Skip to main content

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Public Accountability ICT Support: A Detailed Account of Public Accountability Process and Tasks

verfasst von : Rui Pedro Lourenço, Suzanne Piotrowski, Alex Ingrams

Erschienen in: Electronic Government

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A key objective of open government programs is to promote public accountability by using Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) to release data on the internal working of public agencies. However, it is not clear how actual accountability (such as sanctions or rewards) may be achieved from the data disclosed. Nor it is clear how ICT in general should support it. To better understand how ICT can support open data initiated accountability processes in achieving their goal, this paper considers the three phases (information, discussion, and consequences) usually used to describe such processes. Defining ICT support for these major phases is a difficult effort, since each phase encompasses different tasks and support requirements. This paper aims to address this problem by providing a detailed account of the tasks associated with the whole public accountability process. This may be used by those responsible for open government programs to design and deploy comprehensive ICT support platforms using a task-technology fit perspective.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
“All information accessed through Data.gov is subject to the Information Quality Act (P.L. 106–554). … each agency has confirmed that the data being provided through this site meets the agency’s Information Quality Guidelines.” From Data.​gov (https://​www.​data.​gov/​data-policy) last visited in 30/10/2014.
 
2
See [38] for a list of online transparency assessment efforts based on individual website analysis.
 
3
See, for instance, the New Zealand data portal (https://​data.​govt.​nz/​latest-data-requests/​).
 
4
“How do I make a FOIA Request?” (http://​www.​foia.​gov/​how-to.​html).
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Linders, D., Wilson, S.C.: “What is open government? one year after the directive. In: 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (Dg.o 2011), pp. 262–271 (2011) Linders, D., Wilson, S.C.: “What is open government? one year after the directive. In: 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (Dg.o 2011), pp. 262–271 (2011)
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., Im, T.: The effect of transparency on trust in government: a cross-national comparative experiment. Public Adm. Rev. 73(4), 575–586 (2013)CrossRef Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., Im, T.: The effect of transparency on trust in government: a cross-national comparative experiment. Public Adm. Rev. 73(4), 575–586 (2013)CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Meijer, A.: Understanding the complex dynamics of transparency. Public Adm. Rev. 73(3), 429–439 (2013)CrossRef Meijer, A.: Understanding the complex dynamics of transparency. Public Adm. Rev. 73(3), 429–439 (2013)CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu, H., Robinson, D.: The new ambiguity of ‘Open government’. UCLA Law Rev. Discl. 59, 178–208 (2012) Yu, H., Robinson, D.: The new ambiguity of ‘Open government’. UCLA Law Rev. Discl. 59, 178–208 (2012)
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bovens, M.: Analysing and assessing accountability: a conceptual framework. Eur. Law J. 13(4), 447–468 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRef Bovens, M.: Analysing and assessing accountability: a conceptual framework. Eur. Law J. 13(4), 447–468 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Zigurs, I., Buckland, B.K.: A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness. MIS Q. 22(3), 313–334 (1998)CrossRef Zigurs, I., Buckland, B.K.: A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness. MIS Q. 22(3), 313–334 (1998)CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Robinson, D., Yu, H., Zeller, W.P., Felten, E.W.: Government data and the invisible hand. Yale J. Law Technol. 11, 160 (2009) Robinson, D., Yu, H., Zeller, W.P., Felten, E.W.: Government data and the invisible hand. Yale J. Law Technol. 11, 160 (2009)
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mulgan, R.: ‘Accountability’: an ever-expanding concept? Public Adm. 78(3), 555–573 (2000)CrossRef Mulgan, R.: ‘Accountability’: an ever-expanding concept? Public Adm. 78(3), 555–573 (2000)CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Koppell, J.G.S.: Pathologies of Accountability: ICANN and the Challenge of ‘multiple accountabilities disorder’. Public Adm. Rev. 65(1), 94–108 (2005)CrossRef Koppell, J.G.S.: Pathologies of Accountability: ICANN and the Challenge of ‘multiple accountabilities disorder’. Public Adm. Rev. 65(1), 94–108 (2005)CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Biela, J., Papadopoulos, Y.: Strategies for assessing and measuring agency accountability. In: Conference Paper Presented at the 32nd European Group for Public Administration (EGPA) Annual Conference, Toulouse, France, Sept 2010 Biela, J., Papadopoulos, Y.: Strategies for assessing and measuring agency accountability. In: Conference Paper Presented at the 32nd European Group for Public Administration (EGPA) Annual Conference, Toulouse, France, Sept 2010
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Brandsma, G.J., Schillemans, T.: The accountability cube: measuring accountability. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 23(4), 953–975 (2013)CrossRef Brandsma, G.J., Schillemans, T.: The accountability cube: measuring accountability. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 23(4), 953–975 (2013)CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sinclair, A.: The chameleon of accountability: forms and discourses. Acc. Organ. Soc. 20(2/3), 219–237 (1995)CrossRef Sinclair, A.: The chameleon of accountability: forms and discourses. Acc. Organ. Soc. 20(2/3), 219–237 (1995)CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Schillemans, T.: Accountability in the shadow of hierarchy: the horizontal accountability of agencies. Public Organ. Rev. 8(2), 175–194 (2008)CrossRef Schillemans, T.: Accountability in the shadow of hierarchy: the horizontal accountability of agencies. Public Organ. Rev. 8(2), 175–194 (2008)CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Behn, R.D.: Rethinking Democratic Accountability. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C. (2001) Behn, R.D.: Rethinking Democratic Accountability. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C. (2001)
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Dubnick, M.J., Frederickson, H.G.: Accountable agents: federal performance measurement and third-party government. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 20(suppl 1), i143–i159 (2010)CrossRef Dubnick, M.J., Frederickson, H.G.: Accountable agents: federal performance measurement and third-party government. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 20(suppl 1), i143–i159 (2010)CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Steccolini, I.: Is the annual report an accountability medium? an empirical investigation into italian local governments. Financ. Account. Manage. 20(3), 327–350 (2004)CrossRef Steccolini, I.: Is the annual report an accountability medium? an empirical investigation into italian local governments. Financ. Account. Manage. 20(3), 327–350 (2004)CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Schillemans, T., Van Twist, M., Vanhommerig, I.: Innovations in accountability. Public Perform. Manag. Rev. 36(3), 407–435 (2013)CrossRef Schillemans, T., Van Twist, M., Vanhommerig, I.: Innovations in accountability. Public Perform. Manag. Rev. 36(3), 407–435 (2013)CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Fox, J.: The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Dev. Pract. 17(4–5), 663–671 (2007)CrossRef Fox, J.: The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Dev. Pract. 17(4–5), 663–671 (2007)CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bovens, M., Curtin, D., Hart, P.T.: Towards a more accountable EU: retrospective and roadmap. Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance (2010) Bovens, M., Curtin, D., Hart, P.T.: Towards a more accountable EU: retrospective and roadmap. Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance (2010)
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott, C.: Accountability in the regulatory state. J. Law Soc. 27(1), 38–60 (2000)CrossRef Scott, C.: Accountability in the regulatory state. J. Law Soc. 27(1), 38–60 (2000)CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Busuioc, M.: Accountability, control and independence: the case of european agencies. Eur. Law J. 15(5), 599–615 (2009)CrossRef Busuioc, M.: Accountability, control and independence: the case of european agencies. Eur. Law J. 15(5), 599–615 (2009)CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rutherford, B.A.: Developing a conceptual framework for central government financial reporting: intermediate users and indirect control. Financ. Account. Manage. 8(4), 265–280 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRef Rutherford, B.A.: Developing a conceptual framework for central government financial reporting: intermediate users and indirect control. Financ. Account. Manage. 8(4), 265–280 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald, D.: Fiscal transparency: concepts, measurement and UK practice. Public Adm. 81(4), 723–759 (2003)CrossRef Heald, D.: Fiscal transparency: concepts, measurement and UK practice. Public Adm. 81(4), 723–759 (2003)CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Carter, B.: Transparency and accountability. GSDRC (2014) Carter, B.: Transparency and accountability. GSDRC (2014)
25.
Zurück zum Zitat van Zyl, A.: How civil society organizations close the gap between transparency and accountability. Governance 27(2), 347–356 (2014)CrossRef van Zyl, A.: How civil society organizations close the gap between transparency and accountability. Governance 27(2), 347–356 (2014)CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Peixoto, T.: The uncertain relationship between open data and accountability: a response to Yu and Robinson’s the new ambiguity of ‘open government’. UCLA Law Rev. Discl. 60, 200–213 (2013) Peixoto, T.: The uncertain relationship between open data and accountability: a response to Yu and Robinson’s the new ambiguity of ‘open government’. UCLA Law Rev. Discl. 60, 200–213 (2013)
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Elster, J., Przeworski, A.: Introduction. In: Elster, J. (ed.) Deliberative Democracy, pp. 1–18. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)CrossRef Elster, J., Przeworski, A.: Introduction. In: Elster, J. (ed.) Deliberative Democracy, pp. 1–18. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Briggs, R., Kolfschoten, G., Gert-Jan, V., Douglas, D.: Defining key concepts for collaboration engineering. In: Twelfth Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2006), p. 17 (2006) Briggs, R., Kolfschoten, G., Gert-Jan, V., Douglas, D.: Defining key concepts for collaboration engineering. In: Twelfth Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2006), p. 17 (2006)
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalampokis, E., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K.: A classification scheme for open government data: towards linking decentralized data. Int. J. Web Eng. Technol. 6(3), 266–285 (2011)CrossRef Kalampokis, E., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K.: A classification scheme for open government data: towards linking decentralized data. Int. J. Web Eng. Technol. 6(3), 266–285 (2011)CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked data – the story so far. Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst. 5(3), 1–22 (2009)CrossRef Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked data – the story so far. Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst. 5(3), 1–22 (2009)CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Pedersen, J., Kocsis, D., Tripathi, A., Tarrell, A., Weerakoon, A., Tahmasbi, N., Jie, X., Wei, D., Onook, O., de Vreede, G.J.: Conceptual foundations of crowdsourcing: a review of IS research. In: 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 579–588 (2013) Pedersen, J., Kocsis, D., Tripathi, A., Tarrell, A., Weerakoon, A., Tahmasbi, N., Jie, X., Wei, D., Onook, O., de Vreede, G.J.: Conceptual foundations of crowdsourcing: a review of IS research. In: 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 579–588 (2013)
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Lourenço, R.P.: Open government portals assessment: a transparency for accountability perspective. In: Wimmer, M.A., Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J. (eds.) EGOV 2013. LNCS, vol. 8074, pp. 62–74. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRef Lourenço, R.P.: Open government portals assessment: a transparency for accountability perspective. In: Wimmer, M.A., Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J. (eds.) EGOV 2013. LNCS, vol. 8074, pp. 62–74. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsinchun, C., Chiang, R.H.L., Storey, V.C.: Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS Q. 36(4), 1165–1188 (2012) Hsinchun, C., Chiang, R.H.L., Storey, V.C.: Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS Q. 36(4), 1165–1188 (2012)
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Orwig, R., Chen, H., Vogel, D., Nunamaker, J.F.: A multi-agent view of strategic planning using group support systems and artificial intelligence. Gr. Decis. Negot. 6(1), 37–59 (1997)CrossRef Orwig, R., Chen, H., Vogel, D., Nunamaker, J.F.: A multi-agent view of strategic planning using group support systems and artificial intelligence. Gr. Decis. Negot. 6(1), 37–59 (1997)CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Lourenço, R.P.: A bliki model to support political discourse formation. In: 2008 International Symposium on Wikis (WikiSym 2008) (2008) Lourenço, R.P.: A bliki model to support political discourse formation. In: 2008 International Symposium on Wikis (WikiSym 2008) (2008)
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Bostrom, R.P., Anson, R., Clawson, V.K.: Group facilitation and group support systems. In: Jessup, L.M., Valacich, J.S. (eds.) Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, vol. 8, pp. 146–168. Macmillan, New York (1993) Bostrom, R.P., Anson, R., Clawson, V.K.: Group facilitation and group support systems. In: Jessup, L.M., Valacich, J.S. (eds.) Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, vol. 8, pp. 146–168. Macmillan, New York (1993)
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Seeber, I., Maier, R., Weber, B.: Opening the black box of team processes and emergent states: a literature review and agenda for research on team facilitation. In: 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 473–482 (2014) Seeber, I., Maier, R., Weber, B.: Opening the black box of team processes and emergent states: a literature review and agenda for research on team facilitation. In: 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 473–482 (2014)
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Lourenço, R.P.: Data disclosure and transparency for accountability: A strategy and case analysis. Inf. Polity 18(3), 243–260 (2013) Lourenço, R.P.: Data disclosure and transparency for accountability: A strategy and case analysis. Inf. Polity 18(3), 243–260 (2013)
Metadaten
Titel
Public Accountability ICT Support: A Detailed Account of Public Accountability Process and Tasks
verfasst von
Rui Pedro Lourenço
Suzanne Piotrowski
Alex Ingrams
Copyright-Jahr
2015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22479-4_8