Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Energy Efficiency 5/2016

01.10.2016 | Original Article

Seasonal relationship of peak demand and energy impacts of energy efficiency measures—a review of evidence in the electric energy efficiency programmes

Erschienen in: Energy Efficiency | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

While energy efficiency programmes traditionally focus on energy savings, there is also a policy interest in their impact on system peak demand. Examples include demand-side management, integrated resource planning and recent developments to integrate energy efficiency into forward capacity markets. However, there is only limited research on the relationship between peak demand impacts and overall energy savings from efficiency measures, although this relationship can have important bearings on efficiency programmes. This paper reviews utility efficiency programmes in nine jurisdictions in North America and analyses how the seasonal peak-energy relationship differs between commercial and industrial (C&I) and residential sectors, among efficiency measures. In terms of the seasonal difference in peak demand impacts, these programmes show that residential lighting and residential water heating can deliver greater peak savings in weekday early evening winter peak periods. By contrast, C&I lighting and residential appliances make higher peak savings in weekday afternoon summer peak periods. A seasonal difference is more significant in lighting, especially residential lighting, than other measures. The evidence from North America also suggests that space cooling in both sectors and C&I lighting may well make greater peak savings relative to non-peak impacts than other measures during summer peak periods, while in winter peak periods, residential lighting can achieve greater peak savings relative to non-peak impacts. This review highlights the significance of regional electricity use patterns along with climatic and regulatory conditions and indicates how further research may contribute to appropriate electricity demand reduction programme design and monitoring regimes in particular regions.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Great Britain (GB) is made up of England, Scotland and Wales but does not include the other member nation of the UK, Northern Ireland.
 
2
System peak demand period is defined as 4 pm-8 pm of non-holiday weekdays between November and February.
 
3
Coincident peak demand is the electricity demand occurring during the system peak demand periods.
 
4
Heating, ventilation and air conditioning
 
5
Electric energy efficiency programmes in Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Rhode Island. Capacity payments for the electric energy efficiency programmes in Vermont are channelled to its natural gas energy efficiency programmes.
 
6
Including operational optimisation in some measure categories
 
7
Portfolio-level evaluation reports report the energy and peak demand impacts for all of their energy efficiency programmes.
 
8
For example, in the conservation and demand management (CDM) programmes funded by Ontario Power Authority, The EM&V Protocols and Requirements 2011–2014 defines the peak demand period differently from before it was introduced.
 
9
Net impacts refer to those that can be directly attributed to the programme effects (e.g. discounting free-rider and/or free-driver effects from gross impacts).
 
10
Load forecast is based on probability. A ‘50/50’ load forecast means that there is a 50 % chance for the actual load to exceed the forecast.
 
11
Diversity factor represents the ratio between the highest simultaneous peak demand reduction for a population of specific equipment and the reduction in connected loads. Coincidence factor is the percentage of the highest simultaneous peak demand reduction coincident with a system peak period.
 
12
In the Massachusetts TRM, coincidence factor is defined differently as it is the product of coincidence factor and diversity factor.
 
13
Include the California Energy Commission forecasting model utility end-use load profile or other studies. However, their use needs the ‘review and approval through the evaluation planning review process’
 
14
Regression analysis can be used to account for weather and other variables.
 
15
Used with IPMVP Option B or Option D
 
16
Measures constituting more than 1 % of IOU-claimed energy savings
 
17
The evaluation for 2009 bridge funding period draws upon the results of 2006–2008 programme evaluation.
 
18
Lifetime energy savings refer to the amount of energy savings specific measures can accrue over their operational lifetime.
 
19
Not included in Fig. 1
 
20
Fuel switching measures such as solar water heating are not considered in this review.
 
21
Adjustment factors applied to the connected loads to estimate coincident peak demand impacts in winter peak periods
 
22
With the exception of Hawaii
 
23
Time-based retail tariffs (e.g. time-of-use tariffs) charge different rates depending on when electricity use occurs. By lowering electricity demand (e.g. through energy efficiency) during high price hours, which are typically system peak hours, customers can reduce the electricity expenditure.
 
24
Can only be used for lighting, lighting controls, motors and variable speed drives, process chiller, heating controls, retail display cabinets, and professional refrigerated storage cabinets
 
25
Partial measurement, full measurement with sub-metering and full measurement with total building metering
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Anthony, A., & Foley, L. (2014). Energy Efficiency in Rhode Island’s System Reliability Planning. Paper presented at the 2014 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Anthony, A., & Foley, L. (2014). Energy Efficiency in Rhode Islands System Reliability Planning. Paper presented at the 2014 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings,
Zurück zum Zitat Barbose, G., Goldman, C., Hoffman, I., & Billingsley, M. (2013). The future of utility customer-funded energy efficiency programs in the United States: projected spending and savings to 2025. Berkeley, California: Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Barbose, G., Goldman, C., Hoffman, I., & Billingsley, M. (2013). The future of utility customer-funded energy efficiency programs in the United States: projected spending and savings to 2025. Berkeley, California: Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Zurück zum Zitat BC Hydro (2009). F2009 demand side management milestone evaluation summary report. BC Hydro. BC Hydro (2009). F2009 demand side management milestone evaluation summary report. BC Hydro.
Zurück zum Zitat BC Hydro (2014). Demand side management milestone evaluation summary report F2013. BC Hydro. Report submitted to the British Columbia Utilities Commission. BC Hydro (2014). Demand side management milestone evaluation summary report F2013. BC Hydro. Report submitted to the British Columbia Utilities Commission.
Zurück zum Zitat Cadmus (2009). Connecticut small business energy advantage impact evaluation report program year 2007. Prepared for Connecticut Energy Conservation Management Board, the Connecticut Light & Power Company and the United Illuminating Company. Cadmus (2009). Connecticut small business energy advantage impact evaluation report program year 2007. Prepared for Connecticut Energy Conservation Management Board, the Connecticut Light & Power Company and the United Illuminating Company.
Zurück zum Zitat Cadmus (2012). Efficiency Maine trust residential lighting program evaluation: final report. The Cadmus Group Inc. Prepared for Efficiency Maine Trust. Cadmus (2012). Efficiency Maine trust residential lighting program evaluation: final report. The Cadmus Group Inc. Prepared for Efficiency Maine Trust.
Zurück zum Zitat CAISO (2013). Demand response and energy efficiency roadmap: maximizing preferred resources. Folsom, California: California ISO. CAISO (2013). Demand response and energy efficiency roadmap: maximizing preferred resources. Folsom, California: California ISO.
Zurück zum Zitat CEC (2013). 2013 integrated energy policy report. California Energy Commission. CEC (2013). 2013 integrated energy policy report. California Energy Commission.
Zurück zum Zitat CLC (2011). Annual report on energy efficiency activities in 2010. Cape Light Compact. CLC (2011). Annual report on energy efficiency activities in 2010. Cape Light Compact.
Zurück zum Zitat CLC (2012). Annual report on energy efficiency activities in 2011. Cape Light Compact. CLC (2012). Annual report on energy efficiency activities in 2011. Cape Light Compact.
Zurück zum Zitat CLC (2013). Annual report on energy efficiency activities in 2012. Cape Light Compact. CLC (2013). Annual report on energy efficiency activities in 2012. Cape Light Compact.
Zurück zum Zitat CPUC (2006). California energy efficiency evaluation protocols: technical, methodological, and reporting requirements for evaluation professionals. California Public Utilities Commission. CPUC (2006). California energy efficiency evaluation protocols: technical, methodological, and reporting requirements for evaluation professionals. California Public Utilities Commission.
Zurück zum Zitat CPUC (2010a). 2006–2008 energy efficiency evaluation report. California Public Utilities Commission. CPUC (2010a). 2006–2008 energy efficiency evaluation report. California Public Utilities Commission.
Zurück zum Zitat CPUC (2010b). Transmittal letter for the 2010–2012 energy efficiency evaluation, Measurement and Verification Work Plan. CPUC (2010b). Transmittal letter for the 2010–2012 energy efficiency evaluation, Measurement and Verification Work Plan.
Zurück zum Zitat DECC (2013). Consultation on options to reduce electricity demand - government response. Department of Energy and Climate Change. DECC (2013). Consultation on options to reduce electricity demand - government response. Department of Energy and Climate Change.
