Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. Randomized Response Techniques

verfasst von : Raosaheb Latpate, Jayant Kshirsagar, Vinod Kumar Gupta, Girish Chandra

Erschienen in: Advanced Sampling Methods

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Generally, in surveys the randomization is done for the selection of the sample from a population for the estimation of some population parameters like population mean or total or proportion, ratios like birth or death rate, population correlation coefficient or regression coefficient, etc. The sampled units obtained through the randomization are approached, interviewed, and the required information is obtained. It is assumed that the reporting is truthful, without bias. The estimate of the population parameter of interest is obtained along with the sampling variance.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Probability Proportional to Size Sampling
Nächstes Kapitel Resampling Techniques
Literatur
Warner, S.L.: Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 60(309), 63–69 (1965)MATHCrossRef
Greenberg, B.G., Abul-Ela, A., Simmons, W., Horvitz, D.G.: The unrelated question randomized response model: theoretical framework. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 64(326), 520–539 (1969)MathSciNetCrossRef
Horvitz, D.G., Shah, B.V., Simmmons, W.R.: The unrelated question randomized response model. Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section American Statistical Association, pp. 65–72 (1967)
Moors, J.J.A.: Optimization of the unrelated question randomized response model. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 66, 627–629 (1971)CrossRef
Raghavarao, D.: On an estimation problem in Warner’s randomized response technique. Biometrics 34, 87–90 (1978)CrossRef
Mangat, N.S.: An improved randomized response strategy. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 56, 93–95 (1994)MathSciNetMATH
Haung, K.: A survey technique for estimating the proportion and sensitivity in a dichotomous finite population. Stat. Neerl. 58, 75–82 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRef
Kim, J., Warde, W.D.: A mixed randomized response model. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 110, 1–11 (2004)
Blair, G., Imai, K., Zhou, Y.Y.: Design and analysis of the randomized response technique. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 110(511), 1304–1319 (2015)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Boruch, R.F.: Assuring confidentiality of responses in social research: a note on strategies. Am. Sociol. 6, 308–311 (1971)
Reinmuth, J.E., Geurts, M.D.: The collection of sensitive information using a two-stage, randomized response model. J. Mark. Res. 12, 402–407 (1975)CrossRef
Locander, W., Sudman, S., Bradburn, N.: An investigation of interview method, threat and response distortion. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 71, 269–275 (1976)CrossRef
Lamb, C.W., Stem, D.E.: An empirical validation of the randomized response technique. J. Mark. Res. 15, 616–621 (1978)CrossRef
Tezcan, S., Omran, A.R.: Prevalence and reporting of induced abortion in Turkey: two survey techniques. Stud. Fam. Plan. 12, 262–271 (1981)CrossRef
Tracy, P.E., Fox, J.A.: The validity of randomized response for sensitive measurements. Am. Sociol. Rev. 46, 187–200 (1981)CrossRef
Edgell, S.E., Himmelfarb, S., Duchan, K.L.: Validity of forced responses in a randomized response model. Sociol. Methods Res. 11, 89–100 (1982)CrossRef
Chaudhuri, A., Mukerjee, R.: Randomized Response: Theory and Techniques. Marcel Dekker, New York (1988)MATH
Lara, D., García, S.G., Ellertson, C., Camlin, C., Suarez, J.: The measure of induced abortion levels in Mexico using random response technique. Sociol. Methods Res. 35, 279–301 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRef
Cruyff, M.J., van den Hout, A., van der Heijden, P.G., Bockenholt, U.: Log-linear randomized-response models taking self-protective response behavior into account. Sociol. Methods Res. 36, 266–282 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRef
De Jong, M.G., Pieters, R., Fox, J.P.: Reducing social desirability bias through item randomized response: an application to measure under reported desires. J. Mark. Res. 47, 14–27 (2010)CrossRef
Rao, T.J.: Some questions on randomized response technique. Stat. Appl. 15(1–2), 93–99 (2017)
Van der Heijden, P.G., van Gils, G.: Some logistic regression models for randomized response data. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Statistical Modeling, pp. 15–19 (1996)
Duffy, J.C., Waterton, J.J.: Randomized response vs. direct questioning: estimating the prevalence of alcohol related problems in a field survey. Aust. J. Stat. 30(1), 1–14 (1988)
Stubbe, J.H., Chorus, A.M., Frank, L.E., Hon, O., Heijden, P.G.: Prevalence of use of performance enhancing drugs by fitness centre members. Drug Test. Anal. 6, 434–438 (2014)
Cobo, B., Rueda, M.M., López-Torrecillas, F.: Application of randomized response techniques for investigation cannabis use by Spanish university students. Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. 26, e1517 (2016)CrossRef
Schröter, H., Barkley, J., Studzinski, B., Dietz, P., Ulrich, R., Striegel, H., Simon, P.A.: Comparison of the cheater detection and the unrelated question models: a randomized response survey on physical and cognitive doping in recreational triathletes. PLoS One 11, e0155765 (2016)CrossRef
Kirtadze, I., Otiashvili, D., Tabatadze, M., Vardanashvili, I., Sturua, L., Zabransky, T., Anthony, J.C.: Republic of Georgia estimates for prevalence of drug use: randomized response techniques suggest under-estimation. Drug Alcohol Depend. 187, 300–304 (2018)CrossRef
Wimbush, J.C., Dalton, D.R.: Base rate for employee theft: convergence of multiple methods. J. Appl. Psychol. 82, 756–763 (1997)CrossRef
Donovan, J.J., Dwight, S.A., Hurtz, G.M.: An Assessment of the prevalence, severity, and verifiability of entry-level applicant faking using the randomized response technique. Hum. Perform. 16, 81–106 (2003)CrossRef
Gingerich, D.W.: Understanding off-the-books politics: conducting inference on the determinants of sensitive behavior with randomized response surveys. Polit. Anal. 18, 349–380 (2010)CrossRef
Madigan, F.C., Abernathy, J.R., Herrin, A.N., Tan, C.: Purposive concealment of death in household surveys in Misamis Oriental Province. Popul. Stud. 30, 295–303 (1976)CrossRef
St John, F.A., Keane, A.M., Edwards-Jones, G., Jones, L., Yarnell, R.W., Jones, J.P.: Identifying indicators of illegal behaviour: carnivore killing in human-managed landscapes. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 279, 804–812 (2012)CrossRef
Chaloupka, M.Y.: Application of the randomized response technique to marine park management: an assessment of permit compliance. Environ. Manag. 9, 393–398 (1985)CrossRef
Krumpal, I.: Estimating the prevalence of xenophobia and anti-semitism in Germany: a comparison of randomized response and direct questioning. Soc. Sci. Res. 41, 1387–1403 (2012)CrossRef
Chen, X., Du, Q., Jin, Z., Xu, T., Shi, J., Gao, G.: The randomized response technique application in the survey of homosexual commercial sex among men in Beijing. Iran. J. Public Health 43, 416–422 (2014)
Rosenfeld, B., Imai, K., Shapiro, J.N.: An empirical validation study of popular survey methodologies for sensitive questions. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 60(3), 783–802 (2016)CrossRef
Adeleke, I.A., Esan, E.O., Okafor, R.O.: Horvitz-Thompson theorem as a tool for generalization of probability sampling techniques. Ghana J. Dev. Stud. 5(1), 80–94 (2008)CrossRef
Fidler, D.S., Kleinknecht, R.E.: Randomized response versus direct questioning: two data-collection methods for sensitive information. Psychol. Bull. 84, 1045–1049 (1977)CrossRef
Van der Heijden, P.G., van Gils, G., Bouts, J., Hox, J.J.: A comparison of randomized response, computer-assisted self-interview and face-to-face direct questioning eliciting sensitive information in the context of welfare and unemployment benefit. Sociol. Methods Res. 28, 505–537 (2000)CrossRef
Chang, H., Wang, C., Haung, K.: On estimating the proportion of a qualitative sensitive character using randomized response sampling. Qual. Quant. 38, 675–680 (2004)CrossRef
Chi, I.C., Chow, L., Rider, R.V.: The randomized response technique as used in the taiwan outcome of pregnancy study. Stud. Fam. Plan. 3, 265–269 (1972)CrossRef
Volicer, B.J., Volicer, L.: Randomized response technique for estimating alcohol use and noncompliance in hypertensives. J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs 43, 739–750 (1982)CrossRef
Fox, J.A., Tracy, P.E.: Randomized Response: A Method for Sensitive Surveys. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA (1986)CrossRef
Elffers, H., Van Der Heijden, P., Hezemans, M.: Explaining regulatory non-compliance: a survey study of rule transgression for two Dutch instrumental laws, applying the randomized response method. J. Quant. Criminol. 19, 409–439 (2003)CrossRef
Umesh, U., Peterson, R.A.: A critical evaluation of the randomized response method: applications, validation, and research agenda. Sociol. Methods Res. 20, 104–138 (1991)CrossRef
Greenberg, B.G., Kuebler Jr., R.R., Abernathy, J.R., Horvitz, D.G.: Application of the randomized response technique in obtaining quantitative data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 66, 243–250 (1971)CrossRef
Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.J.: An Introduction to the Bootstrap. CRC Press, New York (1994)MATHCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Randomized Response Techniques
verfasst von
Raosaheb Latpate
Jayant Kshirsagar
Vinod Kumar Gupta
Girish Chandra
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Advanced Sampling Methods

Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0621-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-16-0622-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0622-9_8

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise