Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering
Erschienen in: International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering 1/2018

01.03.2018 | Original Paper

Predicting CBR Value of Stabilized Pond Ash with Lime and Lime Sludge Using ANN and MR Models

verfasst von: Manju Suthar, Praveen Aggarwal

Erschienen in: International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In the present study, a multilayer perception-artificial neural network and multiple regression model is developed for predicting the California bearing ratio (CBR) value of stabilized pond ash. Pond ash collected from Panipat thermal plant is stabilized with lime (2, 4, 6 and 8%) alone and in combination with lime sludge (5, 10 and 15%). Total 51 datasets of experimentally observed CBR value were used in the development of models. Fitness of the model was observed through three statistical parameters i.e. coefficient of correlation (CC), root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error. Both the models predict CBR value with high degree of accuracy having CC more than 0.96. From the sensitivity analysis, it is observed that curing period is the most significant parameter affecting the CBR value of stabilized pond ash.
Vorheriger Artikel Reliability Based LRFD of Geomembrane Liners for V-Shaped Anchor Trenches of MSW Landfills
Nächster Artikel Interface Shear Strength Properties of Gravel Bases and Subgrades with Various Reinforcements

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Bera AK, Ghosh A, Ghosh A (2007) Compaction characteristics of pond ash. J Mater Civ Eng 19(4):349–357CrossRef
2.
Suthar M, Aggarwal P (2017) Analysis of heavy metals in pond ash samples from Haryana. In Proceedings of 29th research world international conference, Las Vegas, USA, 16–17 March 2017, ISBN: 978-93-86291-88-2
3.
ASTM C618-08a (2008) Specification for fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolana for use as material admixture in portland cement concrete
4.
Parsa J, Munson-McGee SH, Steiner R (1996) Stabilization/solidification of hazardous wastes using fly ash. J Environ Eng 122(10):935–940CrossRef
5.
Ghosh A, Subbarao C (2006) Tensile strength bearing ratio and slake durability of class F fly ash stabilized with lime and gypsum. J Mater Civ Eng 18(1):18–27CrossRef
6.
Ghosh A (1996) Environmental and engineering characteristics of stabilized low lime fly ash. PhD dissertation, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India
7.
Ghosh A, Subbarao C (2007) Strength characteristics of class F fly ash modified with lime and gypsum. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 1337:757–766CrossRef
8.
Pandian NS (2004) Fly ash characterization with reference to geotechnical applications. J Indian Inst Sci 184:189–216
9.
Suthar M, Aggarwal P (2015) Class-F pond ash a potential highway construction material—a review. Ind Highways IRC 43(8):23–32
10.
Sahu V, Gayathri V (2014) The use of fly ash and lime sludge as partial replacement of cement in mortar. Int J Eng Technol Innov 4(1):30–37
11.
Battaglia A, Calace N, Nardi E, Petronio BM, Pietroletti M (2007) Reduction of Pb and Zn bioavailable forms in metal polluted soils due to paper mill sludge addition. Effects on Pb and Zn transferability to barley. Biores Technol 98:2993–2999CrossRef
12.
Calacea N, Campisib T, Iacondinib A, Leonia M, Petronioa BM, Pietroletti M (2005) Metal-contaminated soil remediation by means of paper mill sludges addition: chemical and ecotoxicological evaluation. Environ Poll 136:485–492CrossRef
13.
Mahmood T, Elliot A (2006) A review of secondary sludge reduction technology for the pulp and paper industry. Water Res 40(11):2093–2112CrossRef
14.
Medhi UJ, Talukdar AK, Deka S (2005) Physicochemical characteristics of lime sludge waste of paper mill and its impact on growth and production of rice. J Ind Pollut Contr 21(1):51–58
15.
Singh M, Garg M (2008) Utilization of waste lime sludge as building materials. J Sci Ind Res 67:161–166
16.
17.
Talukdar DK (2015) A study of paper mill lime sludge for stabilization of village road sub-base. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 5(2):389–393
18.
Ghosh A (2010) Compaction characteristics and bearing ratio of pond ash stabilized with lime and phosphogypsum. J Mater Civ Eng 22(4):343–351CrossRef
19.
Day WR (2001) Soil testing manual procedures, classification data, and sampling practices. McGraw Hill, New York, p 619
20.
Kin MW (2006) California bearing ratio correlation with soil index properties master of engineering (civil-geotechnics). Thesis, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University Teknology Malaysia
21.
Banimahd M, Yasrobi SS, Woodward PK (2005) Artificial neural network for stress-strain behavior of sandy soils: knowledge based verification. Comput Geotech 32:377–386CrossRef
22.
Caglar N, Arman H (2007) The applicability of neural networks in the determination of soil profiles. Bull Eng Geol Environ 66(3):295–301CrossRef
23.
24.
Najjar YM, Ali HE (1999) Simulating the stress-strain behavior of Nevada sand byANN. In: Proceedings of the 5th U.S. national congress on computational mechanics (USACM), Boulder, CO
25.
Penumadu D, Zhao R (1999) Triaxial compression behavior of sand and gravel using and artificial neural networks (ANN). Comput Geotech 24(3):207–230CrossRef
26.
Ozer M, Isik NS, Orhan M (2008) Statistical and neural network assessment of the compression index of clay-bearing soils. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:537–545CrossRef
27.
Park HI, Kim YT (2010) Prediction of strength of reinforced lightweight soil using an artificial neural network. Eng Comput 28(5):600–605CrossRefMATH
28.
Das SK, Basudhar PK (2006) Undrained lateral load capacity of piles in clay using artificial neural network. Comput Geotech 33(8):454–459CrossRef
29.
Park HI, Cho CH (2010) Neural network model for predicting the resistance of driven piles. Mar Georesour Geotech 28(4):324–344CrossRef
30.
Cho SE (2009) Probabilistic stability analyses of slopes using the ANN-based response surface. Comput Geotech 36:787–797CrossRef
31.
Erzin Y, Cetin T (2013) The prediction of the critical factor of safety of homogeneous finite slopes using neural networks and multiple regressions. Comput Geosci 51:305–313CrossRef
32.
Erzin Y, Cetin T (2014) The prediction of the critical factor of safety of homogeneous finite slopes subjected to earthquake forces using neural networks and multiple regressions. Int J Geomech Eng 6(1):1–15CrossRef
33.
Zhao HB (2008) Slope reliability analysis using a support vector machine. Comput Geotech 35:459–467CrossRef
34.
Erzin Y, Gul T (2013) The use of neural networks for the prediction of the settlement of pad footings on cohesionless soils based on standard penetration test. Int J Geomech Eng 5(6):541–564CrossRef
35.
Erzin Y, Gul T (2014) The use of neural networks for the prediction of the settlement of one-way footings on cohesionless soils based on standard penetration test. Neural Comput Appl 24:891–900CrossRef
36.
Shahin MA, Jaksa MB, Maier HR (2005) Stochastic simulation of settlement prediction of shallow foundations based on a deterministic artificial neural network model. In: Proceedings of the international congress on modelling and simulation, MODSIM, Melbourne, Australia, pp 73–78
37.
Shi JJ (2000) Reduction prediction error by transforming input data for neural networks. J Comput Civil Eng 14(2):109–116MathSciNetCrossRef
38.
Yoo C, Kim JM (2007) Tunneling performance prediction using an integrated GIS and neural network. Comput Geotech 34:19–30CrossRef
39.
Yildirim B, Gunaydin O (2011) Estimation of California bearing ratio by using soft computing systems. Expert Syst Appl 38:6381–6391CrossRef
40.
Sabat AK (2013) Prediction of California bearing ratio of a soil stabilized with lime and quarry dust using artificial neural network. Electron J Geotech Eng 18:3261–3272
41.
Khandelwal M, Singh TN (2009) Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration using artificial neural network. Int J Rock Mech Min 46(7):1214–1222CrossRef
42.
Singh TN, Kanchan R, Saigal K, Verma AK (2004) Prediction of p-wave velocity and anisotropic properties of rock using artificial neural networks technique. J Sci Ind Res India 63(1):32–38
43.
Kashi H, Emamgholizadeh S, Ghorbani H (2014) Estimation of soil infiltration and cation exchange capacity based on multiple regression, ANN (RBF, MLP), and ANFIS models. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 45:1195–1213CrossRef
44.
45.
IS: 2720 Part-7 (1980) (Reaffirmed 2002) Method of test for soils- determination of water content-dry density relation using light compaction (second revision)
46.
IS: 2720 Part-16 (1987) (Reaffirmed 2002) Method of test for soils- laboratory determination of CBR (second revision)
Metadaten
Titel
Predicting CBR Value of Stabilized Pond Ash with Lime and Lime Sludge Using ANN and MR Models
verfasst von
Manju Suthar
Praveen Aggarwal
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 2199-9260
Elektronische ISSN: 2199-9279
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-017-0125-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Technical Note

A Comparative Numerical Study on Soil–Geosynthetic Interactions Using Large Scale Direct Shear Test and Pullout Test

Original Paper

Predicting Swelling Behavior of a Na+-Bentonite Used in GCLs

Technical Note

A New Failure Load Criterion for Large-Diameter Under-Reamed Piles: Practical Perspective

Original Paper

Numerical Simulation of the Response of Geosynthetic Encased Stone Columns Under Oil Storage Tank

Original Paper

Interface Shear Strength Properties of Gravel Bases and Subgrades with Various Reinforcements

Original Paper

A Study on Geotextile—Sand Interface Behavior Based on Direct Shear and Triaxial Compression Tests