Zurück zum Zitat DECC (2014). Electricity demand reduction pilot scheme: participant handbook. Department of Energy and Climate Change. DECC (2014). Electricity demand reduction pilot scheme: participant handbook. Department of Energy and Climate Change.
Zurück zum Zitat Downs, A., & Cui, C. (2014). Energy efficiency resource standards: a new progress report on state experience. Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. Downs, A., & Cui, C. (2014). Energy efficiency resource standards: a new progress report on state experience. Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
Zurück zum Zitat DPS (2009a). Report to the public service board: 2006–2008 evaluation activities related to Vermont’s statewide energy efficiency utility. Vermont Department of Public Service. DPS (2009a). Report to the public service board: 2006–2008 evaluation activities related to Vermont’s statewide energy efficiency utility. Vermont Department of Public Service.
Zurück zum Zitat DPS (2009b). Vermont department of public service electric energy efficiency evaluation plan 2009–2011. Vermont Department of Public Service. DPS (2009b). Vermont department of public service electric energy efficiency evaluation plan 2009–2011. Vermont Department of Public Service.
Zurück zum Zitat DPS (2011). Vermont department of public service electric energy efficiency evaluation plan 2012–2014. Vermont Department of Public Service. DPS (2011). Vermont department of public service electric energy efficiency evaluation plan 2012–2014. Vermont Department of Public Service.
Zurück zum Zitat ECEEE (2013). Understanding the energy efficiency directive—steering through the maze #6: a guide from eceee. European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy. ECEEE (2013). Understanding the energy efficiency directive—steering through the maze #6: a guide from eceee. European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy.
Zurück zum Zitat Energy, H. (2013). Hawaii energy efficiency program technical reference manual (TRM) PY 2013: measure savings calculations. Hawaii Energy. Energy, H. (2013). Hawaii energy efficiency program technical reference manual (TRM) PY 2013: measure savings calculations. Hawaii Energy.
Zurück zum Zitat Eto, J. (1996). The past, present and future of U.S. utility demand-side management programs. Berkeley, California: Environmental Energy Technologies Division. University of Berkeley: Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.CrossRef Eto, J. (1996). The past, present and future of U.S. utility demand-side management programs. Berkeley, California: Environmental Energy Technologies Division. University of Berkeley: Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Evergreen Economics (2014). Evaluation of the Hawaii Energy Conservation and Efficiency Programs: Program Year 2012. Evergreen Economics. Prepared for the State of Hawaii Public Utilities Commission. Evergreen Economics (2014). Evaluation of the Hawaii Energy Conservation and Efficiency Programs: Program Year 2012. Evergreen Economics. Prepared for the State of Hawaii Public Utilities Commission.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilleo, A. (2014). Picking All the Fruit: All Cost-Effective Energy Efficiency Mandates. Paper presented at the 2014 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Gilleo, A. (2014). Picking All the Fruit: All Cost-Effective Energy Efficiency Mandates. Paper presented at the 2014 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings,
Zurück zum Zitat Gottstein, M., & Schwartz, L. (2010). The role of forward capacity markets in increasing demand-side and other low-carbon resources: experience and prospects. The Regulatory Assistance Project. Gottstein, M., & Schwartz, L. (2010). The role of forward capacity markets in increasing demand-side and other low-carbon resources: experience and prospects. The Regulatory Assistance Project.
Zurück zum Zitat Hopper, N., Barbose, G., Goldman, C., & Schlegel, J. (2009). Energy efficiency as a preferred resource: evidence from utility resource plans in the western US and Canada. Energy Efficiency, 2(1), 1–16. doi:10.1007/s12053-008-9030-x.CrossRef Hopper, N., Barbose, G., Goldman, C., & Schlegel, J. (2009). Energy efficiency as a preferred resource: evidence from utility resource plans in the western US and Canada. Energy Efficiency, 2(1), 1–16. doi:10.​1007/​s12053-008-9030-x.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ISO-NE (2014a). Forward capacity auction 2017–2018 obligations. ISO New England Inc.. ISO-NE (2014a). Forward capacity auction 2017–2018 obligations. ISO New England Inc..
