Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Reconfiguring Regimes of Capitalist Integration: Hungary Since the 1970s

verfasst von : Agnes Gagyi, Tamás Gerőcs

Erschienen in: The Political Economy of Eastern Europe 30 years into the ‘Transition’

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter looks at how reconfiguring Hungarian regimes are linked to changing modes of world-economic integration since the world-economic crisis of the 1970’s. It traces the process through which a “bridge” position of the Hungarian economy, relying on Western technological imports counterbalanced by the export of cheap Soviet oil and raw materials got dismantled in the context of the 1970’s crisis, and how resulting reorganizations prepared the ground for the privatizations and Western FDI-based model of the 1990’s. Then, the chapter follows how the end of privatization is succeeded by a debt-led integration model in the 2000’s, and replaced after the crisis of 2008 by a reconfiguration of internal–external structures of world economic integration defined by a politics of the present conservative government that combines a dependent integration subservient to the needs of foreign capital with a broadening of state-backed oligarchic national capital in non-tradable sectors. The chapter points out how strategies of external integration are intertwined with changing global geopolitical relations, manifesting in the increasing role of Russian and Chinese finance locally.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Ukraine and the (Dis)integrating “Empire of Capital”
Nächstes Kapitel Czechia 30 years On: An Imperfect Oligarchy Without Emancipatory Alternative
Fußnoten
1
Trade with the global South remained miniscule compared to Western trade and, because in some instances it did not deliver expected results, it had been deprioritized by the 1980s.
 
2
The third group, the energy lobby, played a more important role in the 1980s.
 
3
On top of that between 1979 and 1981 US Federal Reserve raised the Fed-interest rate which caused turbulence in international money markets. The crisis culminated in a series of sovereign defaults all over the global semi-periphery from Latin America, Africa, Eeastern Europe, and southern Asia in the 1980s and early 1990s.
 
4
The background of these national capitalist classes traces back to state socialist reform-technocrats, corporate managers, and petit entrepreneurs who could partially turn privatization to their benefit thanks to political connections they had nurtured in the late socialist reform period.
 
5
See the parallels on “neo-middle classes” with India and Turkey in Kumral and Karatasli (2020), and with the global South in Bello (2019).
 
6
Some of these industrial policies were co-drafted by Hungarian government officials from the Ministry of Innovation and Technology, and agents of German lobby organizations, for example the German-Hungarian Chamber of Industry and Commerce.
 
7
The official corporate flat-tax rate is 9%, but the effective tax which companies paid in 2018 after specific allowances was only 7.2%, while the 30 largest multinationals—dominated by German manufacturers—were calculated to have paid an effective rate of 3.,6%. The Hungarian personal income tax system is similarly flat, with a universal rate of 15%. In contrast to the low corporate and income tax rates, Hungary introduced the highest value-added tax that was possible within the tax-harmonization framework of the EU, with a rate of 27%.
 
8
The construction industry is probably one of the most traditional spheres where semi-peripheral states provide protected circuits for domestic capital, sometimes in collaboration with finance as well (cf. Arrighi, 1990; Gereffi & Evans, 1981; Radice, 2009; Wallerstein, 1976).
 
9
The former Comecon Development Bank, established in 1970; members are Bulgaria, Cuba, Czechia, Hungary, Mongolia, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, and Vietnam.
 
10
Since 2015, three out of the four largest Chinese banks by total assets, China Construction Bank, Bank of China, and Agricultural Bank of China, already use Budapest for regional offshore RMB transactions.
 
Literatur
Arrighi, G. (1990). The developmentalist illusion: A reconceptualization of the semiperiphery. In G. W. Martin (Ed.), Semiperipheral states in the world-economy (pp. 11–42). Greenwood Press.
Arrighi, G., & Silver, B. (1999). Chaos and governance in the modern world system. University of Minnesota Press.
Ban, C. (2012). Sovereign debt, austerity, and regime change: The case of Nicolae Ceausescu’s Romania. East European Politics and Societies, 26(4), 743–776.CrossRef
Barna, E., Csányi, G., & Éber M. Á. (Eds.). (2019). 2008–2018: Válság és hegemónia Magyarországon (2008–2018: Crisis and hegemony in Hungary). Fordulat 2019/2, special issue.
Becker, J. (2016). Europe’s other periphery. New Left Review, 57(99), 39–64.
Becker, J., Jäger, J., & Weissenbacher, R. (2015). Uneven and dependent development in Europe: The crisis and its implications. In J. Jäger & E. Springler (Eds.), Asymmetric crisis in Europe and possible futures: Critical political economy and post-Keynesian perspectives (pp. 81–93). Routledge.
Bello, W. F. (2019). Counterrevolution: The global rise of the far right. Fernwood Publishing.CrossRef
Berend, T. I. (1996). Central and Eastern Europe, 1944–1993: Detour from the periphery to the periphery. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Bernaciak, M., & Šćepanović, V. (2010). Challenges of upgrading: The dynamics of East Central Europe’s integration into the European automotive production networks. Industrielle Beziehungen, 17(2), 123–146.
Bettelheim, Ch., & Dobb, M. (1965). Socialism and the market. Monthly Review, 17(4), 30–39.CrossRef
Bockman, J. K. (2000). Economists and social change: Science, professional power, and politics in Hungary, 1945–1995. San Diego: University of California.
Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2012). Capitalist diversity on Europe’s periphery. Cornell University Press.
Böröcz, J. (1999). From comprador state to auctioneer state: Property change, realignment and peripheralization in post-state-socialist Central and Eastern Europe. In A. D. Smith, J. D. Solinger, & C. S. Topik (Eds.), States and Sovereignty in the Global Economy (pp. 193–209). Routledge.
Böröcz, J. (2012). Hungary in the European union: “Catching up.” Forever. Economic & Political Weekly, 47(23), 22–25.
Burawoy, M., & Lukács, J. (1994). The radiant past. Ideology and reality in hungary’s road to capitalism. University of Chicago Press.
Brenner, R. (2006). The economics of global turbulence: The advanced capitalist economies from long boom to long downturn, 1945–2005. Verso.
Cardoso, F. H. (1972). Dependency and development in Latin America. New Left Review, 1(74), 83–95.
Chase-Dunn, C. (1980). Socialist state in the capitalist world economy. Social Problems, 27(5), 505–525.CrossRef
Cliff, T. (1974). State capitalism in Russia. London: Pluto.
Czirfusz, M., Meszmann, T. T., Kovai, C., Ivanics, Z. S. (2019). A magyarországi munkásság a hosszú lejtmenetben. Fordulat, 26, 142–172.
Eyal, G., Szelényi, I., & Townsley, E. (1998). Making capitalism without capitalists: Class formations and elite struggles in post-communist central Europe. Verso.
Fabry, A. (2019). The political economy of hungary: From state capitalism to authoritarian neoliberalism. Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRef
Frank, A. G. (1977). Long live transideological enterprise! socialist economies in the capitalist international division of labor. Review, 1(1), 91‒140.
Gagyi, Á. (2016). “Coloniality of power” in East Central Europe: External penetration as internal force in post-socialist hungarian politics. Journal of World-Systems Research, 22(2), 349–372.CrossRef
Gao, H., & Yu, Y. (2011). The internalisation of the renminbi. BIS Working Papers 61.
Gates, L. (2018). Populism: A puzzle without (and for) world-systems analysis. Journal of World-Systems Research, 24(2), 325–336.CrossRef
Gereffi, G., & Evans, P. (1981). Transnational corporations, dependent development, and state policy in the semiperiphery: A comparison of Brazil and Mexico. Latin American Research Review, 16, 31–64.CrossRef
Gerőcs, T. (2017). Challenges of internationalisation from the perspective of the Chinese currency. Financial and Economic Review, 16(1), 170–185.
Gerőcs, T., & Pinkasz, A. (2018a). Debt-ridden development on Europe’s Eastern periphery. In M. Boatcă, A. Komlosy H. & Nolte (Eds.), Global inequalities in world-systems perspective: Theoretical debates and methodological innovations (pp. 131–153). Routledge.
Gerőcs, T., & Pinkasz, A. (2018b). Conflicting interests in the comecon Integration: State socialist debates on East-West-South relations. East Central Europe, 45(2–3), 336–365.
Gerőcs, T. (2019a). The formation of a New Patrie in the multipolar world-system. In T. Gerőcs & M. Szanyi (Eds.), Market liberalism and economic patriotism in the capitalist world-systems. Palgrave, 213-226.
Gerőcs, T. (2019b). The transformation of African–Russian economic relations in the multipolar world-system. Review of African Political Economy, 46(160), 317–335.
Gerőcs, T., & Pinkasz, A. (2019). Relocation, standardization and vertical specialization: Core-periphery relations in the European automotive value chain. Society and Economy, 41(2), 1–22.CrossRef
Gerőcs, T., Meszmann, T. T., & Pinkasz, A. (2020). Uneven development in the European automotive industry: Labour fragmentation and value added production in the Hungarian semi-periphery. In A. Komlosy, & G. Musić (Eds.), ITH global commodity chains and labour relations. Brill.
Grosfoguel, R. (2000). Developmentalism, modernity, and dependency theory in Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South, 1(2), 347–372.
Hirschman, O. A. (1968). The political economy of import-substituting industrialization in Latin America. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82(1), 1–32.CrossRef
Jessop, B. (1997). Twenty years of the regulation approach: Has it been worth it? New Political Economy, 2(3), 503–526.CrossRef
Krzywdzinski, M. (2014). How the EU’s Eastern enlargement changed the German productive model: The case of the automotive industry. Revue De La Regulation, 15(1), 1–61.
Kumral, S., & Karatasli, S. S. (2020). Capitalism, labour and the global populist radical right. Global Labour Journal, 11(2), 152–155.CrossRef
Laki, M., & Szalai, J. (2004). Vállalkozók vagy polgárok? Osiris.
Lipietz, A. (1997). The post-fordist world: Labour relations, international hierarchy and global ecology. Review of International Political Economy, 4(1), 1–41.CrossRef
Lóránt, K. (1990). Adósságcsapda. In A. Vigvári (Ed.), Adósság: Tanulmányok adósságunk múltjáról, jelenéről és jövőjéről (pp. 53‒84). Szakszervezetek Gazdaság- és Társadalomkutató Intézete.
Mihályi, P. (2015). A privatizált vagyon visszaállamosítása Magyarországon 2010–2014. Műhelytanulmányok 7. Budapest: MTA Közgazdaság- és Regionális Tudományi Kutatóközpont Közgazdaságtudományi Intézet.
Mong, A. (2012). Kádár hitele: A magyar államadósság története 1956‒1990. Libri.
Pavlínek, P. (2015). Foreign direct investment and the development of the automotive industry in Central and Eastern Europe. In B. Galgóczi, J. Drahokoupil, & M. Bernaciak (Eds.), Foreign investment in Eastern and Southern Europe after 2008: Still a lever of growth? (pp. 209–255). European Trade Union Institute.
Piroska, D., & Gerőcs, T. (2018). International organization of credit in the liberal leviathan post crisis: The case of China CEEC nexus. Presentation in the Workshop on International Political Economy of Finance and Financialization in BRICs. The M.S Merien International Centre of Advanced Studies ‘Methamorphoses of the Political’, Erfurt 2018.06.01.
Radice, H. (2009). Halfway to paradise? Making sense of semi-periphery. In O. Worth & Ph. Moore (Eds.), Globalization and the new semi-peripheries (pp. 25–40). Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Raviv, O. (2008). Central Europe: Predatory finance and the financialization of the new European periphery. In J. Robertson (Ed.), Power and politics after financial crisis: Rethinking foreign opportunism in emerging markets (pp. 168–186). Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Roberts, M. (2016). The long depression: Marxism and the global crisis of capitalism. Haymarket Books.
Šćepanović, V. (2013). FDI as a solution to the challenges of late development: Catch-up without convergence? Doctoral dissertation, Central European University.
Scheiring, G. (2020). The retreat of liberal democracy. Authoritarian capitalism and the accumulative state in Hungary. Palgrave.CrossRef
Stark, D. (1996). Recombinant property in East European Capitalism. American Journal of Sociology, 101(4), 993–1027.CrossRef
Szentes, T. (1988). The political economy of underdevelopment. Akadémiai.
Thoma, L. (1998). Védtelen társadalom. A rendszerváltás és a szakszervezetek (1988–1992). In T. Krausz (Ed.), Rendszerváltás és társadalomkritika. Tanulmányok a kelet-európai átalakulás történetéből (pp. 245–269). Napvilág.
Tyson, L. (1986). The debt crisis and adjustment responses in Eastern Europe: A comparative perspective. In E. Comisso & L. Tyson (Eds.), Power, purpose, and collective choice: Economic strategy in socialist states (pp. 63–110). Cornell University Press.
Van Apeldoorn, B. (2009). The contradictions of ‘embedded neoliberalism’ and Europe’s multi-level legitimacy crisis: The European project and its limits. In J. Drahokoupil & L. Horn (Eds.), Contradictions and limits of neoliberal European governance (pp. 21–43). Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Van der Pijl, K. (2012). The making of an Atlantic ruling class. Verso.
Vanhuysse, P. (2006). Divide and pacify: Strategic social policies and political protests in post-communist democracies. Central European University Press.CrossRef
Van Noije, P., & De Conti, B. (2017, November 9–11). China: Capital flight or renminbi internationalization? Presentation at the 21st FMM Conference: The crisis of globalization. Berlin, Germany.
Vigvári, A. (1990). Visszapillantás a magyar eladósodás történetére (pp. 54–65). Aula.
Vigvári, A., & Gerőcs, T. (2017). The concept of ‘peasant embourgeoisement’ in the perspective of different historical conjunctures. Studia UBB Sociologia, 62(1), 65–84.
Vliegenthart, A. (2010). Bringing dependency back in: The economic crisis in post-socialist Europe and the continued relevance of dependent development. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 35(2132), 242–265.
Wallerstein, I. (1976). Semi-peripheral countries and the contemporary world crisis. Theory and Society, 3(4), 461–483.CrossRef
Weissenbacher, R. (2018). Peripheral integration and disintegration in Europe: The ‘European dependency school’ revisited. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 26(1), 81–98.CrossRef
Wilkin, P. (2018). The rise of ‘illiberal’ democracy: The orbánization of Hungarian political culture. Journal of World-Systems Research, 24(1), 5–42.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Reconfiguring Regimes of Capitalist Integration: Hungary Since the 1970s
verfasst von
Agnes Gagyi
Tamás Gerőcs
Copyright-Jahr
2022
Buch
The Political Economy of Eastern Europe 30 years into the ‘Transition’

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78914-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-78915-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2022

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78915-2_7

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise