Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Unexpected Cracking in an RC Bridge Pier Cap—A Case Study Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Rock Mass Rating and Geological Strength Index Relationship for Sandstone Along Rock Cut Slope at Markundi, Chopan, District Sonbhadra (U.P.)

verfasst von : Saurabh Kumar, H. K. Pandey

Erschienen in: Advances in Civil Engineering

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The Rock Mass Rating (RMRb) and Geological Strength Index (GSI) are widely employed in geotechnical engineering practice. An attempt has been made to analyze the RMRb and GSI using in situ data corresponding to sandstone rock collected from different outcrops in Markundi Hill along SH-5, Chopan, Sonbhadra. RMR and GSI have been analyzed in order to compare them with the results of the analysis conducted in this study. The Markundi Sandstone is categorized Poor rock mass and Fair rock mass at the locations from the data collected on the basis of RMRb. Finally, the best (most suitable) applied math relations between RMRb and GSI are shown and they are accustomed establish general correlations. Hoek (2013) generalized equation show the best regression relationship between RMRb and GSI for Markundi Sandstone rock.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel A Critical Review on Mass Concrete Embedded Water Pipes as Permanent Roofing
Nächstes Kapitel Evolutionary Topology Optimization of Structural Concrete Under Various Load Cases
Literatur
1.
Anbalagan R, Singh B, Chakraborthy D and Kohli A (2007) A field manual for landslide investigations. A Publication of Department of Science and Technology Government of India, pp 1–153
2.
Barton N, Lien R, Lunde J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Springer, Oslo (Norway)
3.
Barton N (1995) The influence of joint properties in modelling jointed rock masses. Keynote Lecture, 8. ISRM Congress, 3, pp 1023–1032
4.
Bieniawski ZT (ed) (1976) Rock mass classification in rock engineering. In: Exploration for rock engineering, proceedings of the symposium, vol 1. Balkema, Cape Town, pp 97–106
5.
Bieniawski ZT (1979) The geomechanics classification in rock engineering applications. In: Proceedings of the 4th congress of the international society of rock mechanics, vol 2. A.A. Balkema, Montreux, Switzerland. Rotterdam, pp 41–48
6.
Ceballos F, Olalla C, Jiménez R (2014) Relationship between RMRb and GSI based on in situ data, Conference paper
7.
Hoek E, Brown ET (1980) Empirical strength criterion for rock masses. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 106 (GT 9):1013–1035
8.
Hoek E, Kaiser PK, Bawden WF (1995) Support of underground excavations in hard rock. Balkema, Rotterdam
9.
Hoek E, Brown ET (1997) Practical estimates or rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abst 34(8):1165–1186
10.
Hoek E, Carter TG, Dietrichs MS (2013) Quantification of the geological strength index chart. In: Proceedings 47th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium. San Francisco, 2013 ARMA Ca, USA, pp 13–672
11.
Hudson JA, Harrison JP (1997) Engineering rock mechanics—an introduction to the principles. Pergamon press
12.
IS: 9143-1979. Method for determination of unconfined compressive strength of rock materials (BIS)
13.
IS: 13365-1997. Quantitative classification system of rock mass-guidelines, Part-3, determination of slope mass rating. Bureau of India Standards, New Delhi
14.
ISRM: 1978 Suggested methods for quantitative description of discontinuities of rock mass. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 15:319–368
15.
Marinos P, Hoek E (2001) Estimating the geotechnical properties of heterogeneous rock masses such as Flysch. Bull Eng Geol Environ 60:85–92CrossRef
16.
Marinos V, Marinos P, Hoek E (2005) The geological strength index: applications and limitations. Bull Eng Geol Environ 6:55–65CrossRef
17.
Marinos P, Hoek E, Marinos V (2006) Variability of the engineering properties of rock masses quantified by the geological strength index: the case of ophiolites with special emphasis on tunneling. Bull Eng Geol Env 65:129–142CrossRef
18.
Palmstrom A (1974) Characterization of jointing density and the quality of rock masses (in Norwegian). Berdal, Norway, Internal report, A.B, p 26
19.
Roghanchi P, Kallu R, Thareja R (2013) A new expression of three adjustment factors of slope mass rating (SMR) classification. Int J Earth Sci Eng 1–9
20.
Singh PK, Kainthola A, Singh TN (2015) Rock mass assessment along the right bank of river Sutlej, Luhri, Himachal Pradesh, India. Geom Nat Hazards Risk 6(3):212–223CrossRef
21.
Singh JL, Tamrakar NK (2013) Rock mass rating and geological strength index of rock masses of Thopal-Malekhu River areas, Central Nepal Lesser Himalaya, Bulletin of the Department of Geology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal, vol 16, pp 29–42
22.
Vasarhelyi B (2016) Determining the geological strength index (GSI) using different methods. In: Ulusay et al. (eds) Rock mechanics and rock engineering: from the past to the future
23.
Zhang L (2015) Determination and applications of rock quality designation (RQD). J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 5
Metadaten
Titel
Rock Mass Rating and Geological Strength Index Relationship for Sandstone Along Rock Cut Slope at Markundi, Chopan, District Sonbhadra (U.P.)
verfasst von
Saurabh Kumar
H. K. Pandey
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Advances in Civil Engineering

Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5643-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-15-5644-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5644-9_26