Zurück zum Zitat ISO-NE (2014b). ISO new England manual for measurement and verification of demand reduction value from demand resources - manual M-MVDR. ISO New England Inc.. ISO-NE (2014b). ISO new England manual for measurement and verification of demand reduction value from demand resources - manual M-MVDR. ISO New England Inc..
Zurück zum Zitat ISO-NE (2015). ISO new England manual for the forward capacity market (FCM)—manual M-20. ISO New England Inc.. ISO-NE (2015). ISO new England manual for the forward capacity market (FCM)—manual M-20. ISO New England Inc..
Zurück zum Zitat KEMA (2009). National grid USA 2008 custom lighting impact evaluation. KEMA (2009). National grid USA 2008 custom lighting impact evaluation.
Zurück zum Zitat Kushler, M., Nadel, S., York, D., Dietsch, N., & Gander, S. (2006). Energy efficiency resource standards: the next great leap forward? Paper presented at the 2006 ACEEE summer study on energy efficiency in buildings, Kushler, M., Nadel, S., York, D., Dietsch, N., & Gander, S. (2006). Energy efficiency resource standards: the next great leap forward? Paper presented at the 2006 ACEEE summer study on energy efficiency in buildings,
Zurück zum Zitat Kushler, M., Nowak, S., & Witte, P. (2012). A national survey of state policies and practices for the evaluation of ratepayer-funded energy efficiency programs. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. Kushler, M., Nowak, S., & Witte, P. (2012). A national survey of state policies and practices for the evaluation of ratepayer-funded energy efficiency programs. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
Zurück zum Zitat Kushler, M., Nowak, S., & Witte, P. (2014). Examining the net savings issue: a national survey of state policies and practices in the evaluation of ratepayer-funded energy efficiency programs. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. Kushler, M., Nowak, S., & Witte, P. (2014). Examining the net savings issue: a national survey of state policies and practices in the evaluation of ratepayer-funded energy efficiency programs. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
Zurück zum Zitat Kushler, M., Vine, E., & York, D. (2002). Energy efficiency and electric system reliability: a look at reliability-focused energy efficiency programs used to help address the electricity crisis of 2001. Washington, D.C.: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.CrossRef Kushler, M., Vine, E., & York, D. (2002). Energy efficiency and electric system reliability: a look at reliability-focused energy efficiency programs used to help address the electricity crisis of 2001. Washington, D.C.: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kushler, M., & Witte, P. (2003). A follow-up assessment of the status of reliability-focused energy efficiency programs launched during the electricity crisis of 2001: implications for policy. Washington, D.C.: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. Kushler, M., & Witte, P. (2003). A follow-up assessment of the status of reliability-focused energy efficiency programs launched during the electricity crisis of 2001: implications for policy. Washington, D.C.: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
Zurück zum Zitat Lamont, D., & Gerhard, J. (2013). The treatment of energy efficiency in integrated resource plans: a review of six state practices. Regulatory Assistance Project. Lamont, D., & Gerhard, J. (2013). The treatment of energy efficiency in integrated resource plans: a review of six state practices. Regulatory Assistance Project.
Zurück zum Zitat Leidos Engineering (2013). Annual report: programme year 2012—July 1, 2012–June 30, 2013. Leidos Engineering LLC. Report Submitted to the Hawaii Public Utilities Commission. Leidos Engineering (2013). Annual report: programme year 2012—July 1, 2012–June 30, 2013. Leidos Engineering LLC. Report Submitted to the Hawaii Public Utilities Commission.
Zurück zum Zitat MEGEEPA (2009). 2010–2012 Massachusetts joint statewide three-year electric energy efficiency plan. Massachusetts Electric and Gas Energy Efficiency Program Administrators. MEGEEPA (2009). 2010–2012 Massachusetts joint statewide three-year electric energy efficiency plan. Massachusetts Electric and Gas Energy Efficiency Program Administrators.
Zurück zum Zitat MEGEEPA (2011). Massachusetts technical reference manual for estimating savings from energy efficiency measures: 2012 program year—plan version. Massachusetts Electric and Gas Energy Efficiency Program Administrators. MEGEEPA (2011). Massachusetts technical reference manual for estimating savings from energy efficiency measures: 2012 program year—plan version. Massachusetts Electric and Gas Energy Efficiency Program Administrators.
Zurück zum Zitat MEGEEPA (2012a). 2013–2015 Massachusetts joint statewide three-year electric and gas energy efficiency plan. Massachusetts Electric and Gas Energy Efficiency Program Administrators. MEGEEPA (2012a). 2013–2015 Massachusetts joint statewide three-year electric and gas energy efficiency plan. Massachusetts Electric and Gas Energy Efficiency Program Administrators.
Zurück zum Zitat MEGEEPA (2012b). Massachusetts technical reference manual for estimating savings from energy efficiency measures: 2013–2015 program years–plan version. Massachusetts Electric and Gas Energy Efficiency Program Administrators. MEGEEPA (2012b). Massachusetts technical reference manual for estimating savings from energy efficiency measures: 2013–2015 program years–plan version. Massachusetts Electric and Gas Energy Efficiency Program Administrators.
Zurück zum Zitat MEGEEPA (2013). Massachusetts technical reference manual for estimating savings from energy efficiency measures: 2012 program year–report version. Massachusetts Electric and Gas Energy Efficiency Program Administrators. MEGEEPA (2013). Massachusetts technical reference manual for estimating savings from energy efficiency measures: 2012 program year–report version. Massachusetts Electric and Gas Energy Efficiency Program Administrators.
Zurück zum Zitat Michals, J., & Titus, E. (2006). The need for the approaches to developing common protocols to measure, track, and report energy efficiency savings in the northeast. Paper presented at the 2006 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings Michals, J., & Titus, E. (2006). The need for the approaches to developing common protocols to measure, track, and report energy efficiency savings in the northeast. Paper presented at the 2006 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings
Zurück zum Zitat Molina, M. (2014). The best value for America’s energy dollar: a national review of the cost of utility energy efficiency programs. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. Molina, M. (2014). The best value for America’s energy dollar: a national review of the cost of utility energy efficiency programs. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
Zurück zum Zitat Nadel, S., Gordon, F., & Neme, C. (2000). Using targeted energy efficiency programs to reduce peak electrical demand and address electric system reliability problems. Washington, D.C.: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. Nadel, S., Gordon, F., & Neme, C. (2000). Using targeted energy efficiency programs to reduce peak electrical demand and address electric system reliability problems. Washington, D.C.: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
Zurück zum Zitat NAPEE (2008). Understanding cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency programs: best practices, technical methods, and emerging issues for policy-makers. The National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency. NAPEE (2008). Understanding cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency programs: best practices, technical methods, and emerging issues for policy-makers. The National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency.
Zurück zum Zitat Navigant (2011). Process and impact evaluation of Efficiency Vermont’s 2007–2009 geotargeting program. Prepared for Vermont Department of Public Service. Navigant Consulting Inc., West Hill Energy and Computing Inc., Grimason Associates LLC and Blackstone Group. Navigant (2011). Process and impact evaluation of Efficiency Vermont’s 2007–2009 geotargeting program. Prepared for Vermont Department of Public Service. Navigant Consulting Inc., West Hill Energy and Computing Inc., Grimason Associates LLC and Blackstone Group.
Zurück zum Zitat Neme, C., & Sedano, R. (2012). US experience with efficiency as a transmission and distribution system resource. Montpelier, Vermont: Regulatory Assistance Project. Neme, C., & Sedano, R. (2012). US experience with efficiency as a transmission and distribution system resource. Montpelier, Vermont: Regulatory Assistance Project.
Zurück zum Zitat Neme, C., & Cowart, R. (2014). Energy efficiency participation in electricity capacity markets - The U.S. experience. Montpelier, Vermont: The Regulatory Assistance Project. Neme, C., & Cowart, R. (2014). Energy efficiency participation in electricity capacity markets - The U.S. experience. Montpelier, Vermont: The Regulatory Assistance Project.
Zurück zum Zitat NMR (2007). Process and impact evaluation of the low income appliance replacement program—final. Nexus Market Research Inc. and RLW Analytics Inc.. NMR (2007). Process and impact evaluation of the low income appliance replacement program—final. Nexus Market Research Inc. and RLW Analytics Inc..
Zurück zum Zitat NMR (2014). Northeast Residential Lighting Hours-of-Use Study. NMR Group Inc. and DNV GL. Submitted to Connecticut Energy Efficiency Board, Cape Light Compact, Massachusetts Energy Efficiency Advisory Council, National Grid Massachusetts, National Grid Rhode Island, New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Northeast Utilities and Unitil. NMR (2014). Northeast Residential Lighting Hours-of-Use Study. NMR Group Inc. and DNV GL. Submitted to Connecticut Energy Efficiency Board, Cape Light Compact, Massachusetts Energy Efficiency Advisory Council, National Grid Massachusetts, National Grid Rhode Island, New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Northeast Utilities and Unitil.
Zurück zum Zitat Nowak, S., Kushler, M., Sciortino, M., York, D., & Witte, P. (2011). Energy efficiency resource standards: state and utility strategies for higher energy savings. Washington, D.C.: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. Nowak, S., Kushler, M., Sciortino, M., York, D., & Witte, P. (2011). Energy efficiency resource standards: state and utility strategies for higher energy savings. Washington, D.C.: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
Zurück zum Zitat OEB (2013). Conservation and demand management report—2012 results. Ontario Energy Board. OEB (2013). Conservation and demand management report—2012 results. Ontario Energy Board.
Zurück zum Zitat OPA (2014). Final Evaluation Report: High Performance New Construction and Residential New Construction Initiatives. OPA (2014). Final Evaluation Report: High Performance New Construction and Residential New Construction Initiatives.
Zurück zum Zitat Plunkett, J., Weston, F., & Crossley, D. (2012). Government oversight of grid company demand-side management activities in China: recommendations from international experience. Regulatory Assistance Project. Plunkett, J., Weston, F., & Crossley, D. (2012). Government oversight of grid company demand-side management activities in China: recommendations from international experience. Regulatory Assistance Project.
Zurück zum Zitat Schweitzer, M., Hirst, E., & Hill, L. (1991). Demand-side management and integrated resource planning: findings from a survey of 24 electric utilities. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.CrossRef Schweitzer, M., Hirst, E., & Hill, L. (1991). Demand-side management and integrated resource planning: findings from a survey of 24 electric utilities. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat WHEC (2010). Verification of Efficiency Vermonts Energy Efficiency Portfolio for the ISO-NE Forward Capacity Market: Final Report. West Hill Energy and Computing Inc. WHEC (2010). Verification of Efficiency Vermonts Energy Efficiency Portfolio for the ISO-NE Forward Capacity Market: Final Report. West Hill Energy and Computing Inc.
Zurück zum Zitat WHEC (2012a). Verification of Efficiency Vermont’s energy efficiency portfolio for the ISO-NE forward capacity market: final report. West Hill Energy and Computing Inc. WHEC (2012a). Verification of Efficiency Vermont’s energy efficiency portfolio for the ISO-NE forward capacity market: final report. West Hill Energy and Computing Inc.
Zurück zum Zitat WHEC (2012b). Verification of EVT 2011 claimed annual MWh savings, coincident summer and winter peak savings and total resource benefit (TRB). West Hill Energy and Computing Inc. WHEC (2012b). Verification of EVT 2011 claimed annual MWh savings, coincident summer and winter peak savings and total resource benefit (TRB). West Hill Energy and Computing Inc.
Zurück zum Zitat WHEC (2013). Verification of EVT 2012 claimed annual MWh savings, Coincident Summer and Winter Peak Savings and Total Resource Benefit (TRB): Final Report. West Hill Energy and Computing Inc. WHEC (2013). Verification of EVT 2012 claimed annual MWh savings, Coincident Summer and Winter Peak Savings and Total Resource Benefit (TRB): Final Report. West Hill Energy and Computing Inc.
Zurück zum Zitat York, D., Kushler, M., & Witte, P. (2007). Examining the peak demand impacts of energy efficiency: a review of program experience and industry practices. Washington, D.C.: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. York, D., Kushler, M., & Witte, P. (2007). Examining the peak demand impacts of energy efficiency: a review of program experience and industry practices. Washington, D.C.: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
Metadaten
Titel
Seasonal relationship of peak demand and energy impacts of energy efficiency measures—a review of evidence in the electric energy efficiency programmes
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2016
Erschienen in
Energy Efficiency / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 1570-646X
Elektronische ISSN: 1570-6478
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-015-9407-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Energy Efficiency 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe