nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Refocusing Isomorphism to Explain Organizational Legitimacy: A New Approach

verfasst von : Emilio Díez-Martín, Emilio Díez-de-Castro, Adolfo Vázquez-Sánchez

Erschienen in: Organizational Legitimacy

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Isomorphism is the process by which organizations adopt similar structures, routines, or even strategies. Through this process, organizations obtain legitimacy and become institutionalized. This paper criticizes the traditional definition of isomorphism by suggesting that the idea of similarity has been used to imply that organizations are static, which is only true in a small number of cases. In reality, most organizations change according to internal or external contingency factors. The authors note that isomorphism is at the same time a process as well as a state that is reached by sharing essential organizational characteristics. Through this redefined approach to isomorphism, common characteristics are studied, and new propositions are put forth to improve our understanding on how organizational structures are built while also acknowledging and explaining differences among them.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Criteria for Evaluating the Organizational Legitimacy: A Typology for Legitimacy Jungle

Nächstes Kapitel Organizational Legitimacy Research: Contributing Countries and Institutions from 1995 to 2014

Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility. A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 836–863.CrossRef

Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. (2001). Learning from successful local private firms in China. Establishing legitimacy. Academy of Management Executive, 15, 72–84.

Anderson, P. J. J., Blatt, R., Christianson, M. K., Grant, A. M., Marquis, C., Neuman, E. J., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2006). Understanding mechanisms in organizational research. Reflections from a collective journey. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15, 102–113.CrossRef

Arndt, M., & Bigelow, B. (2000). Presenting structural innovation in an institutional environment. Hospitals’ use of impression management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 494–522.CrossRef

Auld, G., & Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2010). Transparency in nonstate certification: Consequences for accountability and legitimacy. Global Environmental Politics, 10(3), 97–119.CrossRef

Baron, J. N., & Pfeffer, J. (1994). The social psychology of organizations and inequality. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(3), 190.CrossRef

Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations. The case of legitimacy, reputations, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36, 151–179.CrossRef

Boxenbaum, E., & Jonsson, S. (2008). Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 78–98). London: Sage Publications.CrossRef

Broadbent, J., Jacobs, K., & Laughlin, R. (2001). Organisational resistance strategies to unwanted accounting and finance changes. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(5), 565–586.CrossRef

Bromley, D. B. (2001). Relationships between personal and corporate reputation. European Journal of Marketing, 35, 316–334.CrossRef

Brown, A. D. (1998). Narrative, politics and legitimacy in an IT implementation. Journal of Management Studies, 35(1), 35–58.CrossRef

Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134.CrossRef

Cash, D., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N., Eckley, N., & Jäger, J. (2003). Salience, credibility, legitimacy and boundaries: Linking research, assessment and decision making. KSG Working Papers Series RWP02–046.

Certo, S. T. (2003). Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige. Signaling with board structures. Academy of Management Review, 28, 432–446.CrossRef

Chen, J.-S., & Tsou, H.-T. (2012). Performance effects of IT capability, service process innovation, and the mediating role of customer service. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(1), 71–94.CrossRef

Choi, T., & Bhakoo, V. (2013). The iron cage exposed. institutional pressures and heterogeneity across the healthcare supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 31, 432–449.CrossRef

Clarke, J., & Holt, R. (2010). The mature entrepreneur: A narrative approach to entrepreneurial goals. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 69–83.CrossRef

Clegg, S. (2010). The state, power and agency. Missing in action in institutional theory? Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 4–13.CrossRef

Contardo, I., & Wensley, R. (2004). The Harvard Business School story. Avoiding knowledge by being relevant. Organization, 11, 211–231.CrossRef

Cruz-Suárez, A., Prado-Román, C., & Díez-Martín, F. (2014). Por qué se institucionalizan las organizaciones. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 23, 22–30.CrossRef

Curtin, D., & Meijer, A. J. (2006). Information polity: The international journal of government and democracy in the information age. Information Polity (Vol. 11). IOS Press.

Czarniawska, B. (2008). How to misuse institutions and get away with it some reflections on institutional theory(ies). In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 769–782). London: Sage Publications.CrossRef

David L. Deephouse, Suzanne M. Carter, (2005) An Examination of Differences Between Organizational Legitimacy and Organizational Reputation*. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (2):329–360.CrossRef

De Fine Licht, J. (2011). Do we really want to know? The potentially negative effect of transparency in decision making on perceived legitimacy. Scandinavian Political Studies, 34(3), 183–201.CrossRef

De Fine Licht, J., Naurin, D., Esaiasson, P., & Gilljam, M. (2014). When does transparency generate legitimacy? Experimenting on a context-bound relationship. Governance, 27(1), 111–134.CrossRef

Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024–1039.CrossRef

Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49–77). London: SAGE Publications Ltd..CrossRef

Dhalla, R., & Oliver, C. (2013). Industry identity in an oligopolistic market and firms’. Responses to institutional pressures. Organization Studies, 34, 1803–1834.CrossRef

Díez-Martín, F., Prado-Roman, C., & Blanco-González, A. (2013). Beyond legitimacy: Legitimacy types and organizational success. Management Decision, 51(10), 1954–1969.CrossRef

Díez-Martín, F., Prado-Román, C., & Blanco-González, A. (2013). Efecto del plazo de ejecución estratégica sobre la obtención de legitimidad organizativa. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección Y Economía de La Empresa, 19(2), 120–125.CrossRef

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRef

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The iron cage revisited. institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organization fields. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 63–82). London: The University of Chicago Press.

Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 252–284.CrossRef

Drazin, R., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1985). Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 514–539.CrossRef

Driscoll, C., & Starik, M. (2004). The primordial stakeholder. Advancing the conceptual consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 55–73.CrossRef

Drori, I., & Honig, B. (2013). A process model of internal and external legitimacy. Organization Studies, 34(3), 345–376.CrossRef

EFQM. (2012). Fundamental concepts of excellence. Brussels, Belgium: EFQM.

Etzion, D., & Ferraro, F. (2010). The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organization Science, 21, 1092–1107.CrossRef

Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy. States and industrial transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princenton University Press.

Filatotchev, I., & Nakajima, C. (2014). Corporate governance, responsible managerial behavior and CSR: Organizational efficiency versus organizational legitimacy? Academy of Management Perspectives, 28, 289–306.CrossRef

Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24, 191–205.CrossRef

Golden-Biddle, K., Locke, K., & Reay, T. (2006). Using knowledge in management studies. An investigation of how we cite prior work. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15, 237–254.CrossRef

Greenwood, R. (2008). Focusing the asteroid belt of organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17, 152–156.CrossRef

Greenwood, R., Hinings, C. R., & Whetten, D. (2014). Rethinking institutions and organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 1206–1220.

Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields. The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 27–48.CrossRef

Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change. The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 58–80.

Griffin, J. J., & Dunn, P. (2004). Corporate public affairs. Commitment, resources and structure. Business and Society, 43, 196–221.CrossRef

Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964.CrossRef

Haveman, H. A., & David, R. J. (2008). Ecologists and institutionalists: Friends or foes? In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 573–595). London: Sage Publications.CrossRef

Hawley, A. H. (1968). Human ecology. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (pp. 328–337). New York: Macmillan.

Hinings, B. (2012). Connections between institutional logics and organizational culture. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21, 98–101.CrossRef

Huy, Q. N. (2001). Time, temporal capability, and planned change. Academy of Management Review, 26, 601–623.CrossRef

Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley.

Kent, P., & Zunker, T. (2013). Attaining legitimacy by employee information in annual reports. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1072–1106.CrossRef

Kimberly D. Elsbach, (1994) Managing Organizational Legitimacy in the California Cattle Industry: The Construction and Effectiveness of Verbal Accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39 (1):57.CrossRef

Lamin, A., & Zaheer, S. (2012). Wall street vs. main street. Firm strategies for defending legitimacy and their impact on different stakeholders. Organization Science, 23, 47–66.CrossRef

Leaptrott, J. (2005). An institutional theory view of the family business. Family Business Review, 18, 215–228.CrossRef

Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007). Assimilation of Enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 59–87.CrossRef

Maguire, S., & Phillips, N. (2008). Citibankers’ at Citigroup. A study of the loss of institutional trust after a merger. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 372–401.CrossRef

Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRef

Miles, R. E. (2011). Lessons learned, ignored, forgotten and reborn: Organizations and management 1960 to today. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 4–7.CrossRef

Mintzberg, H. (1992). El poder en la organización. Barcelona, Spain: Ariel.

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853–886.CrossRef

Mudie, P. (2003). Internal customer: By design or by default. European Journal of Marketing, 37(9), 1261–1276.CrossRef

Munir, K. A. (2011). Financial crisis 2008–2009: What does the silence of institutional theorists tell us? Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 114–117.CrossRef

Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145–179.CrossRef

Palmer, D., Biggart, N., & Dick, B. (2008). Is the new institutionalism a theory? In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 739–768). London: Sage Publications.

Peloza, J. (2006). Using corporate social responsibility as Insurance for Financial Performance. California Management Review, 48(2), 52–72.CrossRef

Peng, M. W. (2002). Towards an institution-based view of business strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2–3), 251–267.CrossRef

Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. (2009). The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 63–81.CrossRef

Reid, E. M., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(11), 1157–1178.CrossRef

Roy Suddaby, (2010) Challenges for Institutional Theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19 (1):14–20.CrossRef

Ruebottom, T. (2013). The microstructures of rhetorical strategy in social entrepreneurship: Building legitimacy through heroes and villains. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 98–116.CrossRef

Ruef, M., & Scott, W. R. (1998). A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy. Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 877–904.CrossRef

Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2011). Implicit leadership theories: Think leader, think effective? Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 141–150.CrossRef

Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 493–511.CrossRef

Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. London: SAGE Publications.

Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations. Ideas, interests, and identities (Fourth ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. A sociological interpretation. New York: Harper and Row.

Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism old and new. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 270–277.CrossRef

Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 159–180.CrossRef

Slack, T., & Hinings, B. (1994). Institutional pressures and isomorphic change: An empirical test. Organization Studies, 15(6), 803–827.CrossRef

Stein, M. (2013). When does narcissistic leadership become problematic? Dick Fuld at Lehman brothers. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22, 282–293.CrossRef

Sud, M., VanSandt, C. V., & Baugous, A. M. (2009). Social entrepreneurship. The role of institutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 201–216.CrossRef

Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York: William Morrow.

Townley, B. (1997). The institutional logic of performance appraisal. Organization Studies, 18, 261–285.CrossRef

Treviño, L. K., den Nieuwenboer, N., Kreiner, G., & Bishop, D. (2014). Legitimating the legitimate. A grounded theory study of legitimacy work among ethics and compliance officers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123, 186–205.CrossRef

Warren, R. C. (2003). The evolution of business legitimacy. European Business Review, 15(3), 153–163.CrossRef

Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance. Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 539–552.

Yang, Z., & Su, C. (2013). Understanding Asian business strategy: Modeling institution-based legitimacy-embedded efficiency. Journal of Business Research, 66(12), 2369–2374.CrossRef

Yang, Z., Su, C., & Fam, K.-S. (2012). Dealing with institutional distances in international marketing channels: Governance strategies that engender legitimacy and efficiency. Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 41–55.CrossRef

Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431.CrossRef

Zucker, L. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443–464.CrossRef

Zucker, L. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42, 726–743.CrossRef

Titel: Refocusing Isomorphism to Explain Organizational Legitimacy: A New Approach
verfasst von: Emilio Díez-Martín
Emilio Díez-de-Castro
Adolfo Vázquez-Sánchez
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Organizational Legitimacy
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75989-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-75990-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75990-6_2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner