Skip to main content

2021 | Buch

Rethinking Politicisation in Politics, Sociology and International Relations

insite
SUCHEN

Über dieses Buch

This book decisively advances the academic debate on politicisation beyond the state of the art. It is the first book to theorise and conceptualise ‘politicisation’ across the epistemic communities of different subdisciplines, bringing together the different strands in the debate: (international) political theory, political sociology, comparative politics, EU studies, legal theory and international relations. This provides a comprehensive discussion of different concepts of politicisation, their ontological and theoretical backgrounds, and their analytical value, including speech-act, practice- and actor-oriented approaches. Furthermore, the linkages of politicisation to the concepts of politics and the political, democracy, depoliticisation, juridification, populism, and Euroscepticism are clarified. Finally, the book shows how the methodological toolbox in empirical politicisation research can be completed regarding different arenas, actors and modes of politicisation. The volume thus provides a much-needed theoretical and conceptual reflection to the newly emerging research field of politicisation in order to recognise and define the key issues and build a solid foundation for further debate and empirical research.

‘When does something come to be considered political - for good or for ill? In social scientific terms, what is politicisation, under what conditions does it occur, created by whom, and with what consequences. These questions drive this outstanding collection of papers that explore how politicization is to be theorized and methodologies for its study. Rather than just a special sphere of activity, the volume demonstrates how politics is best thought of as an activity that can occur across individual and various collective levels. One of the signature contributions of this volume is its exploration of these issues across disciplines: political science, philosophy, sociology and international relations. The texts will be of interest to all students of politics at a time when the very basis of political identity, action, and organization is contested, normatively and analytically. The texts will help bring clarity to these debates.’

—David L. Swartz, Department of Sociology, Boston University, USA

‘Politization has become a widely used and disputed term In International Relations (IR) and more recently in comparative politics as well. This edited volume tries to elevate the term politization onto an analytical concept by i.a. opening it up for action theoretical and organizational approaches. One of the great achievements of the editor is to bring conceptual order into a dispersed debate across political science and its subdisciplines. Moreover, the contributions show how to apply the concept(s) of politization on such different subjects such as democratization, de-democratization, transitions, denationalization or the emergence of populism and Euroscepticism. This is a muchawaited book which can become a conceptual point of reference for better understanding the evolution of national and international regimes.’

—Wolfgang Merkel, Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Frontmatter
Chapter 1. Introduction: Rethinking Politicisation in Politics, Sociology and International Relations
Abstract
The newly emerging field of politicisation research is in lack of a thorough theoretical and conceptual foundation. Accordingly, this volume aims at a theoretical and conceptual clarification of politicisation as a general Social Sciences concept, overcoming the separation of the strands of the debate in the subfields of International Relations, European Union (EU) Studies, (International) Political Theory, Comparative Politics, Political Sociology and Legal Theory. The chapters discuss (1) theories, understandings and/or definitions of politics and the political conceptualisation of politicisation relates to; (2) the who, where and what of politicisation: dimensions, actors, issues, objects, addressees, areas, arenas and spaces; (3) the relation of politicisation to concepts such as democracy, depoliticisation, juridification, legalisation, populism, or Euroscepticism; and (4) the methodological toolbox, approaches and dimensions of empirical study.
Claudia Wiesner

Conceptualising Politicisation

Frontmatter
Chapter 2. Politicisation, Politics and Democracy
Abstract
In this chapter, I aim at conceptualising politicisation and its relation to two other key concepts in Political Science: politics and democracy. I discuss a number of crucial theoretical and conceptual questions related to the understanding and usage of politicisation in general, and European Union (EU) politicisation in particular, setting a special focus on the theoretical and conceptual linkages between politicisation, politics and democracy. My argument is based on the presumption that politicisation needs to be understood as a multilevel concept that covers the theoretical and normative macro level, a conceptual meso level and an operational or empirical micro level. The chapter is split into the following parts: in the first section, I outline key questions and theoretical steps that are related to conceptualising politicisation and its linkages to the concept of politics. I shall discuss two ideal-typical conceptions of politics, that is, (1) an understanding of politics as a system, field or sphere and (2) an understanding of politics as action. In the remainder of the chapter, I base my reflections on an action-oriented understanding of politics and politicisation, arguing that politics and politicisation potentially can take place anywhere and anytime. In the second section, I shall discuss the normative-theoretical question if, and to what extent, a concept of politicisation as action is compatible with representative democracy: if politicisation is action, then politicisation can be both democratic and anti-democratic action, and the ensuing question is how democracies react to this challenge. In the third section, I discuss existing and possible interrelations between politicisation and democracy in the EU. I conclude with a typology of four types of interrelations between politicisation and democracy and a research outlook.
Claudia Wiesner
Chapter 3. Three Concepts of Politicisation: Republican, Deliberative, and Agonistic
Abstract
Politicisation has been an object of interest in political science for quite some time, but there has been little research in political theory on the subject matter as of yet. This chapter fills this gap by proceeding in three steps. First, it argues that concepts of politicisation need to take two manifestations of politicisation into account: governmental and social. Second, in engaging with republicanism, deliberation theory, and agonism, it reconstructs three concepts of politicisation implicit in these paradigms. Third, the chapter concludes by arguing that all three concepts capture the governmental form of politicisation, yet, due to their teleological notion of politics, republican and deliberative approaches are unable to conceptualise social politicisation. Thus, in order to understand politicisation properly, non-teleological notions of politicisation are needed.
Veith Selk
Chapter 4. Parliamentarisation as Politicisation
Abstract
Understanding politics as a contingent and controversial activity, politicisation refers to those activities that create or make visible the political quality in the phenomena in question. Parliamentarisation is a distinct strategy of politicisation. In this chapter, parliament refers to a certain procedural and institutional ideal type of acting politically. The parliamentary way of politicising acting and thinking forms a Gedankenbild, a mental image. It is an ideal type that one-sidedly accentuates and intensifies the political way of thinking. The parliamentary way of proceeding politically transcends the given polity: ‘parliament’ is not primarily a parliament ‘of’ a unit, such as the nation state, but concerns any polity level, from city councils to the worldwide institutions. The chapter discusses different analytically and historically relevant dimensions of parliamentary politicisation. 
Kari Palonen

Politicisation, Populism and (Post-)Democracy

Frontmatter
Chapter 5. Democracy, Post-democracy and What Came After
Abstract
This chapter observes that the current political situation is shaped by politicisation processes (e.g. populist protests) that, contrary to the 1970s (e.g. civil rights movements), deteriorate rather than enhance representative democracy. It thus analyses the reasons for this cleavage and argues that civil rights movements brought the political to the fore while current protest suppresses it. Bringing the political to the fore means to allow the coexistence of more than one representation of one and the same object, highlighting the incommensurability between the people’s sovereign and the actual people. It thus prevents the possibility of a fully fledged representation and allows further contesting in the future. Populist mobilisations, instead, restrict political conflict to the borderline between the people and their ‘enemies’ (immigrants, the elite etc.), politicising without democratising.
Meike Schmidt-Gleim
Chapter 6. Populism and Anti-Populism in the 2017 Dutch, French, and German Elections: A Re-politicisation of Post-politics?
Abstract
This chapter draws on Laclau’s theory of populism and the political and Stavrakakis’s work on anti-populism to examine two related sets of questions: to what extent populism and anti-populism can be seen in the 2017 Dutch, French (presidential), and German election campaigns and to what extent populist discourses constitute counter-hegemonic challenges to neo-liberal crisis management politics while anti-populist discourses constitute a defence of the latter. The post-foundational discourse analysis that follows identifies (1) left-wing populist discourses (SP, La France Insoumise, Die Linke), primarily nationalist rather than populist far-right discourses in the Netherlands and France, and a combination of populism and ethno-cultural reductionism in the Alternative for Germany (AfD) in Germany; and (2) a widespread “thin” anti-populism in the Netherlands, minimal anti-populism in France, and a thick anti-populism of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU).
Seongcheol Kim
Chapter 7. Voting and Non-voting in Post-democratic Times
Abstract
This chapter discusses two emerging patterns of political behaviour in Western democracies, namely non-voting and voting for right-wing populist parties. Both are considered as a reaction to the post-democratic turn in general, and the changing meaning of political participation in special. Against the widespread notion that they should be considered as irrational, it is argued that at least for some parts of the citizenry both forms of political behaviour make sense. It is stated that at least for those parts of the citizenry which can be described as ‘left-authoritarian’, voting for right-wing populist parties seems to be even more rational than refusing to vote. 
Dirk Jörke

(De-)Politicising Europe

Frontmatter
Chapter 8. (De)politicisation: Shifting Dynamics in an Emerging European Political Field and Public Sphere
Abstract
In a landmark article, Hooghe and Marks (British Journal of Political Science 39 (1):1–23, 2009) called for a paradigmatic shift in European integration studies, arguing that the old permissive consensus that facilitated functional integration has been replaced by a new constraining dissensus by a politicised electorate. European Union (EU) politicisation, so the assumption, stands for a qualitative change of European integration and, as such, is primarily expressed in a form of identity politics that is mobilised against the EU. In this chapter, we wish to broaden the discussion of politicisation beyond the narrow focus on voters’ preferences and political parties’ strategies and discuss politicisation as a constitutive element of the public sphere. In political theory, research has conceptualised politicisation as action involving temporal structures and politics as forming the spatial matrix for this activity. We seek to conceptually broaden and deepen this discussion by tracing forms of contestation that develop over time, including politicisation and de-politicisation and structuring a European political space.
Niilo Kauppi, Hans-Jörg Trenz
Chapter 9. Dissensus, Deadlock, and Disintegration? Examining the Effects of EU Politicisation
Abstract
Scholars agree that the European Union (EU) and its policies have become politicised and there is extensive research on the causes and patterns of this phenomenon. The effects of politicisation on supranational decision-making and European integration, in contrast, have received little systematic attention. Against this background, this chapter systemises and discusses theoretical approaches as well as recent empirical studies on the consequences of EU politicisation. It shows that several studies provide support that politicisation enhances EU decision-makers’ responsiveness. At the same time, intra- and inter-institutional bargaining processes seem to remain more or less unaffected. Also, regarding European integration, politicisation does not seem to be a hindrance. This can be attributed to the various strategies decision-makers can employ to shield decisions at the European level from the increasingly attentive and critical public.
Lisa H. Anders
Chapter 10. Depoliticisation at the European Level: Delegitimisation and Circumvention of Representative Democracy in Europe’s Governance
Abstract
This chapter defends the hypothesis that depoliticisation practices in the European Union (EU) stem from the EU’s institutions and actors’ relationship, both singular and long-standing, with “the political” and representative democracy. To do so, this chapter starts by highlighting the omnipresence of the logics of depoliticisation and listing its main methods—expertise, informal negotiation, permanent consultation of interest groups—in making European policies. Trying then to identify what feeds these depoliticisation initiatives, it underlines a relationship of distrust regarding the mechanisms of representative democracy, which is linked to the genesis and institutionalisation of the European field of power and widely shared among Europe’s professionals.
Cécile Robert

Politicisation from Global to Local

Frontmatter
Chapter 11. Political Authority, Expected Consequences, and the Politicisation of International Institutions
Abstract
A prominent argument in the politicisation literature links the degree of politicisation of international institutions to the extent of their delegated political authority. I criticise the authority-politicisation thesis as theoretically myopic and falling short of adequately explaining many empirically observable instances of politicisation. Instead, I argue that politicisation is driven by the (expected) consequences of particular governance arrangements and that the perceived significance and magnitude of such consequences need not correlate with formally delegated or recognised authority. I illustrate the argument with discussions of three types of institutions—the UN General Assembly, the G7/8/20 summits, and coalitions of the willing—each of which can be factually consequential and has triggered substantial politicisation without possessing, as an institution, much recognised political authority in its own right.
Andreas von Staden
Chapter 12. In-Between Juridification and Politicisation: Zooming in on the Everyday Politics of Law
Abstract
While international studies have addressed the interplay between international authority and politicisation, the debate has been surprisingly disconnected from an elaboration of a seemingly “depoliticising” juridification. Moreover, a critique of juridification as it has traditionally been articulated in critical theory is widely absent in international studies. Therefore, the chapter seeks to outline a critical international theory of politicisation and juridification by taking into account the dialectical relation between the two moments. By drawing on the tradition of “legal realism,” the chapter stresses the indeterminacy of law as an entry point for the political and argues that, in fact, juridification and politicisation work simultaneously in the everyday practice of international law and bureaucracies.
Philip Liste
Chapter 13. Conclusion: Rethinking Politicisation: What Have We Learned?
Abstract
The conclusion sums up five lessons for the future research on politicisation that are derived from the discussion in the chapters: first, politics, the political, and politicisation need to be systematically theorised before beginning empirical research; second, conceptualisations of politicisation should be precise, reflected and theory-based in setting up research dimensions, methods, and techniques; third, researchers should cross the boundaries of epistemic communities and their standard truths in conceptualising and studying politicisation; fourth, they should explore and cultivate the garden of neighbouring concepts such as democracy, depoliticisation, juridification, legalisation, populism, or Euroscepticism; and fifth, they should use the full methodological toolbox, ranging from qualitative over mixed methods to quantitative approaches.
Claudia Wiesner
Backmatter
Metadaten
Titel
Rethinking Politicisation in Politics, Sociology and International Relations
herausgegeben von
Prof. Dr. Claudia Wiesner
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Electronic ISBN
978-3-030-54545-1
Print ISBN
978-3-030-54544-4
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54545-1

Premium Partner