Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
Drawing upon recent literature, which employs social networks in the field of project management, the aim of this research is to empirically investigate the importance of projects’ social capital for knowledge development in R&D projects. Primary data were collected via sociometric questionnaires on a population of 53 biotech R&D projects located at one of the most important science parks in Sweden. The analysis focused on the distinctive structural configuration of projects’ social capital, among which the roles of network diversity were emphasized. Our results suggest that certain structural configurations of project social capital maximize the level of effectiveness in knowledge development. More specifically, we found an inverted U-shaped relationship between projects’ network diversity and their level of knowledge development, demonstrating that intermediate levels of diversity maximize project knowledge development. Implications for innovation managers and policymakers are discussed.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Arthur, M. B., DeFillippi, R. J., & Jones, C. (2001). Project-based learning as the interplay of career and company non-financial capital. Management Learning, 32, 99–117. CrossRef
Audretsch, D., & Feldman, M. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86, 630–640.
Bakker, R. M., DeFillippi, R. J., Schwab, A., & Sydow, J. (2016). Temporary organizing: Promises, processes, problems. Organization Studies, 12, 1703–1720. CrossRef
Bhidè, A. (2000). The origin and evolution of new businesses. New York: Oxford University Press.
Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E. G., Causino, N., & Louis, K. S. (1996). Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. New England Journal of Medicine, 335, 1734–1739. CrossRef
Bresnen, M., Goussevskaia, A., & Swan, J. (2004). Embedding new management knowledge in project-based organizations. Organization Studies, 25, 1535–1555. CrossRef
Burt, R. S. (1983). Range. In R. S. Burt & M. J. Minor (Eds.), Applied network analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cacciatori, E. (2008). Memory objects in project environments: Storing, retrieving and adapting learning in project-based firms. Research Policy, 37, 1591–1601. CrossRef
Cattani, G., Ferriani, S., Frederiksen, L., & Taube, F. (2011). Project-based organizing and strategic management. Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 28.
Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152. CrossRef
Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. (2007). Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations. Research Policy, 36, 1620–1634. CrossRef
Cusumano, M. A., & Nobeoka, K. (1998). Thinking beyond lean: How multi-project management is transforming product development at Toyota and other companies. New York: Free Press.
Czarnitzki, D., Glänzel, W., & Hussinger, K. (2009). Heterogeneity of patenting activity and its implications for scientific research. Research Policy, 38, 26–34. CrossRef
Davies, A., & Brady, T. (2000). Organizational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: Towards repeatable solutions. Research Policy, 29, 931–953. CrossRef
Davies, A., Brady, T., Prencipe, A. & Hobday, M. (2011). Innovation in complex products and systems: Implications for project-based organizing. In G. Cattani, S. Ferriani, L. Frederiksen, & F. Taube, Project-based organizing and strategic management; Advances in strategic management, Vol. 28.
Di Vincenzo, F., & Mascia, D. (2012). Social capital in project-based organizations: Its role, structure and impact on project performance. International Journal of Project Management, 30, 5–14. CrossRef
Ebers, M., & Powell, W. (2007). Biotechnology: Its origins, organization, and outputs. Research Policy, 36, 433–437. CrossRef
Felsenstein, D. (1994). University-related science parks—“seedbeds” or enclaves of innovation? Technovation, 14, 93–110. CrossRef
Grabher, G. (2002a). The project ecology of advertising: Tasks, talents and teams. Regional Studies, 36, 245–262. CrossRef
Grabher, G. (2002b). Cool projects, boring institutions: Temporary collaboration in social context. Regional Studies, 36, 205–214. CrossRef
Grabher, G. (2004). Temporary architectures of learning: Knowledge governance in project ecologies. Organization Studies, 25, 1491–1514. CrossRef
Guimerà, R., Uzzi, B., Spiro, J., & Nunes Amaral, L. A. (2005). Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science, 308, 697–702. CrossRef
Hagedoorn, J., & Cloodt, M. (2003). Measuring innovative performance: Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy, 32, 1365–1379. CrossRef
Hobday, M. (2000). The project-based organization: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems. Research Policy, 29, 190–241.
Keegan, A., & Turner, J. R. (2002). The management of innovation in project based firms. Long Range Planning, 35, 367–388. CrossRef
Keller, R. T., & Holland, W. E. (1982). The measurement of performance among R&D professional employees: A longitudinal analysis. IEEE Transactions of Engineering Management, 29, 54–58. CrossRef
Lawrence, P., & Lorsch, J. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 1–30. CrossRef
Lichtenthaler, U. (2010). Outward knowledge transfer: The impact of project-based organization on performance. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19, 1705–1739. CrossRef
Liebeskind, J. P., Oliver, A. L., Zucker, L., & Brewer, M. (1996). Social networks, learning, and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organization Science, 7, 428–433. CrossRef
Linton, J. D., Walsh, S. T., & Morabito, J. (2002). Analysis, ranking and selection of R&D projects in a portfolio. R&D Management, 32, 139–149. CrossRef
Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (3rd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
Manning, S., & Sydow, J. (2011). Projects, paths, and practices: Sustaining and leveraging project-based relationships, Industrial and Corporate Change, 20, 1369–1402.
Maurer, I., & Ebers, M. (2006). Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: Lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 262–292. CrossRef
McCauley, C. (1989). The nature of social influence in groupthink: Compliance and internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 250–260. CrossRef
McFayden, M. A., & Cannella, A. A. (2004). Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 735–746. CrossRef
McKelvey, M., Alm, H., & Riccaboni, M. (2003). Does co-location matter for formal knowledge collaboration in the Swedish biotechnology–Pharmaceutical sector? Research Policy, 32, 483–501. CrossRef
Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 2, 402–433.
Noteboom, B., Van Haverrbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V., & van den Oord, A. (2007). Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 36, 1016–1034. CrossRef
Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertius iugens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 100–130. CrossRef
Oh, H., Chung, M.-H., & Labianca, G. (2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 860–875. CrossRef
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1, 1–28. CrossRef
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Inter-organizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116–145. CrossRef
Prado, P., & Sapsed, J. (2016). The anthropophagic organization: How innovations transcend the temporary in a project-based organization. Organization Studies, 37, 1793–1818. CrossRef
Prencipe, A., & Tell, F. (2001). Inter-project learning: Processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms. Research Policy, 30, 1373–1394. CrossRef
Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. W. (2001). Networks, diversity and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science, 12, 502–517. CrossRef
Semadeni, M., & Anderson, B. (2010). The follower’s dilemma: Innovation and imitation in the professional service industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1175–1193. CrossRef
Stjerne, I. S., & Svejenova, S. (2016). Connecting temporary and permanent organizing: Tensions and boundary work in sequential film projects. Organization Studies, 37, 1771–1792. CrossRef
Storey, D. J., & Tether, B. S. (1998). New technology-based firms in the European Union: An introduction. Research Policy, 26, 933–946. CrossRef
Sydow, J., & Staber, U. (2002). The institutional embeddedness of project networks: The case of content production in German television. Regional Studies, 36, 215–227. CrossRef
Sydow, J., Lindkvist, L., & DeFillippi, R. (2004). Project-based organizations, embeddedness and repositories of knowledge: Editorial. Organization Studies, 25, 1475–1489. CrossRef
van Knippenberg, D., & Mell, J. N. (2016). Past, present, and potential future of team diversity research: From compositional diversity to emergent diversity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 135–145. CrossRef
Verona, G., & Ravasi, D. (1999). Core competence per sviluppare nuovi prodotti con continuità. Economia & Management, 3, 99–110.
Whitley, R. (2004). Competition and pluralism in the public sciences: The impact of institutional frameworks on the organisation of academic science. Research Policy, 32, 1015–1029. CrossRef
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27, 185–203.
Zeller, C. (2002). Project teams as means of restructuring research and development in the pharmaceutical industry. Regional Studies, 36, 275–284. CrossRef
- Project Social Capital in Biotech R&D: Its Configuration and Impact on Knowledge Development
Fausto di Vincenzo
- Chapter 7
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, digitale Transformation/© Maksym Yemelyanov | Fotolia