Skip to main content

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Schauer on the Differentiation of Law

verfasst von : Lars Vinx

Erschienen in: The Force of Law Reaffirmed

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter supports Frederick Schauer’s contention, put forward in the last chapter of The Force of Law, that coercion is one of the differentiating characteristics of law. However, the chapter takes issue with the way in which this contention is defended by Schauer, and it argues that a fully successful case for the differentiating character of coercion ought to focus on the monopolistic character of legal coercion.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
The designation is supposed to emphasize that it is not all that clear, as Schauer points, out, whether Hart would have considered himself to be offering a theory of the nature of law. See Schauer (2015, 3, 40).
 
2
In which obedience involves doing what the law tells us to do for the reason that the law tells us to do so. See Schauer (2015, 48–52).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Hart, H. L. A. (1994). The concept of law. (Second edition with a postscript edited by Penelope A. Bulloch and Joseph Raz). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Hart, H. L. A. (1994). The concept of law. (Second edition with a postscript edited by Penelope A. Bulloch and Joseph Raz). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelsen, H. (1944). Peace through law. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press. Kelsen, H. (1944). Peace through law. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelsen, H. 1945. General theory of law and state. (A. Wedberg, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Kelsen, H. 1945. General theory of law and state. (A. Wedberg, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelsen, H. (1952). Principles of international law. New York: Rinehart&Company. Kelsen, H. (1952). Principles of international law. New York: Rinehart&Company.
Zurück zum Zitat Notermans, M. (2015). Social peace as Conditio Tacita for the validity of the positive legal order. Law and Philosophy, 34, 201–227.CrossRef Notermans, M. (2015). Social peace as Conditio Tacita for the validity of the positive legal order. Law and Philosophy, 34, 201–227.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Raz, J. (1996). Authority, law, and morality. In J. Raz (Ed.), Ethics in the public domain: Essays in the morality of law and politics (pp. 210–237). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Raz, J. (1996). Authority, law, and morality. In J. Raz (Ed.), Ethics in the public domain: Essays in the morality of law and politics (pp. 210–237). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Raz, J. (1999). Practical reason and norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Raz, J. (1999). Practical reason and norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schauer, F. (2015). The force of law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Schauer, F. (2015). The force of law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shapiro, S. J. (2011). Legality. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press. Shapiro, S. J. (2011). Legality. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Vinx, L. (2007). Hans Kelsen’s pure theory of law. Legality and Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Vinx, L. (2007). Hans Kelsen’s pure theory of law. Legality and Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vinx, L. (2013). Austin, Kelsen, and the model of sovereignty: Notes on the history of modern legal positivism. In M. Freeman & P. Mindus (Eds.), The legacy of John Austin’s jurisprudence (pp. 51–71). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef Vinx, L. (2013). Austin, Kelsen, and the model of sovereignty: Notes on the history of modern legal positivism. In M. Freeman & P. Mindus (Eds.), The legacy of John Austin’s jurisprudence (pp. 51–71). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Schauer on the Differentiation of Law
verfasst von
Lars Vinx
Copyright-Jahr
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33987-0_9