. (2005). Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 539–548. CrossRef
Klarin, M., Pororoković, A., Šimić Šašić, S., & Arnaudova, V. (2012). Some characteristics of social interactions among adolescents in Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Macedonia. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 5, 163–172. CrossRef
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Longo, Y. (2015). The simple structure of positive affect. Social Indicators Research, 124, 183–198. CrossRef
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. CrossRef
Matica srpska. (2007). Rečnik srpskog jezika [The Dictionary of Serbian language]. Novi Sad.
Milfont, T. L., & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 112–131. CrossRef
O’Brian, M. R. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41, 673–690. CrossRef
OECD. (2013). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing. CrossRef
Oishi, S. (2006). The concept of life satisfaction across cultures: An IRT analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 411–423. CrossRef
Oishi, S., Schimmack, U., & Diener, E. (2012). Progressive taxation and the subjective well-being of nations. Psychological Science, 23, 86–92. CrossRef
Portela, M., Neira, I., & Salinas-Jiménez, M. (2013). Social capital and subjective wellbeing in Europe: A new approach on social capital. Social Indicators Research, 114, 493–511. CrossRef
Saraiva, C., & Jamrisko, M. (2017). These economies are getting more miserable this year. Retrieved 10 April 2017. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-03-03/these-countries-are-getting-more-miserable-this-year.
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–74.
Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and happiness: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Spring, 1–87.
Tay, L., Herian, M., & Diener, E. (2014). Detrimental effects of corruption on subjective well-being: Whether, how, and when. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 751–759. CrossRef
Tomyn, A. J., & Cummins, R. A. (2011). Subjective wellbeing and homeostatically protected mood: Theory validation with adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 897–914. CrossRef
Tomyn, A. J., Fuller Tyszkiewicz, M., & Cummins, R. A. (2011). The Personal Wellbeing Index: Psychometric equivalence for adults and school children. Social Indicators Research, 110, 913–924. CrossRef
Transparency International. (2016). Corruption Perceptions Index. Retrieved 5 Jan 2015. http://www.transparency.org/cpi2016/results.
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). (2015). Human development report 2015: Work for human development. New York: UNDP. CrossRef
WHO Regional Office for Europe. (2012). Measurement of and target-setting for well-being. Second meeting of the expert group, Paris, 25– 26 June 2012. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
Wills, E. (2009). Spirituality and subjective well-being: Evidences for a new domain in the Personal Wellbeing Index. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 49–69. CrossRef
Zemojtel-Piotrowska, M., Piotrowski, J. P., Cieciuch, J., Adams, B. G., Osin, E. N., Rahkman, A., et al. (2017). Measurement invariance of Personal Well-Being Index (PWI-8) across 26 countries. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18, 1697–1711. CrossRef
- Personal Wellbeing Index: A Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance Study Across Four Countries
Robert A. Cummins
- Springer Netherlands