Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
The Role of Health Status in Older Adults’ Perceptions of the Usefulness of eHealth Technology Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Principles for Developing Digital Health Interventions for Prostate Cancer: A Community-Based Design Approach with African American Men

verfasst von : Otis L. Owens

Erschienen in: Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Design for Everyday Life

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

To reduce disparities related to prostate cancer among African American men, the American Cancer Society recommends that men make an informed decision with their healthcare provider about whether prostate cancer screening is right for them. The informed decision-making process can be facilitated through technology by teaching men about prostate cancer and providing them with activities to build their self-efficacy. However, these tools may be most effective when they are developed using a set of validated design principles, such as the Usability Engineering Lifecycle, in conjunction with a community-based participatory research (CBPR) process. Using CBPR can be especially useful in designing tools for minority communities, where men have the highest prostate cancer incidence and mortality. This paper describes the author’s process for using CBPR principles to develop a prostate cancer education program for African American men and also discusses the value of using these principles within an existing usability framework.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Influence of Mobile ICT on the Adherence of Elderly People with Chronic Diseases
Nächstes Kapitel Evaluation of Complex Distributed Multimodal Applications: Evaluating a TeleRehabilitation System When It Really Matters
Literatur
1.
Siegel, R., et al.: Cancer Statistics, 2014. Cancer 64(1), 9–29 (2014)
2.
American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts and Figures 2015. 2015: Atlanta, GA
3.
American Cancer Society, Prostate Cancer: Early Detection. 2013: Atlanta, GA
4.
Briss, P., et al.: Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems. Am. J. Prev. Med. 26(1), 67–80 (2004)CrossRef
5.
Schroder, F.H., et al.: Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N. Engl. J. Med. 360(13), 1320–1328 (2009)CrossRef
6.
Andriole, G.L., et al.: Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N. Engl. J. Med. 360(13), 1310–1319 (2009)CrossRef
7.
Welch, H.G., Albertsen, P.C.: Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment after the introduction of prostate-specific antigen screening: 1986-2005. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 101(19), 1325–1329 (2009)CrossRef
8.
O’ Connor, A.M.: User Manual-Decision Self Efficacy Scale (1995)
9.
Bass, S.B., et al.: Relationship of internet health information use with patient behavior and self-efficacy: experiences of newly diagnosed cancer patients who contact the national cancer institute’s cancer information service. J. Health Commun. 11(2), 219–236 (2006)CrossRef
10.
Wakefield, C.E., et al.: Development and pilot testing of an online screening decision aid for men with a family history of prostate cancer. Patient Educ. Couns. 83(1), 64–72 (2011)CrossRef
11.
Allen, J.D., et al.: A computer-tailored intervention to promote informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among African American men. Am. J. Mens Health 3(4), 340–351 (2009)CrossRef
12.
Evans, R., et al.: Supporting informed decision making for prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing on the web: an online randomized controlled trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 12(3), e27 (2010)CrossRef
13.
Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Research Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2002)
14.
Israel, B.A., et al.: Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 19, 173–202 (1998)CrossRef
15.
Schulz, A.J., et al.: A community-based participatory planning process and multilevel intervention design toward eliminating cardiovascular health inequities. Health Promot. Pract. 12(6), 900–911 (2011)CrossRef
16.
Nielsen, J.: The usability engineering life cycle. Computer 25(3), 12–22 (1992)CrossRef
17.
Braun, K.L., et al.: Operationalization of community-based participatory research principles across NCI’s community networks programs. Am. J. Public Health 102(6), 1195–1203 (2012)CrossRef
18.
Wallerstein, N., Duran, B.: Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am. J. Public Health 1(100), 10 (2010)
19.
Hebert, J., et al.: Interdisciplinary, translational, and community-based participatory research: finding a common language to improve cancer research. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 18(4), 1213–1217 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRef
20.
Letcher, A.S., Perlow, K.M.: Community-based participatory research shows how a community initiative creates networks to improve well-being. Am. J. Prev. Med. 37(6, suppl 1), S292–S299 (2009)CrossRef
21.
Kerner, J.F.: Integrating research, practice, and policy: what we see depends on where we stand. J. Public Health Manage. Pract. 14(2), 193–198 (2008)CrossRef
22.
Kerner, J.F., et al.: Translating research into improved outcomes in comprehensive cancer control. Cancer Causes Control 1, 27–40 (2005)CrossRef
23.
Israel, B.A., et al.: Community-based participatory research: policy recommendations for promoting a partnership approach in health research. Educ. Health 14(2), 182–197 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRef
24.
Israel, B.A., et al.: Critical issues in developing and following community based participatory research principles. In: Wallerstein, N., Minkler, M. (eds.) Community-Based Participatory Research for Health, pp. 53–79. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2003)
25.
Strong, L.L., et al.: Piloting interventions within a community-based participatory research framework: Lessons learned from the Healthy Environments Partnership. Prog. Community Health Partnerships Res. Educ. Action 3(4), 327 (2009)CrossRef
26.
Friedman, D.B., et al.: Developing partnerships and recruiting dyads for a prostate cancer informed decision making program: lessons learned from a community-academic-clinical team. J. Cancer Educ. 27(2), 243–249 (2012)CrossRef
27.
Hackenberg, G., McCall, R., Broll, W.: Lightweight palm and finger tracking for real-time 3D gesture control. In: Virtual Reality Conference (VR). IEEE (2011)
28.
Hebert, J.R., et al.: Mapping cancer mortality-to-incidence ratios to illustrate racial and gender disparities in a high-risk population. Cancer 115(11), 2539–2552 (2009)CrossRef
29.
Holt, C.L., et al.: A comparison of a spiritually based and non-spiritually based educational intervention for informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among church-attending African-American men. Urol. Nurs. 29(4), 249–258 (2009)
30.
Holt, C.L., Wynn, T.A., Darrington, J.: Religious involvement and prostate cancer screening behaviors among southeastern African American men. Am. J. Mens Health 3(3), 214–223 (2009)CrossRef
31.
Corbie-Smith, G., et al.: Partnerships in health disparities research and the roles of pastors of black churches: potential conflict, synergy, and expectations. J. Natl Med. Assoc. 102(9), 823–831 (2010)
32.
Allicock, M., et al.: Promoting fruit and vegetable consumption among members of black churches, Michigan and North Carolina, 2008–2010. Prev. Chronic Dis. 10, E33 (2013)
33.
Wilcox, S., et al.: The Faith, Activity, and Nutrition (FAN) Program: design of a participatory research intervention to increase physical activity and improve dietary habits in African American churches. Contemp. Clin. Trials 31(4), 323–335 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRef
34.
Kaplan, S.A., et al.: Stirring up the mud: using a community-based participatory approach to address health disparities through a faith-based initiative. J. Health Care Poor Underserved 20(4), 1111–1123 (2009)CrossRef
35.
Drake, B.F., et al.: A church-based intervention to promote informed decision-making for prostate cancer screening among African-American men. J. Natl Med. Assoc. 102(3), 164–171 (2010)MathSciNet
36.
Holt, C.L., et al.: Development of a spiritually based educational intervention to increase informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among church-attending African American men. J. Health Commun. 14(6), 590–604 (2009)CrossRef
37.
Holt, C.L., et al.: A comparison of a spiritually based and non-spiritually based educational intervention for informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among church-attending African-American men. Urol. Nurs. 29(4), 249–258 (2009)
38.
Ford, J.G., et al.: Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review. Cancer 112(2), 228–242 (2008)CrossRef
39.
Owens, O.L., et al.: African American men’s and women’s perceptions of clinical trials research: focusing on prostate cancer among a high-risk population in the South. J. Health Care Poor Underserved 24(4), 1784–1800 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRef
40.
Venkatesh, V., et al.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)
41.
Owens, O.L., et al.: Digital solutions for informed decision making: an academic-community partnership for the development of a prostate cancer decision aid for African-American men. Am. J. Men’s Health (2014). (in Press)
42.
Keeker, K.: Improving Website Usability and Appeal. Microsoft Corporation, Redmond (2007)
43.
Nielsen, J., Mack, R.L.: Usability Inspection Methods. Wiley, Hoboken (1994)CrossRef
44.
Owens, O.l., et al.: An iterative process for developing and evaluating a computer-based prostate cancer decision aid for African-American men. Health Promot. Pract. 2014. (in Press)
Metadaten
Titel
Principles for Developing Digital Health Interventions for Prostate Cancer: A Community-Based Design Approach with African American Men
verfasst von
Otis L. Owens
Copyright-Jahr
2015
Buch
Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Design for Everyday Life

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20912-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-20913-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2015

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20913-5_13

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise