nach oben

Erschienen in:

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

9. Photocatalysis with Nanoparticles for Environmental Applications: Reactor Design Issues

verfasst von : Ilenia Rossetti, Francesco Conte, Antonio Tripodi, Gianguido Ramis

Erschienen in: Nanostructured Catalysts for Environmental Applications

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The scale-up of photochemical or photocatalytic processes is a hard task, requiring the correct definition of light distribution across the device. After a collection of examples of different photoreactor layouts adopted for water treatment, the main modelling issues are reviewed.

Alternative radiation modelling approaches are compared. The reaction rate expressions are presented, considering the dependence on light, catalyst and reactant distribution, including possible mass transfer limitations.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Colloidal Semiconductor Nanocrystals for Artificial Photosynthesis

Nächstes Kapitel From Nano- to Macrostructured Carbon Catalysts for Water and Wastewater Treatment

V.H. Nguyen, J.C.S. Wu, Recent developments in the design of photoreactors for solar energy conversion from water splitting and CO2 reduction. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 550, 122–141 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2017.11.002CrossRef

D. Heggo, S. Ookawara, Multiphase photocatalytic microreactors. Chem. Eng. Sci. 169, 67–77 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2017.01.019CrossRef

F.S. Freyria, M. Compagnoni, N. Ditaranto, I. Rossetti, M. Piumetti, G. Ramis, B. Bonelli, Pure and Fe-doped mesoporous titania catalyse the oxidation of acid orange 7 by H2O2 under different illumination conditions: Fe doping improves photocatalytic activity under simulated solar light. Catalysts 7, 213 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal7070213CrossRef

S. Mozia, Photocatalytic membrane reactors (PMRs) in water and wastewater treatment. A review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 73, 71–91 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2010.03.021CrossRef

R. Molinari, C. Lavorato, P. Argurio, Recent progress of photocatalytic membrane reactors in water treatment and in synthesis of organic compounds. A review. Catal. Today 281, 144–164 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CATTOD.2016.06.047CrossRef

R. Molinari, C. Lavorato, P. Argurio, K. Szymański, D. Darowna, S. Mozia, Overview of photocatalytic membrane reactors in organic synthesis, energy storage and environmental applications. Catalysts 9, 239 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9030239CrossRef

R. Munter, Advanced oxidation processes—current status and prospects. Proc. Est. Acad. Sci. Chem. 50, 59–80 (2001)

Y. Boyjoo, H. Sun, J. Liu, V.K. Pareek, S. Wang, A review on photocatalysis for air treatment: from catalyst development to reactor design. Chem. Eng. J. 310, 537–559 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.090CrossRef

Y. Boyjoo, M. Ang, V. Pareek, Some aspects of photocatalytic reactor modeling using computational fluid dynamics. Chem. Eng. Sci. 101, 764–784 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2013.06.035CrossRef

10.

E. Bahadori, M. Rapf, A. Di Michele, I. Rossetti, Photochemical vs. photocatalytic azo-dye removal in a pilot free-surface reactor: is the catalyst effective? Sep. Purif. Technol. 237, 116320 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116320CrossRef

11.

G. Ramis, E. Bahadori, I. Rossetti, Photoreactors design for hydrogen production. Chem. Eng. Trans. 74, 481–486 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1974081CrossRef

12.

M. Compagnoni, G. Ramis, F.S. Freyria, M. Armandi, B. Bonelli, I. Rossetti, Innovative photoreactors for unconventional photocatalytic processes: the photoreduction of CO2 and the photo-oxidation of ammonia. Rend Lincei 28, 151–158 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-017-0617-zCrossRef

13.

F. Galli, M. Compagnoni, D. Vitali, C. Pirola, C.L. Bianchi, A. Villa, L. Prati, I. Rossetti, CO2 photoreduction at high pressure to both gas and liquid products over titanium dioxide. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 200, 386–391 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.07.038CrossRef

14.

A. Olivo, E. Ghedini, M. Signoretto, M. Compagnoni, I. Rossetti, Liquid vs. gas phase CO2 photoreduction process: which is the effect of the reaction medium? Energies 10, 1394 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/en10091394CrossRef

15.

I. Rossetti, A. Villa, M. Compagnoni, L. Prati, G. Ramis, C. Pirola, C.L. Bianchi, W. Wang, D. Wang, CO2 photoconversion to fuels under high pressure: effect of TiO2 phase and of unconventional reaction conditions. Cat. Sci. Technol. 5, 4481–4487 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CY00756ACrossRef

16.

E. Bahdori, A. Tripodi, A. Villa, C. Pirola, L. Prati, G. Ramis, N. Dimitratos, D. Wang, I. Rossetti, High pressure CO2 photoreduction using Au/TiO2: unravelling the effect of the co-catalyst and of the titania polymorph. Cat. Sci. Technol. 9, 2253–2265 (2019)CrossRef

17.

E. Bahadori, A. Tripodi, A. Villa, C. Pirola, L. Prati, G. Ramis, I. Rossetti, High pressure photoreduction of CO2: effect of catalyst formulation, hole scavenger addition and operating conditions. Catalysts 8, 430 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8100430CrossRef

18.

I. Rossetti, A. Villa, C. Pirola, L. Prati, G. Ramis, A novel high-pressure photoreactor for CO2 photoconversion to fuels. RSC Adv. 4, 28883–28885 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra03751kCrossRef

19.

C.S. Ong, W.J. Lau, P.S. Goh, B.C. Ng, A.F. Ismail, Investigation of submerged membrane photocatalytic reactor (sMPR) operating parameters during oily wastewater treatment process. Desalination 353, 48–56 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.09.008CrossRef

20.

R.A. Damodar, S.J. You, S.H. Ou, Coupling of membrane separation with photocatalytic slurry reactor for advanced dye wastewater treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 76, 64–71 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2010.09.021CrossRef

21.

R.A. Damodar, S.J. You, G.W. Chiou, Investigation on the conditions mitigating membrane fouling caused by TiO2 deposition in a membrane photocatalytic reactor (MPR) used for dye wastewater treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 203–204, 348–356 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.12.027CrossRef

22.

S.R. De Loos, J. Van Der Schaaf, R.M. Tiggelaar, T.A. Nijhuis, M.H.J.M. De Croon, J.C. Schouten, Gas-liquid dynamics at low Reynolds numbers in pillared rectangular micro channels. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 9, 131–144 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-009-0525-3CrossRef

23.

A. Serizawa, Z. Feng, Z. Kawara, Two-phase flow in microchannels. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 26, 703–714 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-1777(02)00175-9CrossRef

24.

P.M.Y. Chung, M. Kawaji, The effect of channel diameter on adiabatic two-phase flow characteristics in microchannels. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 30, 735–761 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2004.05.00CrossRef

25.

K.S. Elvira, R.C.R. Wootton, N.M. Reis, M.R. Mackley, A.J. DeMello, Through-wall mass transport as a modality for safe generation of singlet oxygen in continuous flows. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 1, 209–213 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/sc300093jCrossRef

26.

H. Eskandarloo, A. Badiei, M.A. Behnajady, G.M. Ziarani, UV-LEDs assisted preparation of silver deposited TiO2 catalyst bed inside microchannels as a high efficiency microphotoreactor for cleaning polluted water. Chem. Eng. J. 270, 158–167 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.01.117CrossRef

27.

K.N. Knust, D. Hlushkou, R.K. Anand, U. Tallarek, R.M. Crooks, Electrochemically mediated seawater desalination. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 8107–8110 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201302577CrossRef

28.

W. Liao, N. Wang, T. Wang, J. Xu, X. Han, Z. Liu, X. Zhang, W. Yu, Biomimetic microchannels of planar reactors for optimized photocatalytic efficiency of water purification. Biomicrofluidics 10, 014123 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4942947CrossRef

29.

A. Castedo, E. Mendoza, I. Angurell, J. Llorca, Silicone microreactors for the photocatalytic generation of hydrogen. Catal. Today 273, 106–111 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2016.02.053CrossRef

30.

O. Ola, M.M. Maroto-Valer, Synthesis, characterization and visible light photocatalytic activity of metal based TiO2 monoliths for CO2 reduction. Chem. Eng. J. 283, 1244–1253 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.07.090CrossRef

31.

Z. He, Y. Li, Q. Zhang, H. Wang, Capillary microchannel-based microreactors with highly durable ZnO/TiO2 nanorod arrays for rapid, high efficiency and continuous-flow photocatalysis. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 93, 376–382 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.10.011CrossRef

32.

B.A. Marinho, R.O. Cristóvão, R. Djellabi, A. Caseiro, S.M. Miranda, J.M. Loureiro, R.A.R. Boaventura, M.M. Dias, J.C.B. Lopes, V.J.P. Vilar, Strategies to reduce mass and photons transfer limitations in heterogeneous photocatalytic processes: hexavalent chromium reduction studies. J. Environ. Manag. 217, 555–564 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.003CrossRef

33.

S. Li, L. Yang, O. Ola, M. Maroto-Valer, X. Du, Y. Yang, Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 by CO co-feed combined with photocatalytic water splitting in a novel twin reactor. Energy Convers. Manag. 116, 184–193 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.03.001CrossRef

34.

E. Baniasadi, I. Dincer, G.F. Naterer, Radiative heat transfer and catalyst performance in a large-scale continuous flow photoreactor for hydrogen production. Chem. Eng. Sci. 84, 638–645 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2012.09.013CrossRef

35.

L. Ghalamchi, M.H. Rasoulifard, Immobilization of Fe3O4/TiO2 nanocomposite thin layer on the glass tubes in a component parabolic collector for the treatment of DR23. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 16, 7509–7522 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-2169-xCrossRef

36.

K.S. Ochoa-Gutiérrez, E. Tabares-Aguilar, M.Á. Mueses, F. Machuca-Martínez, G. Li Puma, A novel prototype offset multi tubular photoreactor (OMTP) for solar photocatalytic degradation of water contaminants. Chem. Eng. J. 341, 628–638 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.02.068CrossRef

37.

I. Salmerón, K.V. Plakas, I. Sirés, I. Oller, M.I. Maldonado, A.J. Karabelas, S. Malato, Optimization of electrocatalytic H2O2 production at pilot plant scale for solar-assisted water treatment. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 242, 327–336 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.045CrossRef

38.

A.M. Cahino, M.M.A. de Andrade, E.S. de Araújo, E.L. Silva, C. de Oliveira Cunha, E.M.R. Rocha, Degradation of tetracycline by solar photo-Fenton: optimization and application in pilot photoreactor. Environ. Qual. Manag. 28, 101–106 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.21579CrossRef

39.

F. Cao, Q. Wei, H. Liu, N. Lu, L. Zhao, L. Guo, Development of the direct solar photocatalytic water splitting system for hydrogen production in Northwest China: design and evaluation of photoreactor. Renew. Energy 121, 153–163 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.01.016CrossRef

40.

I. Boiarkina, S. Norris, D.A. Patterson, Investigation into the effect of flow structure on the photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue and dehydroabietic acid in a spinning disc reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 222, 159–171 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.02.025CrossRef

41.

I. Boiarkina, S. Norris, D.A. Patterson, The case for the photocatalytic spinning disc reactor as a process intensification technology: comparison to an annular reactor for the degradation of methylene blue. Chem. Eng. J. 225, 752–765 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.03.125CrossRef

42.

M. Mirzaei, B. Dabir, M. Dadvar, M. Jafarikojour, Photocatalysis of phenol using a spinning disc photoreactor immobilized with TiO2 nanoparticles: hydrodynamic modeling and reactor optimization. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 56, 1739–1749 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b03204CrossRef

43.

M. Mirzaei, M. Jafarikojour, B. Dabir, M. Dadvar, Evaluation and modeling of a spinning disc photoreactor for degradation of phenol: impact of geometry modification. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 346, 206–214 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.05.043CrossRef

44.

C. Boyle, N. Skillen, L. Stella, P.K.J. Robertson, Development and optimization of an immobilized photocatalytic system within a stacked frame photoreactor (SFPR) using light distribution and fluid mixing simulation coupled with experimental validation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58, 2727–2740 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b05709CrossRef

45.

M. Jafarikojour, B. Dabir, M. Sohrabi, S.J. Royaee, Application of a new immobilized impinging jet stream reactor for photocatalytic degradation of phenol: reactor evaluation and kinetic modelling. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 364, 613–624 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.03.043CrossRef

46.

M. Jafarikojour, B. Dabir, M. Sohrabi, S.J. Royaee, Evaluation and optimization of a new design photocatalytic reactor using impinging jet stream on a TiO2 coated disc. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 121, 215–223 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2017.08.011CrossRef

47.

M. Jafarikojour, M. Sohrabi, S.J. Royaee, M. Rezaei, A new model for residence time distribution of impinging streams reactors using descending-sized stirred tanks in series. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 109, 86–96 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2016.01.003CrossRef

48.

Y.K. Abdel-Maksoud, E. Imam, A.R. Ramadan, TiO2 water-bell photoreactor for wastewater treatment. Sol. Energy 170, 323–335 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.05.053CrossRef

49.

A.A. Azzaz, A.A. Assadi, S. Jellali, A. Bouzaza, D. Wolbert, S. Rtimi, L. Bousselmi, Discoloration of simulated textile effluent in continuous photoreactor using immobilized titanium dioxide: effect of zinc and sodium chloride. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 358, 111–120 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.01.032CrossRef

50.

O. Shvydkiv, C. Limburg, K. Nolan, M. Oelgemöller, Synthesis of juglone (5-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone) in a falling film microreactor. J. Flow Chem. 2, 52–55 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1556/jfchem.2012.00022CrossRef

51.

S. Baghbani Ghatar, S. Allahyari, N. Rahemi, M. Tasbihi, Response surface methodology optimization for photodegradation of methylene blue in a ZnO coated flat plate continuous photoreactor. Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. 16, 1–14 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2017-0221CrossRef

52.

J.C. Espíndola, R.O. Cristóvão, S.R.F. Araújo, T. Neuparth, M.M. Santos, R. Montes, J.B. Quintana, R. Rodil, R.A.R. Boaventura, V.J.P. Vilar, An innovative photoreactor, FluHelik, to promote UVC/H2O2 photochemical reactions: tertiary treatment of an urban wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 667, 197–207 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.335CrossRef

53.

J.C. Espíndola, R.O. Cristóvão, D.A. Mayer, R.A.R. Boaventura, M.M. Dias, J.C.B. Lopes, V.J.P. Vilar, Overcoming limitations in photochemical UVC/H2O2 systems using a mili-photoreactor (NETmix): oxytetracycline oxidation. Sci. Total Environ. 660, 982–992 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.012CrossRef

54.

J.C. Espíndola, R.O. Cristóvão, S.G.S. Santos, R.A.R. Boaventura, M.M. Dias, J.C.B. Lopes, V.J.P. Vilar, Intensification of heterogeneous TiO2 photocatalysis using the NETmix mili-photoreactor under microscale illumination for oxytetracycline oxidation. Sci. Total Environ. 681, 467–474 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.066CrossRef

55.

S.G.S. Santos, L.O. Paulista, T.F.C.V. Silva, M.M. Dias, J.C.B. Lopes, R.A.R. Boaventura, V.J.P. Vilar, Intensifying heterogeneous TiO2 photocatalysis for bromate reduction using the NETmix photoreactor. Sci. Total Environ. 664, 805–816 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.045CrossRef

56.

V. Héquet, C. Raillard, O. Debono, F. Thévenet, N. Locoge, L. Le Coq, Photocatalytic oxidation of VOCs at ppb level using a closed-loop reactor: the mixture effect. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 226, 473–486 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.12.041CrossRef

57.

X. Meng, N. Yun, Z. Zhang, Recent advances in computational photocatalysis: a review. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 97, 1982–1998 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.23477CrossRef

58.

R. Acosta-Herazo, J. Monterroza-Romero, M.Á. Mueses, F. Machuca-Martínez, G. Li Puma, Coupling the six flux absorption-scattering model to the Henyey-Greenstein scattering phase function: evaluation and optimization of radiation absorption in solar heterogeneous photoreactors. Chem. Eng. J. 302, 86–96 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.127CrossRef

59.

I. Rossetti, E. Bahadori, A. Tripodi, G. Ramis, Modelling of photoreactors for water treatment. Chem. Eng. Trans. 74, 289–294 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1974049CrossRef

60.

N. Padoin, C. Soares, An explicit correlation for optimal TiO2 film thickness in immobilized photocatalytic reaction systems. Chem. Eng. J. 310, 381–388 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.013CrossRef

61.

M.T. Dhotre, B. Niceno, B.L. Smith, Large eddy simulation of a bubble column using dynamic sub-grid scale model. Chem. Eng. J. 136, 337–348 (2008)CrossRef

62.

E. Olmos, C. Gentric, C. Vial, G. Wild, N. Midoux, Numerical simulation of multiphase flow in bubble column reactors. Influence of bubble coalescence and break-up. Chem. Eng. Sci. 56, 6359–6365 (2001)CrossRef

63.

V.K. Pareek, S.J. Cox, M.P. Brungs, B. Young, A.A. Adesina, Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulation of a pilot-scale annular bubble column photo- catalytic reactor. Chem. Eng. Sci. 58, 859–865 (2003)CrossRef

64.

J. Sanyal, S. Roy, M.P. Dudukovic, Numerical simulation of gas–liquid dynamics in cylindrical bubble column reactors. Chem. Eng. Sci. 54, 5071–5083 (1999)CrossRef

65.

M.V. Tabib, S.A. Roy, J.B. Joshi, CFD simulation of bubble column—an analysis of interphase forces and turbulence models. Chem. Eng. J. 139, 589–614 (2008)CrossRef

66.

Y. Boyjoo, M. Ang, V. Pareek, CFD simulation of a pilot scale slurry photocatalytic reactor and design of multiple-lamp reactors. Chem. Eng. Sci. 111, 266–277 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2014.02.022CrossRef

67.

R.L. Romero, O.M. Alfano, A.E. Cassano, Radiation field in an annular, slurry photocatalytic reactor. 2. Model and experiments. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 42, 2479–2488 (2003)CrossRef

68.

J. Wang, B. Deng, J. Gao, H. Cao, Numerical simulation of radiation distribution in a slurry reactor: the effect of distribution of catalyst particles. Chem. Eng. J. 357, 169–179 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.126CrossRef

69.

O.I. Tokode, R. Prabhu, L.A. Lawton, P.K.J. Robertson, Effect of controlled periodic-based illumination on the photonic efficiency of photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange. J. Catal. 290, 138–142 (2012)CrossRef

70.

O. Tokode, R. Prabhu, L.A. Lawton, P.K.J. Robertson, Mathematical modelling of quantum yield enhancements of methyl orange photooxidation in aqueous TiO2 suspensions under controlled periodic UV LED illumination. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 156−157, 398–403 (2014)CrossRef

71.

O. Tokode, R. Prabhu, L.A. Lawton, P.K.J. Robertson, The effect of pH on the photonic efficiency of the destruction of methyl orange under controlled periodic illumination with UV-LED sources. Chem. Eng. J. 246, 337–342 (2014)CrossRef

72.

C. Casado, R. Timmers, A. Sergejevs, C.T. Clarke, D.W.E. Allsopp, C.R. Bowen, R. van Grieken, J. Marugán, Design and validation of a LED-based high intensity photocatalytic reactor for quantifying activity measurements. Chem. Eng. J. 327, 1043–1055 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.06.167CrossRef

73.

C. Casado, J. Marugán, R. Timmers, M. Muñoz, R. van Grieken, Comprehensive multiphysics modeling of photocatalytic processes by computational fluid dynamics based on intrinsic kinetic parameters determined in a differential photoreactor. Chem. Eng. J. 310, 368–380 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.07.081CrossRef

74.

F.C. Moreira, E. Bocos, A.G.F. Faria, J.B.L. Pereira, C.P. Fonte, R.J. Santos, J.C.B. Lopes, M.M. Dias, M.A. Sanromán, M. Pazos, R.A.R. Boaventura, V.J.P. Vilar, Selecting the best piping arrangement for scaling-up an annular channel reactor: an experimental and computational fluid dynamics study. Sci. Total Environ. 667, 821–832 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.260CrossRef

75.

F. Denny, J. Scott, V. Pareek, G.D. Peng, R. Amal, Computational fluid dynamics modelling and optimal configuring of a channelled optical fibre photoreactor. Chem. Eng. Sci. 65, 5029–5040 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.06.003CrossRef

76.

H. Einaga, J. Tokura, Y. Teraoka, K. Ito, Kinetic analysis of TiO2-catalyzed heterogeneous photocatalytic oxidation of ethylene using computational fluid dynamics. Chem. Eng. J. 263, 325–335 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.11.017CrossRef

77.

J.S. Devia-Orjuela, L.A. Betancourt-Buitrago, F. Machuca-Martinez, CFD modeling of a UV-A LED baffled flat-plate photoreactor for environment applications: a mining wastewater case. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26, 4510–4520 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2431-2CrossRef

78.

J.E. Duran, F. Taghipour, M. Mohseni, Irradiance modeling in annular photoreactors using the finite-volume method. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 215, 81–89 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2010.07.027CrossRef

79.

J. Kumar, A. Bansal, Photocatalytic degradation in annular reactor: modelization and optimization using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and response surface methodology (RSM). J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 1, 398–405 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2013.06.002CrossRef

80.

J. van Walsem, S.W. Verbruggen, B. Modde, S. Lenaerts, S. Denys, CFD investigation of a multi-tube photocatalytic reactor in non-steady-state conditions. Chem. Eng. J. 304, 808–816 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.07.028CrossRef

81.

A.J. Guadarrama-Mendoza, H.I. Villafán-Vidales, P.J. Valadés-Pelayo, C.A. Arancibia-Bulnes, D. Riveros-Rosas, H. Romero-Paredes, Radiative analysis in a multichanneled monolith solar reactor coated with ZnFe2O4 thin film. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 132, 275–284 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2018.05.042CrossRef

82.

A. Brucato, A.E. Cassano, F. Grisafi, G. Montante, L. Rizzuti, G. Vella, Estimating radiant fields in flat heterogeneous photoreactors by the six flux model. AICHE J. 52, 3882–3890 (2006)CrossRef

83.

A. Brucato, L. Rizzuti, Simplified modeling of radiant fields in heterogeneous photoreactors. 1. Case of zero reflectance. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 36, 4740–4747 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie960259jCrossRef

84.

G. Li Puma, J.N. Khor, A. Brucato, Modeling of an annular photocatalytic reactor for water purification: oxidation of pesticides. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 3737–3745 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1021/es0301020CrossRef

85.

A. Busciglio, O.M. Alfano, F. Scargiali, A. Brucato, A probabilistic approach to radiant field modeling in dense particulate systems. Chem. Eng. Sci. 142, 79–88 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2015.11.025CrossRef

86.

G. Marotta, F. Scargiali, S. Lima, G. Caputo, F. Grisafi, A. Brucato, Vacuum air-lift bioreactor for microalgae production. Chem. Eng. Trans. 57, 925–930 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1757155CrossRef

87.

G. Marotta, J. Pruvost, F. Scargiali, G. Caputo, A. Brucato, Reflection-refraction effects on light distribution inside tubular photobioreactors. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 95, 1646–1651 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.22811CrossRef

88.

I. Grcˇic, G.L. Puma, Photocatalytic degradation of water contaminants in multiple photoreactors and evaluation of reaction kinetic constants independent of photon absorption, irradiance, reactor geometry and hydrodynamics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 13702–13711 (2013)CrossRef

89.

P.J. Valades-Pelayo, J. Moreira, B. Serrano, H. de Lasa, Boundary conditions and phase functions in a Photo-CREC Water-II reactor radiation field. Chem. Eng. Sci. 107, 123–136 (2014)CrossRef

90.

R. Acosta-Herazo, M.Á. Mueses, G.L. Puma, F. Machuca-Martínez, Impact of photocatalyst optical properties on the efficiency of solar photocatalytic reactors rationalized by the concepts of initial rate of photon absorption (IRPA) dimensionless boundary layer of photon absorption and apparent optical thickness. Chem. Eng. J. 356, 839–849 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.085CrossRef

91.

D. Castilla-Caballero, F. Machuca-Martínez, C. Bustillo-Lecompte, J. Colina-Márquez, Photocatalytic degradation of commercial acetaminophen: evaluation, modeling, and scaling-up of photoreactors. Catalysts 8, 179 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8050179CrossRef

92.

F. Cao, H. Li, H. Chao, L. Zhao, L. Guo, Optimization of the concentration field in a suspended photocatalytic reactor. Energy 74, 140–146 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.068CrossRef

93.

M.A. Mueses, F. Machuca-Martinez, G. Li Puma, Effective quantum yield and reaction rate model for evaluation of photocatalytic degradation of water contaminants in heterogeneous pilot-scale solar photoreactors. Chem. Eng. J. 215–216, 937–947 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.11.076CrossRef

94.

B.M. da Costa Filho, A.L.P. Araujo, S.P. Padrão, R.A.R. Boaventura, M.M. Dias, J.C.B. Lopes, V.J.P. Vilar, Effect of catalyst coated surface, illumination mechanism and light source in heterogeneous TiO2 photocatalysis using a mili-photoreactor for n-decane oxidation at gas phase. Chem. Eng. J. 366, 560–568 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.122CrossRef

95.

G. Charles, T. Roques-Carmes, N. Becheikh, L. Falk, J.M. Commenge, S. Corbel, Determination of kinetic constants of a photocatalytic reaction in micro-channel reactors in the presence of mass-transfer limitation and axial dispersion. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 223, 202–211 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2011.08.019CrossRef

96.

O. Barlay Ergu, O.N. Sara, S. Yapici, M.E. Arzutug, Pressure drop and point mass transfer in a rectangular microchannel. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 36, 618–623 (2009)CrossRef

97.

D.S. de Sá, L.E. Vasconcelos, J.R. de Souza, B.A. Marinkovic, T. Del Rosso, D. Fulvio, D. Maza, A. Massi, O. Pandoli, Intensification of photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes and phenol by scale-up and numbering-up of meso- and microfluidic TiO2 reactors for wastewater treatment. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 364, 59–75 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.05.020CrossRef

98.

J.R. Bolton, K.G. Bircher, W. Tumas, C.A. Tolman, Figures of merit for the technical development and application of advanced oxidation technologies for both electric and solar driven systems. Pure Appl. Chem. 73, 627–637 (2001)CrossRef

99.

M. Compagnoni, G. Ramis, F.S. Freyria, M. Armandi, B. Bonelli, I. Rossetti, Photocatalytic processes for the abatement of N-containing pollutants from waste water. Part 1: inorganic pollutants. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 17, 3632–3653 (2017)CrossRef

100.

F.S. Freyria, M. Armandi, M. Compagnoni, G. Ramis, I. Rossetti, B. Bonelli, Catalytic and photocatalytic processes for the abatement of N-containing pollutants from wastewater. Part 2: organic pollutants. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 17, 3654–3672 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2017.14014CrossRef

101.

F. Audino, L. Conte, A. Schenone, M. Pérez-Moya, M. Graells, O. Alfano, A kinetic study for the fenton and photo-fenton paracetamol degradation in an annular photoreactor involving assessment of LVRPA. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26, 4312–4323 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3098-4CrossRef

102.

J. Colina-Marquez, D. Castilla-Caballero, F. Machuca-Martinez, Modeling of a falling-film photocatalytic reactor: fluid dynamics for turbulent regime. Appl. Math. Model. 40, 4812–4821 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.12.007CrossRef

Titel: Photocatalysis with Nanoparticles for Environmental Applications: Reactor Design Issues
verfasst von: Ilenia Rossetti
Francesco Conte
Antonio Tripodi
Gianguido Ramis
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Nanostructured Catalysts for Environmental Applications
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58933-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-58934-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58934-9_9

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht