nach oben

Erschienen in:

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. Polymers in Orthopaedic Surgery

verfasst von : Catherine G. Ambrose, Braden E. Hartline, Thomas O. Clanton, Walter R. Lowe, William C. McGarvey

Erschienen in: Advanced Polymers in Medicine

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Polymers have been used as biomaterials in Orthopaedic Surgery for decades. Despite reports of complications with some polymeric materials, most are biocompatible and have been used successfully in total joint replacements, for soft tissue reconstruction, for joint fusion, and as fracture fixation devices. In this chapter we will describe the types of polymers used in commercially-available orthopaedic implants, and then give a breakdown by clinical application.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Overview on Cell-Biomaterial Interactions

Nächstes Kapitel Polymers in Ophthalmology

Rohm, O.: On the polymerization products of acrylic acid. Chemistry (dissertation). University of Tubingen, Tubingen (1901)

Charnley, J.: The bonding of prostheses to bone by cement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 46, 518–529 (1964)

Smith, D.C.: The genesis and evolution of acrylic bone cement. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 36, 1–10 (2005)CrossRef

Jaeblon, T.: Polymethylmethacrylate: properties and contemporary uses in orthopaedics. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 18, 297–305 (2010)

Lewis, G.: Properties of acrylic bone cement: state of the art review. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 38, 155–182 (1997)CrossRef

Lewis, G.: Properties of antibiotic-loaded acrylic bone cements for use in cemented arthroplasties: a state-of-the-art review. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 89, 558–574 (2009)CrossRef

Harper, E.J., Braden, M., Bonfield, W., et al.: Influence of sterilization upon a range of properties of experimental bone cements. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 8, 849–853 (1997)

Lewis, G., Mladsi, S.: Effect of sterilization method on properties of Palacos R acrylic bone cement. Biomaterials 19, 117–124 (1998)CrossRef

Lewis, G.: Apparent fracture toughness of acrylic bone cement: effect of test specimen configuration and sterilization method. Biomaterials 20, 69–78 (1999)CrossRef

10.

Graham, J., Pruitt, L., Ries, M., Gundiah, N.: Fracture and fatigue properties of acrylic bone cement: the effects of mixing method, sterilization treatment, and molecular weight. J. Arthroplasty 15, 1028–1035 (2000)CrossRef

11.

An, Y.H., Alvi, F.I., Kang, Q., et al.: Effects of sterilization on implant mechanical property and biocompatibility. Int. J. Artif. Organs 28, 1126–1137 (2005)

12.

Mjoberg, B., Pettersson, H., Rosenqvist, R., Rydholm, A.: Bone cement, thermal injury and the radiolucent zone. Acta Orthop. Scand. 55, 597–600 (1984)CrossRef

13.

Urrutia, J., Bono, C.M., Mery, P., Rojas, C.: Early histologic changes following polymethylmethacrylate injection (vertebroplasty) in rabbit lumbar vertebrae. Spine 33, 877–882 (2008)CrossRef

14.

Donaldson, A.J., Thomson, H.E., Harper, N.J., Kenny, N.W.: Bone cement implantation syndrome. Br. J. Anaesth. 102, 12–22 (2009)CrossRef

15.

Chen, Y.J., Tan, T.S., Chen, W.H., et al.: Intradural cement leakage: a devastatingly rare complication of vertebroplasty. Spine 31, E379–E382 (2006)CrossRef

16.

Zhang, J.D., Poffyn, B., Sys, G., Uyttendaele, D.: Comparison of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for complications. Orthop. Surg. 3, 158–160 (2011)CrossRef

17.

Wang, L., Gardner, A.W., Kwek, E.B., Naidu, G.R.: Retrograde cement arteriovenogram of nutrient vessels following hemiarthroplasty of the hip. Acta Orthop. Belg. 78, 431–435 (2012)

18.

Corcos, G., Dbjay, J., Mastier, C., et al.: Cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty for spinal metastases: a retrospective evaluation of incidence and risk factors. Spine 39, E332–E338 (2014)CrossRef

19.

Krause, W., Mathis, R.S.: Fatigue properties of acrylic bone cements: review of the literature. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 22, 37–53 (1988)

20.

Cuckler, J.M.: If hip implant retrievals could speak, what would they tell us? J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 94, 11–13 (2012)CrossRef

21.

Goodman, S.: Wear particulate and osteolysis. Orthop. Clin. North. Am. 36(1), 41–48 (2005)CrossRef

22.

Rajpura, A., Kendoff, D., Board, T.N.: The current state of bearing surfaces in total hip replacement. Bone Joint J. 96(2), 147–156 (2014)CrossRef

23.

Gordon, A.C., D’Lima, D.D., Colwell Jr, C.W.: Highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 14, 511–523 (2006)

24.

Oral, E., Muratoglu, O.K.: Vitamin E diffused, highly crosslinked UHMWPE: a review. Int. Orthop. 35, 215–223 (2011)CrossRef

25.

Goodman, S.B., Gibon, E., Yao, Z.: The basic science of periprosthetic osteolysis. Instr. Course Lect. 62, 201–206 (2013)

26.

Ulrich, S.D., Seyler, T.M., Bennett, D., et al.: Total hip arthroplasties: what are the reasons for revision? Int. Orthop. 32, 597–604 (2008)CrossRef

27.

Bozic, K.J., Kurtz, S.M., Lau, E., et al.: The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 91, 128–133 (2009)CrossRef

28.

Bozic, K.J., Kurtz, S.M., Lau, E., et al.: The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 468, 45–51 (2010)CrossRef

29.

Eschbach, L.: Nonresorbable polymers in bone surgery. Injury 31(Suppl 4), 22–27 (2000)CrossRef

30.

Kurtz, S.M., Devine, J.N.: PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 28, 4845–4869 (2007)CrossRef

31.

Nino Gomez, D., Eslava, S., Federico, A., et al.: Use of poly(ether ether ketone) cages in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Clin. 17, 449–457 (2012)CrossRef

32.

Chen, Y., Wang, X., Lu, X., et al.: Comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the surgical treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective, randomized, control study with over 7-year follow-up. Eur. Spine J. 22, 1539–1546 (2013)CrossRef

33.

Kersten, R.F., van Gaalen, S.M., de Gast, A., Oner, F.C.: Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in cervical applications: a systematic review. Spine J.: Official J. North Am. Spine Soc. (2013)

34.

Barber, F.A., Herbert, M.A., Beavis, R.C., Barrera Oro, F.: Suture anchor materials, eyelets, and designs: update 2008. Arthroscopy 24, 859–867 (2008)CrossRef

35.

Barber, F.A., Herbert, M.A., Hapa, O., et al.: Biomechanical analysis of pullout strengths of rotator cuff and glenoid anchors: 2011 update. Arthroscopy 27, 895–905 (2011)CrossRef

36.

Uzumcugil, O., Yalcinkaya, M., Ozturkmen, Y., et al.: Effect of PEEK polymer on tunnel widening after hamstring ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics 35, e654–e659 (2012)CrossRef

37.

Gogolewski, S.: Bioresorbable polymers in trauma and bone surgery. Injury 31(Suppl 4), 28–32 (2000)CrossRef

38.

Rokkanen, P.U., Bostman, O., Hirvensalo, E., et al.: Bioabsorbable fixation in orthopaedic surgery and traumatology. Biomaterials 21, 2607–2613 (2000)CrossRef

39.

Ambrose, C.G., Clanton, T.O.: Bioabsorbable implants: review of clinical experience in orthopedic surgery. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32, 171–177 (2004)CrossRef

40.

Kontakis, G.M., Pagkalos, J.E., Tosounidis, T.I., et al.: Bioabsorbable materials in orthopaedics. Acta Orthop. Belg. 73, 159–169 (2007)

41.

Mukherjee, D.P., Pietrzak, W.S.: Bioabsorbable fixation: scientific, technical, and clinical concepts. J Craniofac. Surg. 22, 679–689 (2011)CrossRef

42.

Bostman, O.M.: Metallic or absorbable fracture fixation devices: a cost minimization analysis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 329, 233–239 (1996)CrossRef

43.

Nair, L.S., Laurencin, C.T.: Polymers as biomaterials for tissue engineering and controlled drug delivery. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 102, 47–90 (2006)

44.

Kluin, O.S., van der Mei, H.C., Busscher, H.J., Neut, D.: Biodegradable vs non-biodegradable antibiotic delivery devices in the treatment of osteomyelitis. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 10, 341–351 (2013)CrossRef

45.

Ciccone 2nd, W.J., Motz, C., Bentley, C., Tasto, J.P.: Bioabsorbable implants in orthopaedics: new developments and clinical applications. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 9, 280–288 (2001)

46.

Knight, S.R., Aujla, R., Biswas, S.P.: Total hip arthroplasty—over 100 years of operative history. Orthop. Rev. 3, e16 (2011)CrossRef

47.

Callaghan, J.J., Albright, J.C., Goetz, D.D., et al.: Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement minimum twenty-five-year follow-up. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 82(4), 487–497 (2000)

48.

Cason, G.W., Herkowitz, H.N.: Cervical intervertebral disc replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 95, 279–285 (2013)CrossRef

49.

Jacobs, W., Van der Gaag, N.A., Tuschel, A., et al. Total disc replacement for chronic back pain in the presence of disc degeneration. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 9, CD008326 (2012)

50.

Abdul-Jalil, Y., Bartels, J., Alberti, O., Becker, R.: Delayed presentation of pulmonary polymethylmethacrylate emboli after percutaneous vertebroplasty. Spine 32, E589–E593 (2007)CrossRef

51.

Bose, R., Choi, J.W.: Successful percutaneous retrieval of methyl methacrylate orthopedic cement embolism from the pulmonary artery. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Interv. 76, 198–201 (2010)CrossRef

52.

Esses, S.I., McGuire, R., Jenkins, J., et al.: American academy of orthopaedic surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the treatment of osteoporotic spinal compression fractures. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 93, 1934–1936 (2011)CrossRef

53.

Waris, E., Konttinen, Y.T., Ashammakhi, N., et al.: Bioabsorbable fixation devices in trauma and bone surgery: current clinical standing. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 1, 229–240 (2004)CrossRef

54.

Yetkin, H., Senkoylu, A.: Biomaterials in orthopaedic surgery and traumatology. Technol. Health Care 10, 173–175 (2002)

55.

Cotic, M., Vogt, S., Hinterwimmer, S., et al. A matched-pair comparison of two different locking plates for valgus-producing medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: peek-carbon composite plate versus titanium plate. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 1–9 (2014)

56.

Alan Barber, F., Boothby, M.H., Richards, D.P.: New sutures and suture anchors in sports medicine. Sports Med. Arthrosc. 14, 177–184 (2006)CrossRef

57.

Gunja, N.J., Athanasiou, K.A.: Biodegradable materials in arthroscopy. Sports Med. Arthrosc. 14, 112–119 (2006)CrossRef

58.

Denard, P.J., Burkhart, S.S.: The evolution of suture anchors in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 29, 1589–1595 (2013)CrossRef

59.

Dhawan, A., Ghodadra, N., Karas, V., et al.: Complications of bioabsorbable suture anchors in the shoulder. Am. J. Sports Med. 40, 1424–1430 (2012)CrossRef

60.

McCarty 3rd, L.P., Buss, D.D., Datta, M.W., et al.: Complications observed following labral or rotator cuff repair with use of poly-L-lactic acid implants. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 95, 507–511 (2013)CrossRef

61.

Papalia, R., Franceschi, F., Diaz Balzani, L., et al. The arthroscopic treatment of shoulder instability: bioabsorbable and standard metallic anchors produce equivalent clinical results. Arthroscopy (2014)

62.

Gardner, M.P., Chong, A.C., Pollock, A.G., Wooley, P.H.: Mechanical evaluation of large-size fourth-generation composite femur and tibia models. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38, 613–620 (2010)CrossRef

63.

Grover, P., Albert, C., Wang, M., Harris, G.F. Mechanical characterization of fourth generation composite humerus. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H J. Eng. Med. 225, 1169–1176 (2011)

64.

Elfar, J., Menorca, R.M., Reed, J.D., Stanbury, S.: Composite bone models in orthopaedic surgery research and education. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 22, 111–120 (2014)CrossRef

65.

Saito, N., Murakami, N., Takahashi, J., et al.: Synthetic biodegradable polymers as drug delivery systems for bone morphogenetic proteins. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 57, 1037–1048 (2005)CrossRef

66.

Tan, H.L., Lin, W.T., Tang, T.T.: The use of antimicrobial-impregnated PMMA to manage periprosthetic infections: controversial issues and the latest developments. Int. J. Artif. Organs 35, 832–839 (2012)

67.

Ambrose, C.G., Clyburn, T.A., Mika, J., et al.: Evaluation of antibiotic-impregnated microspheres for the prevention of implant-associated orthopaedic infections. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 96, 128–134 (2014)CrossRef

68.

Fedorovich, N.E., Alblas, J., de Wijn, J.R., et al.: Hydrogels as extracellular matrices for skeletal tissue engineering: state-of-the-art and novel application in organ printing. Tissue Eng. 13, 1905–1925 (2007)CrossRef

69.

Spiller, K.L., Maher, S.A., Lowman, A.M.: Hydrogels for the repair of articular cartilage defects. Tissue Eng. Part B, Rev. 17, 281–299 (2011)CrossRef

70.

Kosuge, D., Khan, W.S., Haddad, B., Marsh, D.: Biomaterials and scaffolds in bone and musculoskeletal engineering. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 8, 185–191 (2013)CrossRef

71.

Raftery, R., O’Brien, F.J., Cryan, S.A. Chitosan for gene delivery and orthopedic tissue engineering applications. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 18(5), 5611–5647 (2013)

Titel: Polymers in Orthopaedic Surgery
verfasst von: Catherine G. Ambrose
Braden E. Hartline
Thomas O. Clanton
Walter R. Lowe
William C. McGarvey
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Advanced Polymers in Medicine
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12477-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-12478-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12478-0_5

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht