nach oben

Erschienen in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. Polymers for Membrane Filtration in Water Purification

verfasst von : Adewale Giwa, Menatalla Ahmed, Shadi Wajih Hasan

Erschienen in: Polymeric Materials for Clean Water

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Polymers are sometimes preferred for membrane filtration because they are more flexible, easier to handle, and less expensive than inorganic membranes fabricated from oxides, metals, and ceramics. The polymers are used as the membrane active layer and porous support in reverse osmosis (RO), nanofiltration (NF), ultrafiltration (UF), microfiltration (MF) processes. However, the application of polymers for filtration suffers critical drawbacks, such as the chemical attack of polymers, membrane fouling, and hydrophobicity of most polymers. In this chapter, the polymers used for membrane filtration in recent studies and their fabrication procedures are presented and discussed. The polymers used in recent applications include cellulose acetate (CA), polyamide (PA), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polysulfone (PSF), polyethersulfone (PES), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyimide (PI), polyacrylonitrile (PAN), polyethylene glycol (PEG), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), poly(methacrylic acid) (PMAA), poly(arylene ether ketone) (PAEK), poly(ether imide) (PEI), and polyaniline nanoparticles (PANI). A new polymeric material named polyethersulfone amide (PESA) has also been presented recently. Most of the recent studies have focused on improving the specific energy consumption, salt rejection, water flux, chemical resistance and antifouling properties of polymeric membranes and nanocomposites through blending and surface modification techniques. These techniques involve the use of zwitterionic coatings, sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) (SPAES), perfluorophenyl azide (PFPA), carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene oxide (GO) as nanofillers, polyether ether ketone (PEEK), and nanoparticles such as titanium dioxide (TiO₂), and mesoporous silica. The use of polymers for filtration is still gaining tremendous attention, and further improvements of polymeric characteristics for enhanced membrane performance are expected in the coming years.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Polymers as Water Disinfectants

Abdel-Karim A, Gad-Allah TA, El-Kalliny AS, Ahmed SIA, Souaya ER, Badawy MI, Ulbricht M (2017) Fabrication of modified polyethersulfone membranes for wastewater treatment by submerged membrane bioreactor. Sep Purif Technol 175:36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.10.060CrossRef

Ahmad A, Jamshaid F, Adrees M, Iqbal SS, Sabir A, Riaz T, Zaheer H, Islam A, Jamil T (2017) Novel polyurethane/polyvinyl chloride-co-vinyl acetate crosslinked membrane for reverse osmosis (RO). Desalination 420:136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.07.007CrossRef

Ahmad R (2017) Water worldwide—US water regulations and India’s water challenges. J Am Water Works Assoc 109:64–67. https://doi.org/10.5942/jawwa.2017.109.0041CrossRef

Ahmed FE, Lalia BS, Hilal N, Hashaikeh R (2017) Electrically conducting nanofiltration membranes based on networked cellulose and carbon nanostructures. Desalination 406:60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.09.005CrossRef

Al Ashhab A, Gillor O, Herzberg M (2014) Biofouling of reverse-osmosis membranes under different shear rates during tertiary wastewater desalination: microbial community composition. Water Res 67:86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.09.007CrossRefPubMed

Amy G, Ghaffour N, Li Z, Francis L, Linares RV, Missimer T, Lattemann S (2017) Membrane-based seawater desalination: present and future prospects. Desalination 401:16–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.10.002CrossRef

Ashoor BB, Mansour S, Giwa A, Dufour V, Hasan SW (2016) Principles and applications of direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD): a comprehensive review. Desalination 398:222–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.07.043CrossRef

Ashoor BB, Fath H, Marquardt W, Mhamdi A (2012) Dynamic modeling of direct contact membrane distillation processes. Comput Aided Chem Eng 170–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-59507-2.50026-3

Aslam M, Charfi A, Lesage G, Heran M, Kim J (2017) Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment: a review of mechanical cleaning by scouring agents to control membrane fouling. Chem Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.144CrossRef

10.

Behboudi A, Jafarzadeh Y, Yegani R (2017) Polyvinyl chloride/polycarbonate blend ultrafiltration membranes for water treatment. J Memb Sci 534:18–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.04.011CrossRef

11.

Bereskie T, Haider H, Rodriguez MJ, Sadiq R (2017) Framework for continuous performance improvement in small drinking water systems. Sci Total Environ 574:1405–1414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.067CrossRefPubMed

12.

Bichai F, Ashbolt N (2017) Public health and water quality management in low-exposure stormwater schemes: a critical review of regulatory frameworks and path forward. Sustain Cities Soc 28:453–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.09.003CrossRef

13.

Buonomenna MG (2013) Nano-enhanced reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 314:73–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.01.006CrossRef

14.

Chhipi-Shrestha G, Hewage K, Sadiq R (2017) Microbial quality of reclaimed water for urban reuses: probabilistic risk-based investigation and recommendations. Sci Total Environ 576:738–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.105CrossRefPubMed

15.

da Silva Burgal J, Peeva LG, Kumbharkar S, Livingston A (2015) Organic solvent resistant poly(ether-ether-ketone) nanofiltration membranes. J Memb Sci 479:105–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.12.035CrossRef

16.

Daer S, Kharraz J, Giwa A, Hasan SW (2015) Recent applications of nanomaterials in water desalination: a critical review and future opportunities. Desalination 367:37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.03.030CrossRef

17.

Değermenci N, Cengiz İ, Yildiz E, Nuhoglu A (2016) Performance investigation of a jet loop membrane bioreactor for the treatment of an actual olive mill wastewater. J Environ Manage 184:441–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.014CrossRefPubMed

18.

Deshmukh K, Ahamed MB, Deshmukh RR, Pasha SKK, Sadasivuni KK, Polu AR, Ponnamma D, AlMaadeed MA-A, Chidambaram K (2017) Newly developed biodegradable polymer nanocomposites of cellulose acetate and Al₂O₃ nanoparticles with enhanced dielectric performance for embedded passive applications. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 28:973–986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-5616-9CrossRef

19.

Di Vincenzo M, Barboiu M, Tiraferri A, Legrand YM (2017) Polyol-functionalized thin-film composite membranes with improved transport properties and boron removal in reverse osmosis. J Memb Sci 540:71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.034CrossRef

20.

Díez B, Roldán N, Martín A, Sotto A, Perdigón-Melón JA, Arsuaga J, Rosal R (2017) Fouling and biofouling resistance of metal-doped mesostructured silica/polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes. J Memb Sci 526:252–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.051CrossRef

21.

Drangert J-O, Sharatchandra HC (2017) Addressing urban water scarcity: reduce, treat and reuse—the third generation of management to avoid local resources boundaries. Water Policy wp2017152. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2017.152CrossRef

22.

Dulebohn J, Ahmadiannamini P, Wang T, Kim SS, Pinnavaia TJ, Tarabara VV (2014) Polymer mesocomposites: ultrafiltration membrane materials with enhanced permeability, selectivity and fouling resistance. J Memb Sci 453:478–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.11.042CrossRef

23.

Farahbaksh J, Delnavaz M, Vatanpour V (2017) Investigation of raw and oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes in fabrication of reverse osmosis polyamide membranes for improvement in desalination and antifouling properties. Desalination 410:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.01.031CrossRef

24.

Fischer K, Grimm M, Meyers J, Dietrich C, Gläser R, Schulze A (2015) Photoactive microfiltration membranes via directed synthesis of TiO₂ nanoparticles on the polymer surface for removal of drugs from water. J Memb Sci 478:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.01.009CrossRef

25.

Gherasim C-V, Mikulášek P (2014) Influence of operating variables on the removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions by nanofiltration. Desalination 343:67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.11.012CrossRef

26.

Gholami A, Moghadassi AR, Hosseini SM, Shabani S, Gholami F (2014) Preparation and characterization of polyvinyl chloride based nanocomposite nanofiltration-membrane modified by iron oxide nanoparticles for lead removal from water. J Ind Eng Chem 20:1517–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.07.041CrossRef

27.

Ginic-Markovic M, Barclay TG, Constantopoulos KT, Markovic E, Clarke SR, Matisons JG (2015) Biofouling resistance of polysulfobetaine coated reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 369:37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.04.024CrossRef

28.

Giwa A, Akther N, Dufour V, Hasan SW (2016) A critical review on recent polymeric and nano-enhanced membranes for reverse osmosis. RSC Adv 6:8134–8163. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA17221GCrossRef

29.

Giwa A, Akther N, Housani A Al, Haris S, Hasan SW (2016) Recent advances in humidification dehumidification (HDH) desalination processes: improved designs and productivity. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 57:929–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.108CrossRef

30.

Giwa A, Daer S, Ahmed I, Marpu P, Hasan S (2016) Experimental investigation and artificial neural networks ANNs modeling of electrically-enhanced membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment. J Water Process Eng 11:88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.03.011CrossRef

31.

Giwa A, Dufour V, Al Marzooqi F, Al Kaabi M, Hasan SW (2017) Brine management methods: recent innovations and current status. Desalination 407:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.12.008CrossRef

32.

Giwa A, Hasan S (2015) Theoretical investigation of the influence of operating conditions on the treatment performance of an electrically-induced membrane bioreactor. J Water Process Eng 6:72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2015.03.004CrossRef

33.

Gkotsis P, Banti D, Peleka E, Zouboulis A, Samaras P (2014) Fouling issues in membrane bioreactors (MBRs) for wastewater treatment: major mechanisms, prevention and control strategies. Processes 2:795–866. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr2040795CrossRef

34.

Gong G, Nagasawa H, Kanezashi M, Tsuru T (2015) Reverse osmosis performance of layered-hybrid membranes consisting of an organosilica separation layer on polymer supports. J Memb Sci 494:104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.07.039CrossRef

35.

Grandclément C, Seyssiecq I, Piram A, Wong-Wah-Chung P, Vanot G, Tiliacos N, Roche N, Doumenq P (2017) From the conventional biological wastewater treatment to hybrid processes, the evaluation of organic micropollutant removal: a review. Water Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.005CrossRefPubMed

36.

Hasan SW, Elektorowicz M, Oleszkiewicz JA (2014) Start-up period investigation of pilot-scale submerged membrane electro-bioreactor (SMEBR) treating raw municipal wastewater. Chemosphere 97:71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.11.009CrossRefPubMed

37.

Huang YW, Wang ZM, Yan X, Chen J, Guo YJ, Lang WZ (2017) Versatile polyvinylidene fluoride hybrid ultrafiltration membranes with superior antifouling, antibacterial and self-cleaning properties for water treatment. J Colloid Interface Sci 505:38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.05.076CrossRefPubMed

38.

Jamaly S, Giwa A, Hasan SW (2015) Recent improvements in oily wastewater treatment: progress, challenges, and future opportunities. J Environ Sci 37:15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.04.011CrossRef

39.

Jiang S, Li Y, Ladewig BP (2017) A review of reverse osmosis membrane fouling and control strategies. Total Environ, Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.235CrossRef

40.

Kanagaraj P, Nagendran A, Rana D, Matsuura T, Neelakandan S, Karthikkumar T, Muthumeenal A (2015) Influence of N-phthaloyl chitosan on poly (ether imide) ultrafiltration membranes and its application in biomolecules and toxic heavy metal ion separation and their antifouling properties. Appl Surf Sci 329:165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.12.082CrossRef

41.

Katsoyiannis IA, Gkotsis P, Castellana M, Cartechini F, Zouboulis AI (2017) Production of demineralized water for use in thermal power stations by advanced treatment of secondary wastewater effluent. J Environ Manage 190:132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.040CrossRefPubMed

42.

Kim HJ, Choi K, Baek Y, Kim D-G, Shim J, Yoon J, Lee J-C (2014) High-performance reverse osmosis CNT/polyamide nanocomposite membrane by controlled interfacial interactions. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:2819–2829. https://doi.org/10.1021/am405398fCrossRefPubMed

43.

Krzeminski P, Leverette L, Malamis S, Katsou E (2017) Membrane bioreactors—a review on recent developments in energy reduction, fouling control, novel configurations, LCA and market prospects. J Memb Sci 527:207–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.010CrossRef

44.

Kwan SE, Bar-Zeev E, Elimelech M (2015) Biofouling in forward osmosis and reverse osmosis: measurements and mechanisms. J Memb Sci 493:703–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.07.027CrossRef

45.

Le-Clech P, Chen V, Fane TAG (2006) Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J Memb Sci 284:17–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.08.019CrossRef

46.

Le NL, Nunes SP (2016) Materials and membrane technologies for water and energy sustainability. Sustain Mater Technol 7:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2016.02.001CrossRef

47.

Lee J, Chae HR, Won YJ, Lee K, Lee CH, Lee HH, Kim IC, Lee JM (2013) Graphene oxide nanoplatelets composite membrane with hydrophilic and antifouling properties for wastewater treatment. J Memb Sci 448:223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.08.017CrossRef

48.

Li Y, Su Y, Zhao X, Zhang R, Zhao J, Fan X, Jiang Z (2014) Surface fluorination of polyamide nanofiltration membrane for enhanced antifouling property. J Memb Sci 455:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.060CrossRef

49.

Liang S, Qi G, Xiao K, Sun J, Giannelis EP, Huang X, Elimelech M (2014) Organic fouling behavior of superhydrophilic polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) ultrafiltration membranes functionalized with surface-tailored nanoparticles: implications for organic fouling in membrane bioreactors. J Memb Sci 463:94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.037CrossRef

50.

Liu C, Lee J, Ma J, Elimelech M (2017) Antifouling thin-film composite membranes by controlled architecture of zwitterionic polymer brush layer. Environ Sci Technol acs.est.6b05992. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05992CrossRef

51.

Liu C, Mao H, Zheng J, Zhang S (2017) Tight ultrafiltration membrane: preparation and characterization of thermally resistant carboxylated cardo poly (arylene ether ketone)s (PAEK-COOH) tight ultrafiltration membrane for dye removal. J Memb Sci 530:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.02.005CrossRef

52.

Liu M, Chen Q, Lu K, Huang W, Lü Z, Zhou C, Yu S, Gao C (2017) High efficient removal of dyes from aqueous solution through nanofiltration using diethanolamine-modified polyamide thin-film composite membrane. Sep Purif Technol 173:135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.09.023CrossRef

53.

Luo W, Phan HV, Xie M, Hai FI, Price WE, Elimelech M, Nghiem LD (2017) Osmotic versus conventional membrane bioreactors integrated with reverse osmosis for water reuse: biological stability, membrane fouling, and contaminant removal. Water Res 109:122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.036CrossRefPubMed

54.

Ma W, Soroush A, Van Anh Luong T, Brennan G, Rahaman MS, Asadishad B, Tufenkji N (2016) Spray- and spin-assisted layer-by-layer assembly of copper nanoparticles on thin-film composite reverse osmosis membrane for biofouling mitigation. Water Res 99:188–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.04.042CrossRefPubMed

55.

Maghsoud Z, Pakbaz M, Famili MHN, Madaeni SS (2017) New polyvinyl chloride/thermoplastic polyurethane membranes with potential application in nanofiltration. J Memb Sci 541:271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.001CrossRef

56.

Martín A, Arsuaga JM, Roldán N, de Abajo J, Martínez A, Sotto A (2015) Enhanced ultrafiltration PES membranes doped with mesostructured functionalized silica particles. Desalination 357:16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.10.046CrossRef

57.

McVerry BT, Wong MCY, Marsh KL, Temple JAT, Marambio-Jones C, Hoek EMV, Kaner RB (2014) Scalable antifouling reverse osmosis membranes utilizing perfluorophenyl azide photochemistry. Macromol Rapid Commun 35:1528–1533. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.201400226CrossRefPubMed

58.

Mehrparvar A, Rahimpour A (2015) Surface modification of novel polyether sulfone amide (PESA) ultrafiltration membranes by grafting hydrophilic monomers. J Ind Eng Chem 28:359–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2015.03.016CrossRef

59.

Mercer KL (2017) 2017 State of the water industry: strengthening our connections. J Am Water Works Assoc 109:56–65. https://doi.org/10.5942/jawwa.2017.109.0090CrossRef

60.

Mi Y-F, Zhao F-Y, Guo Y-S, Weng X-D, Ye C-C, An Q-F (2017) Constructing zwitterionic surface of nanofiltration membrane for high flux and antifouling performance. J Memb Sci 541:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.091CrossRef

61.

Mohammad AW, Teow YH, Ang WL, Chung YT, Oatley-Radcliffe DL, Hilal N (2015) Nanofiltration membranes review: recent advances and future prospects. Desalination. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.10.043CrossRef

62.

Mokhtari S, Rahimpour A, Shamsabadi AA, Habibzadeh S, Soroush M (2017) Enhancing performance and surface antifouling properties of polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes with salicylate-alumoxane nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci 393:93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.10.005CrossRef

63.

Monisha S, Mathavan T, Selvasekarapandian S, Milton Franklin Benial A, Aristatil G, Mani N, Premalatha M, Vinoth Pandi D (2017) Investigation of bio polymer electrolyte based on cellulose acetate-ammonium nitrate for potential use in electrochemical devices. Carbohydr Polym 157:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.09.026CrossRef

64.

Nebipasagil A, Sundell BJ, Lane OR, Mecham SJ, Riffle JS, McGrath JE (2016) Synthesis and photocrosslinking of disulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) copolymers for potential reverse osmosis membrane materials. Polym (United Kingdom) 93:14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2016.04.009CrossRef

65.

Neoh CH, Noor ZZ, Mutamim NSA, Lim CK (2016) Green technology in wastewater treatment technologies: integration of membrane bioreactor with various wastewater treatment systems. Chem Eng J 283:582–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.07.060CrossRef

66.

Ng LY, Mohammad AW, Leo CP, Hilal N (2013) Polymeric membranes incorporated with metal/metal oxide nanoparticles: a comprehensive review. Desalination 308:15–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.11.033CrossRef

67.

Oh HJ, McGrath JE, Paul DR (2017) Kinetics of poly(ethylene glycol) extraction into water from plasticized disulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) desalination membranes prepared by solvent-free melt processing. J Memb Sci 524:257–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.036CrossRef

68.

Oh HJ, Park J, Inceoglu S, Villaluenga I, Thelen JL, Jiang X, McGrath JE, Paul DR (2017) Formation of disulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) thin film desalination membranes plasticized with poly(ethylene glycol) by solvent-free melt extrusion. Polymer (Guildf) 109:106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2016.12.035CrossRef

69.

Orooji Y, Faghih M, Razmjou A, Hou J, Moazzam P, Emami N, Aghababaie M, Nourisfa F, Chen V, Jin W (2017) Nanostructured mesoporous carbon polyethersulfone composite ultrafiltration membrane with significantly low protein adsorption and bacterial adhesion. Carbon N Y 111:689–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.055CrossRef

70.

Pardeshi PM, Mungray AK, Mungray AA (2017) Polyvinyl chloride and layered double hydroxide composite as a novel substrate material for the forward osmosis membrane. Desalination. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.01.041CrossRef

71.

Prince JA, Bhuvana S, Boodhoo KVK, Anbharasi V, Singh G (2014) Synthesis and characterization of PEG-Ag immobilized PES hollow fiber ultrafiltration membranes with long lasting antifouling properties. J Memb Sci 454:538–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.050CrossRef

72.

Pulido BA, Waldron C, Zolotukhin MG, Nunes SP (2017) Porous polymeric membranes with thermal and solvent resistance. J Memb Sci 539:187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.05.070CrossRef

73.

Qadir D, Mukhtar H, Keong LK (2017) Mixed matrix membranes for water purification applications. Sep Purif Rev 46:62–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/15422119.2016.1196460CrossRef

74.

Qiu G, Ting YP (2014) Short-term fouling propensity and flux behavior in an osmotic membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment. Desalination 332:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.11.010CrossRef

75.

Rabiee H, Vatanpour V, Farahani MHDA, Zarrabi H (2015) Improvement in flux and antifouling properties of PVC ultrafiltration membranes by incorporation of zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles. Sep Purif Technol 156:299–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2015.10.015CrossRef

76.

Razali NF, Mohammad AW, Hilal N (2014) Effects of polyaniline nanoparticles in polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes: fouling behaviours by different types of foulant. J Ind Eng Chem 20:3134–3140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.11.056CrossRef

77.

Sabir A, Shafiq M, Islam A, Sarwar A, Dilshad MR, Shafeeq A, Zahid Butt MT, Jamil T (2015) Fabrication of tethered carbon nanotubes in cellulose acetate/polyethylene glycol-400 composite membranes for reverse osmosis. Carbohydr Polym 132:589–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.06.035CrossRefPubMed

78.

Safarpour M, Vatanpour V, Khataee A, Zarrabi H, Gholami P, Yekavalangi ME (2017) High flux and fouling resistant reverse osmosis membrane modified with plasma treated natural zeolite. Desalination 411:89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.02.012CrossRef

79.

Shaffer DL, Tousley ME, Elimelech M (2017) Influence of polyamide membrane surface chemistry on gypsum scaling behavior. J Memb Sci 525:249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.003CrossRef

80.

Shafi HZ, Matin A, Akhtar S, Gleason KK, Zubair SM, Khan Z (2017) Organic fouling in surface modified reverse osmosis membranes: filtration studies and subsequent morphological and compositional characterization. J. Memb. Sci. 527:152–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.01.017CrossRef

81.

Shao L, Wang ZX, Zhang YL, Jiang ZX, Liu YY (2014) A facile strategy to enhance PVDF ultrafiltration membrane performance via self-polymerized polydopamine followed by hydrolysis of ammonium fluotitanate. J Memb Sci 461:10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.006CrossRef

82.

Sharma N, Purkait MK (2017) Impact of synthesized amino alcohol plasticizer on the morphology and hydrophilicity of polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane. J Memb Sci 522:202–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.08.068CrossRef

83.

Son M, Kim H, Jung J, Jo S, Choi H (2017) Influence of extreme concentrations of hydrophilic pore-former on reinforced polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes for reduction of humic acid fouling. Chemosphere 179:194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.101CrossRefPubMed

84.

Subramanian S, Seeram R (2013) New directions in nanofiltration applications—are nanofibers the right materials as membranes in desalination? Desalination 308:198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.08.014CrossRef

85.

Tang Y-J, Xu Z-L, Xue S-M, Wei Y-M, Yang H (2017) Tailoring the polyester/polyamide backbone stiffness for the fabrication of high performance nanofiltration membrane. J Memb Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.033CrossRef

86.

Tong T, Zhao S, Boo C, Hashmi SM, Elimelech M (2017) Relating silica scaling in reverse osmosis to membrane surface properties. Environ Sci Technol 51:4396–4406. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06411CrossRefPubMed

87.

Tsai H-A, Wang T-Y, Huang S-H, Hu C-C, Hung W-S, Lee K-R, Lai J-Y (2017) The preparation of polyamide/polyacrylonitrile thin film composite hollow fiber membranes for dehydration of ethanol mixtures. Sep Purif Technol 187:221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.06.060CrossRef

88.

Turek M, Mitko K, Piotrowski K, Dydo P, Laskowska E, Jakóbik-Kolon A (2017) Prospects for high water recovery membrane desalination. Desalination 401:180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.07.047CrossRef

89.

Ulbricht M (2006) Advanced functional polymer membranes. Polymer (Guildf) 47:2217–2262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2006.01.084CrossRef

90.

Vatanpour V, Safarpour M, Khataee A, Zarrabi H, Yekavalangi ME, Kavian M (2017) A thin film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membrane containing amine-functionalized carbon nanotubes. Sep Purif Technol 184:135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.04.038CrossRef

91.

Velu S, Arthanareeswaran G, Lade H (2017) Removal of organic and inorganic substances from industry wastewaters using modified aluminosilicate-based polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes. Environ Prog Sustain Energy https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12614CrossRef

92.

Verbeke R, Gómez V, Vankelecom IFJ (2016) Chlorine-resistance of reverse osmosis (RO) polyamide membranes. Polym. Sci, Prog. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.05.003CrossRef

93.

Wang C, Li Z, Chen J, Li Z, Yin Y, Cao L, Zhong Y, Wu H (2017) Covalent organic framework modified polyamide nanofiltration membrane with enhanced performance for desalination. J Memb Sci 523:273–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.09.055CrossRef

94.

Wang H, Wang Z-M, Yan X, Chen J, Lang W-Z, Guo Y-J (2017) Novel organic-inorganic hybrid polyvinylidene fluoride ultrafiltration membranes with antifouling and antibacterial properties by embedding N-halamine functionalized silica nanospheres. J Ind Eng Chem 52:295–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.03.059CrossRef

95.

Wang H, Wei M, Zhong Z, Wang Y (2017) Atomic-layer-deposition-enabled thin-film composite membranes of polyimide supported on nanoporous anodized alumina. J Memb Sci 535:56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.04.026CrossRef

96.

Wang JJ, Wang Z, Wang JJ, Wang S (2015) Improving the water flux and bio-fouling resistance of reverse osmosis (RO) membrane through surface modification by zwitterionic polymer. J Memb Sci 493:188–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.036CrossRef

97.

Wang P, Luo L, Chung TS (2014) Tri-bore ultra-filtration hollow fiber membranes with a novel triangle-shape outer geometry. J Memb Sci 452:212–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.033CrossRef

98.

Wang X, Chang VWC, Tang CY (2016) Osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) technology for wastewater treatment and reclamation: advances, challenges, and prospects for the future. J Memb Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.01.010CrossRef

99.

Wang X, Wang C, Tang CY, Hu T, Li X, Ren Y (2017) Development of a novel anaerobic membrane bioreactor simultaneously integrating microfiltration and forward osmosis membranes for low-strength wastewater treatment. J Memb Sci 527:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.062CrossRef

100.

Werber JR, Deshmukh A, Elimelech M (2016) The critical need for increased selectivity, not increased water permeability, for desalination membranes. Environ Sci Technol Lett 3:112–120. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00050CrossRef

101.

Wu H, Liu Y, Mao L, Jiang C, Ang J, Lu X (2017) Doping polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane with TiO₂-PDA nanohybrid for simultaneous self-cleaning and self-protection. J Memb Sci 532:20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.03.010CrossRef

102.

Yang B, Yang X, Liu B, Chen Z, Chen C, Liang S, Chu L-Y, Crittenden J (2017) PVDF blended PVDF-g-PMAA pH-responsive membrane: effect of additives and solvents on membrane properties and performance. J Memb Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.045CrossRef

103.

Yang C, Li X-M, Gilron J, Kong D, Yin Y, Oren Y, Linder C, He T (2014) CF4 plasma-modified superhydrophobic PVDF membranes for direct contact membrane distillation. J Memb Sci 456:155–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.01.013CrossRef

104.

Yin J, Deng B (2015) Polymer-matrix nanocomposite membranes for water treatment. J Memb Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.019CrossRef

105.

You X, Ma T, Su Y, Wu H, Wu M, Cai H, Sun G, Jiang Z (2017) Enhancing the permeation flux and antifouling performance of polyamide nanofiltration membrane by incorporation of PEG-POSS nanoparticles. J Memb Sci 540:454–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.084CrossRef

106.

Yu H, Zhang Y, Sun X, Liu J, Zhang H (2014) Improving the antifouling property of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membrane by incorporation of dextran grafted halloysite nanotubes. Chem Eng J 237:322–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.094CrossRef

107.

Zhang G, Lu S, Zhang L, Meng Q, Shen C, Zhang J (2013) Novel polysulfone hybrid ultrafiltration membrane prepared with TiO₂-g-HEMA and its antifouling characteristics. J Memb Sci 436:163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.02.009CrossRef

108.

Zhang H, Li Bin, Pan J, Qi Y, Shen J, Gao C, Van der Bruggen B (2017) Carboxyl-functionalized graphene oxide polyamide nanofiltration membrane for desalination of dye solutions containing monovalent salt. J Memb Sci 539:128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.05.075CrossRef

109.

Zhang Y, Guo M, Pan G, Yan H, Xu J, Shi Y, Shi H, Liu Y (2015) Preparation and properties of novel pH-stable TFC membrane based on organic-inorganic hybrid composite materials for nanofiltration. J Memb Sci 476:500–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.12.011CrossRef

110.

Zhang Y, Zhao C, Yan H, Pan G, Guo M, Na H, Liu Y (2014) Highly chlorine-resistant multilayer reverse osmosis membranes based on sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) and poly(vinyl alcohol). Desalination 336:58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.12.034CrossRef

111.

Zhao C, Lv J, Xu X, Zhang G, Yang Y, Yang F (2017) Highly antifouling and antibacterial performance of poly (vinylidene fluoride) ultrafiltration membranes blending with copper oxide and graphene oxide nanofillers for effective wastewater treatment. J Colloid Interface Sci 505:341–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.05.074CrossRefPubMed

112.

Zhou D, Zhu L, Fu Y, Zhu M, Xue L (2015) Development of lower cost seawater desalination processes using nanofiltration technologies—a review. Desalination 376:109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.08.020CrossRef

Titel: Polymers for Membrane Filtration in Water Purification
verfasst von: Adewale Giwa
Menatalla Ahmed
Shadi Wajih Hasan
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Polymeric Materials for Clean Water
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00742-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-00743-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00743-0_8

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht