Skip to main content

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Scaling Things Up: Large Group Decision Making (LGDM)

verfasst von : Iván Palomares Carrascosa

Erschienen in: Large Group Decision Making

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

What is a Large Group Decision Making problem? What differentiates them from the conventional Group Decision Making problems and approaches introduced in the previous chapter, and what are the added complexities of supporting high-quality decisions to be made by large groups? The present chapter aims at introducing and contextualizing this relatively new area of research, highlighting its main limitations of challenges and discussing some of its newly related disciplines, as witnessed in recent research.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Alcantud, J.C.R., de Andrés, R.: A fuzzy viewpoint of consensus measures in social choice. ESTYLF 2014 Proceedings: XVII Spanish Conference on Fuzzy Logic and Technologies, pp. 87–92, 2014. Alcantud, J.C.R., de Andrés, R.: A fuzzy viewpoint of consensus measures in social choice. ESTYLF 2014 Proceedings: XVII Spanish Conference on Fuzzy Logic and Technologies, pp. 87–92, 2014.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Arrow, K.J.: A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 58(4), pp. 328–346, 1950.CrossRef Arrow, K.J.: A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 58(4), pp. 328–346, 1950.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat B’́ack, E., Esaiasson, P., Gilljam, M., Svenson, O., Lindholm, T.: Post-Decision Consolidation in Large Group decision-making. Cognition and Neurosciences. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, pp. 320–328, 2011.CrossRef B’́ack, E., Esaiasson, P., Gilljam, M., Svenson, O., Lindholm, T.: Post-Decision Consolidation in Large Group decision-making. Cognition and Neurosciences. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, pp. 320–328, 2011.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker, K.R.: Management Science: An Introduction to the Use of Decision Models. Wiley (NY), 1985. Baker, K.R.: Management Science: An Introduction to the Use of Decision Models. Wiley (NY), 1985.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bryson, N.: Group decision-making and the analytic hierarchy process. exploring the consensus-relevant information content. Computers and Operations Research, 23(1), pp. 27–35, 1996.CrossRef Bryson, N.: Group decision-making and the analytic hierarchy process. exploring the consensus-relevant information content. Computers and Operations Research, 23(1), pp. 27–35, 1996.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bullock, S., Crowder, R., Pitonakova, L.: Task allocation in foraging robot swarms: The role of information sharing. Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Life 13, pp. 306–313, 2016. Bullock, S., Crowder, R., Pitonakova, L.: Task allocation in foraging robot swarms: The role of information sharing. Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Life 13, pp. 306–313, 2016.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Carneiro, J., Saraiva, P., Martinho, D., Marreiros, G., Novais, P.: Representing decision-makers using styles of behavior: an approach designed for group decision support systems. Cognitive Systems Research, 47, pp. 109–132, 2018.CrossRef Carneiro, J., Saraiva, P., Martinho, D., Marreiros, G., Novais, P.: Representing decision-makers using styles of behavior: an approach designed for group decision support systems. Cognitive Systems Research, 47, pp. 109–132, 2018.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Cartlidge, J., Cliff, D.: Modelling complex financial markets using real-time human-agent trading experiments. In Chen S.H. et al. (Eds.): Complex Systems Modeling and Simulation in Economics and Finance, Springer, 2018. Cartlidge, J., Cliff, D.: Modelling complex financial markets using real-time human-agent trading experiments. In Chen S.H. et al. (Eds.): Complex Systems Modeling and Simulation in Economics and Finance, Springer, 2018.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Carvalho, G., Vivacqua, A.S., Souza, J.M., Medeiros, S.P.J.: LaSca: a Large Scale Group Decision Support System. Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design. Xi’an (China), 2008. Carvalho, G., Vivacqua, A.S., Souza, J.M., Medeiros, S.P.J.: LaSca: a Large Scale Group Decision Support System. Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design. Xi’an (China), 2008.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Chadwick, A.: Web 2.0: New challenges for the study of e-democracy in an era of informational exuberance. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 5(1), pp. 9–41, 2009. Chadwick, A.: Web 2.0: New challenges for the study of e-democracy in an era of informational exuberance. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 5(1), pp. 9–41, 2009.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Chin, K.S., Xu, D.L., Yang, J.B., Lam, J.P.-K.: Group-based ER-AHP system for product project screening. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(4), pp. 1909–1929, 2008.CrossRef Chin, K.S., Xu, D.L., Yang, J.B., Lam, J.P.-K.: Group-based ER-AHP system for product project screening. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(4), pp. 1909–1929, 2008.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Crosscombe, M., Lawry, J.: Exploiting vagueness for multi-agent consensus. Multi-agent and Complex Systems, Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 670, pp. 67–78, Springer, 2017. Crosscombe, M., Lawry, J.: Exploiting vagueness for multi-agent consensus. Multi-agent and Complex Systems, Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 670, pp. 67–78, Springer, 2017.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Dong, Y., Zhang, H., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Integrating experts’ weights generated dynamically into the consensus reaching process and its applications in managing non-cooperative behaviors. Decision Support Systems, 84, pp. 1–15, 2016.CrossRef Dong, Y., Zhang, H., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Integrating experts’ weights generated dynamically into the consensus reaching process and its applications in managing non-cooperative behaviors. Decision Support Systems, 84, pp. 1–15, 2016.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Dong, Y., Zhan, M., Kou, G., Ding, Z., Liang, H.: A survey of the fusion process in opinion dynamics. Information Fusion, 43, pp. 57–65, 2018.CrossRef Dong, Y., Zhan, M., Kou, G., Ding, Z., Liang, H.: A survey of the fusion process in opinion dynamics. Information Fusion, 43, pp. 57–65, 2018.CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Felfernig, A., Boratto, L., Stettinger, M., Tkalcic, M.: Group Recommender Systems - an Introduction. SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering, Springer, 2018.CrossRef Felfernig, A., Boratto, L., Stettinger, M., Tkalcic, M.: Group Recommender Systems - an Introduction. SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering, Springer, 2018.CrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Flach, P.: Machine Learning: The Art and Science of Algorithms that make sense of Data. Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRef Flach, P.: Machine Learning: The Art and Science of Algorithms that make sense of Data. Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat García-Lapresta, J.L., Llamazares, B.: Aggregation of fuzzy preferences: some rules of the mean. Social Choice and Welfare, 17(4), pp. 673–690.MathSciNetCrossRef García-Lapresta, J.L., Llamazares, B.: Aggregation of fuzzy preferences: some rules of the mean. Social Choice and Welfare, 17(4), pp. 673–690.MathSciNetCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Goel, A., Lee, D.T.: Towards large-scale deliberative decision-making: small groups and the importance of triads. EC ’16 Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pp. 287–303, 2016. Goel, A., Lee, D.T.: Towards large-scale deliberative decision-making: small groups and the importance of triads. EC ’16 Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pp. 287–303, 2016.
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoegen, A., Steininger, D., Veit, D.: How do investors decide? An interdisciplinary review of decision-making in crowdfunding. Electronic Markets, Oct. 2017, pp. 1–27, 2017.CrossRef Hoegen, A., Steininger, D., Veit, D.: How do investors decide? An interdisciplinary review of decision-making in crowdfunding. Electronic Markets, Oct. 2017, pp. 1–27, 2017.CrossRef
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Husain, A.J.A.: A multi-agent system for scalable group decision making. Husain, A.J.A.: A multi-agent system for scalable group decision making.
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Kacprzyk, J., Zadrozny, S.: Soft computing and web intelligence for supporting consensus reaching. Soft Computing, 14(8), pp. 833–846, 2010.CrossRef Kacprzyk, J., Zadrozny, S.: Soft computing and web intelligence for supporting consensus reaching. Soft Computing, 14(8), pp. 833–846, 2010.CrossRef
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Lawry, J., Tang, Y.: Uncertainty modelling for vague concepts: A prototype theory approach. Artificial Intelligence, 173(18), pp. 1539–1558, 2009.MathSciNetCrossRef Lawry, J., Tang, Y.: Uncertainty modelling for vague concepts: A prototype theory approach. Artificial Intelligence, 173(18), pp. 1539–1558, 2009.MathSciNetCrossRef
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu, B., Chen, Y., Shen, Y., Sun, H., Xu, X.: A complex multi-attribute large-group decision making method based on the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy principal component analysis model. Soft Computing, 18, pp. 2149–2160, 2014.CrossRef Liu, B., Chen, Y., Shen, Y., Sun, H., Xu, X.: A complex multi-attribute large-group decision making method based on the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy principal component analysis model. Soft Computing, 18, pp. 2149–2160, 2014.CrossRef
85.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu, B., Shen, Y., Zhang, W., Chen, X., Wang, X.: An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy principal component analysis model-based method for complex multi-attribute large-group decision-making. European Journal of Operational Research, 245, pp. 209–225, 2015.MathSciNetCrossRef Liu, B., Shen, Y., Zhang, W., Chen, X., Wang, X.: An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy principal component analysis model-based method for complex multi-attribute large-group decision-making. European Journal of Operational Research, 245, pp. 209–225, 2015.MathSciNetCrossRef
100.
Zurück zum Zitat Palomares, I., Sánchez, P., Quesada, F., Mata, F., Martínez, L.: COMAS - A multi-agent system for performing consensus processes. In Abraham, A. et al. (Eds.): Procs. International Symposium on Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence (DCAI 2011). Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, 91, pp. 125–132, Springer, 2011. Palomares, I., Sánchez, P., Quesada, F., Mata, F., Martínez, L.: COMAS - A multi-agent system for performing consensus processes. In Abraham, A. et al. (Eds.): Procs. International Symposium on Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence (DCAI 2011). Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, 91, pp. 125–132, Springer, 2011.
103.
Zurück zum Zitat Palomares, I., Estrella, F.J., Martinez, L., Herrera, F.: Consensus under a fuzzy context - taxonomy, analysis framework AFRYCA and experimental case of study. Information fusion, 20, pp. 252–271, 2014.CrossRef Palomares, I., Estrella, F.J., Martinez, L., Herrera, F.: Consensus under a fuzzy context - taxonomy, analysis framework AFRYCA and experimental case of study. Information fusion, 20, pp. 252–271, 2014.CrossRef
104.
Zurück zum Zitat Palomares, I., Martinez, L.: A semisupervised multiagent system model to support consensus-reaching processes. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(4), pp. 762–777, 2014.CrossRef Palomares, I., Martinez, L.: A semisupervised multiagent system model to support consensus-reaching processes. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(4), pp. 762–777, 2014.CrossRef
105.
Zurück zum Zitat Palomares, I., Martínez, L., Herrera, F.: A consensus model to detect and manage non-cooperative behaviors in large-scale group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(3), pp. 516–530, 2014.CrossRef Palomares, I., Martínez, L., Herrera, F.: A consensus model to detect and manage non-cooperative behaviors in large-scale group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(3), pp. 516–530, 2014.CrossRef
107.
Zurück zum Zitat Palomares, I., Martínez, L., Herrera, F.: MENTOR: A graphical monitoring tool of preferences evolution in large-scale group decision making. Knowledge-based Systems, 58 (Spec.Iss.), pp. 66–74, 2014.CrossRef Palomares, I., Martínez, L., Herrera, F.: MENTOR: A graphical monitoring tool of preferences evolution in large-scale group decision making. Knowledge-based Systems, 58 (Spec.Iss.), pp. 66–74, 2014.CrossRef
108.
Zurück zum Zitat Palomares, I.: Multi-agent System to model consensus processes in large-scale group decision making using soft computing techniques. PhD Thesis, University of Jaén (Spain), 2014. Palomares, I.: Multi-agent System to model consensus processes in large-scale group decision making using soft computing techniques. PhD Thesis, University of Jaén (Spain), 2014.
110.
Zurück zum Zitat Palomares, I., Killough, R., Bauters, K., Liu, W., Hong, J.: A collaborative multiagent framework based on online risk-aware planning and decision-making. In Proceedings of ICTAI’16 International Conference, 2016. Palomares, I., Killough, R., Bauters, K., Liu, W., Hong, J.: A collaborative multiagent framework based on online risk-aware planning and decision-making. In Proceedings of ICTAI’16 International Conference, 2016.
111.
Zurück zum Zitat Palomares, I., Sellak, H., Ouhbi, B., Frikh, B.: Adaptive, Semi-Supervised Consensus Model for Multi-Criteria Large Group Decision Making in a Linguistic Setting. In ISKE 2017 Proceedings: 12th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering, 2017. Palomares, I., Sellak, H., Ouhbi, B., Frikh, B.: Adaptive, Semi-Supervised Consensus Model for Multi-Criteria Large Group Decision Making in a Linguistic Setting. In ISKE 2017 Proceedings: 12th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering, 2017.
116.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodríguez, M.A.: Advances towards a general-purpose societal-scale human-collective problem-solving engine. Procs. 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC), pp. 206–211, 2004. Rodríguez, M.A.: Advances towards a general-purpose societal-scale human-collective problem-solving engine. Procs. 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC), pp. 206–211, 2004.
117.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodriguez, M.A.: Social decision making with multi-relational networks and grammar-based particle swarms. Procs. 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2007. Rodriguez, M.A.: Social decision making with multi-relational networks and grammar-based particle swarms. Procs. 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2007.
119.
Zurück zum Zitat Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (3rd Ed.). Pearson, 2016. Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (3rd Ed.). Pearson, 2016.
128.
Zurück zum Zitat Squillante, M.: Decision making in social networks. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25(3), Special Issue, 2010. Squillante, M.: Decision making in social networks. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25(3), Special Issue, 2010.
131.
Zurück zum Zitat Shum, S., Cannavacciuolo, L., De Liddo, A., Iandoli, L., Quinto, I.: Using social network analysis to support collective decision-making processes. International Journal of Decision Support System Technology, 3(2), pp. 15–31, 2011.CrossRef Shum, S., Cannavacciuolo, L., De Liddo, A., Iandoli, L., Quinto, I.: Using social network analysis to support collective decision-making processes. International Journal of Decision Support System Technology, 3(2), pp. 15–31, 2011.CrossRef
132.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, J.E., Winterfeldt, D.: Decision Analysis in “Management Science”. Management Science, 50(5), pp. 561–574, 2004.CrossRef Smith, J.E., Winterfeldt, D.: Decision Analysis in “Management Science”. Management Science, 50(5), pp. 561–574, 2004.CrossRef
134.
Zurück zum Zitat Soto, R., Robles-Baldenegro, M.E., López, V.: MQDM: An iterative fuzzy method for group decision making in structured social networks. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 32, pp. 17–30, 2017.CrossRef Soto, R., Robles-Baldenegro, M.E., López, V.: MQDM: An iterative fuzzy method for group decision making in structured social networks. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 32, pp. 17–30, 2017.CrossRef
135.
Zurück zum Zitat Srdjevic, B.: Linking analytic hierarchy process and social choice methods to support group decision-making in water management. Decision Support Systems, 42, pp. 2261–2273, 2007.CrossRef Srdjevic, B.: Linking analytic hierarchy process and social choice methods to support group decision-making in water management. Decision Support Systems, 42, pp. 2261–2273, 2007.CrossRef
148.
Zurück zum Zitat von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press (NJ), 1944. von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press (NJ), 1944.
152.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu, T., Liu, X.W.: An interval type-2 fuzzy clustering solution for large-scale multiple-criteria group decision-making problems. Knowledge-based Systems, 144, pp. 118–127, 2016.CrossRef Wu, T., Liu, X.W.: An interval type-2 fuzzy clustering solution for large-scale multiple-criteria group decision-making problems. Knowledge-based Systems, 144, pp. 118–127, 2016.CrossRef
153.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu, T., Liu, X., Qin, J.: A linguistic solution for double large-scale group decision-making in E-commerce. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 116, pp. 97–112, 2018.CrossRef Wu, T., Liu, X., Qin, J.: A linguistic solution for double large-scale group decision-making in E-commerce. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 116, pp. 97–112, 2018.CrossRef
160.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu, Z.: An automatic approach to reaching consensus in multiple attribute group decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56(4), pp. 1369–1374, 2009.CrossRef Xu, Z.: An automatic approach to reaching consensus in multiple attribute group decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56(4), pp. 1369–1374, 2009.CrossRef
163.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu, X.H., Cai, C., Chen, X., Zhou, Y.: A multi-attribute large group emergency decision making method based on group preference consistency of generalized interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 24(2), pp. 211–228, 2015.CrossRef Xu, X.H., Cai, C., Chen, X., Zhou, Y.: A multi-attribute large group emergency decision making method based on group preference consistency of generalized interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 24(2), pp. 211–228, 2015.CrossRef
165.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu, X.H., Du, Z.J., Chen, X.H.: Consensus model for multi-criteria large-group emergency decision making considering non-cooperative behaviors and minority opinions. Decision Support Systems, 79, pp. 150–160, 2015.CrossRef Xu, X.H., Du, Z.J., Chen, X.H.: Consensus model for multi-criteria large-group emergency decision making considering non-cooperative behaviors and minority opinions. Decision Support Systems, 79, pp. 150–160, 2015.CrossRef
174.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang, Y., Fu, C., Chen, Y.-W., Xu, D.-L., Yang, S.-L.: A belief rule based expert system for predicting consumer preference in new product development. Knowledge-based Systems, 94, pp. 105–113, 2016.CrossRef Yang, Y., Fu, C., Chen, Y.-W., Xu, D.-L., Yang, S.-L.: A belief rule based expert system for predicting consumer preference in new product development. Knowledge-based Systems, 94, pp. 105–113, 2016.CrossRef
189.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang, Z., Guo, C., Martínez, L.: Managing multigranular linguistic distribution assessments in large-scale multiattribute group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics: Systems, 47(11), pp. 3063–3076, 2017.CrossRef Zhang, Z., Guo, C., Martínez, L.: Managing multigranular linguistic distribution assessments in large-scale multiattribute group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics: Systems, 47(11), pp. 3063–3076, 2017.CrossRef
193.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu, W.D., Liu, F., Chen, Y.W., Yang, J.B., Xu, D.L., Wang, D.P.: Research project evaluation and selection: an evidential reasoning rule-based method for aggregating peer review information with reliabilities. Scientometrics, 105(3), pp. 1469–1490, 2015.CrossRef Zhu, W.D., Liu, F., Chen, Y.W., Yang, J.B., Xu, D.L., Wang, D.P.: Research project evaluation and selection: an evidential reasoning rule-based method for aggregating peer review information with reliabilities. Scientometrics, 105(3), pp. 1469–1490, 2015.CrossRef
194.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu, J., Zhang, S., Chen, Y., Zhang, L.: A Hierarchical Clustering Approach Based on Three-Dimensional Gray Relational Analysis for Clustering a Large Group of Decision Makers with Double Information. Group Decision and Negotiation, 25, pp. 325–354, 2016.CrossRef Zhu, J., Zhang, S., Chen, Y., Zhang, L.: A Hierarchical Clustering Approach Based on Three-Dimensional Gray Relational Analysis for Clustering a Large Group of Decision Makers with Double Information. Group Decision and Negotiation, 25, pp. 325–354, 2016.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Scaling Things Up: Large Group Decision Making (LGDM)
verfasst von
Iván Palomares Carrascosa
Copyright-Jahr
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01027-0_3