Skip to main content

2021 | Buch

Rethinking Map Literacy

insite
SUCHEN

Über dieses Buch

This book provides two conceptual frameworks for further investigation of map literacy and fills in a gap in map literacy studies, addressing the distinction between reference maps and thematic maps and the varying uses of quantitative map literacy (QML) within and between the two. The text offers two conceptual frameworks and uses specific map examples to explore this variability in map reading skills and knowledge, with the goal of informing educational pedagogy and practices within geography and related disciplines. The book will appeal to cartographers and geographers as a new perspective on a tool of communication they have long employed in their disciplines, and will also appeal to those involved in the educational pedagogy of information and data literacy as a way to conceptualize the development of curricula and teaching materials in the increasingly important arena of the interplay between quantitative data and map-based graphics.
The first framework discussed is based on a three-set Venn model, and addresses the content and relationships of three “literacies” – map literacy, quantitative literacy and background information. As part of this framework, the field of QML is introduced, conceptualized, and defined as the knowledge (concepts, skills and facts) required to accurately read, use, interpret and understand the quantitative information embedded in geographic backgrounds. The second framework is of a compositional triangle based on (1) the ratio of reference to thematic map purpose and (2) the level of generalization and/or distortion within maps. In combination, these two parameters allow for any type of map to be located within the triangle as a prelude to considering the type and level of quantitative literacy that comes into play during map reading. Based on the two frameworks mentioned above, the pedagogical tool of “word problems” is applied to “map literacy” in an innovative way to explore the variability of map reading skills and knowledge based on specific map examples.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Frontmatter
Chapter 1. From Literacy to Maps via Numeracy
Abstract
En route to a comprehensive literature review of map literacy in the next chapter, we come at the subject with an arc through “quantitative literacy,” the term by which numeracy is more generally known in the United States. Our goal in this targeted review of numeracy and quantitative literacy is to build a directed concept chain – namely, literacy → numeracy → quantitative literacy → graph literacy → graphicacy → maps – the next step of which is map literacy.
Ming Xie, Steven Reader, H. L. Vacher
Chapter 2. Map Literacy
Abstract
In this chapter, we review previous literature on map literacy for both reference and thematic maps. We note how prior individual studies have historically been skewed to one or the other of these two broad categories, have focused mainly on low-level skills, and have often been limited to studies of single types of maps (within a category) or to studies of map symbolization.
Ming Xie, Steven Reader, H. L. Vacher
Chapter 3. A Three-Set Venn Model for Map Literacy
Abstract
A new three-literacy Venn model is introduced building on the two-set Venn diagram introducing the discussion of quantitative literacy in Chap. 1. The three sets represent the quantitative literacy and map literacy of Fig. 1.​1 and an additional literacy for required background knowledge. For reference maps, this third set generally represents geographic literacy, with its focus on the locational information of mapped features and/or information regarding their formation. For thematic maps, the third set generally represents thematic literacy and is focused on the thematic information embedded in the mapped features.
Ming Xie, Steven Reader, H. L. Vacher
Chapter 4. A Triangular Graphic for Thinking About Maps
Abstract
In this chapter, a conceptual triangular-plot model is introduced to discuss how maps vary according to two parameters that we consider important to map literacy and to the distribution of map-reading knowledge and skills. The graphic is an upright equilateral triangle. The first parameter represents a map’s position on a continuum from purely locational information on the left to purely thematic information on the right. The second parameter, which represents the level (a judgment) of the map’s generalization and distortion, positions the map vertically in the triangle.
Ming Xie, Steven Reader, H. L. Vacher
Chapter 5. Maps Across the Triangle
Abstract
Various types of maps are explored and located in the triangular-plot graphic introduced in the previous chapter. Reference maps tend to the left side of this triangular plot while thematic maps to the right side, whereas land-use maps, and others, where both locational and thematic information are of fairly equal importance are in a vertical wedge along the medial height. Large-scale topographic maps, regional maps, world maps, topological maps (e.g., subway maps), choropleth maps, cartograms, weather maps, geologic maps, and maps of airline routes – all these and more – can be positioned on this triangular-plot visualization.
Ming Xie, Steven Reader, H. L. Vacher
Chapter 6. Knowledge and Skills for Reading Reference Maps
Abstract
With the triangular-plot graphic to discuss various types of maps, and the three-set Venn model for various literacies, the knowledge and skills involved in map reading and interpretation can be explored systematically. This chapter focuses on the left side of the triangle. Specific map literacy (ML), quantitative literacy (QL), and geographic literacy (GL) knowledge and skills involved in solving word problems are identified for a university campus parking map, topographic maps, a Mercator projection world map, and a subway map.
Ming Xie, Steven Reader, H. L. Vacher
Chapter 7. Knowledge and Skills for Reading Thematic Maps
Abstract
This chapter focuses on the right side of the triangular plot. Without map scale as an organizing framework, this chapter, instead, uses a broad selection of published thematic maps that address public interest or research questions. This chapter considers both the knowledge and skills involved in the map reading and interpretation of these various maps, along with where they would position in the triangular plot.
Ming Xie, Steven Reader, H. L. Vacher
Chapter 8. Concluding Thoughts
Abstract
This concluding chapter offers a look back at six thoughts that were key to framing our rethink of map literacy. It then provides a look sideways at the interactions between map literacy and other “literacies” and how the device of word problems can both demonstrate such interactions and be used to enhance the development of knowledge and skills. Finally, we look forward, with a closing thought, and a hopeful one, that we have managed to provide some navigational tools in this book for one of the more unknown of the many “seas of literacy.”
Ming Xie, Steven Reader, H. L. Vacher
Backmatter
Metadaten
Titel
Rethinking Map Literacy
verfasst von
Ming Xie
Steven Reader
H. L. Vacher
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Electronic ISBN
978-3-030-68594-2
Print ISBN
978-3-030-68593-5
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68594-2