Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Fast Traffic Sign Detection Using Color-Specific Quaternion Gabor Filters Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

PMIQD 2019: A Pathological Microscopic Image Quality Database with Nonexpert and Expert Scores

verfasst von : Shuning Xu, Menghan Hu, Wangyang Yu, Jianlin Feng, Qingli Li

Erschienen in: Digital TV and Wireless Multimedia Communication

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In medical diagnostic analysis, pathological microscopic image is often regarded as a gold standard, and hence the study of pathological microscopic image is of great necessity. High quality microscopic pathological images enable doctors to arrive at correct diagnosis. The pathological microscopic image is an important cornerstone for modernization and computerization of medical procedures. The quality of pathological microscopic images may be degraded due to a variety of reasons. It is difficult to acquire key information, so research for quality assessment of pathological microscopic image is quite necessary. In this paper, we perform a study on subjective quality assessment of pathological microscopic images and investigate whether the existing objective quality measures can be applied to the pathological microscopic images. Concretely, we establish a new pathological microscopic image quality database (PMIQD) which includes 425 pathological microscopic images with different quality degrees. The mean opinion scores rated by nonexperts and experts are calculated afterwards. Besides, we investigate the prediction performance of the existing popular image quality assessment (IQA) algorithms on PMIQD, including 8 no-reference (NR) methods. Experimental results demonstrate that the present objective models do not work well. IQA for pathological microscopic image needs to be developed for predicting the quality rated by nonexperts and experts.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Screen Content Picture Quality Evaluation by Colorful Sparse Reference Information
Nächstes Kapitel A Generalized Cellular Automata Approach to Modelling Contagion and Monitoring for Emergent Events in Sensor Networks
Literatur
1.
Snead, D.R.J., et al.: Validation of digital pathology imaging for primary histopathological diagnosis. Histopathology 68(7), 1063–1072 (2016)CrossRef
2.
Sheikh, H.R., Bovik, A.C., De Veciana, G.: An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 14(12), 2117–2128 (2005)CrossRef
3.
Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P., et al.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13(4), 600–612 (2004)CrossRef
4.
Zhang, L., Shen, Y., Li, H.: VSI: a visual saliency-induced index for perceptual image quality assessment. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 23(10), 4270–4281 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRef
5.
Zhang, L., Zhang, L., Mou, X., Zhang, D.: FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 20(8), 2378–2386 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRef
6.
7.
Larson, E.C., Chandler, D.M.: Categorical image quality (CSIQ) database (2010)
8.
Ponomarenko, N., et al.: Image database TID2013: peculiarities, results and perspectives. Sig. Process. Image Commun. 30, 57–77 (2015)CrossRef
9.
Recommendation ITU-R BT.500-13: Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures. Technical report, International Telecommunication Union (2012)
10.
Zhu, W., Zhai, G., Menghan, H., Liu, J., Yang, X.: Arrow’s impossibility theorem inspired subjective image quality assessment approach. Sig. Process. 145, 193–201 (2018)CrossRef
11.
Karbowski, M., Youle, R.J.: Dynamics of mitochondrial morphology in healthy cells and during apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 10(8), 870 (2003)CrossRef
12.
Shrestha, P., Kneepkens, R., Vrijnsen, J., Vossen, D., Abels, E., Hulsken, B.: A quantitative approach to evaluate image quality of whole slide imaging scanners. J. Pathol. Inform. 7, 56 (2016)CrossRef
13.
Li, L., Lin, W., Wang, X., Yang, G., Bahrami, K., Kot, A.C.: No-reference image blur assessment based on discrete orthogonal moments. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 46(1), 39–50 (2015)CrossRef
14.
Narvekar, N.D., Karam, L.J.: A no-reference perceptual image sharpness metric based on a cumulative probability of blur detection. In: 2009 International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience, pp. 87–91. IEEE (2009)
15.
Vu, P.V., Chandler, D.M.: A fast wavelet-based algorithm for global and local image sharpness estimation. IEEE Sig. Process. Lett. 19(7), 423–426 (2012)CrossRef
16.
Vu, C.T., Phan, T.D., Chandler, D.M.: A spectral and spatial measure of local perceived sharpness in natural images. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 21(3), 934–945 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRef
17.
Winkelman, K.-H.: Method and apparatus for the automatic analysis of density range, color cast, and gradation of image originals on the basis of image values transformed from a first color space into a second color space, 16 September 1997. US Patent 5,668,890 (1997)
18.
P ITU-T Recommendation: Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications. International Telecommunication Union (1999)
19.
Sheikh, H.R., Sabir, M.F., Bovik, A.C.: A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15(11), 3440–3451 (2006)CrossRef
20.
Mantiuk, R.K., Tomaszewska, A., Mantiuk, R.: Comparison of four subjective methods for image quality assessment. In: Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 31, pp. 2478–2491. Wiley Online Library (2012)
21.
Kumar, B., Singh, S.P., Mohan, A., Anand, A.: Performance of quality metrics for compressed medical images through mean opinion score prediction. J. Med. Imaging Health Inform. 2(2), 188–194 (2012)CrossRef
22.
Streijl, R.C., Winkler, S., Hands, D.S.: Mean opinion score (MOS) revisited: methods and applications, limitations and alternatives. Multimed. Syst. 22(2), 213–227 (2016)CrossRef
23.
Pelgrom, M.J.M., Duinmaijer, A.C.J., Welbers, A.P.G.: Matching properties of MOS transistors. IEEE J. Solid-State Circ. 24(5), 1433–1439 (1989)CrossRef
24.
Sheikh, H.R., Bovik, A.C.: Image information and visual quality. In: 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 3, pp. iii–709. IEEE (2004)
25.
Saad, M.A., Bovik, A.C., Charrier, C.: Blind image quality assessment: a natural scene statistics approach in the DCT domain. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 21(8), 3339–3352 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRef
26.
Mittal, A., Moorthy, A.K., Bovik, A.C.: No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 21(12), 4695–4708 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRef
27.
Gu, K., et al.: FISBLIM: a five-step blind metric for quality assessment of multiply distorted images. In: SiPS 2013 Proceedings, pp. 241–246. IEEE (2013)
28.
Mittal, A., Soundararajan, R., Bovik, A.C.: Making a “completely blind” image quality analyzer. IEEE Sig. Process. Lett. 20(3), 209–212 (2012)CrossRef
29.
Xue, W., Zhang, L., Mou, X.: Learning without human scores for blind image quality assessment. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 995–1002 (2013)
30.
Ke, G., Zhai, G., Yang, X., Zhang, W.: Hybrid no-reference quality metric for singly and multiply distorted images. IEEE Trans. Broadcast. 60(3), 555–567 (2014)CrossRef
31.
Moorthy, A.K., Bovik, A.C.: Visual importance pooling for image quality assessment. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Sig. Process. 3(2), 193–201 (2009)CrossRef
32.
Chen, M.-J., Su, C.-C., Kwon, D.-K., Cormack, L.K., Bovik, A.C.: Full-reference quality assessment of stereopairs accounting for rivalry. Sig. Process. Image Commun. 28(9), 1143–1155 (2013)CrossRef
33.
Gu, K., Zhai, G., Yang, X., Zhang, W., Liu, M.: Subjective and objective quality assessment for images with contrast change. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 383–387. IEEE (2013)
34.
Dhanachandra, N., Manglem, K., Chanu, Y.J.: Image segmentation using K-means clustering algorithm and subtractive clustering algorithm. Procedia Comput. Sci. 54, 764–771 (2015)CrossRef
35.
Ameisen, D., et al.: Automatic image quality assessment in digital pathology: from idea to implementation. In: IWBBIO, pp. 148–157 (2014)
Metadaten
Titel
PMIQD 2019: A Pathological Microscopic Image Quality Database with Nonexpert and Expert Scores
verfasst von
Shuning Xu
Menghan Hu
Wangyang Yu
Jianlin Feng
Qingli Li
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Digital TV and Wireless Multimedia Communication

Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3340-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-15-3341-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3341-9_25

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise